Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Interlayer Spacing Regulations on MoS2-Based Supercapacitors: Recent Advances and Challenges

  • Wu Mingyu 1 ,
  • Ma Dongliang , 1, * ,
  • Hua Qingsong , 2, * ,
  • Lu Shun , 3, *
Expand
  • 1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
  • 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • 3 Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China
* (Dongliang Ma);
(Qingsong Hua);
(Shun Lu)

Received date: 2025-06-09

  Revised date: 2025-06-26

  Online published: 2025-07-15

Supported by

The Xinjiang Uygur Automomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project-Key R&D Special Project(2022B02051)

The Semiconductor physics and micro and nano devices Tianshan Innovation team(2023D14001)

The Tianshan Talent Training Project-Xinjiang Science and Technology Innovation Team Program(2023TSYCTD0012)

Abstract

Due to its unique layered structure and excellent electrochemical properties, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) demonstrates significant potential for applications in the energy storage field, particularly in supercapacitors. It is widely regarded as one of the most representative transition metal dichalcogenides. MoS2 possesses a high theoretical specific capacitance, abundant edge active sites, and favorable tunability and structural diversity, which provide it with a distinct advantage in the construction of advanced electrode structures. Additionally, the anisotropic characteristics of MoS2 concerning electron and ion transport offer more dimensions for regulating its electrochemical behavior. This work will systematically review various synthesis strategies for MoS2 and its recent advancements in energy storage, with a particular focus on the mechanisms by which interlayer spacing modulation affects energy storage behavior in supercapacitor configurations. The discussion will encompass a comprehensive logical framework that spans material structure modifications, electronic configuration evolution, and enhancements in macroscopic device performance. This review aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the application of MoS2 in the next generation of high-performance energy storage devices.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Overview of MoS2 as a fundamental electrode material for supercapacitors

3 Synthesis strategies of MoS2

3.1 “Bottom-up” synthesis of MoS2

3.2 “Top-down” synthesis of MoS2

4 Strategy of modulating MoS2 interlayer spacing and the effects on electrochemical properties

4.1 Interlayer agent induces interlayer spacing expansion

4.2 3D structure construction

4.3 Defect engineering

4.4 Other methods to regulate the interlayer spacing of MoS2

4.5 Theoretical understanding

5 Summary and outlook

Cite this article

Wu Mingyu , Ma Dongliang , Hua Qingsong , Lu Shun . Interlayer Spacing Regulations on MoS2-Based Supercapacitors: Recent Advances and Challenges[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2025 , 37(9) : 1235 -1260 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20250605

1 Introduction

As the global population expands and industrial processes accelerate, issues related to energy crises and environmental pollution have become increasingly prominent[1-2]. In light of the "dual carbon" objectives, the transformation of energy structures and the development of efficient renewable energy sources have emerged as pivotal areas for scientific and technological advancement globally[3]. Sustainable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and tidal power, are gaining widespread recognition for their low-carbon attributes. However, these energy sources are inherently intermittent and unstable, rendering their practical application highly sensitive to external factors, including geographical location and climatic conditions. Consequently, power fluctuations in the grid present a significant challenge[4]. Thus, establishing reliable, durable, and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions is crucial for addressing the challenges associated with renewable energy sources. Among various energy storage technologies, electrochemical energy storage has attracted considerable interest due to its high energy conversion efficiency, rapid response times, and adaptable modular design. Batteries and supercapacitors are two prominent types of energy storage devices[5]. While batteries offer high energy density, their relatively slow electron and ion transport rates lead to low power density. Additionally, under high current discharge conditions, batteries may generate substantial heat, posing safety risks[6]. Conversely, supercapacitors have significant application potential in scenarios requiring short-term, high-power output[7-8]. The electrochemical performance of supercapacitors is largely influenced by the properties of the electrode materials. Currently, mainstream electrode materials can be classified into three categories[9]: carbon-based materials, conducting polymers[10], and transition metal oxides/sulfides[11-12]. Although carbon-based systems demonstrate excellent charge transport properties and corrosion resistance, they primarily rely on electrostatic charge accumulation at interfaces and lack sufficient Faradaic reaction centers, which limits their energy density enhancement. Conducting polymers store energy through redox reactions but suffer from poor cycling and mechanical stability. Transition metal oxides, while exhibiting excellent pseudocapacitive properties, often face challenges such as limited transport efficiency and significant structural degradation with repeated use. Therefore, the search for novel 2D electrode materials that achieve a balance of high capacitance, rapid rate capability, and long cycling life has become a central focus in contemporary electrochemical energy storage[13-14].
Despite notable advancements in the application of MXenes and graphene for supercapacitors, their further development encounters significant hurdles. MXenes are limited by a narrow electrochemical window and inadequate ion transport, complicating the simultaneous optimization of energy density and rate capability[15]. Although graphene boasts exceptional electrical conductivity, its strong sp2 interlayer bonding severely limits the dynamic adjustment of interlayer spacing, thereby constraining the enhancement of intercalation pseudocapacitance[16]. In this context, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have rapidly gained attention as a prominent research area, owing to their tunable band structures and unique quantum properties that set them apart from bulk materials[17]. These unique characteristics position TMDs as promising candidates for diverse applications, including electronics, optoelectronics, and energy storage[18]. Among them, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has emerged as a highly investigated representative, evidenced by a notable increase in research activity since 2013 and a consistent rise in scholarly output (Fig. 1). As a 2D semiconductor, MoS2 exhibits a high theoretical specific capacitance, a tunable bandgap, and abundant edge-active sites, making it highly suitable for electrochemical energy storage[19]. Notably, the presence of multiple polymorphs, including the semiconducting 2H phase and metallic 1T phase, imparts tunable electronic properties to MoS2, enhancing its potential for use in electrochemical energy storage devices, such as Li/Na-ion cells and various catalytic systems. However, MoS2 faces several critical challenges in practical applications. First, the natural 2H phase is semiconducting and has poor electrical conductivity, limiting its high-rate performance[20-21]; Second, the layered structure maintained by van der Waals forces leads to significant restacking between layers, resulting in underutilization of active sites and hindering ion diffusion, thus diminishing both capacity and cycling stability. Additionally, multilayer MoS2 often experiences structural collapse and volume expansion in electrolyte, further compromising its energy storage capabilities[22-23]. Therefore, it is essential to enhance structural stability and optimize charge and ion mobility in MoS2 while retaining its intrinsic layered advantages[24-25]. Various strategies have emerged to improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2, including heterostructure fabrication, surface functionalization, defect engineering, and phase transformation[26-28].
图1 Web of Science相关出版物的数量:(a) MoS2, (b)MoS2及其用于超级电容器的纳米复合材料 (统计时间:2025年6月)

Fig.1 Recent publications across Web of Science: (a) MoS2, (b) MoS2 and their nanocomposites for supercapacitor (June 2025)

Among the various strategies for structural optimization, interlayer spacing engineering has garnered significant attention[29-30]. Increasing the interlayer distance in MoS2 can markedly improve the kinetics of ion intercalation and deintercalation, accelerate diffusion rates, lower diffusion barriers, and create more accessible space for electrolyte ions, thus enhancing pseudocapacitive performance[31-33]. Theoretical studies indicate that broader interlayer spacing effectively reduces the intercalation energy for multivalent ions, thereby improving both thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics of energy storage. Furthermore, expanded interlayer spacing helps prevent layer restacking, maintains sheet dispersion, increases surface area, and enhances electrolyte wettability, all of which facilitate charge transport and storage. Various methods have been developed to modulate the interlayer spacing of MoS2, including the intercalation of guest species such as organic molecules, metal ions, and hydrated ions; heteroatom doping; and phase transformation. These approaches not only structurally increase the interlayer distance but also synergistically enhance electrical conductivity, structural integrity, and electrochemical activity[34-36]. MoS2-based supercapacitor electrodes engineered through interlayer spacing regulation have exhibited improved specific capacitance, enhanced rate capability, and superior cycling stability, demonstrating considerable potential for flexible electronics and micro-scale energy storage devices[37-38].
MoS2 is widely recognized as a promising candidate for supercapacitor electrodes due to its unique layered structure and remarkable energy retention capabilities. To address its inherent challenges, such as low electrical conductivity and limited ion diffusion, interlayer spacing engineering has emerged as a crucial strategy for synergistically enhancing both its structural and electrochemical performance[39-41]. Chen et al.[42] studied van der Waals gap engineering and discussed various strategies, including intercalation, doping, and heterostructures, but not establish a cohesive framework that connects structural modifications to performance outcomes. Moreover, their analysis lacked quantitative assessments of how adjustments in interlayer spacing influence ion diffusion barriers and charge redistribution at interfaces. Liu et al.[43] primarily focused on MoS2 but did not provide computational simulations to support findings related to intercalation kinetics or variations in electronic structure. Similarly, Zhang et al.[44] offered a brief overview of fundamental mechanisms such as charge transfer and size effects during intercalation, neglecting practical issues like production stability and long-term performance. In this work, we analyze how integrating various approaches, such as combining intercalation with doping or heterostructures, can enhance performance. Through first-principles calculations, we demonstrate charge transfer during intercalation, changes in chemical bonds at interfaces, and the influence of material dimensions on outcomes. We emphasize the work mechanisms, their effects, and their implications for energy storage applications, while also addressing future challenges and directions in this field.

2 Overview of MoS2 as a fundamental electrode material for supercapacitors

In recent years, MoS2 has attracted considerable interest in various fields such as optoelectronic devices, supercapacitors, catalysis, and lubrication[45-47]. Structurally, MoS2 is a prototypical 2D material characterized by a three-atom-thick "sandwich" configuration, comprising one layer of Mo atoms situated between two layers of S atoms, which are bonded by robust Mo-S covalent bonds. Adjacent trilayers are held together by weaker van der Waals forces[19,48-49]. This layered architecture provides MoS2 with excellent exfoliation capabilities and significant potential for interlayer modifications, making it suitable for electrochemical systems and next-generation electronics. In nature, MoS2 predominantly exists in the 2H phase in bulk form, appearing as a black powder[50]. Bulk MoS2 can be exfoliated through mechanical or liquid-phase methods to yield few-layer (FL-MoS2) or even single-layer (SL-MoS2) nanosheets[51-52]. Compared with bulk MoS2, SL-MoS2 exhibits higher electron mobility and a more direct bandgap structure. Specifically, SL-MoS2 has a direct bandgap of 1.7~1.9 eV, whereas bulk MoS2 exhibits an indirect bandgap of 1.1~1.3 eV, making SL-MoS2 capable of visible-light excitation and well-suited for photocatalysis and optoelectronic applications[53-56]. Additionally, SL-MoS2 displays strong photoluminescence, which is absent in bulk material. At room temperature, SL-MoS2 shows an on/off current ratio as high as 108 and an electron mobility of approximately 200 cm2·V-1·s-1, positioning it as an excellent candidate for next-generation semiconductor technologies[57].
MoS2 displays several polymorphic structures, which are influenced by interlayer stacking modes and intralayer coordination, as illustrated in Fig. 2. The five prevalent polymorphs are 1T, 1T′, 1H, 2H, and 3R, where the numbers denote the number of MoS2 layers in a unit cell, and the letters “T”, “H”, and “R” refer to trigonal, hexagonal, and rhombohedral crystal systems, respectively[58]. Among these, 2H and 3R are naturally occurring phases, while the 1T phase is a metastable structure. 2H-MoS2 represents the most thermodynamically stable form, with each Mo atom coordinated by six S atoms in a trigonal prismatic arrangement, resulting in a hexagonally symmetric bilayer structure that exhibits typical semiconducting properties[59-61]. Its bandgap originates from the energy level difference between the Mo dz2 orbital and the d x 2 - y 2 and dxy orbitals. The 3R phase contains three Mo-S units per unit cell and is also considered metastable, whereas the 1T phase exhibits metallic characteristics with Mo atoms in octahedral coordination. Despite its high electrical conductivity, the 1T phase is unstable and tends to convert to the lower-energy 2H structure[62-63].
图2 MoS2中各种多晶型的原子结构[64]

Fig.2 Atomic structures of various polymorphs in MoS2. Adapted with permission from Ref 64. Copyright 2022 Wiley

It is important to highlight that the phase transitions among various polymorphs of MoS2 can be reversible under specific conditions. For instance, the thermodynamically stable 2H-MoS2 can be transformed into the metallic 1T-MoS2 phase through lithium-ion intercalation combined with ultrasonic exfoliation. The resulting 1T phase can then revert to the 2H structure via laser irradiation or thermal annealing[63]. Moreover, both the 3R and 1T phases are likely to convert to the energetically favorable 2H structure when subjected to elevated temperatures[62]. Owing to the loose interlayer bonding in MoS2, its layers can easily slide over each other, making it highly suitable for solid lubrication applications. Recently, interlayer engineering has emerged as an effective strategy to improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2[65-66]. It is well established that the physical and catalytic properties of solids are influenced by their structural characteristics[67-68]. Among the strategies for interlayer engineering, interlayer spacing is a critical parameter that can modify the electronic structure of MoS2’s active sites and expose additional catalytic centers by adjusting the distance between layers[69].

3 Synthesis strategies of MoS2

The synthesis of MoS2 is primarily divided into two strategies: bottom-up and top-down approaches. Bottom-up methods utilize atomic or molecular precursors, allowing for the direct growth of MoS2 nanostructures under controlled conditions. Conversely, top-down techniques begin with bulk MoS2 and employ mechanical or chemical processes to exfoliate it into few-layer or monolayer forms.

3.1 “Bottom-up” synthesis of MoS2

3.1.1 Hydrothermal method

The hydrothermal method is a widely employed technique for producing 2D MoS2 nanosheets, noted for its simplicity, controllable reaction conditions, and eco-friendliness[70]. The experimental procedure is illustrated in Fig. 3a[71]. The resulting nanosheets typically consist of 5~6 stacked layers (Fig. 3b), providing MoS2 with high adsorption capacity and a large surface area. By varying the hydrothermal reaction time, the morphology of MoS2 can be tailored[72]. Shorter reaction times yield dispersed nanosheets (Fig. 3c, d), whereas prolonged reaction times result in self-assembled, uniform flower-like structures with increased surface exposure.
图3 (a) MoS2的合成,(b) HRTEM[71];(c, d) 不同反应时间下产物的SEM[72];(e) 1T/2H MoS2 PVDF的合成示意图,(f) FESEM[76];(g) 在不同衬底上生长MoS2的AFM图:(h) 蓝宝石,(i) 石墨烯,(j) SiO2[83]

Fig.3 (a) Preparation process of MoS2. (b) HRTEM. Reproduced with permission from Ref 71. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (c, d) SEM analysis of products under different reaction times. Reproduced with permission from Ref 72. Copyright 2015 Elsevier. (e) Schematic representation of the synthesis of 1T/2H MoS2-PVDF. (f) FESEM. Reproduced with permission from Ref 76. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (g) AFM images of MoS2 growth on different substrates: (h) sapphire; (i) graphene; (j) SiO2. Reproduced from Ref 83. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society

3.1.2 Solvothermal method

The solvothermal method, primarily differs by using organic solvents or non-aqueous systems as the reaction medium. This approach offers notable advantages for synthesizing MoS2 hybrids, including increased interfacial area, reduced aggregation, and lower energy requirements[73]. Compared to conventional hydrothermal synthesis, the solvothermal method provides enhanced control over the morphology, crystal structure, and active surface sites of the resulting products[74-75]. For example, one study employed a solvothermal method with organic solvents to synthesize MoS2 Fig. 3e[76], and combined it with polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) to create a 1T/2H-phase MoS2-PVDF nanocomposite membrane. This membrane exhibited excellent structural uniformity, high catalytic reactivity, and remarkable stability, demonstrating outstanding reusability and pollutant degradation efficiency (Fig. 3f). Typically, the solvothermal process is a one-pot synthesis that facilitates high-pressure growth without requiring additional catalysts, thereby minimizing contamination risks and enhancing product uniformity.

3.1.3 Chemical vapor deposition

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a widely utilized “bottom-up” synthesis technique for producing high-quality 2D MoS2 films. This method typically employs molybdenum sources MoO3[77], Mo[78] or (NH42MoS4[79], in combination with sulfur powder or H2S gas as sulfur sources[80], under high temperatures ranging from 700~1000 ℃, these precursors react on substrates like Si/SiO2[81] and sapphire[82] to form MoS2 films. Studies indicate that substrate type and processing temperature significantly influence film structure and integrity. Sitek et al.[83] systematically studied substrate effects on morphology (Fig. 3g~j), finding that graphene substrates form thermodynamically stable triangular MoS2, while SiO2 substrates produce truncated triangular or circular domains. This highlights how substrate surface properties control nucleation behavior.

3.2 “Top-down” synthesis of MoS2

3.2.1 Liquid phase exfoliation method

Liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) is a simple, cost-effective, and scalable method for preparing MoS2 nanosheets. It dissociates bulk MoS2 into single- or few-layer structures through physical/chemical processes. A typical LPE procedure comprises three stages: solvent dispersion, exfoliation, and product purification (Fig. 4a[84]. The process of synthesizing MoS2 using the LPE method is shown in Fig. 4b[85]. The exfoliation mechanism relies on 2-MeIm intercalation between MoS2 layers (Fig. 4c), with the nanosheets exhibiting aggregation-induced photoluminescence at 420~480 nm and semiconductor properties when formed into films.
图4 (a) LPE法合成MoS2 [84];(b) 2-MeIm辅助剥离流程,(c) MoS2剥离机制[85];(d, e) 光学显微图像[86];(f) MSLDH3电荷转移路径[87];(g)电化学剥离的实验装置,(h)剥落过程示意图[88]

Fig.4 (a) LPE synthesis of MoS2. Reproduced from Ref 84. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (b) 2-MeIm assisted process, (c) exfoliation mechanism of MoS2. Reproduced with permission from Ref 85. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (d, e) Optical microscope images. Reproduced with permission from Ref 86. Available under CC-BY 4.0. Copyright 2015 The Authors. (f) Charge transfer path in MSLDH3. Reproduced from Ref 87. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (g) Electrochemical exfoliation setup of MoS2; (h) exfoliation process. Reproduced with permission from Ref 88. Copyright 2014 Elsevier

3.2.2 Solid phase exfoliation

Solid-phase exfoliation is one of the earliest "top-down" methods for preparing high-quality 2D MoS2 nanomaterials. Its principle involves applying external forces to directly peel bulk MoS2 into few-layer or even monolayer nanosheets. This method is simple to operate, and the resulting materials exhibit high purity and good crystalline integrity, making it widely used for studying the intrinsic properties and device performance of MoS2. Magda et al.[86] developed an improved mechanical exfoliation method using chemically enhanced adhesion to produce large-area monolayer MoS2, addressing limitations of traditional tape-based methods (e.g., limited productivity and lateral sizes <10 μm). By leveraging strong interactions between sulfur atoms and gold surfaces, they enhanced adhesion between the bottom MoS2 layer and underlying gold film. This enabled efficient removal of upper multilayers while leaving monolayers firmly attached to the substrate. In Fig. 4d, e: optical microscopy revealed large, darkest-contrast regions (marked by dashed lines) corresponding to monolayer MoS2, surrounded by blue multilayer areas. This method extends beyond MoS2 to other layered materials, generating monolayers spanning hundreds of micrometers.

3.2.3 Electrochemical exfoliation method

Electrochemical exfoliation is an efficient, low-cost, and scalable technique for synthesizing MoS2 nanosheets. Nayak et al. employed cathodic exfoliation (Fig. 4f[87], where Na2MoO4 and thiourea were ultrasonically dispersed and adsorbed onto positively charged NiFe layered double hydroxide (LDH) surfaces. Hydrothermal treatment at 210 ℃ for 24 hours formed interwoven heterostructures. Electrostatic interactions built strongly coupled p-n junction interfaces, while simultaneous hydrothermal exfoliation increased surface area and exposed active sites, suppressing material restacking and promoting spatial separation of photogenerated charges. You et al.[88] developed anodic exfoliation (Fig. 4g) using bulk MoS2 as the anode and platinum wire as the cathode in a sulfuric acid electrolyte. Initially, a +1 V voltage enabled hydroxyl radicals to attack crystal edges and form defects. Then, increasing voltage to +10 V drove SO42-/OH- intercalation between layers (Fig. 4h). Finally, high-pressure gas expansion from embedded ions achieved mechanical exfoliation, yielding mono-/few-layer nanosheets (Table 1).
表1 各种原位合成方法的优缺点

Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of various in situ synthesis methods

Synthesis methods Advantages Disadvantages
Hydrothermal method Suitable for thermally unstable materials.
Controllable morphology and structure.
Green, scalable synthesis.
High equipment cost and safety risks.
Limited process visibility and difficult control.
Long reaction time and high energy consumption.
Solvothermal method Precise morphology control.
Low contamination risk.
High surface area, low aggregation.
Solvent impurities.
Purity issues due to residues.
Not for high-melting/insoluble precursors.
Chemical vapor deposition High-quality crystals.
Controllable size and thickness.
Large-area compatibility.
High cost.
Limited morphology control.
Complex and time-consuming process.
Liquid phase exfoliation method Low-cost and scalable.
Simple process.
High yield.
Safety risks.
Low quality control.
Restacking and degradation.
Solid phase exfoliation Highest quality.
Simple and clean.
Ideal for fundamental research.
Extremely low yield.
Uncontrollable morphology.
Substrate limitation.
Electrochemical exfoliation method High yield & low cost.
Large flake size.
Scalable and continuous production.
Limited property control.
Chemical instability risk.
Process complexity

4 Strategy of modulating MoS2 interlayer spacing and the effects on electrochemical properties

4.1 Interlayer agent induces interlayer spacing expansion

Intercalant-induced interlayer expansion is achieved by introducing external substances into the interlayer spaces of MoS2, disrupting the original van der Waals interactions and expanding the interlayer distance, thereby enhancing ion diffusion efficiency and the exposure of active sites. Based on the structural dimensionality and functional roles of the intercalants, this strategy can be classified into two typical types: ionic intercalants and polymer intercalants. These intercalants not only regulate the interlayer spacing but also influence the electronic structure, interfacial stability, and electrochemical reaction kinetics of MoS2. Several types of intercalants will be discussed in detail.

4.1.1 Ionic intercalation

Ionic intercalants are various cations or anions that penetrate the spaces between MoS2 layers, primarily guided by electrostatic interactions with sulfur atom surfaces, resulting in the expansion of interlayer spacing. Sarkar et al.[34] synthesized MoS2/r-GO (reduced graphene oxide) composite nanosheets via a one-step hydrothermal method. The composite materials were directly grown on molybdenum foil, eliminating the need for binders and resulting in enhanced mechanical stability and electronic conductivity. In this process, in addition to acting as the sulfur precursor, thiourea decomposed during hydrolysis to generate NH4+ ions, which acted as intercalants (Fig. 5a). The insertion of NH4+ weakened the interlayer attractions in MoS2, resulting in an expanded spacing of around 0.95 nm, markedly exceeding the initial ~0.63 nm, which markedly improved the insertion/extraction capability of Na⁺ ions and enhanced the pseudocapacitive reaction efficiency (Fig. 5b). The use of rGO further improved conductivity and electrochemical stability. As a result, MoS2/r-GO//Fe2O3/MnO2 asymmetric supercapacitor was constructed, maintaining more than 98% capacitance even after 20 000 charge-discharge cycles (Fig. 5c).
图5 (a) NH4+插层MoS2,(b) SEM和TEM,(c) 循环稳定性[34];(d) 层间膨胀MoS2合成路线,(e) Na+迁移能垒,(f) E-MoS2的离子扩散;(g) 稳定性[89]

Fig.5 (a) NH4+ intercalation in MoS2, (b) SEM and TEM, (c) cycling stability. Reproduced from Ref 34. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (d) Synthesis route for expanded MoS2, (e) Na⁺ migration barrier, (f) ion diffusion in E-MoS2, (g) stability test. Reproduced with permission from Ref 89. Copyright 2023 Royal Society of Chemistry

In addition to using single ions as intercalants, multi-ion intercalation strategies have also been explored. Wang et al.[89] utilized thiourea as both a reactant and a precursor for intercalants. During the hydrothermal reaction, thiourea was transformed into ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN), which dissociated into NH4+ and SCN- ions. These ions were simultaneously intercalated into the interlayer spaces of MoS2, significantly expanding the interlayer distance to 9.4 Å (Fig. 5d). This expanded structure enhanced the Na+ adsorption capacity and diffusion rate, thereby markedly improving the electrochemical performance. The resulting E-MoS2 exhibited excellent specific capacitance in a 3-electrode system and demonstrated good cycling stability in a symmetric supercapacitor, retaining 81.7% of its capacity after 3000 cycles. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations further revealed the stable adsorption behavior of NH4+ and SCN- on the MoS2 surface and within its interlayers, as well as their role in lowering the diffusion energy barrier for Na+Fig. 5e, f), ultimately leading to expanded interlayer spacing and enhanced capacitive performance (Fig. 5g).

4.1.2 Organic molecular intercalation

Organic molecular intercalation can also be employed. Zhang et al.[90] significantly enhanced the electrochemical performance of 2H-MoS2 in supercapacitors by introducing polypyrrole (PPy) as an organic intercalant and constructing a MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2Tx MXene heterostructure (Fig. 6a). It demonstrated that PPy intercalation effectively increased the gap between MoS2 from 6.5 to 10.3 Å (Fig. 6b~g), thereby enhancing ion diffusion pathways and exposing more active sites. Meanwhile, MXene served as a highly conductive substrate, further improving charge transfer efficiency and boosting the electrode’s energy storage performance and fast-charging responsiveness (Fig.6h~l). As a result, the synthesized MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2Tx composite delivered a high charge storage capacity of 265 F·g-1 along with stable long-term performance, maintaining 94.1% retention over 10 000 charge-discharge cycles (Fig. 6k). The enhanced performance of the composite stems from multiple synergistic effects. PPy intercalation directly expands the interlayer spacing of MoS2, exposing more edge active sites. In addition, the PPy connects MoS2 with MXene, forming continuous conductive pathways while providing additional redox-active sites. Furthermore, surface functional groups (—O, —OH) on MXene form chemical bonds with MoS2, strengthening interfacial charge transfer.
图6 (a) MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2Tx的结构图,2H-MoS2(b~d)与MoS2-PPy(e~g)的HRTEM图,(h) MoS2-Na电荷差侧视图;(i) MoS2-PPy-Na电荷差侧视图;(j) MoS2/MXene-Na电荷差侧视图,(k) 电极的电容保持率和库仑效率,(l) 混合材料中层间结构的调节机制[90]

Fig.6 (a) Schematic illustration of the architecture of the MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2Tx, HR-TEM images of the 2H-MoS2 (b~d) and MoS2-PPy (e~g), (h) side view of charge density difference for MoS2-Na; (i) side view of charge density difference for MoS2-PPy-Na; (g) side view of charge density difference for MoS2/MXene-Na. Reproduced with permission from Ref 90. Copyright 2025 Elsevier

Polymer intercalants refer to long-chain, flexible polymer molecules that can form stable network structures within the interlayers, enhancing the flexibility and electrochemical stability of the composite material. Upon intercalation, they increase electron/ion transport channels, inhibit the restacking of MoS2 nanosheets, and improve mechanical stability; if the polymers are conductive, they can also contribute to pseudocapacitance. Lian et al.[91] successfully constructed a multilayer three-dimensional PPy/MoS2 intercalated composite by polymerizing pyrrole monomers under acidic conditions and subsequently reacting them hydrothermally with sodium molybdate and thiourea (Fig.7a). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization confirmed that PPy molecules coordinated with the sulfur atoms of MoS2 via nitrogen atoms and intercalated into the MoS2 layers, forming a stable 3D intercalated composite structure (Fig.7b). Experimental data revealed that this composite delivered a notable capacitance of 895.6 F·g-1 under 1 A·g-1, sustained an energy output of 3.774 Wh·kg-1 even at a high power level of 252.8 kW·kg-1, and preserved 98% of its original capacitance following 10 000 cycles-markedly surpassing the retention rates of pristine PPy (59.8%) and MoS2 (74.8%) (Fig. 7c). This structure takes advantage of the interlayer ion transport channels and pseudocapacitive behavior of MoS2, while the conductive network of PPy enhances charge transfer efficiency and suppresses volume deformation, thereby significantly improving cycling stability (Fig. 7d). Other polymer intercalants include polyaniline (PANI). Wang et al. directly intercalated aniline monomers into exfoliated MoS2 layers and doped them with dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (DBSA), successfully preparing a MoS2/PANI intercalated composite (Fig. 7e[92]. Experimental results showed that the intercalation interaction between MoS2 and PANI significantly improved the composite’s conductivity and thermal stability. The MoS2/PANI-38 sample achieved a conductivity of 2.38 S·cm-1, and its maximum thermal decomposition rate occurred at 353 ℃ (Fig.7f). Electrochemical evaluation revealed that this composite achieved a capacitance value of 390 F·g-1 and maintained 86% of its initial performance over 1000 charge-discharge cycles-substantially outperforming pure PANI electrodes, which only delivered 131 F·g-1 with a 42% retention rate. (Fig.7g, h). This improvement stems from the combined contributions of MoS2 electrostatic charge storage and PANI’s redox-based capacitance, alongside the homogeneous distribution and effective charge transport facilitated by the interlayer architecture. The study clearly applied polymer intercalation technology, embedding PANI into MoS2 layers via in-situ polymerization, thereby regulating the interlayer spacing and microstructure of the composite for performance optimization.
图7 (a) PPy/MoS2的制备流程,(b) PPy/MoS2的全测量光谱,(c) 循环性能测试,(d) 电子传输示意图[91];(e) 实验方法示意图,(f) PANI/MoS2/PANI的TGA曲线,(g)奈奎斯特曲线,(h)循环稳定性测试[92]

Fig.7 (a) Schematic illustration for the fabrication of PPy/MoS2, (b) full survey spectrum of PPy/MoS2, (c) cycling performance, (d) schematic of the electron transportation. Reproduced with permission from Ref 91. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (e) Schematic presentation of the experimental method, (f) TGA curve of PANI/MoS2/PANI, (g) Nyquist plots, (h) cycle stability testing of composite materials. Reproduced with permission from Ref 92. Copyright 2015 Elsevier

When comparing the three organic ion intercalation methods, the MoS2/PANI system achieves enhanced conductivity of 2.38 S·cm-1 through dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (DBSA) doping. However, this remains notably lower than the MXene-based composite approach, where Ti3C2Tx contributes ultrahigh conductivity (150 000 S·m-1) in the MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2Tx structure. For the PPy/MoS2 hydrothermal method, though conductivity wasnot directly measured, the uneven PPy coating thickness (25~66 nm) may cause localized resistance variations. These conductivity differences directly correlate with rate capability: the MXene composite maintains 57.6% capacity at 20 A·g-1, while the PPy/MoS2 system sustains high energy density (3.774 Wh· kg-1) even at 252.8 kW·kg-1 power density. Regarding structural stability, PPy/MoS2 exhibits superior cycling retention primarily due to covalent N—S bonding between polypyrrole’s nitrogen atoms and sulfur in MoS2 interlayers, coupled with PPy’s three-dimensional network effectively absorbing ion-insertion stress. Conversely, the MoS2/PANI system relies on weaker electrostatic interactions. Repeated expansion/contraction of PANI chains during lithiation/delithiation leads to only 86% capacity retention. The MXene composite demonstrates 94.1% retention but faces oxidation susceptibility of terminal functional groups during high-voltage cycling. In summary, while PPy intercalation offers optimal stability, inconsistent coating thickness risks localized stress concentration; the MXene strategy provides unmatched conductivity yet carries unquantified long-term corrosion risks at multi-phase interfaces; and though the PANI approach is cost-effective, electrolyte contamination from degradation byproducts remains a concern.

4.2 3D structure construction

The construction of 3D architectures is an important strategy aimed at preventing the restacking of layered materials through spatial structural design, thereby enhancing specific surface area and electrolyte accessibility[26]. This approach effectively improves electron/ion transport and the exposure of active sites. Generally, 3D structural construction strategies can be categorized into two main types: self-assembled flower-like structures and carbon-based 3D framework composites[93].

4.2.1 Self-assembling flower-like structure

By adjusting the reaction conditions, MoS2 nanosheets can be microscopically arranged in a radial or layer-by-layer unfolding manner, ultimately forming flower-like 3D structures. These structures consist of numerous MoS2 nanosheets with outward-facing edges, presenting an open and loose morphology. Compared to conventional dense layered stacks, this configuration provides increased accessible surface regions and a greater number of electrochemically active regions. For example, Chen et al.[94] synthesized a 3D flower-like MoS2/NiCo(OH)2CO3 (MoS2/NiCoHC) composite and applied it to supercapacitors. In Fig. 8a, utilizing MoS2 nanospheres as initial templates through a solvothermal approach, NiCoHC thin layers spontaneously organized into a 3D flower-like architecture. The morphology was systematically characterized by SEM (Fig.8b). Experiments revealed that MoS2 nanospheres acted as nucleation agents to induce the surface growth and assembly of NiCoHC nanosheets into 3D flower-like particles. This architecture notably expanded the accessible surface region, and a large number of surfactant sites are provided through NiCoHC nanosheets, and sulfur atoms at the edge of MoS2 nanospheres act as additional redox sites, synergistically improving the reaction interface and improving the overall charge storage capacity. Under charge-discharge evaluation, the MoS2/NiCoHC hybrid exhibited impressive storage capability, reaching 583 C·g-1 (1296 F·g-1) at 1 A·g-1, and maintained 94.3% of its capacity after 2000 cycles (Fig. 8c). The resulting hybrid device further demonstrated outstanding energy storage capabilities. The authors further used kinetic analysis and impedance spectroscopy to demonstrate that the 3D flower-like structure promoted charge transport and ion diffusion while ensuring long-term cycling stability. Liu et al.[95] investigated a 3D sandwich-structured MoS2/C@RGO hybrid fabricated through a combination of molecular self-organization and hydrothermal treatment, where uniformly distributed MoS2 layers were anchored onto reduced graphene oxide (RGO) along with in situ-formed carbon nanoparticles (Fig.8d). Among them, RGO provides a high-conductive network in-plane, greatly reducing charge transfer resistance, and MoS2 provides pseudocapacitor active sites. Supramolecular self-assembly realizes the directional growth of MoS2 on the RGO surface, forming strong interface bonding. This sandwich structure (RGO-MoS2-carbon particles) forms a three-layer role of “conductive-active-buffering”. Such a distinctive three-dimensional framework suppressed MoS2 and RGO aggregation, improved conductivity, enlarged electrolyte accessibility, and promoted ion transport and exposure of active electrochemical sites (Fig.8e~g). Wei et al.[96] studied the electrochemical performance enhancement of self-assembled flower-like MoS2 nanomaterials used as supercapacitor electrode materials. Through a simple one-pot hydrothermal reaction, 1T-phase MoS2 nanosheets were self-assembled into 3D nanoflower structures. In Fig. 8h, i, this nanoflower framework exhibited a more stable structure and superior charge transport channels compared to discrete nanosheets. In KCl electrolyte, it achieved a specific capacitance of 483 F·g-1 at 0.5 A·g-1, while in KOH electrolyte, the activated battery-type charge storage mechanism led to an outstanding capacitance of 1120 F·g-1. After 2000 cycles, the nanoflower electrodes retained 94% and 96% of their capacities in KCl and KOH electrolytes, respectively, significantly outperforming the nanosheet electrodes (Fig.8j, k).
图8 (a) MoS2/NiCoHC示意图,(b) SEM,(c) 循环稳定性[94];(d) 3D MoS2/C@RGO生长机制,(e,f) TEM;(g) 循环稳定性[95];(h,i) MoS2的FESEM图,(j, k) KCL/KOH电解质稳定性测试[96]

Fig.8 (a) Synthesis of MoS2/NiCoHC, (b) SEM, (c) cycle stability. Reproduced with permission from Ref 94, Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (d) Growth mechanism of 3D MoS2/C@RGO, (e, f) TEM, (g) cycle stability. Reproduced with permission from Ref 95, Copyright 2019 Elsevier. (h,i) FESEM of MoS2, (j, k) stability tests in KCL/KOH electrolytes. Reproduced from Ref 96. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society

4.2.2 Carbon based 3D skeleton composite

Carbon-based 3D framework composites involve integrating layered materials such as MoS2 with 3D porous carbon structures (e.g., graphene aerogels, CNT networks, carbon foams, or rGO). This strategy constructs a stable conductive support network that effectively suppresses the interlayer restacking of MoS2 induced by van der Waals forces during intercalation. Simultaneously, it improves the overall architecture’s available active surface and ion transport pathways. Tiwari et al.[97] developed MoS2@CNT heterostructure by combining chemical vapor deposition and physical vapor deposition techniques, enabling precise control over the electrode’s microstructure. This heterostructure forms an open porous network through the synergy between the 3D conductive CNT scaffold and vertically grown MoS2 nanosheets (Fig. 9a). Such architecture not only shortens the ion and electron diffusion paths but also broadens the MoS2 gallery distance to 0.63 nm (Fig. 9b), providing more intercalation sites for Na+ ions. The robust mechanical properties and excellent electrical performance of CNTs effectively suppress volume expansion and structural deformation of MoS2 during charge/discharge cycles. The CNT network thus offers both mechanical support and improved electron transport for MoS2. Contact angle measurements further revealed that MoS2 coating alters the originally superhydrophobic CNT surface (154°, Fig. 9c) to a hydrophilic one (49.2°, Fig. 9d), thereby enhancing electrolyte infiltration. Electrochemical tests demonstrated that the MoS2@CNT electrode exhibits a high areal capacitance of 337 mF·cm-2 at a scan rate of 5 mV·s-1. In symmetric devices, a capacitance of 131 mF·cm-2 and a cycling stability of 97.6% were achieved (Fig. 9e,f). These results confirm the critical role of 3D carbon frameworks in modulating structural stability, conductivity, and ion transport kinetics of 2D materials. Guan et al.[98] investigated a core-shell structured MoS2@C/CNTs composite as a supercapacitor electrode. In Fig.9g, few-layer MoS2 nanosheets were integrated with CNTs and carbon interlayers through a hydrothermal method followed by carbonization, forming a coaxial nanocable structure. CNTs served as the conductive backbone, coated with PEDOT:PSS to create a stable interface. Glucose and CTAB were introduced to facilitate in situ carbonization within the MoS2 interlayers and on its surface, resulting in carbon intercalation structures. This design increased the gap between MoS2 layers to 0.72 nm (Fig. 9h,i), enhancing both electron transport and ion diffusion pathways. Moreover, the carbon layers effectively suppressed MoS2 volume expansion and improved structural integrity. Electrochemical tests revealed that the material delivered 335 F·g-1 at 1 A·g-1 and maintained 127% of its initial capacitance after 40 000 cycles, indicating outstanding durability over extended cycling (Fig 9j~l). CNT is the basis of core conductivity, PEDOT:PSS performs interface regulation, and carbon interpolation MoS2 forms the electron transmission gradient. The three work together to break through the bottleneck that traditional materials cannot have both “high capacity-long life”.
图9 (a) 合成MoS2@CNT电极示意图,(b) HRTEM图,(c, d) CNT水接触角,(e) GCD曲线,(f) 循环2500次后的GCD曲线[97];(g) MoS2/PEDOT:PSS/CNTs薄膜合成图,(h) TEM,(i) HAADF-STEM,(j) MoS2@C/CNTs的结构示意图,(k) GCD曲线,(l)电容保持率及库仑效率[98]

Fig.9 (a) Synthesis of MoS2@CNT electrode, (b) HRTEM, (c, d) water contact angle of CNT, (e) GCD curves, (f) GCD curve after 2500 cycles. Reproduced with permission from Ref 97. Copyright 2019 Elsevier. (g) Synthesis of MoS2/PEDOT:PSS/CNTs film, (h) TEM, (i) HAADF-STEM, (j) structure of MoS2@C/CNTs, (k) GCD curves, (l) capacitance retention and coulombic efficiency. Reproduced with permission from Ref 98. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

4.3 Defect engineering

Defect engineering refers to the intentional and controllable introduction of structural imperfections into materials to modulate their electronic structure, lattice strain, and reaction activity, thereby enhancing their performance for specific applications[99]. In layered transition metal dichalcogenides such as MoS2, defect engineering is widely employed to improve electrochemical properties, demonstrating significant effects in fields like supercapacitors and battery electrode materials[100-101]. The layered structure of MoS2 consists of a sulfur-molybdenum-sulfur (S-Mo-S) trilayer configuration, held together by van der Waals forces. This architecture inherently exhibits low basal-plane chemical reactivity and limited electronic conductivity, which restricts its performance in high-rate charge/discharge and high-power output scenarios[102]. By introducing sulfur vacancies, molybdenum vacancies, edge defects, interstitial defects, or even lattice dislocations, defect engineering can disrupt the original symmetric structure of MoS2, activating otherwise inert basal planes and generating more electrochemically active sites[103]. Moreover, such defects can alter the electronic density of states and tune the bandgap, thereby enhancing electronic conductivity and accelerating ion migration rates[104-106].

4.3.1 Doped defects of MoS2

The electrochemical activity of MoS2 primarily originates from the sulfur atoms located at the edge sites, while the basal planes exhibit low activity due to their intrinsically low surface reactivity and poor electrical conductivity. Metal doping has emerged as an effective strategy to improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2, typically achieved by introducing a controlled number of dopants during the synthesis of precursors. The type and concentration of dopants can significantly influence the resulting electrochemical behavior. Among various metal doping approaches, transition metal doping is one of the most representative. Transition metals possess unfilled d orbitals, which can accept lone pair electrons, enabling them to alter the electronic structure of MoS2. Introducing dopant elements from the transition metal group effectively boosts electrical transport properties, promotes the formation of additional reactive edge sites, and can also stimulate the activity of the inert basal planes, thus markedly enhancing the electrochemical behavior. It has been demonstrated that the incorporation of transition metal ions such as Cu, Ni, Mo, and Fe into the MoS2 lattice effectively modulates its activity. Vikraman et al.[107] investigated the regulation of active sites in MoS2 nanostructures via transition metal doping to enhance their performance in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and supercapacitor applications. As shown in Fig. 10a, Ni, Cu, and Fe were successfully doped into MoS2 matrices through a chemical precipitation method to address issues such as low conductivity and limited active site availability. Structural characterization and electrochemical testing revealed that the doped MoS2 nanostructures exhibited significant morphological changes: the introduction of transition metals expanded the interlayer spacing and facilitated the formation of vertically aligned nanosheet arrays, while concurrently altering the charge distribution to enhance the accessibility of catalytically active regions (Fig. 10b,c). Specifically, Cu-doped MoS2 achieved an impressive capacitance value of 353 F·g-1 and maintained 94% of its initial capacity over prolonged cycling, attributed to the enlarged active interface and the presence of a porous framework (Fig. 10d, e). Through Fe/Ni doping, MoS2 is transformed from semiconductor phase (2H) to metal phase (1T), and the proportion of 1T phase is increased: the conductivity of the metal phase is higher than that of the 2H phase, which accelerates charge transfer at the electrode interface, Fe doping exposes more edge sites, Cu doping triggers lattice distortion, and experiments combine atom doping with microstructure regulation to achieve a significant improvement in electrochemical performance.
图10 (a) 金属掺杂MoS2纳米结构,(b, c) Cu-MoS2 的FESEM,(d) 原始和掺杂的MoS2比电容的对比,(e) 循环稳定性[107];(f) 样品示意图,(g, h) S-Ⅱ的HRTEM图,(i, j) S-Ⅰ和S-Ⅱ的电容值,(k) S-Ⅰ/S-Ⅱ CV电容(左)与GCD电容(右),(l) 器件点亮LED展示[108]

Fig.10 (a) Metal-doped MoS2 nanostructures; (b, c) FESEM of Cu-MoS2, (d) specific capacitance comparison: pure vs. doped MoS2, (e) cycling stability. Reproduced with permission from Ref 107. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (f) Scheme of sample structure, (g, h) HRTEM of S-Ⅱ, (i, j) capacitance values: S-Ⅰ/S-Ⅱ; (k) CV capacitance (left) and GCD capacitance (right) for S-Ⅰ/S-Ⅱ; (l) device powering LEDs. Reproduced with permission from Ref 108. Copyright 2020 Elsevier

The doping concentration is a crucial factor influencing the electrochemical performance of MoS2. Singha et al.[108] investigated the effect of various Mn doping levels on the nanoflower morphology of MoS2 and its performance in supercapacitors. By adjusting the Mn doping concentration, four types of samples were synthesized: undoped MoS2 (S-Ⅰ), low Mn-doping (S-Ⅱ), medium Mn-doping (S-Ⅲ), and high Mn-doping (S-Ⅳ) (Fig.10f). The results demonstrate that an appropriate level of Mn doping in the S-Ⅱ sample significantly enhanced the electrochemical activity. Structural characterizations, such as XRD and TEM, revealed that Mn doping expanded the interlayer spacing of MoS2 from 0.63 nm to 0.76 nm and increased the specific surface area and porosity. These changes provided more electrochemically active sites, facilitating enhanced adsorption and diffusion of electrolyte ions (Fig.10g,h). However, excessive Mn doping, as in the S-Ⅳ sample, resulted in a performance decline due to pore blockage and a reduced proportion of Mn3+ species. Electrochemical testing showed that the S-Ⅱ sample exhibited the highest specific capacitance in 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte and maintained excellent cycling stability, retaining 77% of its capacity after 5000 cycles (Fig.10i~l).
In addition to transition metals, noble metals and rare earth elements have also been doped into MoS2 for supercapacitor applications. Shao et al.[109], utilized a sequential two-step solvothermal process to synthesize Pt-doped MoS2 layered structures directly on the surface of carbon cloth (CC). Compared with undoped pristine MoS2, the Pt doping significantly enhanced the electrochemical performance. The synthesized Pt-MoS2 delivered an impressive capacitance value of 250 F·g-1 under 0.5 A·g-1, and when operated at 10 A·g-1, its capacitance doubled compared to unmodified MoS2, indicating a 100% gain. This performance stemmed from the incorporation of Pt, which optimized the material's electronic and structural characteristics. which, as shown by TEM analyses, reduced the crystallinity of MoS2 and created more active sites, thereby facilitating charge transport and electrolyte ion diffusion (Fig. 11a~c). To explore practical applications, an asymmetric flexible supercapacitor (ASC) device was constructed, employing Pt-MoS2 as the cathode material and activated carbon (AC) as the anode. The configuration and corresponding electrochemical performance are illustrated in Fig. 11d~f, the flexible device was tested under various bending angles, and CV curves remained nearly overlapping with negligible changes in specific capacitance, demonstrating excellent mechanical flexibility and bending stability. These properties make the device highly suitable for flexible electronic applications.
图11 (a,b) Pt掺杂MoS2的TEM,(c) HRTEM图,(d) 比电容与电流密度的关系;(e) 100 ℃不同弯曲角度下的CV曲线,(f) 不同电流密度下的比电容[109];(g) MoS2, (h) Nd-MoS2和(i) Gd-MoS2的SEM图,(j) Gd-MoS2的循环稳定性,(k) 奈奎斯特图,(l) 比电容与电流密度的关系[110]

Fig.11 (a, b) TEM image of Pt-doped MoS2, (c) HRTEM, (d) relationship between specific capacitance and current density, (e) CV curves at different bending angles at 100 ℃, (f) specific capacitance at different current densities. Reproduced with permission from Ref 109. Copyright 2019 Elsevier. SEM images of pure (g) MoS2, (h) Nd-MoS2 and (i) Gd-MoS2, (j) cycling stability of Gd-MoS2, (k) Nyquist plot, (l) relationship between specific capacitance and current density. Reproduced from Ref 110. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society

Exploiting the abundant f-orbitals and strong spin-orbit coupling inherent in trivalent rare earth (RE3+) ions enables modulation of MoS2 properties. Their incorporation does the lattice, generating abundant defect sites and expanding interlayer spacing, which widens ion transport pathways, reduces bandgap width, and enhances intrinsic electrical conductivity, all of which contribute to improved energy storage performance. Isacfranklin et al.[110] investigated the application of Nd and Gd-doped MoS2 electrode materials for supercapacitors. SEM analysis showed that pristine MoS2 exhibited spherical nanoparticles, while rare earth doping-particularly with Gd-induced a significant morphological transformation into nanosheet structures (Fig.11g~i). The sheet-like structure enhanced surface exposure and reduced ion migration distances, leading to a significant improvement in electrochemical performance. Electrochemical testing confirmed that Gd-MoS2 demonstrated the best performance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) further revealed that Gd-MoS2 exhibited the lowest solution resistance (0.292 Ω) and charge transfer resistance (0.796 Ω), indicating superior conductivity. Moreover, Gd-MoS2 retained 81.50% of its initial specific capacitance after 5000 charge-discharge cycles, demonstrating excellent cycling stability (Fig.11j,k). This study clearly demonstrated that rare earth element doping-especially with gadolinium-effectively modulated the morphology of MoS2 (from spherical to sheet-like structures) and significantly improved its key supercapacitor performance metrics, including specific capacitance, conductivity, and cycle life (Fig.11l). These improvements are primarily attributed to the strong binding affinity between the rare earth 4f vacant orbitals and functional groups, leading to structural optimization. This offers crucial evidence for developing novel RE-modified metal sulfides as high-performance electrodes.

4.3.2 Intrinsic defects of MoS2

Although defect-rich MoS2 retains locally ordered hexagonal arrangements of Mo atoms, it exhibits long-range structural disorder overall, primarily manifested as lattice distortion. This “order within disorder” structural characteristic leads to the presence of numerous intrinsic defects-such as sulfur vacancies, voids, and cracks-throughout the surface and bulk of the material in addition to naturally occurring edge sites. These defects provide extra electrochemically active sites, which contribute to enhanced pseudocapacitive reactions and ion intercalation capability. In particular, sulfur vacancies tailor the local atomic arrangement and electronic environment of MoS2, promoting enhanced charge transfer and conductivity, thereby significantly augmenting its electrochemical reactivity and overall conductivity. Thus, rationally introducing and regulating such intrinsic defects represents a vital approach to enhancing the energy storage function of MoS2 as an electrode material. For instance, Wu et al.[111] synthesized ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets with abundant structural defects by reacting ammonium heptamolybdate ((NH46Mo7O24·4H2O) and L-cysteine in the presence of 1,6-hexanediamine. Physical characterization clearly confirmed the existence of numerous intrinsic defects, especially those related to sulfur atoms, such as S vacancies or uncoordinated sulfur atoms at the edges. These defects were formed intrinsically during synthesis due to the coordination agent (1,6-hexanediamine) modulating the crystal growth kinetics and inhibiting the perfect lattice ordering of MoS2, rather than being induced by external dopants (Fig. 12a). The intrinsic defects exposed a high density of unsaturated sulfur active sites, significantly altering the electronic structure and surface properties of the material. In Fig. 12b~d, this defect-rich MoS2 exhibited excellent electrochemical performance when used as a supercapacitor electrode, delivering high specific capacitance and outstanding cycling stability. The presence of defects promoted the formation of electric double layers and accelerated ion diffusion, contributing to the superior energy storage behavior.
图12 (a) 制备具有内在缺陷的MoS2,(b) HRTEM图,(c) HRTEM图,(d) 用巯基乙酸钠合成的MoS2的FESEM图像[111];(e) MoS2-x-300(f)MoS2-x-500(g)MoS2-x-700的HRTEM图,(h) 循环稳定性,(i) 无缺陷MoS2和含有三种原子空位的MoS2-x的示意图[113]

Fig.12 (a) Preparation of MoS2 with intrinsic defects; (b) HRTEM of edge, (c) HRTEM; (d) FESEM image of MoS2. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [111]. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) HRTEM of MoS2-x-300 (f), MoS2-x-500 (g), MoS2-x-700; (h) cycling stability; (i) schematic diagram of defect-free MoS2 and MoS2-x containing three types of atomic vacancies. Reproduced with permission from Ref 113. Available under CC-BY-NC 3.0. Copyright 2021 The Authors

Defect concentration strongly determines the electrochemical performance of materials. Joseph et al. synthesized two types of MoS2 samples-high defect density (HDD-MoS2) and low defect density (LDD-MoS2) by adjusting the amount of thiourea, and probed defect-mediated changes to lattice symmetry, charge transport, and interfacial reactivity[112].Structural characterizations revealed that higher defect density led to lattice distortion and increased interlayer spacing, thereby enhancing the intercalation and diffusion of electrolyte ions.
The presence of S vacancies introduces additional electronic states adjacent to the Fermi edge and creates localized spin carriers, which contribute to activating the otherwise inert MoS2 surface and enhancing its charge transport characteristics. Wang et al.[113] introduced sulfur vacancies into 2H-phase MoS2 nanosheets by annealing them at different temperatures under an Ar/H2 atmosphere. The study demonstrated that incorporating sulfur vacancies markedly enhanced the charge transport efficiency and electrochemical storage capacity of MoS2. As the annealing temperature increased, the concentration of sulfur vacancies rose, resulting in enlarged interlayer spacing, shortened ion diffusion paths, and enhanced electron mobility, all of which facilitated reversible redox reactions (Fig. 12e~g). MoS2-x sample annealed at 700 ℃ exhibited the best performance, achieving a maximum specific capacitance of 142.3 F·g-1 and excellent cycling stability with 87.1% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles (Fig.12h). DFT calculations further revealed that sulfur vacancies, particularly sulfur edge vacancies, made significant contributions to enhancing conductivity and capacitance (Fig.12i), by introducing new electronic states near the Fermi level, increasing carrier density, and strengthening electron transfer capability.
Although defect engineering can significantly improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2, excessively high defect concentrations can cause multiple structural stability problems. For example, too many sulfur vacancies distort the local lattice structure and create stress concentration. Additionally, defect sites allow electrolytes to penetrate more easily, worsening corrosion of the electrode material. Current methods to create defects in MoS2 require complex equipment and demanding reaction conditions, making large-scale production difficult. That’s why future research should develop advanced characterization tools that can monitor defect behavior during actual operation, providing real-time insights for designing industrial-grade electrodes.
Studies have shown that moderate interlayer spacing is critical to the capacitive performance of two-dimensional electrode materials. As summarized in Table 2, excessively large interlayer distances can create inactive dead volume within the electrode, thereby reducing the effective specific surface area and ion accessibility. This, in turn, weakens the charge storage density and release efficiency, hinders fast ion transport, and limits the utilization of electrochemically active sites-ultimately leading to a decline in the overall energy storage capacity.
表2 MoS2复合材料调控方法的性能比较

Table 2 Comparison of regulation methods for MoS2 composite materials

Interlayer spacing Material Capacitance Number of cycles Ref
0.95 nm MoS2/r-GO//Fe2O3/MnO2 1.54 F·cm-3 Retention rate 98% after 20 000 cycles 34
9.4 Å MoS2-10 476.0 F·g-1 Retention rate 81.7% after 3000 cycles 89
10.3 Å MoS2-PPy@Ti3C2TxMXene 265 F·g-1 Retention rate 94.1% after 10 000 cycles 90
0.63 nm PPy/MoS2 895.6 F·g-1 Retention rate 98% after 10 000 cycles 91
0.63 nm MoS2@CNT 337 mF·cm-2 Retention rate 97.8% after 2500 cycles 97
0.72 nm MoS2@C/CNTs 335 F·g-1 Retention rate 127% after 40 000 cycles 98
0.76 nm low Mn-doping (S-Ⅱ) 88 F·g-1 Retention rate 77% after 5000 cycles 108
0.65 nm Pt dope MoS2 250 F·g-1 Retention rate 88% after 3000 cycles 109
0.62 nm defect-rich MoS2 270.3 F·g-1 Retention rate 91.2% after 2000 cycles 111
0.625 nm HDD-MoS2 379 F·g-1 Retention rate 92% after 3000 cycles 112
0.628 nm MoS2-x-700 142.3 F·g-1 Retention rate 87.1% after 5000 cycles 113

4.4 Other methods to regulate the interlayer spacing of MoS2

In addition to the strategies discussed above, various alternative approaches have also been explored to adjust the spacing between MoS2 layers, aiming to enhance their electrochemical behavior. Thomas et al.[114] investigated the phase transformation of hydrothermally synthesized MoS2 under thermal treatment at different temperatures and its impact on supercapacitor performance. MoS2 was synthesized at 200 ℃ using Na2MoO4·2H2O and CH4N2S as precursors, followed by annealing in air at 250 ℃, 300 ℃, and 350 ℃, respectively. Annealing at 300 ℃ resulted in the development of a novel MoO3-x/MoS2-y hybrid structure, featuring the coexistence of flower-like MoS2 and brick-like MoO3 morphologies. This hybrid material exhibited superior structural and electrochemical properties compared to pure MoS2 or MoO3, as evidenced by its higher specific capacitance and excellent cycling stability. Unlike conventional methods that rely on intercalating agents, the modulation of MoS2 interlayer spacing in this case was achieved through thermally induced formation of the MoO3-x/MoS2-y heterostructure. During the structural evolution process, phase transition and lattice distortion occurred, which indirectly resulted in the expansion of interlayer spacing and structural relaxation. Abdulhamid adopts a green and environmentally friendly physical exfoliation strategy, dispersing commercial bulk MoS2 powder in a mixed solvent of acetone/deionized water, and preparing high-quality few layer MoS2 by 550 W pulsed ultrasound in an ice bath environment. The mechanical shear force generated by the ultrasonic cavitation effect breaks the interlayer van der Waals force, causing the interlayer spacing of MoS2 to increase from 0.61 nm in the bulk to 0.66 nm, and the number of layers decreases to 1~3, while maintaining the 2H phase structure. The stripped few layers of MoS2 are directly loaded on the foam nickel electrode to avoid blocking of active sites by traditional binders and conductive carbon black. MoS2 electrodes exhibit ultra-high specific capacitance far exceeding that of bulk MoS2.

4.5 Theoretical understanding

Two-dimensional layered MoS2 has emerged as an ideal electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors due to its exceptional ion intercalation capability and tunable electronic structure. The interlayer spacing, a critical structural parameter, directly governs ion diffusion kinetics and charge storage behavior. DFT calculations provide atomic-scale insights into the tuning mechanism, revealing that enhanced electrochemical performance stems primarily from optimized ion diffusion pathways and cooperative electronic structure regulation. For instance, Zhang et al.[90] directly expanded the interlayer spacing of MoS2 via polypyrrole (PPy) intercalation. DFT charge density difference analysis (Fig.13a~c) demonstrated stronger sodium ion adsorption energy and increased charge transfer after spacing expansion, along with reduced ion diffusion barriers. Density of states (DOS) calculations (Fig. 13d~f) indicated higher electron occupation near the Fermi level due to MXene incorporation, enhancing overall electrode polarity. Similarly, Cai et al.[115] improved electrode performance by directly widening the MoS2 interlayer spacing. DFT modeling at 9.0 Å spacing (Fig. 13g) showed enlarged ion diffusion channels, and calculations revealed a low K⁺ adsorption energy of -2.16 eV (Fig. 13j) in the expanded structure, significantly outperforming conventional configurations. DFT analysis (Fig. 13h) confirmed bandgap narrowing in the 1T/2H hybrid phase, while DOS (Fig. 13i) showed increased density near the Fermi level, improving electron mobility.
图13 (a) MoS2-Na电荷差侧视图;(b) MoS2-PPy-Na电荷差侧视图;(c) MoS2/MXene-Na电荷差侧视图,(d) MoS2,(e) MoS2-PPy和(f)MoS2的态密度[90];(g) MoS2模型结构,(h) MoS2模型的能带,(i) 状态密度,(j) MoS2在层间的吸附模型[115]

Fig.13 (a) Side view of charge density difference for MoS2-Na; (b) side view of charge density difference for MoS2-PPy-Na; (c) side view of charge density difference for MoS2/MXene-Na, density of states for model (d) MoS2, (e) MoS2-PPy and (f) MoS2. Reproduced with permission from Ref 90. Copyright 2025 Elsevier. (g) MoS2 model structure, (h) the energy band of the MoS2 model, (i) state density, (j) the adsorption models of MoS2 at the interlayer. Reproduced with permission from Ref 115. Copyright 2024 Elsevier

Alternatively, introducing active sites via elemental doping can also induce MoS2 interlayer expansion to enhance supercapacitor performance. Prakash et al.[116] expanded the MoS2 interlayer spacing through Ni doping (Fig.14a,b). Total density of states (TDOS) plots (Fig. 14c) revealed new electronic states near the Fermi level, attributed to hybridization between Ni-3d and Mo-4d/S-2p orbitals (Fig. 14f), thereby increasing electron density at the Fermi level. Ni doping reduced the MoS2 bandgap from 1.73 eV to 1.24 eV (Fig. 14e~g). These narrower bandgaps enhanced electrode conductivity. Concurrently, Ni2+/Ni3+ redox reactions contributed additional pseudocapacitance, further boosting electrochemical properties. Similarly, Radhakrishna et al.[117] developed MoS2@Te heterostructures where Te nanorods formed Mo-O-Te interfacial bonds within MoS2 layers (Fig.14h). This chemical bonding reorganization directly expanded the interlayer spacing. After expansion, the overall quantum capacitance (QC) increased significantly (Fig. 14i). DFT results confirmed electron transfer from Te-5p to Mo-4d orbitals, leading to heightened density of states at the Fermi level of MoS2 and consequent performance enhancement (Fig.14j~m).
图14 (a, b) MoS2与Ni- MoS2优化构型对比;(c) 总态密度(黑:原始,红:掺镍);(d) 原始MoS2PDOS;(e)原始能带结构;(f) Ni-MoS2 PDOS;(g) Ni-MoS2能带结构[116];(h) 电荷密度图MS@TeMS的等值线为0.052e,(i) 量子电容变化MS@Te和MS,(j) 总态密度,(k) Mo 4d的部分态密度[117]

Fig.14 (a, b) Optimized geometries of MoS2 vs. Ni-MoS2, (c) total density of states (Black: Pure, Red: Ni-doped), (d) PDOS of pure MoS2, (e) band structure of pure MoS2, (f) PDOS of Ni-MoS2, (g) band structure of Ni-MoS2. Reproduced with permission from Ref 116. Copyright 2023 Elsevier. (h) Charge density isosurface (0.052e) of MS@TeMS; (i) quantum capacitance (Cq) variation: MS@Te vs. MS; (j) total density of states; (k) Mo 4d partial density of states. Reproduced with permission from Ref 117. Copyright 2023 Elsevier

