Raman Spectroscopy in the Detection of Environmental Micro- and Nanoplastics: Applications and Challenges
Received date: 2024-07-10
Revised date: 2024-08-26
Online published: 2025-01-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22241601)
This review highlights the advantages and research advancements of Raman spectroscopy in detecting micro- and nanoplastics in the environment. With the worsening issue of microplastic pollution, particularly its widespread presence in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, Raman spectroscopy has emerged as a non-destructive, high-resolution analytical technique widely employed for identifying and quantitatively analyzing micro- and nanoplastics. This is attributed to its unique spectral characteristics and reduced susceptibility to water interference compared to infrared spectroscopy. The strengths of Raman spectroscopy in detecting micro- and nanoplastics lie in its high spatial resolution, broad spectral range, and exceptional sensitivity. However, challenges such as fluorescence interference and low signal-to-noise ratios persist in the detection process. To enhance Raman signals, researchers have introduced various approaches, including sample pretreatment, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and nonlinear Raman spectroscopy techniques. Furthermore, this paper underscores the necessity of building a comprehensive Raman spectroscopy database to boost detection accuracy and efficiency. Future research directions include developing more effective preprocessing methods, dynamically monitoring the behavior of micro- and nanoplastics, and integrating intelligent detection systems.
1 Introduction
2 Raman spectroscopy methods for micro-and nanoplastics
2.1 Basic principles and conventional Raman spectroscopy
2.2 Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)
2.3 Coherent Raman spectroscopy (CRS)
2.4 Raman imaging
3 Identification in environmental samples with Raman spectroscopy
3.1 Fluorescence interference and its elimination
3.2 Machine learning applications with Raman spectral databases
4 Quantitative Analysis
4.1 In situ concentration and mass concentration
4.2 Number concentration via µ-Raman and imaging
5 Conclusion and outlook
Kefu Ye , Minjie Xie , Xingqi Chen , Zhiyu Zhu , Shixiang Gao . Raman Spectroscopy in the Detection of Environmental Micro- and Nanoplastics: Applications and Challenges[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2025 , 37(1) : 2 -15 . DOI: 10.7536/PC240710
Figure 1 (a) A "coffee ring" was formed on the surface enhanced substrate of klarite; (b) Schematic diagram of enhanced Raman signal on colloidal surface of metal nanoparticles; (c) Two kinds of coherent Raman spectrum mechanism diagrams; (d) Schematic diagram of Raman spectral imagingFig. 1 (a) Schematic diagram of the formation of “coffee ring” on Klarite surface-enhanced substrates ;(b) Schematic diagram of the colloidal surface-enhanced Raman signals of metal nanoparticles; (c) Mechanism of the two coherent Raman spectra; (d) Schematic diagram of Raman spectroscopic imaging |
Table 1 Application of metal nano array substrate in the detection of micro nano plasticsTable 1 The application of metal nanoarray substrates in the detection of micro- and nanoplastics |
Class | SERS material or structure | Target | Dispersed System | Limit of detection | Excitation wavelength | ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-membrance pattern | Klarite | PS, PMMA≥360 nm | Pure water | Single nanoplastic | 785 nm | 35 | |
PET, PMMA≥450 nm | Atmospheric Aerosols | ||||||
SiO2 PC@Ag | PS 100~1000 nm | Pure water | Single nanoplastic | 633 nm | 36 | ||
Bottled, river, and tap water spiked samlpes | 5 µg/g | ||||||
AAO/MoS2/Ag | PS 100~300 nm | Pure water | - | 532 nm | 37 | ||
Au/Ag triangular cavity array | PS 50~1000 nm | Pure water | 10 µg/g | 532 nm | 38 | ||
PET 88.2 nm | Bottled water | - | |||||
Ag/ZnO@PDMS | PS 800 nm | Pure water | 25 µg/mL | 785 nm | 39 | ||
Spiked samples of tap water, lake water, river water, seawater | Tap water 25 µg/mL;lake water 28 µg/mL;river water 35 µg/mL; Seawater 60 µg/mL | ||||||
Non-membrance pattern | AuNPs@V-shaped AAO | PS, PMMA≥1 µm | Pure water | Single particle | 785 nm | 40 | |
PS≥2 µm | Spiked samples of rain water | ||||||
Au nanoparticles self-assembled on a glass slide | PS 161 nm; 33 nm PET 62 nm | Pure water | PS 10 µg/mL PET 15 µg/mL | 785 nm | 32 | ||
Silver-coated gold nanostars inserted into anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) nanopore | PS≥400 nm | Pure water | 50 µg/mL | 633 nm | 41 | ||
