Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Graphite Materials in Metal-Ion Secondary Batteries

  • Qingdong Wang 1, 2 ,
  • Zitao Wang 1, 2 ,
  • Yu Dong 1, 2 ,
  • Tao Liu 1, 2 ,
  • Ning Li , 1, 2, * ,
  • Yuefeng Su , 1, 2, *
Expand
  • 1 Chongqing Innovation Center, Beijing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 401120, China
  • 2 School of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
* (Ning Li);
(Yuefeng Su)

†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received date: 2025-04-06

  Revised date: 2025-07-13

  Online published: 2025-10-25

Supported by

Heilongjiang Province Key R&D Program(2023ZX04A01)

National Key Research and Development Program(2021YFC2902905)

Chongqing Key Technology Innovation and Application Development Project(2022TIAD-DEX0024)

Chongqing Key Technology Innovation and Application Development Project(2023TIAD-KPX0007)

Beijing Nova Program,and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China(2022NSCQ-JQX3895)

Abstract

With the increasing proportion of renewable energy in the energy structure, the development of efficient and safe secondary battery energy storage technologies is crucial for addressing the challenges of integrating intermittent energy sources such as wind and solar power into the grid. Due to its unique structure and physicochemical properties, graphite anode material has been widely used in lithium-ion batteries. Inspired by the lithium storage behavior of graphite, its application in other metal-ion batteries has also been extensively studied, demonstrating significant potential. However, the application of graphite anode materials in various metal-ion secondary batteries still lacks a comprehensive understanding. This review analyzes the electrochemical behavior of graphite in different metal-ion secondary battery systems, identifies the challenges faced by graphite materials, and highlights the primary strategies and current research progress in addressing these issues. The aim is to provide a reference for the development of high-performance and sustainable graphite-based energy storage batteries.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Basic concepts of graphite materials

2.1 Crystal structure of graphite

2.2 Graphite intercalation compound

2.3 Types of Graphite Anodes for Batteries

3 Lithium-ion batteries

3.1 Challenges faced by graphite anode of lithium ion battery

3.2 Modification methods and research progress

4 Sodium ion battery

4.1 Present situation and challenge of graphite anode in sodium ion battery

4.2 Modification strategy of graphite anode

5 Potassium ion battery

5.1 Potassium storage mechanism of graphite anode

5.2 Challenge of graphite anode in potassium ion battery

5.3 Modification method

6 Multivalent metal ion battery

6.1 magnesium ion battery

6.2 Calcium ion battery

6.3 Zinc ion battery

6.4 Aluminum ion battery

7 Summary and prospect

Cite this article

Qingdong Wang , Zitao Wang , Yu Dong , Tao Liu , Ning Li , Yuefeng Su . Graphite Materials in Metal-Ion Secondary Batteries[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2025 , 37(12) : 1820 -1835 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20250408

1 Introduction

Wind energy, solar energy, tidal energy, and other new energy sources are characterized by intermittent power generation and cannot provide continuous, stable electricity, posing challenges to the stable operation of the power grid[1-2]. Energy storage technologies can ensure the smooth operation of the power grid[3]. Among these, secondary battery energy storage technology, with its green and environmentally friendly attributes, high energy density, and reusability, can serve as a viable strategy for the efficient and sustained operation of new energy systems, possessing significant application and research value. Lithium-ion batteries are currently the most mature high-specific-energy secondary batteries. However, lithium-ion batteries face challenges related to limited and unevenly distributed lithium resources, making it difficult for them to meet the demands of large-scale energy storage systems[4]. In the quest for alternatives to lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion[5], potassium-ion[6], magnesium-ion[7], and zinc-ion[8]batteries, owing to their abundant resource availability, have gradually emerged as research hotspots.
Graphite has a high theoretical capacity (~372 mAh/g) and a suitable lithiation/delithiation potential (~0.1 V vs Li/Li⁺), and is widely used as the anode material in lithium-ion batteries, serving as a key material that has driven the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries[9]. Given graphite's excellent performance in lithium-ion batteries, researchers have become interested in its performance in other types of metal-ion battery systems. Due to differences among various metal ions in terms of elemental species, ionic radius, charge density, and other factors, graphite's performance in these systems differs significantly from that in lithium-ion batteries. However, through methods such as regulating the graphite structure[10], surface modification[11], and compositing with other materials[12], the performance of graphite in different ion batteries can be greatly enhanced, providing new options for the development of secondary battery materials. At present, there remains a lack of comprehensive and systematic understanding of the application of graphite electrode materials in various metal-ion secondary batteries.
Given the broad application prospects of graphite in various secondary batteries, this article reviews the current research status of graphite in metal-ion batteries (such as lithium-ion, sodium-ion, potassium-ion, magnesium-ion, calcium-ion, zinc-ion, and aluminum-ion batteries). First, the physicochemical properties of graphite are introduced, and the principles underlying its suitability for metal-ion batteries are analyzed. Next, the challenges faced by graphite in its applications across different metal-ion batteries, along with corresponding improvement strategies, are presented. Finally, based on theoretical analysis and existing strategies, several promising research directions and key perspectives are proposed, aiming to advance the development of graphite materials in ion batteries.