Fig.15 illustrates various strategies for modulating the interlayer spacing of MoS2 to improve its electrochemical performance, encompassing strategic mechanisms, modifications to electronic structure, performance benefits, and associated limitations. Together, these elements set a coherent framework that enhances the understanding of how interlayer engineering influences MoS2 properties. Regarding strategic mechanisms, it emphasizes three key approaches: (1) intercalation of ions (e.g., Na⁺, K⁺) or other physical/chemical methods to expand interlayer spacing, which enhances ion adsorption and diffusion kinetics; (2) modification of the electronic structure through the introduction of sulfur vacancies or metal dopants, thereby improving conductivity and charge transfer efficiency; and (3) the formation of hybrid or mixed-phase structures (e.g., 1T/2H), which introduce new energy bands and active sites. These methods have been validated by DFT calculations, demonstrating significant impacts on the electronic behavior of MoS2. At the electronic structure level, strategies like interlayer expansion and defect engineering modify valence states and Fermi-level occupancy, increase the density of empty orbitals, and enhance material polarity and metallicity, promoting rapid electron and ion transport as well as energy storage reactions. The introduction of defects generates new hybrid orbitals and electronic states, providing additional sites for pseudocapacitive reactions.
From an electrochemical performance perspective, these strategies often yield advantages such as high specific capacitance, improved rate capability, enhanced structural stability, and environmentally friendly synthesis pathways. Notably, 1T/2H mixed-phase configurations and MoS2-based composites integrate conductivity, structural integrity, and compatibility with flexible electrode designs, balancing experimental feasibility with application potential. However, challenges persist, including complex processing, high-temperature annealing, and precise dopant control, which can hinder reproducibility and scalability. Excessive interlayer expansion may create electrochemically inactive voids, diminishing material density and energy efficiency. Additionally, phase transformation strategies can induce lattice distortions or phase separation, leading to increased interfacial resistance and reduced cycling stability. Overall, Fig. 15 provides theoretical insights into the mechanisms and trade-offs of interlayer modulation strategies for MoS2, assisting in the rational design of next-generation energy storage materials.
图15 MoS2调控策略:结构变化和储能特性

Fig.15 MoS2 regulations: Structural evolution and energy storage characteristics.

5 Summary and outlook

MoS2, characterized by its unique layered structure and numerous electrochemically active sites, shows significant potential for supercapacitor applications. However, the inherently narrow interlayer spacing of MoS2 often leads to layer stacking, which hinders the effective diffusion of electrolyte ions and limits the accessibility of active sites, thereby constraining its energy storage capabilities. Recently, engineering interlayer spacing has emerged as a vital strategy to enhance the electrochemical properties of MoS2 electrodes, attracting considerable attention. Studies indicate that a moderate increase in the spacing between MoS2 layers can significantly expand the accessible surface area, facilitate ion transport pathways, reduce diffusion barriers, and improve pseudocapacitive characteristics, thereby enhancing overall electrochemical performance (Fig. 16).
图16 MoS2的层间距调控:从原子理论到宏观性能的协同策略

Fig.16 Interlayer spacing regulation in MoS2: synergistic strategies from atomic theory to macroscopic performance

From a material design perspective, optimizing the electrochemical performance of MoS2 involves several key aspects, including ionic intercalation, heterostructure complementarity, and defect engineering. These adjustment strategies ultimately influence the diffusion and transport of ions and electrons between the electrode and electrolyte, making the interlayer environment of MoS2 crucial. However, expanding interlayer spacing necessitates a careful balance between improved ion diffusion and the potential for structural instability, as excessive spacing could reduce electrode density and compromise mechanical integrity. Future work should concentrate on developing controllable and reversible mechanisms for regulating interlayer spacing, gaining deeper insights into how structural changes between layers affect energy storage behavior, and investigating the synergistic effects of novel intercalants with MoS2 layers. These initiatives aim to achieve balanced energy and power outputs with sustained cycling stability in MoS2-based supercapacitor electrodes.
[1]
Ragupathi V, Panigrahi P, Nagarajan G S. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol., 2023, 12(2): 024001.

[2]
Vamsi Krishna B N, Ankinapalli O R, Yu J S. J. Energy Storage, 2024, 92: 112187.

[3]
Jones C W, Park A-H A, Wright P. Acc. Chem. Res., 2023, 56: 3545.

[4]
Ruttinger A W, Tavakkoli S, Shen H, Wang C, Jordaan S M. Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15(3): 1222.

[5]
Heydari Gharahcheshmeh M, Chowdhury K. Energy Adv., 2024, 3(11): 2668.

[6]
Dou Q Y, Park H S. Energy Environ. Mater., 2020, 3(3): 286.

[7]
Sriram G, Hegde G, Dhanabalan K, Kalegowda Y, Mouraliraman D, Vishwanath R S, Kurkuri M, Oh T H. J. Energy Storage, 2024, 94: 112454.

[8]
Wu Y P, Wang X F, Li B X, Zhao X D, Liu X Y. Prog. Chem., 2023, 35(7): 1005

( 吴云鹏, 王晓峰, 李本仙, 赵旭东, 刘晓旸. 化学进展, 2023, 35(7): 1005).

[9]
Sahani S, Mahajan H, Han S S. J. Energy Storage, 2024, 90: 111808.

[10]
Kim D, Yun T G, Lee J H, Yoon K R, Kim K. Nanoscale Adv., 2024, 6(7): 1900.

[11]
Wang D, Li X, Zhang A Y, Wen X J, Wang Q, Liu Y G, Qi X W, Wang Z Y. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2024, 12(6): 114085.

[12]
Qi Q, Xu P Z, Tian Z D, Sun W, Liu Y J, Hu X. Prog. Chem., 2022, 34(9): 2051

( 戚琦, 徐佩珠, 田志东, 孙伟, 刘杨杰, 胡翔. 化学进展, 2022, 34(9): 2051).

[13]
Wu M C, Zheng W Y, Hu X, Zhan F Y, He Q Q, Wang H Y, Zhang Q C, Chen L Y. Small, 2022, 18(50): 2205101.

[14]
Meng L, Wang Q, Sun M, Chen W, Zhao Y, Xu J, Jia Q, Li H, Lu S, Zhang Y. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2025, 8: 10907.

[15]
Xie Y T, Zhang H T, Qu Y X, Jiang X L, Huang J F, Zhang X, Gao Y Y, Tang L, Lv Q, Jiao X X, Yang W Q, He Z Y. ACS Energy Lett., 2025, 10(1): 345.

[16]
Salunkhe R R, Wang J, Alowasheeir A, Lin J J, Malgras V, Bando Y, Zakaria M B, Ali Alshehri A, Kim J, Yamauchi Y, Wu K C. ChemistrySelect, 2018, 3(16): 4522.

[17]
Chen X, Jiang D W, Xie K, Liu L L, Wang Y, Wang Y Q. Prog. Chem., 2024, 36(7): 961

( 陈星, 蒋德敏, 谢昆, 刘丽君, 王堙, 王育乔. 化学进展, 2024, 36(7): 961).

[18]
Kim J H, Sung H, Lee G H. Small Sci., 2023, 4: 2300093.

[19]
Jia Q L, Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhao Y J, Wang Q, Rui S Q, Meng L S, Li H, Lu S, Zhang Y X. J. Energy Storage, 2025, 110: 115242.

[20]
Qiao Y N, Sun W C, Yu F, Yu J L, Yao P P, Zhu C Z, Xu J. Electrochim. Acta, 2023, 464: 142929.

[21]
Yu H Y, Jiang G Q, Ni J F, Li L. Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2021, 28: e00255.

[22]
Bai J, Si J G, Mao Y J, Ma H Y, Wang P Y, Li W Y, Xiao K, Zhang G F, Wei Y Y, Zhu X B, Zhao B C, Sun Y P. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11(23): 12102.

[23]
Li H Y, Yu G, Luo J, Li G Y, Wang W, He B H, Hou Z H, Yin H. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2022, 922: 116715.

[24]
Zhao Y, Cong Y, Ning H, Li Y W, Yang H, Jiao Z M, Song D W, Li Y Z, Zhao Q S, Wu M B. Energy Fuels, 2023, 37(6): 4641.

[25]
Ye B Q, Cui Z, Yang Z X, Wu W B, Ye Y L, Shen Z H, Zhou Y Q, Huang Q C, Ye S W, Cheng Z M, Hong H Y, Meng Z Y, Zeng Z W, Lan Q T, Wang J X, Chen Y, Zhang H, Guo T L, Ye Y, Sa B S, Weng Z Z, Chen Y Y. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2023, 11(39): 13228.

[26]
Zhang Y, Xu J, Lu S, Li H, Yonar T, Hua Q S, Liu T, Zhang Y X. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater., 2025, 8: 108.

[27]
Zhang Y, Tang C, Lu S, Zeng Y, Hua Q S, Zhang Y X. Carbon Neutralization, 2025, 4(3): e70006.

[28]
Yuan X L, Xu J, Zhao Y J, Rui S Q, Wang Q, Meng L S, Jia Q L, Li H, Lu S, Zhang Y X. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2025, 13(16): 8179.

[29]
Chen J, Su L P, Zhang X Q, Chen Y X, Wang P, Zheng Q J, Lin D M. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2023, 11(33): 12467.

[30]
Li H N, Liu Y Z, Zhu X R, Li Y F, Chen C M. Energy Storage Mater., 2024, 73: 103859.

[31]
Rasamani K D, Alimohammadi F, Sun Y G. Mater. Today, 2017, 20(2): 83.

[32]
Sun H H, Liu H Y, Hou Z D, Zhou R, Liu X R, Wang J G. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 387: 124204.

[33]
Zhou R, Han C J, Wang X M. J. Power Sources, 2017, 352: 99.

[34]
Sarkar D, Das D, Das S, Kumar A, Patil S, Nanda K K, Sarma D D, Shukla A. ACS Energy Lett., 2019, 4(7): 1602.

[35]
Ali B A, Omar A M A, Khalil A S G, Allam N K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(37): 33955.

[36]
Panchu S J, Raju K, Singh P, Johnson D D, Swart H C. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2023, 6(4): 2187.

[37]
Li Y N, Sun Y, Zhang S, Wu X L, Song M, Jiao M L, Qin Q, Mi L W. RSC Adv., 2023, 13(38): 26509.

[38]
Ramachandran R, Wang Y, Chandrasekaran S, Li M Z, Luo A X, Xu Z X, Wang F. Appl. Mater. Today, 2022, 29: 101578.

[39]
Bo Z, Cheng X N, Yang H C, Guo X Z, Yan J H, Cen K F, Han Z J, Dai L M. Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12(11): 2103394.

[40]
Rosaiah P, Ashok K, Radhalayam D, Roy S, Ko T J, Nunna G P, Karim M R. Ceram. Int., 2024, 50(24): 54371.

[41]
Ji Y J, Wei Q L, Sun Y G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57(13): 4571.

[42]
Chen Q, Wei Y, Zhai P B, Gong Y J. Rare Met., 2024, 43(12): 6125.

[43]
Liu Y, Wang Z, Hu G, Chen X, Xu K, Guo Y, Xie Y, Wu C. Precis. Chem., 2025, 3: 51.

[44]
Zhang Y C, Zhang R J, Guo Y X, Li Y M, Li K S. J. Alloys Compd., 2024, 998: 174916.

[45]
Theerthagiri J, Senthil R A, Senthilkumar B, Reddy Polu A, Madhavan J, Ashokkumar M. J. Solid State Chem., 2017, 252: 43.

[46]
Singh A, Singh R P, Islam M U, Ahmed S, Bhat A R, Alam M, Iqbal M. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2025, 140(5): 381.

[47]
Farooq N, Rehman Z U, Khan M I, Asghar S, Saleem M, Irshad R, Sheikh A, Shanableh A, Manzoor S, Khan Z U. New J. Chem., 2024, 48(19): 8933.

[48]
Park H, Jung G S, Ibrahim K M, Lu Y, Tai K L, Coupin M, Warner J H. ACS Nano, 2022, 16(7): 10260.

[49]
Gupta D, Chauhan V, Kumar R. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2020, 121: 108200.

[50]
Zhao M H, Huang Z, Wang S X, Zhang L B. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 401: 126006.

[51]
Yang X, Li J, Liang T, Ma C Y, Zhang Y Y, Chen H Z, Hanagata N, Su H X, Xu M S. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(17): 10126.

[52]
Fan J J, Li Y F, Nguyen H N, Yao Y, Rodrigues D F. Environ. Sci. Nano, 2015, 2(4): 370.

[53]
Rani A, Singh K, Patel A S, Chakraborti A, Kumar S, Ghosh K, Sharma P. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2020, 738: 136874.

[54]
Gangwar R, Pandey D, Kancharlapalli S, Raychaudhuri D, Chakrabarti A, Banerjee A, Ghanty T K. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2021, 125(2): 1493.

[55]
Chang M J, Cui W N, Liu J, Wang K, Du H L, Qiu L, Fan S M, Luo Z M. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 36: 97.

[56]
Arefi-Oskoui S, Khataee A, Ucun O K, Kobya M, Hanci T Ö, Arslan-Alaton I. Chemosphere, 2021, 268: 128822.

[57]
Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6(3): 147.

[58]
Krishnan U, Kaur M, Singh K, Kumar M, Kumar A. Superlattices Microstruct., 2019, 128: 274.

[59]
Wang Y J, Zhai W, Ren Y, Zhang Q H, Yao Y, Li S Y, Yang Q, Zhou X C, Li Z J, Chi B L, Liang J Z, He Z, Gu L, Zhang H. Adv. Mater., 2024, 36(17): 2307269.

[60]
Solati N, Karakaya C, Kaya S. ACS Catal., 2023, 13(1): 342.

[61]
Kiran P S, Kumar K V, Pandit N, Indupuri S, Kumar R, Wagh V V, Islam A, Keshri A K. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34(29): 2316266.

[62]
Pradhan G, Sharma A K. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 479: 1236.

[63]
Silambarasan K, Archana J, Harish S, Navaneethan M, Sankar Ganesh R, Ponnusamy S, Muthamizhchelvan C, Hara K. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 51: 94.

[64]
Zhao X X, Ning S C, Fu W, Pennycook S J, Loh K P. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(47): 1802397.

[65]
Wang M C, Ye H, Vasudevan V, Medhekar N V. J. Power Sources, 2022, 542: 231722.

[66]
Pan Y, Guan W M. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41(26): 11033.

[67]
Pu D L, Pan Y. Ceram. Int., 2021, 47(2): 2311.

[68]
Pan Y, Yu E D. Phys. B Condens. Matter, 2021, 611: 412936.

[69]
Lu Q P, Yu Y F, Ma Q L, Chen B, Zhang H. Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(10): 1917.

[70]
Song T S, Fu L, Wan N K, Wu J X, Xie J J.J. CO2 Util., 2020, 41: 101231.

[71]
Sharma P, Singh M K, Mehata M S. J. Mol. Struct., 2022, 1249: 131651.

[72]
Zhang X H, Huang X H, Xue M Q, Ye X, Lei W N, Tang H, Li C S. Mater. Lett., 2015, 148: 67.

[73]
Cao H W, Bai Z, Li Y T, Xiao Z R, Zhang X W, Li G Z. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, 8(19): 7343.

[74]
Bai Z, Wang L Y, Cao H W, Zhang X W, Li G Z. Fuel, 2022, 322: 124252.

[75]
Florio F, Ferlazzo A, Bonforte S, Nicotra G, Neri G, Pinkas I, van der Boom M E, Gulino A. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2025, 13(22): 11214.

[76]
Dharman R K, Palanisamy G, Oh T H. Chemosphere, 2022, 308: 136571.

[77]
Arafat A, Islam M S, Ferdous N, Islam A S M J, Sarkar M M H, Stampfl C, Park J. Sci. Rep., 2022, 12: 16085.

[78]
Zhan Y J, Liu Z, Najmaei S, Ajayan P M, Lou J. Small, 2012, 8(7): 966.

[79]
Liu K K, Zhang W J, Lee Y H, Lin Y C, Chang M T, Su C Y, Chang C S, Li H, Shi Y M, Zhang H, Lai C S, Li L J. Nano Lett., 2012, 12(3): 1538.

[80]
Xie C Y, Yang P F, Huan Y H, Cui F F, Zhang Y F. Dalton Trans., 2020, 49(30): 10319.

[81]
Yang S Y, Shim G W, Seo S B, Choi S Y. Nano Res., 2017, 10(1): 255.

[82]
Dumcenco D, Ovchinnikov D, Marinov K, Lazić P, Gibertini M, Marzari N, Sanchez O L, Kung Y C, Krasnozhon D, Chen M-W, Bertolazzi S, Gillet P, Fontcuberta i Morral A, Radenovic A, Kis A. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(4): 4611.

[83]
Sitek J, Plocharski J, Pasternak I, Gertych A P, McAleese C, Conran B R, Zdrojek M, Strupinski W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(40): 45101.

[84]
Martínez-Merino P, Sani E, Mercatelli L, Alcántara R, Navas J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, 8(3): 1627.

[85]
Sokolov M R, Tumbinskiy K A, Zvyagina A I, Senchikhin I N, Averin A A, Aleksandrov A E, Tameev A R, Ezhov A A, Kalinina M A. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun., 2022, 47: 100604.

[86]
Magda G Z, Pető J, Dobrik G, Hwang C, Biró L P, Tapasztó L. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 14714.

[87]
Nayak S, Swain G, Parida K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(23): 20923.

[88]
You X Q, Liu N, Lee C J, Pak J J. Mater. Lett., 2014, 121: 31.

[89]
Wang J W, Zheng X J, Dong Y Y, Chen L Y, Chen L J, He W Y. Dalton Trans., 2023, 52(14): 4537.

[90]
Zhang Y, Jia Q L, Ma M Z, Wang W X, Li B, Wang X, Zhang Y X, Zhu X B. Mater. Today Chem., 2025, 43: 102477.

[91]
Lian M, Wu X M, Wang Q G, Zhang W Z, Wang Y. Ceram. Int., 2017, 43(13): 9877.

[92]
Wang J, Wu Z C, Hu K H, Chen X Y, Yin H B. J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 619: 38.

[93]
Tang C, Zhang Y, Lu S, Zeng Y, Hua Q S, Zhang Y X. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2025, 8(3): 1568.

[94]
Chen A Y, Liu H H, Qi P, Xie X F, Wang M T, Wang X Y. J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 864: 158144.

[95]
Liu Q, Gao A M, Huang Y L, Yi F Y, cheng H H, Zhao S X, Chen H Y, Zeng R H, Sun Z Q, Shu D, Song X N. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 777: 1176.

[96]
Wei S F, Zhou R H, Wang G Y. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(14): 15780.

[97]
Tiwari P, Jaiswal J, Chandra R. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 324: 134767.

[98]
Guan X B, Zhao L P, Zhang P, Liu J, Song X F, Gao L. Mater. Today Energy, 2020, 16: 100379.

[99]
Manoj S, Sadhanala H K, Perelshtein I, Gedanken A. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14(16): 18570.

[100]
Liu Z P, Wang K W, Li Y J, Yuan S S, Huang G Q, Li X T, Li N. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2022, 300: 120696.

[101]
Li Z Q, Wang X X, Xu M D, Yin Z K, Zhao J L. J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 894: 162492.

[102]
Tang J, Huang J Z, Ding D J, Zhang S X, Deng X L. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47(94): 39771.

[103]
Teli A M, Beknalkar S A, Mane S M, Bhat T S, Kamble B B, Patil S B, Sadale S B, Shin J C. Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(19): 29002.

[104]
Zhu F J, Zhang H N, Lu Z Y, Kang D D, Han L. J. Energy Storage, 2021, 42: 103046.

[105]
Zhang H P, Wang K, Wang H, Lin H F, Zheng Y. Catal. Today, 2022, 404: 269.

[106]
Liu T T, Peng N, Zhang X K, Zheng R T, Xia M T, Yu H X, Shui M, Xie Y, Shu J. Nano Energy, 2021, 79: 105460.

[107]
Vikraman D, Hussain S, Karuppasamy K, Kathalingam A, Jo E B, Sanmugam A, Jung J, Kim H S. J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 893: 162271.

[108]
Singha S S, Rudra S, Mondal S, Pradhan M, Nayak A K, Satpati B, Pal P, Das K, Singha A. Electrochim. Acta, 2020, 338: 135815.

[109]
Shao J, Li Y Y, Zhong M, Wang Q Y, Luo X, Li K, Zhao W W. Mater. Lett., 2019, 252: 173.

[110]
Isacfranklin M, Princy L E M, Rathinam Y, Kungumadevi L, Ravi G, Al-Sehemi A G, Velauthapillai D. Energy Fuels, 2022, 36(12): 6476.

[111]
Wu Z C, Li B E, Xue Y J, Li J J, Zhang Y L, Gao F. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(38): 19445.

[112]
Joseph N, Muhammed Shafi P, Chandra Bose A. New J. Chem., 2018, 42(14): 12082.

[113]
Wang H, Xu X P, Neville A. RSC Adv., 2021, 11(42): 26273.

[114]
Thomas C, Sasi S, Benazeera Beegum K A, A S A, Reshmi R. Electrochim. Acta, 2024, 508: 145260.

[115]
Cai Z C, Wang Y N, Zhao J, Long Q, Li S W, Guo D, Zhu Z W, Zhang H F. Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 491: 151934.

[116]
Prakash K, Harish S, Kamalakannan S, Logu T, Shimomura M, Archana J, Navaneethan M. J. Energy Chem., 2023, 80: 335.

[117]
Radhakrishnan S, Mane P, Sree Raj K A, Chakraborty B, Rout C S. J. Energy Storage, 2023, 60: 106703.

Outlines

/