Spiked samples of tap water, river water and seawater | 500 µg/mL | ||||||
Membrane pattern | Gold nanorods assembled on cellulose | PS 84 nm;630 nm | Pure water | 100 µg/mL | 785 nm | 42 | |
Au-AAO membrance | PS 360 nm, 500 nm, 1 µm, 2 µm, 5 µm; PMMA 360 nm, 500 nm, 2 µm, 5 µm | Pure water | Single particle | 785 nm | 43 | ||
PS PE≥360 nm | Sea salt | ||||||
Au nanoparticles self-assembled on filter paper | PET≥20 µm | Pure water | 100 µg/mL | 532 nm | 44 | ||
Spiked samples of tap water and pool water | |||||||
Self-assembly of spiked Au nanoparticles on glass fiber filter membrane | PS 20~10000 nm | Pure water | 0.1 µg/mL | 785 nm | 45 | ||
Spiked samples of tap water and rain water | |||||||
Silver Nanowire Membrane | PS 50~1000 nm | Pure water | 10-3 µg/mL | 785 nm | 46 | ||
seawater | - |
Table 2 Application of metal nanoparticles colloid in the detection of micro nano plasticsTable 2 The application of metal nanoparticle colloids in the detection of micro- and nanoplastics |
SERS material | Target | Dispersed System | Limit of detection | Excitation wavelength | Detection environment | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag nanoparticles solution | PS 20~5000 nm | Pure water | 5 µg/mL | 785 nm | Direct determination in solution | 47 |
Spiked samples of rain water and bottled water | ||||||
Ag nanoparticles solution | PS≥100 nm | Pure water | 40 µg/mL | 785 nm | 34 | |
Spiked of seawater | 40 µg/mL | |||||
Ag nanoparticles solution | PS 50~500 nm | Pure water | 6.25 µg/mL | 785 nm | 48 | |
Spiked of lake water | - | |||||
Ag nanoparticles | PS 20 nm | Pure water | 10 µg/mL | 785 nm | Drying after mixing | 49 |
CuO/Ag nanoparticles | PE 400 µm | Pure water | 1.6 ng/mL | 532 nm | 50 | |
Au nanourchins | PS 600 nm | Pure water | - | 785 nm | 51 |
Table 3 An algorithm for transforming hyperspectral signals in Raman imaging analysis of micro/nano plasticsTable 3 Algorithm for transforming hyperspectral signals in Raman imaging analysis of micro- and nanoplastics. |
Class | Algorithm | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
Threshold determination | Otsu's algorithm | Automatic, simple, and fast identification Applicable to both bright field and dark field microscopy Suitable for different particle sizes, shapes, colors, and transparency | Insensitive to contrast between particles and background Unable to distinguish fibers from aggregates | 82 |
Multi-image merging | Logic-based | Cross-validation of different characteristic peak signals Effectively shields interference signals High accuracy in mapping | Complex processing workflow | 79 |
Algebraic | Algebra-based | High computational flexibility Ability to integrate with other algorithms | Failure to consider varying contributions of different peaks Potential signal loss issues | 83 |
Multivariate | Principal Component Analysis(PCA) | Effective extraction of critical information Independent of standard Raman spectra | Significant background interference Lower accuracy | 84 |
PCA-linear discriminant analysis | Automatic identification of polymer types High accuracy in identifying plastic types Applicable to aged microplastics | Issues with signal loss Mismatch in feature changes | 85 | |
Dual-PCA | High signal-to-noise ratio imaging Automatic classification of various polymers Suitable for machine learning | High computational complexity Difficulty in feature selection | 81 | |
Multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares | Analysis in complex backgrounds Samples require no pre-processing | Dependent on constraints High sensitivity to data noise | 86 |
Figure 2 (a) Schematic diagram of fluorescence interference and suppression technology; (b) Schematic diagram of Raman spectrum recognition processing of micro nano plastics in environmental samples through machine learningFig. 2 (a) Schematic diagram of fluorescence interference and suppressed fluorescence techniques; (b) Schematic diagram of Raman spectral recognition processing of micro- and nanoplastics in environmental samples by machine learning. |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
[79] |
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
|
[83] |
|
[84] |
|
[85] |
|
[86] |
|
[87] |
|
[88] |
|
[89] |
|
[90] |
|
[91] |
|
[92] |
|
[93] |
|
[94] |
|
[95] |
|
[96] |
|
[97] |
|
[98] |
|
[99] |
|
[100] |
|
[101] |
|
[102] |
|
[103] |
|
[104] |
|
[105] |
|
[106] |
|
[107] |
|
[108] |
|
[109] |
|
[110] |
|
[111] |
|
[112] |
|
[113] |
|
[114] |
|
[115] |
|
[116] |
|
[117] |
|
[118] |
|
[119] |
|
[120] |
|
[121] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |