Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Recent Advances in Selective Oxidation of Glycerol to Lactic Acid over Noble Metal Catalysts

  • Haodong Xie ,
  • Zunlong Hu ,
  • Haobin Wei ,
  • Sida Ge ,
  • Zixuan Wang ,
  • Yuming Zhang ,
  • Zhijie Wu , *
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing and the Key Laboratory of Catalysis of CNPC, Beijing 102249, China

Received date: 2023-11-21

  Revised date: 2024-02-04

  Online published: 2024-05-15

Supported by

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFB3805602)

Abstract

the problem of excess glycerol as a by-product of biodiesel production has become more and more prominent,and the catalytic conversion of glycerol to high-value-added chemicals is of great significance.in recent years,noble metal catalysts(Au,Pt,Pd,etc.)are often used to catalyze the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid,in which the improvement of lactic acid selectivity and catalyst stability are the key challenges for the catalysts.Here,we summarized the reaction mechanism of selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid over supported noble metal catalysts,revealing the role of different metal active sites.At the same time,the effects of metal particle size,support,and pH of the reaction system on the reaction performance are discussed based on the structure and electronic properties of noble metal active sites.Also,the role of metal in the promotion and support of strong interaction on the activation of the hydroxyl groups of glycerol was clarified.Finally,the main challenges and prospects for the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid were clarified。

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Reaction mechanism of glycerol to lactic acid

2.1 Hydrothermal conversion of glycerol to lactic acid

2.2 Selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid

2.3 Electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid

3 Noble metal catalyst

3.1 Au-based catalyst

3.2 Pt-based catalyst

3.3 Other noble metal catalyst

4 Catalyst supports and roles

4.1 Carbon materials

4.2 Zeolite

4.3 Metallic oxide

4.4 Other supports

5 Catalyst deactivation and reusability

6 Conclusion and outlook

Cite this article

Haodong Xie , Zunlong Hu , Haobin Wei , Sida Ge , Zixuan Wang , Yuming Zhang , Zhijie Wu . Recent Advances in Selective Oxidation of Glycerol to Lactic Acid over Noble Metal Catalysts[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2024 , 36(7) : 1088 -1101 . DOI: 10.7536/PC231114

1 Introduction

Biodiesel is a clean and renewable energy,which can be obtained by transesterification of vegetable oil with alcohols[1]。 Glycerol,a by-product of the transesterification reaction,accounts for about 10 wt%of biodiesel production[2]。 the rapid development of biodiesel industry has led to a large surplus of glycerol,and the high-value utilization of glycerol is very important to improve the economy of biodiesel。
Common applications of glycerol include cosmetics,personal care products,pharmaceuticals,solvents,food additives,and tobacco[3]。 In addition,due to the booming development of biodiesel,glycerol has become one of the most important biomass platform compounds,producing value-added chemicals and intermediates(such as glyceraldehyde,dihydroxyacetone,glyceric acid,lactic acid,acrylic acid,propylene glycol,etc.)Through different conversion pathways(such as biological fermentation,oxidation,hydrogenolysis,dehydration,chlorination,esterification,etherification,carbonylation,polymerization,etc.)[4,5]。 At present,hydrogenolysis and selective oxidation of glycerol are the most active fields.for example,the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to produce 1,2-propanediol,a chemical raw material For polyester resin,has been industrialized,and many scholars are devoting themselves to the industrial application of glycerol hydrogenolysis or fermentation to produce 1,3-propanediol(poly(trimethyl terephthalate)monomer).In the selective oxidation of glycerol,the process of glycerol oxidation to dihydroxyacetone,hydroxypropionaldehyde,glyceric acid and glyceraldehyde is becoming more and more mature.In recent years,with the promotion of degradable plastics,polylactic acid materials have attracted much attention,which makes the catalytic oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid an attractive conversion route.At present,lactic acid is mainly produced by biological fermentation of bio-based carbohydrates,such as glucose and sucrose[6]。 This method requires continuous addition of alkaline medium to maintain a suitable pH in the reaction environment and avoid the deactivation of the enzyme catalyst.At the same time,after the reaction is completed,lactic acid needs to be acidified by H2SO4,which leads to the formation of a large amount of salt waste,high production cost and serious environmental pollution[7,8]。 the production of lactic acid from glycerol is considered to be The most potential alternative to microbial fermentation[1,9]
The catalytic oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid is a serially coupled reaction,which is also a structure-sensitive reaction[10~12]。 In the catalytic conversion process,the catalyst properties(metal composition and structure,support properties,etc.)and reaction conditions(temperature,pressure,pH,substrate concentration,etc.)Have a significant impact on the catalyst activity,stability and product selectivity[13,14]。 in this paper,the research progress of noble metal catalysts In the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid is summarized,focusing on the catalytic reaction mechanism,the mechanism of catalyst active sites,and the effects of supports,promoters and reaction conditions on the catalyst performance.the deactivation mechanism of the catalyst was discussed,and the catalyst design for the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid was prospected。

2 Reaction Mechanism of Glycerol Conversion to Lactic Acid

Conversion of Glycerol to lactic acid can be achieved by hydrothermal,hydrogenolysis,or selective oxidation.In contrast,glycerol selective oxidation is one of the most promising strategies,which can be carried out under relatively mild reaction conditions.glycerol oxidation to lactic acid mainly involves three processes:oxidative dehydrogenation,dehydration and intramolecular Cannizzaro rearrangement[15]。 In the aqueous solution system,glycerol mainly produced lactic acid;In alcohol systems such as methanol or ethanol,glycerol mainly produces methyl lactate or ethyl lactate,which can reduce the subsequent esterification,distillation,hydrolysis and other processing procedures of glycerol to lactic acid products[16]。 It was found that solvent and pH had significant effects on the glycerol conversion pathway[7]

2.1 Hydrothermal conversion of glycerol to lactic acid

Homogeneous basic catalysts have generally shown good catalytic performance for the production of lactic acid[17~20]。 in 2005,Kishida et al.Reported the role of inorganic bases In the hydrothermal conversion of glycerol[17]。 When the reaction temperature is 300℃and the concentration of NaOH is 1.25 mol/L,the yield of lactic acid is as high as 90 mol%.Almost no lactic acid was produced without the addition of NaOH.The reaction mechanism is based on the first oxidative dehydrogenation of glycerol to methylglyoxal,the release of H2by hydrogen transfer to neighboring hydrogen,and the conversion of methylglyoxal to lactate ion by benzilic acid rearrangement 。
Shen et al.Further demonstrated the feasibility of the hydrothermal conversion of glycerol to lactic acid catalyzed by alkali metal hydroxides(KOH,NaOH,LiOH)and alkaline earth metal hydroxides(Ba(OH)2,Sr(OH)2,Ca(OH)2,Mg(OH)2)as well as amphoteric hydroxide Al(OH)3[18]。 Except for Al(OH)3,the above alkaline catalysts can catalyze glycerol to produce lactic acid or lactate,and the effect of alkali metal hydroxides is better than that of alkaline earth metal hydroxides.The effect of KOH is better than that of NaOH at lower concentration or shorter reaction time,indicating that the alkali metal ion species affect the reaction behavior.Sharning Hausen et al.Compared the performance of KOH,LiOH and NaOH,and found that KOH was the best catalyst for the formation of lactic acid[19]。 Chen et al.Used CaO as a solid base for the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid,and the reaction path is shown in Figure 1[21]。 Glycerol is first oxidized to glyceraldehyde,after which glyceraldehyde is dehydrated to 2-hydroxyacrolein,which is readily converted to methylglyoxal by keto-enol isomerism.At the same time,2-hydroxyacrolein and methylglyoxal may undergo hydrogenation reaction with the intermediate product H2to produce a small amount of propylene glycol.Finally,under the catalysis of CaO,methylglyoxal readily undergoes benzilic acid rearrangement to form calcium lactate(Figure 1A).In addition,the oxide ion may also evolve into an oligomer during its formation(fig.1B).These oligomers are poorly soluble or are adsorbed on the catalyst surface,resulting in decreased reaction efficiency.Therefore,the reaction activity of solid base catalyst alone is low,and its further application is limited 。
图1 CaO催化甘油转化为乳酸的反应途径[21]

Fig. 1 Reaction pathways for glycerol conversion to lactic acid catalyzed by CaO[21]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier

Hydrothermal reaction system has harsh reaction conditions,large waste emissions,and high cost of product and catalyst separation,which makes it difficult to promote industrial application.At present,the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid mainly focuses on the development of heterogeneous catalytic systems。

2.2 Selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid

In addition to the hydrothermal conversion of glycerol,the introduction of oxidant and catalyst is another feasible way to produce lactic acid from glycerol.At present,most researchers mainly focus on the selective oxidation of glycerol catalyzed by noble metal(Au,Pt,Pd)catalysts under mild conditions[22,23]。 However,this system usually needs to add a certain amount of base(NaOH,LiOH or KOH)to increase the pH of the reaction system,couple the catalytic dehydrogenation and dehydration ability of the base under hydrothermal conditions,and improve the catalytic activity and selectivity.In 2010,Shen et al.Reported the efficient one-pot conversion of glycerol to lactic acid using Au-Pt/TiO2as a catalyst,and the reaction path is shown in Fig.2[15]。 Glycerol is first oxidatively dehydrogenated to Dihydroxyacetone(DHA)or Glyceraldehyde(GLA)in the presence of O2,DHA and GLA can be converted to each other,then DHA is catalytically dehydrated to Pyruvialdehyde(PA),and finally PA is rearranged to LA by benzilic acid.The equilibrium between DHA and GLA depends on pH,and the oxidation products without alkali are GLA,DHA and Glyceric acid(GLYA),indicating that the presence of alkali promotes the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid catalyzed by Au-Pt,which is consistent with the results reported by Kishida et al[17]。 the presence of base on the one hand promotes the deprotonation of the glycerol hydroxyl group and on the other hand accelerates the conversion of the intermediate(DHA)to lactic acid。
图2 Au-Pt/TiO2上的甘油氧化反应路径[15]

Fig. 2 Proposed reaction pathways of glycerol oxidation on Au-Pt/TiO2[15]. Copyright 2010, Wiley-VCH

As mentioned earlier,the alkali solution can lead to the formation of lactate,and the production of lactic acid requires additional reaction and separation steps,which not only increases the production cost,but also produces a large amount of salt waste.Therefore,the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid in alkali-free system has more application potential.It has been shown that,similar to bases,Lewis acids are also able to catalyze dehydration and isomerization in glycerol conversion.Xu et al.Also used AuPt/TiO2as a catalyst and found that glycerol could selectively oxidize glycerol directly to lactic acid in the presence of Lewis acid AlCl3under alkali-free conditions[24]。 The reaction path to lactic acid is as follows:glycerol is oxidatively dehydrogenated to DHA and glyceraldehyde intermediates,and H+and Al3+cooperatively catalyze the dehydration and rearrangement of these intermediates to LA.However,the hydration of Al3+and the toxicity of Cl-often affect their practical application.In 2014,Cho et al.Proposed a bifunctional catalyst strategy,using Pt/Sn-MFI catalyst,to realize the direct oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid(Fig.3 )[25]。 Under mild reaction conditions,glycerol was first oxidized to DHA or GLA on the active site of Pt metal,and then GLA was rapidly converted to more stable DHA in the presence of Lewis acid of Sn-MFI molecular sieve,DHA was dehydrated to PA,and PA was added to water by intramolecular hydrogen transfer to LA.Tao et al.Proposed to introduce Lewis acid sites Al3+or Cr3+into polyoxometalates(POMs)by proton exchange with metal ions to prepare bifunctional catalysts(AlPMo or CrPMo)with Lewis acid active sites and oxidation active sites to directly catalyze the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid[26]。 It was found that Lewis acid metal ions had a significant effect on the redox potential of POMs,and the stronger the Lewis acid,the higher the redox potential,thus increasing the glycerol conversion.At the same time,stronger Lewis acid catalysts improve the chemoselectivity of DHA,and the dehydration of DHA and the conversion of PA to LA also require Lewis acid sites.In addition,the higher catalytic efficiency of AlPMo or CrPMo is also related to its hydrophobicity.Insoluble AlPMo or CrPMo can quickly release the water produced from the secondary structure,promote the dehydration of DHA to PA,and show the reaction characteristics of rapid production of LA.Feng et al.Prepared Pt/L-Nb2O5bifunctional catalyst with layered L-Nb2O5as the carrier,and also realized the direct conversion of glycerol to lactic acid[27]。 Glycerol is first converted to DHA and GLA catalyzed by Pt nanoparticles,DHA is dehydrated to form intermediate PA catalyzed by Brønsted acid and Lewis acid,and finally lactic acid is produced by 1,2-hydride shift catalyzed by Lewis acid.It has been shown that the high catalytic activity of L-Nb2O5is most likely due to its large number of Lewis acid sites and Brønsted acid sites from the deformed orthorhombic structure of a and B axes and the additional layer of C axis.The reaction mechanism of other catalytic glycerol conversion under alkali-free conditions is also similar to the above process[28,29]
图3 Pt/Sn-MFI催化剂上甘油选择性氧化为乳酸的串联反应路径[25]

Fig. 3 Proposed tandem reaction pathways for the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid over the Pt/Sn-MFI catalyst[25]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry

Since methanol is inevitably present in the crude glycerol for biodiesel production,it is theoretically simple and easy to directly convert glycerol to alkyl lactate(methyl lactate)in a"one-pot"process without additional separation and esterification steps.At present,the direct conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate or ethyl lactate in methanol or ethanol has become a hot topic.Similar to the reaction pathway of glycerol to lactic acid in aqueous solution,the conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate involves three consecutive reactions:(1)oxidation of glycerol to DHA and GLA[16,30]; (2)DHA and GLA are dehydrated to form pyruvic aldehyde;(3)addition and isomerization of pyruvic aldehyde to methyl lactate.Lu et al.Developed Au/Sn-USY bifunctional catalyst for one-pot conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate in methanol solution[16]。 On the one hand,the interaction between Au and extra-framework SnOxaround the DeAl-USY mesopores promotes the dispersion of Au particles,which is beneficial to the oxidation of glycerol into DHA and GLA.On the other hand,the framework Sn changes the Lewis acid property of the catalyst,giving it a unique carbonyl activation ability,which is essential for the formation of methyl lactate 。
Although there are different reaction mechanisms,the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid will produce a certain amount of by-products,such as glyceric acid,oxalic acid,acetic acid,formic acid and other C-C cleavage products[31]。 Therefore,it is still a challenge to construct alkali-free catalytic systems with high activity and selectivity.the development of bifunctional or multifunctional catalysts is an inevitable choice,and The oxidation active sites(noble metals),dehydration and isomerization active sites(acid sites or basic sites,metal active sites)of hydroxyl groups need to be considered[30]。 noble metals have been proved to be the best choice for glycerol activation,and how to reduce the amount of Noble metals while avoiding their leaching deactivation In the liquid phase reaction is the main challenge.in addition,more and more attention has been paid to the improvement of oxidation activity and selectivity through the synergistic effect of L acid and B acid[32,33]

2.3 Electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid

Compared with the traditional thermal catalytic oxidation,the electrocatalytic oxidation can not only realize the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid under mild conditions,but also couple with the cathode to produce hydrogen。
Lux et al.Reported the electrocatalytic oxidation of crude glycerol to DHA and GLA,followed by base-catalyzed conversion of DHA or GLA to lactic acid[34]。 Dai et al.Prepared an AuPt bimetallic nanocatalyst to produce lactic acid by electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol at normal temperature and pressure,and the reaction path is shown in Figure 4[35]。 glycerol was first oxidized to DHA or GLA by AuPt catalyst and alkali,then dehydrated to 2-hydroxyacrolein or pyruvic aldehyde by alkali catalysis,and finally rearranged to lactic acid by Cannizzaro.Recently,Yan et al.Reported a photo-assisted electrocatalytic strategy to realize the selective oxidation of Glycerol to lactic acid over gold nanowires(Au NWs)catalyst with 80%selectivity of lactic acid[36]。 In situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR)revealed that irradiation could promote the adsorption of glycerol on the surface of Au NWs,especially the secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol,which contributed to the production of DHA intermediate and further conversion to lactic acid by base catalysis,while the side reaction of GLA intermediate to GLYA or C1~C2 products could be significantly inhibited。
图4 AuPt催化剂在碱性溶液中甘油电催化氧化反应路径[35]

Fig. 4 Proposed reaction pathways for glycerol electrochemical oxidation in alkaline solution on AuPt catalysts[35]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier

At present,the electrocatalytic oxidation method is still limited by the low current density of the battery,which hinders its practical application.On the other hand,the development of low-cost,highly selective and stable electrocatalysts is another major challenge for electrocatalytic oxidation。

3 Precious metal catalyst

Noble metals such as Au,Pt,Pd and their alloys have good activity,high stability,oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance in the dehydrogenation of alcohols[37,38]。 the catalyst cost can be reduced while the catalytic activity is maintained by partial substitution,introduction of promoter metal,or improvement of the preparation method.This section mainly discusses Au-based,Pt-based,Pd-based and other noble metal catalysts。

3.1 Au-based catalyst

Au-based catalysts generally exhibit excellent low-temperature catalytic activity and selectivity for hydroxyl groups[39~42]。 Meng et al.Reported that the activation energy of the secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol on the Au(111)crystal face is 112.3 kJ/mol,which is lower than that of the primary hydroxyl group(169.2 kJ/mol),and the selective activation ability of the secondary hydroxyl group is strong[43]。 In addition,Au-based catalysts are not prone to deactivation due to excessive oxidation and poisoning,and have high stability and reusability[44,45]。 Table 1 shows the research results of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid catalyzed by some Au-based catalysts。
表1 Typical results of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid catalyzed by Au-based catalysts reported in recent years

Table 1 Typical results for glycerol to lactic acid over Au-containing catalysts reported in the last years

Catalyst Base a T / ℃ PO2 / MPa Reaction time / h Conversion / % Selectivity b / % Year Ref
Au-Pt/TiO2 (1∶1) c 4∶1 90 0.1 - ≈30.0 LA 85.6 2010 15
Au-Pt/TiO2 (3∶1) c 4∶1 90 0.1 - ≈30.0 LA 84.3
Au-Pt/TiO2 (1∶3) c 4∶1 90 0.1 - ≈30.0 LA 85.3
1% Au/CeO2 d 4∶1 90 0.1 - 99.1 LA 73.1 2013 23
1% Au/CeO2 e 4∶1 90 0.1 - 98.0 LA 83.0
3% Au/CeO2 d 4∶1 90 0.1 - 98.0 LA 73.5
3% Au/CeO2 e 4∶1 90 0.1 - 98.0 LA 79.7
5% Au/CeO2 d 4∶1 90 0.1 - 98.0 LA 72.2
5% Au/CeO2 e 4∶1 90 0.1 - 98.0 LA 79.0
Au/TiO2 base free 160 1 2 1.2 - 2013 24
Pd/TiO2 base free 160 1 2 46.2 LA 47.7
AuPd/TiO2 base free 160 1 2 29.7 LA 58.5
0.5Au/Sn-MCM-41-XS DP base free 140 3 4.5 76.0 MLA 46.0 2018 51
0.5Au/Sn-MCM-41-XS CI base free 140 3 4.5 20.0 MLA 82.0
0.5Au/CuO+Sn-MCM-41-XS base free 140 3 4.5 79.0 MLA 64.0
AuPd/CNTs base free 140 3 4.5 6.8 MLA 5.7 2019 52
AuPd/CNTs-NS+Sn-MCM-41-XS base free 140 3 4.5 81.0 MLA 87.0
AuPd/CNTs-NS+Sn-MCM-41-XS base free 140 3 9 96.0 MLA 88.0

aNaOH to glycerol mole ratio if not otherwise denoted;bLA:lactic acid,MLA:methyl lactate;cAu to Pt mole ratio;dH2reduced samples;eGlycerol reduced samples 。

In the aqueous phase oxidation system of glycerol,the presence of base can improve the activity of Au-based catalyst[46]。 on the one hand,the combination of hydroxide on the catalyst surface can significantly reduce the activation energy of Au(111)crystal face,on the other hand,it can promote theβ-hydride elimination reaction of aldehyde or ketone intermediates formed on the catalyst surface to produce the corresponding carboxylic acid[40]。 Demirel-G Gülen et al.Found that Au catalyst can effectively catalyze glycerol oxidation only under alkaline conditions[11]。 With the increase of alkali content,the glycerol oxidation was kinetically more favorable,indicating that the Au catalyst needs the assistance of alkali to achieve the glycerol oxidation reaction.Redina et al.Found that when the ratio of NaOH to glycerol was 2,the conversion and selectivity of glycerol to lactic acid were the best,while too high ratio of NaOH to glycerol could easily lead to a large number of carbonates,resulting in the deactivation of Au catalyst[47]。 Zope et al.Used18O2and H218O isotope labeling experiments to prove that the oxygen for the oxidation of the hydroxyl group to the carbonyl or carboxyl group in the glycerol oxidation reaction comes from the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen atom of molecular oxygen[48]。 Density functional theory(DFT)calculations further show that molecular oxygen participates in the catalytic cycle not through metal site dissociation to atomic oxygen,but through the formation of H2O2intermediates to catalyze the decomposition to form hydroxide ions.In addition to basicity,increasing the reaction temperature can also improve the selectivity of lactic acid over Au-based catalysts.Purushothaman et al.Investigated the effect of reaction temperature on the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid,and found that when the temperature increased from 140℃to 180℃,the conversion rate of glycerol increased from 70%to about 80%,while the selectivity of lactic acid increased from 24%to 60%,indicating that high temperature was conducive to the formation of lactic acid[49]。 Xu et al.Also found that the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid required a higher temperature under acidic conditions[24]。 the conversion rate of glycerol was very low at 100℃,and no lactic acid was produced.When the temperature was increased to 140℃,the selectivity of lactic acid was 57.5%.When the temperature was further increased to 160°C,the selectivity of lactic acid increased slightly,while the glycerol conversion increased significantly。
the oxidation of glycerol molecules on Au-based catalysts is considered to be a structure-sensitive reaction,and the size of Au nanoparticles is an important factor in controlling the selective oxidation of glycerol.Bianchi et al.Found that the activity of Au/C catalyst reached the maximum when the average diameter of Au particles was 7~8 nm[45]。 Lakshmanan et al.Found that the formation of lactic acid was closely related to the size of Au particles[23]。 When the Au content in the Au/CeO2catalyst is 1%,the selectivity to lactic acid reaches the maximum with the increase of Au particle size to~6 nm;However,when the Au content in Au/CeO2catalyst was 3%and 5%,the medium-size Au particles(~8 nm)showed the highest selectivity for lactic acid,while the smaller or larger Au particles showed poor selectivity for lactic acid.It can be seen that in the reaction of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid,the optimal size of Au nanoparticles should be 5~10 nm,and the selectivity of lactic acid is high.However,a large number of hydrogen and oxygen reactions using Au nanoparticles have been reported,and the size range of Au nanoparticles with excellent activity and selectivity should be smaller(1~5 nm).This difference is related to the formation and conversion path of DHA and GLA(Figure 3)in the process of glycerol conversion to lactic acid:small-scale Au nanoparticles have more beneficial oxidative dehydrogenation ability,which can quickly oxidize and dehydrogenate GLA to GLYA,and accordingly,the path of GLA isomerization to DHA is inhibited 。
Alloying is another effective strategy to improve the activity and selectivity of Au-based catalysts for glycerol oxidation to lactic acid.In the oxidation system in the presence of alkali,Purushothaman et al.Compared the effect of monometallic Au/nCeO2catalyst and bimetallic Au-Pt/nCeO2catalyst on the reaction performance[31]。 The monometallic Au/nCeO2TOF is about 1100 mol·mol-1·h-1,and the lactic acid selectivity is 60%.Bimetallic Au-Pt/nCeO2catalyst with higher TOF(1350 mol·mol-1·h-1)and lactic acid selectivity(80%).It should be noted that Pt metal has poor activity and selectivity in the alkaline system suitable for Au catalyst.However,by alloying it with Au to form bimetallic Au-Pt,both activity and selectivity are improved.This promotion is related to the synergistic effect of metal alloying and is also affected by the strong metal-support interaction.In this study,the reducible CeO2was coupled with Pt metal,which was suitable for the effect of strong metal-support interaction:during the reduction or activation process of the catalyst,the CeO2at the interface between the support and the metal was partially reduced,forming Ce3+and oxygen deficient sites,while some Ce species could migrate to cover the metal surface and inhibit metal sintering.In addition,due to the strong interaction between metal and support,Ce4+ions also change the chemical valence of Pt and Au metals,and the surface active sites of Au0decrease,which increases new surface active species such as Au3+and Au+,which are beneficial to the activation of polar bonds such as C—O and C=O.Shen et al.Compared the glycerol oxidation performance of Au-Pt/TiO2catalysts with different Au/Pt atomic ratios(1/3–7/1),and found that the activity was the highest when the Au/Pt atomic ratio was 3∶1(TOF was 524 h-1[50]。 The promotion effect further shows that the electron density of Pt is increased by the electron transfer from Au to Pt through alloying,the chemical valence of Au and Pt active metal on the surface is changed,the oxidation of glycerol secondary hydroxyl is promoted,and the formation of DHA is better than that of glyceraldehyde.The synergistic effect between Au and Pt indicates that glycerol can be efficiently oxidized to lactic acid by rationally adjusting the electronic properties of the metal catalyst.In the alkali-free reaction system,Xu et al.Found that AuPd/TiO2catalyst together with AlCl3could selectively oxidize glycerol directly to lactic acid without alkali,and Au-Pd alloy could increase the selectivity of lactic acid from 47.7%to 58.5%[24]。 The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS)and transmission electron microscopy(TEM)characterization prove that there is an interaction between Au and Pd。
the Au catalyst also has excellent performance in the glycerol reaction system with methanol as the solvent.Purushothaman et al.Used Au/USY as a catalyst,and the yield of methyl lactate was 73%when the glycerol conversion was 95%[30]。 Tang et al.Used metal oxide-supported Au nanoparticles and Sn-MCM-41 to form a multifunctional catalytic system by physical mixing,and found that the physical mixing of Au/CuO and Sn-MCM-41 had the best performance,with glycerol conversion of 95%and methyl lactate yield of 63%[51]。 Mechanistic studies showed that the Au-based catalyst promoted the glycerol dehydrogenation step,converting glycerol to DHA and GLA,and the solid acid Sn-MCM-41 with strong Lewis acid and weak Brønsted acid isomerized the intermediate DHA to methyl lactate.the research team further found that the multifunctional catalytic system composed of Au-Pd bimetallic supported on carbon nanotubes(CNTs)and Sn-MCM-41 could increase the conversion of glycerol to 96%and the yield of methyl lactate to 85%[52]。 Zhou et al.Physically mixed Au/CuO and Sn-Beta to form a bifunctional catalyst,which realized the efficient conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate[53]。 Under the low temperature of 90℃,the glycerol conversion of 86%and the methyl lactate yield of 60%can be obtained.Au/CuO provides oxidation active sites for the oxidative dehydrogenation of glycerol to DHA,while Sn-Beta provides Lewis acid sites for the further conversion of DHA to methyl lactate.Lu et al.Investigated the effects of reaction temperature,reaction time and other conditions on the catalytic performance of Au/Sn-DeAl-USY[16]。 It was found that the glycerol conversion and methyl lactate yield increased gradually in a certain temperature range(100~140℃),while higher reaction temperature(>180℃)led to an increase in over-oxidation products.Similarly,the reaction process can be effectively inferred according to the product distribution at different reaction times。
Compared with Pt and Pd noble metal catalysts,Au has a weaker ability to adsorb and activate oxygen,so its reactivity is significantly affected by the acidity and alkalinity of the system.Moreover,Au is easy to sinter or run off.How to construct multifunctional active sites and improve the activity and stability of Au by introducing carriers or additives is the focus of current research on Au-based catalysts。

3.2 Pt-based catalyst

the main challenges of Pt-based catalysts in glycerol oxidation are to improve the resistance to oxidative poisoning and the directional activation of hydroxyl groups.Table 2 shows the research results of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid catalyzed by some Pt-based catalysts。
表2 Typical results of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid catalyzed by Pt-based catalysts in recent years

Table 2 Typical results for glycerol to lactic acid over Pt-containing catalysts reported in the last years

Catalyst Base a T / ℃ PO2 / MPa Reaction time / h Conversion / % Selectivity b / % Year Ref
Pt/Al2O3 0.75∶1 240 3.5 22~30 95.4 LA 29.8 2018 54
Pt/ZnO 0.75∶1 240 3.5 22~30 97.0 LA 25.5
Pt/MgO 0.75∶1 240 3.5 22~30 93.6 LA 30.8
Au/nCeO2 4∶1 100 0.5 0.5 82.0 LA 68.0 2014 31
Pt/nCeO2 4∶1 100 0.5 0.5 60.0 LA 52.0
Au-Pt/nCeO2 4∶1 100 0.5 0.5 99.0 LA 80.0
0.1%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 43.7 LA 66.9 2017 58
0.2%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 52.7 LA 65.7
0.35%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 68.2 LA 72.9
0.5%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 80.0 LA 69.3
0.75%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 62.7 LA 67.5
1.0%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 60.9 LA 64.4
2.0%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC 1.5∶1 90 0.1 4 42.8 LA 49.0
Pt-Co/CeOx 1.0∶1 200 1(N2) 4 85.0 LA 88.0 2019 65
Pt/TiO2 4∶1 90 0.1 2 33.9 LA 51.5 2014 66
Pd/TiO2 4∶1 90 0.1 2 26.3 LA 51.7
Pd1Ni1Ox/TiO2 4∶1 90 0.1 2 44.0 LA 51.6
Pt1Ni1Ox/TiO2 4∶1 90 0.1 2 58.0 LA 73.7
Pt1Ni1Ox/TiO2 4∶1 90 0.1 4 99.1 LA 62.6
Pt/Sn-MFI base-free 100 0.62 24 89.8 LA 80.5 2014 25
Pt/Sn-BEA base-free 100 0.62 24 93.4 LA 28.1
Pt/silicalite-1 base-free 100 0.62 24 83.8 LA 0.0
Pt/AC + Sn-MFI base-free 100 0.62 24 53.6 LA 80.8
Pt/TiO2 base-free 100 0.62 24 92.3 LA 0.0
0.1Pt/L-Nb2O5 base-free 140 0.5 3 9.0 LA 92.0 2020 27
0.5Pt/L-Nb2O5 base-free 140 0.5 3 53.0 LA 79.0
1Pt/L-Nb2O5 base-free 140 0.5 3 69.0 LA 61.0
2Pt/L-Nb2O5 base-free 140 0.5 3 84.0 LA 28.0

aNaOH to glycerol ratio if not otherwise denoted;bLA:lactic acid 。

The support has a significant effect on the performance of Pt-based catalysts.Bruno et al.Prepared Pt catalysts supported on different oxides(Al2O3,ZnO,MgO)by wet impregnation method,and found that the selectivity of Pt/Al2O3,Pt/ZnO,Pt/MgO catalysts to lactic acid was 45%,60%and 55%,respectively[54]。 The Pt/Al2O3catalyst has the lowest selectivity to lactic acid,which is generally considered to be caused by its low alkaline density(0.3μmol CO2m-2).However,the basicity(35.8μmol CO2m-2)of Pt/ZnO catalyst is lower than that of Pt/MgO catalyst(60.9μmol CO2m-2),but the selectivity and yield of lactic acid over Pt/ZnO catalyst are better than those over Pt/MgO.This fully shows that the selectivity of lactic acid does not depend entirely on the acidity and basicity of the carrier,but also on the structure of the carrier.As an n-type semiconductor,ZnO is the active component of syngas to methanol in the early stage,which shows that it has excellent performance in activating polar bonds such as C—O or C=O.Pt/ZnO catalyst,ZnO can not only be used as a carrier to support the high dispersion of Pt,but also the Zn2+itself has Lewis acid characteristics,which can activate the C—O bond in DHA and promote the conversion of DHA to PA.This is corroborated by the results of Ftouni et al.,who compared the glycerol oxidation performance of Pt/C,Pt/TiO2,Pt/ZrO2catalysts[55]。 Lactic acid selectivity of Pt/C catalyst is 60%,while that of catalysts with n-type semiconductor TiO2or ZrO2is more than 80%.Checa et al.Further compared the glycerol conversion performance of Pt catalysts supported on different reducible metal oxides(TiO2,ZnO,SnO2,and ZrO2)supports[56]。 It was found that the Pt catalysts supported on ZnO and SnO2exhibited the highest oxidation activity due to the Zn or Sn atoms at the interface between the metal and the support,because of the strong metal-support interaction,resulting in the formation of Pt-Zn or Pt-Sn alloy structure,which promoted glycerol conversion.Komanoya et al.Demonstrated that the combined catalyst of Pt nanoparticles and TiO2could realize the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid under oxygen atmosphere[28]。 The yield of lactic acid reached 63%even in the absence of base.Among them,the Lewis acid site on TiO2facilitates the dehydration and rearrangement of the intermediate to produce lactic acid with high efficiency.Wu et al.Found that the support itself could participate in the reaction,improve the activity of the catalyst and affect the selectivity of the product[57]。 Pt/CuO,Pt/TiO2and Pt-Sol catalysts were prepared by Sol-gel method for glycerol oxidation,and combined with the results of in situ infrared spectroscopy and reaction kinetics,it was found that Pt/CuO and Pt/TiO2catalysts showed different reaction paths(Fig.5).The O atom on the surface of Pt/CuO catalyst has a strong interaction(βinteraction)with the secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol through hydrogen bonding,and the oriented oxidation of the secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol is realized by reducing the electron cloud density of the C—O bond of the secondary hydroxy group of glycerol in the reaction process.However,the Ti atom on the surface of the Pt/TiO2catalyst forms an alkoxide with the primary hydroxyl group of glycerol,resulting in a strong metal-oxygen interaction(γinteraction),which reduces the electron cloud density of the C—O bond of the primary hydroxyl group of glycerol during the reaction,thus improving the selectivity of the oxidation of the primary hydroxy group of glycerol 。
图 5 Pt/CuO催化剂和Pt/TiO2催化剂对甘油的吸附和C—H键活化反应路径[57]

Fig. 5 Glycerol adsorption and C—H bond activation process over Pt/CuO catalyst and Pt/TiO2 catalyst[57]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier

In conclusion,coupling the reducible n-type semiconductor oxide support with metal Pt can improve the thermal stability and anti-sintering stability of metal Pt by using the strong metal-support interaction,and the activity and selectivity of glycerol conversion can be significantly improved by using the interfacial reaction to generate a new active phase。
in addition to the support effect,the structure and size of Pt metal nanoparticles are also important factors affecting the catalytic activity.Zhang et al.Prepared a series of Pt/AC catalysts with Pt particle size ranging from 10.2 nm to 3.8 nm by changing the precipitation-deposition temperature(0~80℃),and studied the size effect of Pt particles in the reaction of glycerol to lactic acid catalyzed by Pt/AC catalysts in alkaline solution[58]。 Among them,the Pt/AC-30 catalyst with medium Pt particles(average particle size of 7.9 nm)had the highest TOF value,and the selectivity to lactic acid reached 42.9%at 64.1%glycerol conversion.However,the selectivity of lactic acid was not significantly affected by the Pt particle size effect.In addition,the particle size effect is also related to the type of alkali,and the effect of Pt metal particle size on glycerol conversion is more obvious in LiOH solution than in KOH solution.Oberhauser et al.Prepared 1.5 nm Pt nanoparticles and supported them on carbon materials,and the resulting Pt@C exhibited superior catalytic activity,(780 h-1),and lactic acid selectivity(94% )[59]
the terminal hydroxyl group of glycerol is preferentially activated on the Pt catalyst,so the Pt catalyst is used in the oxidation reaction of glycerol and is easy to produce glyceric acid[60~63]。 In order to improve the selectivity of lactic acid,an alloy or bimetallic catalyst is usually formed by introducing a second metal into Pt metal.Zhang et al.Introduced Cu into Pt/AC catalyst and found that the introduction of Cu improved Pt dispersion[64]。 The strong interaction between Cu and Pt enhanced the glycerol oxidation activity,and the lactic acid yield of 0.5%Cu-1.0%Pt/AC catalyst was 2.4 times higher than that of 1.0%Pt/AC catalyst.Further study showed that the valence state of Cu species in the catalyst changed with the Pt/Cu ratio.Among them,Cu+and Cu0species are beneficial to glycerol activation and lactic acid production,while Cu2+(large CuO particles)are beneficial to glyceric acid formation.Zhang et al.Prepared a bimetallic Pt-Co/CeOxcatalyst and found that electrons were transferred from Co0to Pt0,while Pt-Ce interaction occurred[65]。 Both glycerol and NaOH need to be activated on the Pt-Co surface,and the unique electronic coupling effect between Pt-Co and the CeOxlattice distortion caused by Co incorporation make the catalyst have excellent performance.The activity(1533.9 h-1)and selectivity(87.7%)of glycerol oxidation to lactic acid at 200℃were significantly increased.Li et al.Prepared Ni-promoted PtmNinOx/TiO2catalyst,and found that compared with Pt/TiO2,NiOxcooperated with metal Pt to catalyze glycerol oxidation,thus significantly improving the glycerol conversion activity of the catalyst,and the selectivity of lactic acid was 62.6%at glycerol conversion of 99.1%[66]
Pt-based catalysts have excellent oxidative dehydrogenation performance,and the size of metal particles and support is the key factor affecting the reaction process.Although Pt-based catalysts show good catalytic activity and selectivity in glycerol oxidation,their stability is poor,and they are prone to oxygen poisoning and metal leaching.By introducing the second metal to modify the catalyst,the alloy can be formed and the number of active sites can be increased,which can not only improve the reaction activity,but also greatly improve the stability of the catalyst。

3.3 Other precious metal catalyst

in addition to Au and Pt catalysts,Pd,Ru,and Ag catalysts have also been used for glycerol oxidation.the selectivity of Pd catalyst to glyceric acid is higher,and it is necessary to add alkali In the reaction system to improve the activity[67]。 Marques et al.Used Pd/AC catalyst for the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid.Under the conditions of 230℃and NaOH/glycerol molar ratio of 1.1,the conversion of glycerol was 99%and the selectivity of lactic acid was 46%[68]。 Arcanjo et al.Studied the activity of activated carbon supported Pd catalyst,and the catalytic performance was significantly affected by the catalyst metal loading,NaOH/glycerol molar ratio,temperature and other parameters[69]。 At a reaction temperature of 230°C,the 10%Pd/C catalyst gave a glycerol conversion of about 99%and a selectivity to lactic acid of 68%,but with a high Pd loading.Shen et al.Prepared Pd3/HAP catalyst by 3%Pd supported on hydroxyapatite(HAP),and the selectivity of lactic acid was as high as 95%at glycerol conversion of 99%under the conditions of NaOH/glycerol molar ratio of 1.1 and reaction temperature of 230°C[70]。 The Pd3/HAP catalyst was separated from the solution by centrifugation,and the glycerol conversion decreased from 99%to 93%and the lactic acid selectivity decreased from 95%to 94%after five repeated experiments.The slight decrease in the catalytic activity and selectivity of the Pd3/HAP catalyst is due to the leaching of trace Pd from the surface of the support into the solution.Recently,Ten et al.Prepared a bimetallic Pd,Bi@Uio-66 catalyst for the cascade conversion of glycerol to lactic acid,and the unique structure and tunability of the hybrid material allowed 58%selectivity to lactic acid at 19%glycerol conversion without the addition of any base[71]。 it can be seen that It is difficult for Pd catalyst to obtain high activity under alkali-free conditions。
Ru has a high oxidation and coordination number,so Ru metal complexes usually have good oxidation reactivity.Li et al.Proposed a method for hydrogen production from glycerol and selective synthesis of lactic acid using pincer Ru complexes[72]。 using less than 1 ppm of Ru-MACHO catalyst for 2 H at 125°C,an unprecedented TOF value was obtained with 67%yield of lactic acid.in addition,the analysis of glycerol dehydrogenation products showed that improving the decarboxylation efficiency is the key to further reforming process.It is worth noting that there is a problem in the production of lactic acid from glycerol Using Ru-based catalysts.Ru is easy to break the C—C bond in hydrocarbons.Therefore,when Ru nanoparticles catalyze the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid under alkaline conditions,the decomposition of lactic acid to formic acid inevitably leads to the formation of methane and carbon dioxide[73]。 To solve the above problem,Jiang et al.Reported a hydroxyapatite(HAP)supported trimetallic Ru-Zn-CuI/HAP catalyst to convert glycerol into lactic acid[74]。 The results show that the Ru particles(<2 nm)are uniformly dispersed on the HAP.CuIcan effectively inhibit the cleavage of C—C bond,and the selectivity of lactic acid is significantly improved.Meanwhile,the presence of Zn2+enhanced the isomerization of methylglyoxal as an intermediate.Compared with Ru/HAP catalyst(63.7%)and Ru-Zn/HAP catalyst(70.9%),the selectivity of Ru-Zn-CuI/HAP catalyst to lactic acid increased to 82.7%.Pemmana et al.Studied the application of activated carbon supported Ru-V bimetallic catalyst in the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid[75]。 The Ru/V2O5(Ru-V/AC)bimetallic catalyst was superior to the monometallic Ru and V catalysts,and the Ru-V/AC bimetallic catalyst showed the best catalytic performance under mild reaction conditions,with a glycerol conversion of 98.7%and a lactic acid yield of 75.5% 。
Unlike other noble metals,Ag-based catalysts showed the weakest activity for glycerol oxidation.Lari et al.Proposed a conversion process of glycerol to lactic acid using methylglyoxal as an intermediate,namely,glycerol gas phase oxidative hydration to methylglyoxal,and continuous liquid phase conversion of methylglyoxyal to lactic acid or methyl lactate[76]。 Tao et al.Prepared silver-exchanged phosphomolybdic acid catalyst AgxPMo12O40(x=1,2,3)and evaluated its performance in the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid[77]。 The results show that the addition of Ag metal can increase the redox potential of H3PMo12O40,which is beneficial to the conversion of glycerol to DHA rather than GLA,while the Lewis acid site of Ag is beneficial to the further dehydration of DHA to lactic acid.The suitable redox potential,Lewis acid sites and hydrophobicity enable high conversion and selectivity.In the absence of any base,the selectivity of Ag3PMo12O40to lactic acid reached 93%at 99%glycerol conversion.At the same time,Ag3PMo12O40as a heterogeneous catalyst remained highly active after 12 cycles of reaction 。
the high cost and limited reusability of noble metals make the development of low-cost catalysts for glycerol conversion an attractive direction in the future.Therefore,the introduction of non-noble metal active phases into catalysts is the focus of future catalyst design。

4 Choice and function of catalyst support

as mentioned earlier,the effect of support on catalyst performance has been mentioned many times.the support can affect the structure,size and electronic properties of noble metals,and can also introduce new functional sites(such As acidic or basic sites)to affect the activation of reactants.At present,the main catalyst supports for glycerol oxidation to lactic acid are carbon materials,molecular sieves and metal oxides。

4.1 Carbon material

Carbon materials have large specific surface area,good conductivity,acid and alkali resistance,and can realize the recovery of precious metals through high temperature combustion,so they are often used to support precious metal catalysts[78]
activated carbon(AC)is a general term for carbon materials with strong adsorption capacity.the specific surface area and pore size distribution of Activated carbon will affect the activity of the catalyst.Zhang et al.Studied the catalytic performance of AC supported Pt catalysts with different particle sizes in the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid,and found that Pt nanoparticles were highly dispersed on the surface of AC,with an average particle size of 2.8~5.0 nm.These highly dispersed Pt nanocatalysts showed high activity in the oxidation of glycerol under alkali-free conditions[79]。 the decrease of AC particle size increases the accessibility of Pt nanoparticles to reactants,and thus increases the reactivity。
N-doping of carbon materials can introduce surface functional groups,including pyridine N,pyrrole N and graphite N,which can anchor metal particles and improve the dispersion of metals[80]。 in addition,the doped N-containing groups interact electronically with the metal nanoparticles,resulting In a novel catalytic behavior.Chen et al.Found that the incorporation of N atoms into carbon nanotubes(CNTs)increased the surface basicity of the catalyst,thereby accelerating the activation of glycerol hydroxyl groups[81]。 The activity of Pt/N-CNTs catalyst doped with N atoms for glycerol oxidation in alkali-free aqueous solution was much higher than that of Pt/CNTs catalyst without N atoms.The reasons for the improvement of catalytic activity by doping N are:(I)electron transfer from N to Pt;(II)accelerating the activation of molecular oxygen;(III)The increase of surface defect sites promotes the adsorption of glycerol and O2;(IV)The increase of surface basicity makes the—OH group in glycerol more easily activated.It is also pointed out that these catalysts can be reused many times,but the catalysts are subject to oxygen poisoning(formation of PtOxspecies)and need to be regenerated at H2.Zhang et al.Used N-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes(MWCNTs)as the support of Pt nanoparticles for glycerol oxidation reaction under alkali-free conditions[82]。 the results are consistent with the conclusion of Chen et al.,and the incorporation of N is beneficial to the high dispersion of Pt species,while the Pt nanoparticles maintain the electron-rich state[81]

4.2 Molecular sieve

Compared with other supported catalysts,molecular sieve-supported metal catalysts have many advantages,such as the formation of ultra-small and stable metal species,excellent thermal/hydrothermal stability in catalytic reactions(especially under harsh reaction conditions),and unique shape-selective catalytic characteristics[83]。 At present,the main carriers for glycerol catalytic conversion to lactic acid are BEA molecular sieve,MCM molecular sieve,MWW molecular sieve and MFI molecular sieve.Among them,Sn heteroatom-containing molecular sieves(Sn-β,Sn-MCM,Sn-MWW,Sn-MFI)have attracted much attention as multifunctional Lewis acid catalysts[84,85]
the combination of Lewis acid sites and Brønsted acid sites in Sn-containing molecular sieves can greatly improve The catalytic activity.Asgar et Al.Synthesized Sn-Al-Beta molecular sieves containing L acid sites(framework Sn)and B acid sites(framework Al)and mixed with AuPd/CNTs as a multifunctional catalytic system for one-pot conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate[86]。 At 140℃,the conversion of glycerol was 29%and the selectivity of methyl lactate was 67%。
Due to the large molecular size of glycerol,the intragranular diffusion limitation of molecular sieves can also affect the catalytic effect.the construction of hierarchical pore structure molecular sieves can significantly improve the diffusion performance.Tang et al.Constructed core-shell Snβ@mesoporous silica(MS)composites by oriented assembly of mesoporous silica on microporous Snβzeolite[87]。 the shell mesoporous channel is vertically aligned with the Snβinner core to achieve sufficient mass transfer between the shell and the inner core.On this basis,the Au/Snβ@MS catalyst was prepared(Fig.6).the introduction of mesoporous silica can effectively change the ratio of L acid to B acid of Snβ@MS,and also promote the formation of highly dispersed Au nanoparticles.In addition,the core-shell structure of the catalyst can effectively protect Au nanoparticles from sintering,thus showing high stability and recyclability.Cho et al.Successfully synthesized hierarchical pore Sn-MFI molecular sieve with high mesopore ratio by adding three-dimensional ordered mesoporous carbon template[88]。 In addition,the weak acid sites produced by the silicon hydroxyl defects can promote the activation of reactants。
图6 Au/Snβ@MS催化剂甘油一锅法转化为乳酸甲酯[87]

Fig. 6 One-pot conversion of glycerol to methyl lactate over Au/Snβ@MS catalysts[87]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier

4.3 Metal oxide

metal oxide support has the advantages of adjustable composition,controllable morphology,and strong interaction with the supported metal,which can inhibit the agglomeration and loss of active metal,accelerate electron transfer,and thus increase the activity and stability of the catalyst.In addition,the metal oxide itself has the acidity and basicity,oxygen adsorption activity and so on,which may also play the role of promoter。
Metal oxides,such as TiO2,CuO,Al2O3,CeO2,ZnO,and SnO2,are commonly used to enhance the Lewis acid strength in the oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid.However,the limited surface area of the oxide support limits the dispersion of the noble metal.To solve this problem,Douthwaite et al.Synthesized a high specific surface area mesoporous TiO2material(110 m2/g)by nanocasting using SBA-15 as a hard template,and then prepared a AuPt/TiO2catalyst[89]。 The nano-cast TiO2supported AuPt catalyst was found to exhibit higher glycerol conversion(99%)and lactic acid selectivity(82%).It is believed that the large amount of Si remaining on the surface of TiO2after SBA-15 etching will form B acid sites,and the reaction with NaOH will form L acid sites,both of which can promote the dehydration of primary hydroxyl groups of glycerol,thus improving the selectivity of lactic acid 。
the metal-support strong interaction(SMSI)exists in the noble metal-reducible oxide system,which can change the geometric and electronic structure of the metal[90]。 Pan et al.Prepared Au/ZnO catalyst by precipitation deposition(DP)and controlled the air heat treatment condition(Au/ZnODP-Air),which produced strong SMSI between the ZnO layer and Au nanoparticles[91]。 The results show that ZnO migrates to the surface of Au nanoparticles during air heat treatment,forming Au-O-Zn interfaces as well as a large number of oxygen vacancies.The secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol can be adsorbed and activated on the generated interfacial site,resulting in higher DHA selectivity(Fig.7).Specifically,the secondary hydroxyl groups of glycerol are dissociatively adsorbed on the oxygen vacancy defects at the Au/ZnO interface to form adsorbed(R2)CHO*and H*species.Therefore,the preparation of this interfacial structure is an effective strategy to achieve the selective conversion of glycerol 。
图7 Au/ZnO界面仲羟基氧化的机理[91]

Fig. 7 Proposed mechanism of secondary alcohol group oxidation at the Au/ZnO interface[91]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier

Metal oxide perovskites,with their high structural tolerance,are ideal materials for studying how changes in the chemical composition of the support affect the performance of catalysts.Evans et al.Used LaBO3perovskite(where B=Cr,Mn,Fe,Co or Ni)as a support to prepare bimetallic AuPt nanocatalysts for glycerol oxidation[92]。 By changing the B site,the catalytic activity and selectivity of the catalyst change significantly with the oxygen adsorption capacity.For example,the selectivity of the AuPt/LaMnO3catalyst to glyceric acid was 70%,while the selectivity of the AuPt/LaCrO3catalyst to lactic acid was 86%under the same reaction conditions 。

4.4 Other carrier

In recent years,two-dimensional layered materials such as layered bimetallic hydroxides(LDHs)and layered rare earth hydroxides(LREHs)have also been explored as carriers for the aerobic oxidation of glycerol[93][94]
LREHs are a new type of rare earth materials with two-dimensional layered structure,which are composed of host layers of rare earth metal hydroxides rich in positive charges and guest anions between layers[95]。 At present,there are few reports on the use of LREH materials in the field of catalysis,which needs to be further developed.Wang et al.Prepared a series of uniform LREH(RE=Y,La,Pr,Nd,Sm,Eu,Gd,Tb,Dy,Ho,Er and Tm)nanosheets by reverse microemulsion method,and then loaded Au catalyst(Au/LREO)by precipitation-deposition method[94]。 The catalytic activity and structural characterization of Au/LREO showed that the type of rare earth ions played a key role in the particle size,valence and reducibility of Au,which was an important factor affecting the catalytic activity of Au in the conversion of glycerol.Au/LPrO showed the best performance,including the highest glycerol conversion(68.2%),lactic acid selectivity(66.8%),and C3 product selectivity(90.6%).In fact,the ultra-small size(∼3 nm),high Au0component content,and high reducibility of gold particles are the necessary prerequisites for achieving the excellent catalytic performance of Au/LPrO 。

5 Catalyst deactivation and regeneration

As mentioned above,noble metal catalysts are suitable for the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid in a liquid phase system.However,the catalyst after the reaction can not be reused due to excessive oxidation,strong adsorption and deactivation of products or by-products,metal leaching or metal sintering[37,39,96]。 The most frequently reported type of deactivation is catalyst deactivation due to excessive oxidation[62]。 Chemisorbed oxygen can form strong M—O or M—OH bonds that partially cover the metal surface,resulting in over-oxidation of the catalyst.the coverage of surface adsorbed oxygen depends on the relative affinity of the metal for oxygen and the organic substrate,as well as the pH,solvent,temperature,and oxygen partial pressure of the reaction.This dynamic redox equilibrium controls the reaction rate,and as the substrate concentration decreases,the reaction equilibrium shifts toward high oxygen coverage,poisoning the catalyst[10]。 Metals with high redox potential are not easily oxidized,so the order of oxidation resistance In common noble metal catalysts is Au>Pt>Pd.Au-based catalysts can react at higher oxygen pressures without showing signs of catalyst deactivation.When using Pt or Pd-based catalysts,it is necessary to use a lower oxygen pressure or even atmospheric pressure to prevent over-oxidation.in addition,under acidic conditions,undissociated organic acids(such as glyceric acid)are strongly adsorbed on the active sites of the catalyst,which increases surface peroxidation and is more likely to cause deactivation。
Researchers have made many efforts to solve the deactivation problem,including optimizing the composition and structure of the catalyst.Zhang et al.Found that doping N in the carbon support could enhance the activity and stability of Pt nanoparticles,because N provided its electrons to the metal Pt,which enhanced the interaction between the carbon support and the metal[82]。 Sun et al.Encapsulated Pt nanoparticles with a carbon film to overcome the sintering,leaching,and over-oxidation of Pt nanoparticles during the reaction[63]。 in addition,the carbon film can also prevent the strong adsorption of organic carboxylic acids on the Pt surface.Au is used in bimetallic catalysts to stabilize other metals,prevent the leaching of metals and improve the life of the catalyst.By using the bimetallic active phase Au-Pt or Au-Pd,the catalyst can be recycled five times without a decrease in activity and lactic acid selectivity[31,52]
In general,the development of heterogeneous catalysts for the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid is still a challenging task.While ensuring the high activity of glycerol conversion and the high selectivity of lactic acid,it is necessary to focus on the development of recoverable and recyclable catalysts。

6 Conclusion and prospect

At present,the production of lactic acid mainly depends on biological fermentation,but this method has the problems of harsh reaction conditions,serious environmental pollution and low production efficiency.Compared with the biological fermentation method,the bio-based glycerol catalytic conversion method has the advantages of mild reaction conditions and environmentally friendly production process.in this paper,the research progress of selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid over noble metal catalysts is reviewed.Firstly,the reaction mechanism of glycerol conversion to lactic acid was briefly introduced,including hydrothermal conversion,selective oxidation and electrocatalytic oxidation.It is worth mentioning that the conversion of glycerol in methanol system avoids the tedious process of phase separation and purification in aqueous reaction system;Then,the effects of noble metal catalysts,such as Au-based catalysts and Pt-based catalysts,on the selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid were introduced and reviewed.Oxidative dehydrogenation is the key step in the catalytic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid,and noble metals and their alloys have significant activity in the dehydrogenation of glycerol;Finally,from the perspective of catalyst design,the effects of support types and properties on the catalyst activity were analyzed,and the deactivation mechanism of the catalyst was discussed,and the introduction of appropriate functional sites was the key to obtain excellent catalytic performance.At present,although great progress has been made in the design and structural regulation of catalysts for selective oxidation of glycerol to lactic acid,future research and industrial applications still face the following opportunities and challenges:
(1)glycerol oxidation reaction network is complex,focusing on the theoretical system and technical methods of"precise catalysis"to achieve directional activation of glycerol is the main research direction to improve the selectivity of lactic acid.Specifically,the role of metal active sites in the oxidation of primary and secondary hydroxyl groups of glycerol needs to be explored In depth.Especially for noble metal catalysts,it is necessary to further clarify the effect of metal-support interface on hydroxyl activation,so as to determine the best metal type and metal loading form,and to improve and optimize the catalyst preparation strategy.in addition,most of the high-activity and high-selectivity catalysts are still based on precious metal catalysts,but the cost of industrial application is extremely high.the amount of noble metal is reduced,and the design and synthesis concept of monoatomic or atomic-scale dispersed supported metal catalysts is introduced into the system catalyst to prepare noble metal monoatomic or diatomic catalysts,which is expected to further improve the reaction selectivity while reducing the cost of noble metals.in addition,the design and development of non-precious metal catalysts is still the best choice to reduce costs.the concept of noble metal compounds(such as nitrogen,phosphorus,carbon and other compounds)or high-entropy alloys can be introduced into the development of transition metal catalysts to solve the problem of low activity of transition metals,which will be an important development direction for the research and development of efficient glycerol conversion catalysts in the future。
(2)Lewis acid plays an important role in the catalytic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid,which can achieve high yield of lactic acid under alkali-free conditions.The incorporation of tetravalent Sn4+metal ions into the silica framework is an effective strategy for the synthesis of Lewis acid catalysts and exhibits remarkable activity and selectivity.Nevertheless,the large-scale use of this material still faces some important problems.From the perspective of material synthesis,exploring new synthesis methods,increasing the introduction of framework Sn species to improve Lewis acidity,and preparing hierarchical pore molecular sieves to improve mass transfer and accessibility of active sites are major challenges for the effective use of molecular sieves in biomass conversion.Currently,characterization of the acidity and redox properties of molecular sieves usually relies on the adsorption of probe molecules interacting with active sites,while studies on the adsorption of active sites in solvent media are limited,and in situ characterization techniques and methods need to be developed in the future to better understand the behavior of active sites in liquid-phase catalysis 。
(3)the precise construction of catalyst functional sites and the synergistic mechanism of active sites are the research frontiers in the field of biomass catalysis.to further analyze the structure-activity relationship,advanced in situ characterization techniques and theoretical simulation calculations are needed to clarify the interaction mechanism between reactants and active sites from the molecular and atomic perspectives.in addition,noble metal catalysts are often deactivated due to metal leaching or poisoning in liquid phase reaction systems.It is an important research direction to develop low-cost,high-selectivity and high-stability catalysts by combining experimental characterization and theoretical calculation to analyze the poisoning process and deactivation reasons of active sites from a microscopic point of view。
[1]
Arcanjo M R A, da Silva I J Jr, Cavalcante C L Jr, Iglesias J, Morales G, Paniagua M, Melero J A, Vieira R S. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin., 2020, 14(2): 357.

[2]
Liu Y J, Zhong B Q, Lawal A. RSC Adv., 2022, 12(43): 27997.

[3]
Koranian P, Huang Q, Dalai A K, Sammynaiken R. Catalysts, 2022, 12(8): 897.

[4]
Tang C, Li S M, Yu S S. Chinese J. Mol. Catal., 2022, 36(4): 398.

(唐成, 李双明, 于三三. 分子催化, 2022, 36(4): 398.)

[5]
Dodekatos G, Schünemann S, Tüysüz H. ACS Catal., 2018, 8(7): 6301.

[6]
Ghaffar T, Irshad M, Anwar Z, Aqil T, Zulifqar Z, Tariq A, Kamran M, Ehsan N, Mehmood S. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci., 2014, 7(2): 222.

[7]
Wang K, Yang Z Y, Ma Y Y, Zhao W, Sun J Y, Lu T L, He H. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin., 2022, 16(5): 1428.

[8]
Dusselier M, Van Wouwe P, Dewaele A, Makshina E, Sels B F. Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6(5): 1415.

[9]
Zavrazhnov S A, Esipovich A L, Danov S M, Zlobin S Y, Belousov A S. Kinet. Catal., 2018, 59(4): 459.

[10]
Zhou C H C, Beltramini J N, Fan Y X, Max Lu G Q. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37(3): 527.

[11]
Demirel-Gülen S, Lucas M, Claus P. Catal. Today, 2005, 102: 166.

[12]
Gupta G, Roling L T. ChemCatChem, 2023, 15(2): e202201188.

[13]
Yang L H, Li X W, Chen P, Hou Z Y. Chin. J. Catal.-Eur. J., 2019, 40(7): 1020.

[14]
Akbulut D, Özkar S. RSC Adv., 2022, 12(29): 18864.

[15]
Shen Y H, Zhang S H, Li H J, Ren Y, Liu H C. Chem. - Eur. J., 2010, 16(25): 7368.

[16]
Lu T L, Fu X M, Zhou L P, Su Y L, Yang X M, Han L, Wang J F, Song C Y. ACS Catal., 2017, 7(10): 7274.

[17]
Kishida H, Jin F M, Zhou Z Y, Moriya T, Enomoto H. Chem. Lett., 2005, 34(11): 1560.

[18]
Shen Z, Jin F M, Zhang Y L, Wu B, Kishita A, Tohji K, Kishida H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48(19): 8920.

[19]
Sharninghausen L S, Campos J, Manas M G, Crabtree R H. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 5084.

[20]
Xu S G, Tian Q, Xiao Y, Zhang W Y, Liao S Q, Li J M, Hu C W. J. Catal., 2022, 413: 407.

[21]
Chen L, Ren S J, Ye X P. Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, 120: 40.

[22]
Tang Z C, Liu P, Cao H T, Bals S, Heeres H J, Pescarmona P P. ACS Catal., 2019, 9(11): 9953.

[23]
Lakshmanan P, Upare P P, Le N T, Hwang Y K, Hwang D W, Lee U H, Kim H R, Chang J S. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2013, 468: 260.

[24]
Xu J L, Zhang H Y, Zhao Y F, Yu B, Chen S, Li Y B, Hao L D, Liu Z M. Green Chem., 2013, 15(6): 1520.

[25]
Cho H J, Chang C C, Fan W. Green Chem., 2014, 16(7): 3428.

[26]
Tao M L, Zhang D, Deng X, Li X Y, Shi J Y, Wang X H. Chem. Commun., 2016, 52(16): 3332.

[27]
Feng S X, Takahashi K, Miura H, Shishido T. Fuel Process. Technol., 2020, 197: 106202.

[28]
Komanoya T, Suzuki A, Nakajima K, Kitano M, Kamata K, Hara M. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8(6): 1094.

[29]
Kano E, Aihara T, Ghampson I T, Nogami T, Miura H, Shishido T. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2022, 10(37): 12072.

[30]
Pazhavelikkakath Purushothaman R K, Van Haveren J, Melián- Cabrera I, van Eck E R H, Heeres H J. ChemSusChem, 2014, 7(4): 1140.

[31]
Purushothaman R K P, van Haveren J, van Es D S, Melián-Cabrera I, Meeldijk J D, Heeres H J. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2014, 147: 92.

[32]
Pescarmona P P, Janssen K P F, Delaet C, Stroobants C, Houthoofd K, Philippaerts A, De Jonghe C, Paul J S, Jacobs P A, Sels B F. Green Chem., 2010, 12(6): 1083.

[33]
Li L, Collard X, Bertrand A, Sels B F, Pescarmona P P, Aprile C. J. Catal., 2014, 314: 56.

[34]
Lux S, Stehring P, Siebenhofer M. Sep. Sci. Technol., 2010, 4512-13: 1921.

[35]
Dai C C, Sun L B, Liao H B, Khezri B, Webster R D, Fisher A C, Xu Z J. J. Catal., 2017, 356: 14.

[36]
Yan Y F, Wang Q Y, Hao P J, Zhou H, Kong X G, Li Z H, Shao M F. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15(19): 23265.

[37]
He Z Y, Ning X M, Yang G X, Wang H J, Cao Y H, Peng F, Yu H. Catal. Today, 2021, 365: 162.

[38]
Yang H L, Li G G, Jiang G X, Zhang Z S, Hao Z P. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 325: 122384.

[39]
Villa A, Dimitratos N, Chan-Thaw C E, Hammond C, Prati L, Hutchings G J. Acc. Chem. Res., 2015, 48(5): 1403.

[40]
Davis S E, Ide M S, Davis R J. Green Chem., 2013, 15(1): 17.

[41]
Della Pina C, Falletta E, Rossi M. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41(1): 350.

[42]
Hashmi A S K. Chem. Rev., 2007, 107(7): 3180.

[43]
Meng Y, Zou S H, Zhou Y H, Yi W Z, Yan Y, Ye B, Xiao L P, Liu J J, Kobayashi H, Fan J. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8(14): 3704.

[44]
Biella S, Prati L, Rossi M. J. Catal., 2002, 206(2): 242.

[45]
Bianchi C, Porta F, Prati L, Rossi M. Top. Catal., 2000, 13(3): 231.

[46]
Ketchie W C, Murayama M, Davis R J. J. Catal., 2007, 250(2): 264.

[47]
Redina E A, Kirichenko O A, Greish A A, Kucherov A V, Tkachenko O P, Kapustin G I, Mishin I V, Kustov L M. Catal. Today, 2015, 246: 216.

[48]
Zope B N, Hibbitts D D, Neurock M, Davis R J. Science, 2010, 330(6000): 74.

[49]
Purushothaman R K P, van Haveren J, Mayoral A, Melián-Cabrera I, Heeres H J. Top. Catal., 2014, 57(17): 1445.

[50]
Shen Y H, Li Y M, Liu H C. J. Energy Chem., 2015, 24(5): 669.

[51]
Tang Z C, Fiorilli S L, Heeres H J, Pescarmona P P. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6(8): 10923.

[52]
Tang Z C, Boer D G, Syariati A, Enache M, Rudolf P, Heeres H J, Pescarmona P P. Green Chem., 2019, 21(15): 4115.

[53]
Zhou L P, Xu Y Y, Yang X M, Lu T L, Han L. Energy Convers. Manag., 2019, 196: 277.

[54]
Bruno A M, Chagas C A, Souza M M V M, Manfro R L. Renew. Energy, 2018, 118: 160.

[55]
Ftouni J, Villandier N, Auneau F, Besson M, Djakovitch L, Pinel C. Catal. Today, 2015, 257: 267.

[56]
Checa M, Auneau F, Hidalgo-Carrillo J, Marinas A, Marinas J M, Pinel C, Urbano F J. Catal. Today, 2012, 196(1): 91.

[57]
Wu G D, Liu Y N, He Y F, Feng J T, Li D Q. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2021, 291: 120061.

[58]
Zhang C, Wang T, Ding Y J. Catal. Lett., 2017, 147(5): 1197.

[59]
Oberhauser W, Evangelisti C, Tiozzo C, Vizza F, Psaro R. ACS Catal., 2016, 6(3): 1671.

[60]
An Z, Zhang Z L, Huang Z Y, Han H B, Song B B, Zhang J, Ping Q, Zhu Y R, Song H Y, Wang B, Zheng L R, He J. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13: 5467.

[61]
Li Y, Zaera F. J. Catal., 2015, 326: 116.

[62]
Lei J Q, Dong H, Duan X Z, Chen W Y, Qian G, Chen D, Zhou X G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55(2): 420.

[63]
Sun Y Y, Li X W, Wang J G, Ning W S, Fu J, Lu X Y, Hou Z Y. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2017, 218: 538.

[64]
Zhang C, Wang T, Liu X, Ding Y J. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem., 2016, 424: 91.

[65]
Zhang G Y, Jin X, Guan Y N, Yin B, Chen X B, Liu Y B, Feng X, Shan H H, Yang C H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019, 58(31): 14548.

[66]
Li Y B, Chen S, Xu J L, Zhang H Y, Zhao Y F, Wang Y B, Liu Z M. CLEAN, 2014, 42(8): 1140.

[67]
Rinaudo M G, Beltrán A M, Fernández A, Cadús L E, Morales M R. Results Eng., 2022, 16: 100737.

[68]
Marques F L, Oliveira A C, Mendes Filho J, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Cavalcante C L, Vieira R S. Fuel Process. Technol., 2015, 138: 228.

[69]
Arcanjo M R A, Silva I J, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Infantes-Molina A, Vieira R S. Catal. Today, 2017, 279: 317.

[70]
Shen L Q, Yu Z Y, Zhang D, Yin H B, Wang C T, Wang A L. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2019, 94(1): 204.

[71]
Ten S A, Kurmanova M D, Kurmanbayeva K, Torbina V V, Stonkus O A, Vodyankina O V. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2024, 674: 119603.

[72]
Li Y, Nielsen M, Li B, Dixneuf P H, Junge H, Beller M. Green Chem., 2015, 17(1): 193.

[73]
Wang S, Yin K H, Zhang Y C, Liu H C. ACS Catal., 2013, 3(9): 2112.

[74]
Jiang Z W, Zhang Z R, Wu T B, Zhang P, Song J L, Xie C, Han B X. Chem., 2017, 12(13): 1598.

[75]
Pemmana H R, Barnwal P K, Uppaluri R V, Peela N R. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2023, 124: 224.

[76]
Lari G M, García-Muelas R, Mondelli C, López N, Pérez-Ramírez J. Green Chem., 2016, 18(17): 4682.

[77]
Tao M L, Zhang D, Guan H Y, Huang G H, Wang X H. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 29840.

[78]
Gong Y T, Xie L, Chen C H, Liu J R, Antonietti M, Wang Y. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2023, 132: 101048.

[79]
Zhang M Y, Liang D, Nie R F, Lu X Y, Chen P, Hou Z Y. Chin. J. Catal., 2012, 33(7-8): 1340.

[80]
Schiros T, Nordlund D, Pálová L, Prezzi D, Zhao L Y, Kim K S, Wurstbauer U, Gutiérrez C, Delongchamp D, Jaye C, Fischer D, Ogasawara H, Pettersson L G M, Reichman D R, Kim P, Hybertsen M S, Pasupathy A N. Nano Lett., 2012, 12(8): 4025.

[81]
Chen S S, Qi P Y, Chen J, Yuan Y Z. RSC Adv., 2015, 5(40): 31566.

[82]
Zhang M Y, Shi J J, Sun Y Y, Ning W S, Hou Z Y. Catal. Commun., 2015, 70: 72.

[83]
Sun Q M, Wang N, Yu J H. Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(51): 2104442.

[84]
Suib S L, Přech J, Szaniawska E, Čejka J. Chem. Rev., 2023, 123(3): 877.

[85]
Xia Y Q, Wu K Y, Liu C, Zhao X J, Wang J, Cao J X, Chen Z X, Fang M C, Yu J, Zhu C, Zhang X H, Wang Z L. Adv. Sci., 2024, 11(10): 2306533.

[86]
Asgar Pour Z, Boer D G, Fang S, Tang Z C, Pescarmona P P. Catalysts, 2021, 11(11): 1346.

[87]
Tang B, Wang D, Li A, Tang H M, Yang E C, Dai W L. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2023, 347: 112348.

[88]
Cho H J, Dornath P, Fan W. ACS Catal., 2014, 4(6): 2029.

[89]
Douthwaite M, Powell N, Taylor A, Ford G, López J M, Solsona B, Yang N T, Sanahuja-Parejo O, He Q, Morgan D J, Garcia T, Taylor S H. ChemCatChem, 2020, 12(11): 3097.

[90]
Ide M S, Davis R J. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47(3): 825.

[91]
Pan Y N, Wu G D, He Y F, Feng J T, Li D Q. J. Catal., 2019, 369: 222.

[92]
Evans C D, Kondrat S A, Smith P J, Manning T D, Miedziak P J, Brett G L, Armstrong R D, Bartley J K, Taylor S H, Rosseinsky M J, Hutchings G J. Faraday Discuss., 2016, 188: 427.

[93]
An Z, Ma H H, Han H B, Huang Z Y, Jiang Y T, Wang W L, Zhu Y R, Song H Y, Shu X, Xiang X, He J. ACS Catal., 2020, 10(21): 12437.

[94]
Wang C Y, Zhang X Q, Li J F, Qi X Y, Guo Z Y, Wei H, Chu H B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13(1): 522.

[95]
Gándara F, Perles J, Snejko N, Iglesias M, Gómez-Lor B, Gutiérrez-Puebla E, Monge M Á. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45(47): 7998.

[96]
Razali N, Abdullah A Z. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2017, 543: 234.

Outlines

/