2 Basic Concepts of Graphite Materials

2.1 Crystal structure of graphite

Graphite crystals have a layered structure, with carbon atoms forming covalent bonds via sp2hybridization, which in turn form graphene sheets. The layers are connected by van der Waals forces, with an interlayer spacing of 0.335 nm. As shown in Fig. 1a, b,depending on the stacking mode of the carbon atomic layers, graphite can be classified into hexagonal graphite (Hexagonal, 2H) and rhombohedral graphite (Rhombohedral, 3R). In hexagonal graphite, the carbon atomic layers are stacked in an ABAB… sequence, where the carbon atoms in layer B are shifted relative to those in layer A by a certain distance, and then the AB sequence is repeated (see Fig. 1b). In rhombohedral graphite, the carbon atoms in layer C are shifted relative to those in layer B by the same distance, and the ABC sequence is repeated (see Fig. 1c)[13], ultimately forming the stacking structure shown in Fig. 1d [14]. In most natural graphite samples, both types of graphite structures are typically present simultaneously, as indicated by the XRD pattern shown in Fig. 1e, where the proportion of rhombohedral graphite is less than 30%, reflecting the greater thermodynamic stability of hexagonal graphite. Due to the layered structure of graphite, graphite particles generally exhibit two distinct surface morphologies: basal planes and edge planes (see Fig. 1f)[15]. Because the carbon atoms on the edge planes are unsaturated in terms of bonding, the edge planes exhibit higher reactivity.
图1 (a) 六方石墨结构示意图;(b) 六方石墨基面和边缘面示意图;(c) 三方石墨结构示意图; (d) 三方石墨基面和边缘面示意图[14];(e) 天然石墨的XRD谱图;(f) 石墨的SEM图[15]

Fig.1 (a) Illustration of hexagonal graphite structure; (b) illustration of the basal and edge plane surfaces of hexagonal graphite; (c) illustration of rhombohedral graphite structure; (d) illustration of the basal and edge plane surfaces of rhombohedral graphite; Reproduced with permission[14]. Copyright 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) XRD patterns of natural graphite; (f) SEM image of graphite. Reproduced with permission[15]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry

2.2 Graphite Intercalation Compounds

Graphite's ability to form intercalation compounds with metal ions is a key reason why graphite can serve as an electrode material[16-17]. Due to graphite's unique layered structure and the relatively weak van der Waals forces between layers, many substances (such as metal atoms, ions, or molecules) can, under certain conditions, be inserted between graphite layers, forming graphite intercalation compounds (GICs)[18]. These foreign substances are referred to as guests, while the graphite material is referred to as the host; the process by which guest materials are inserted between the host graphite layers is called the intercalation reaction. Based on the type of interaction between the guest atoms and graphite, graphite intercalation compounds can be classified into four categories: ionic GICs, covalent GICs, molecular GICs, and mixed-bond GICs. Among these, ionic GICs can be further divided into two subtypes based on the direction of electron transfer: one subtype involves electron transfer from the guest atoms to graphite, known as donor-type GICs, such as alkali metal intercalation compounds (Li-GICs, Na-LICs); the other subtype involves electron transfer from the $\mathrm{\pi }$electrons in the graphite layers to the guest, known as acceptor-type GICs, such as intercalation compounds formed by metal chlorides[19](FeCl3-GICs, MgCl2-GICs). In addition, depending on the type of guest inserted between the graphite layers, GICs can also be classified into binary GICs[20](such as AlCl3-GICs) and ternary GICs[21](such as Li-DMSO-GICs). In metal-ion secondary batteries, energy is stored through the formation of intercalation compounds via intercalation reactions between metal ions and graphite.

2.3 Types of Graphite Anodes

Graphite anodes are mainly divided into natural graphite and synthetic graphite. Natural graphite anodes are derived from naturally occurring graphite deposits and are processed through a series of steps, including crushing, grading, and purification, to produce the anode material. Synthetic graphite anodes are produced by calcining organic materials (such as needle coke, petroleum coke, and pitch coke) at a specific graphitization temperature.
Natural graphite boasts advantages such as high capacity, high compaction density, and low cost, but it also suffers from issues like numerous surface defects and a broad particle size distribution. Surface defects in natural graphite can trigger side reactions with the electrolyte, leading to the formation of an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film, which in turn affects the capacity and cycling stability of natural graphite. Due to its cost-effectiveness and relatively short cycle life, natural graphite is primarily used in consumer electronics applications where performance requirements are not stringent. Moreover, a range of modification techniques, including surface coating and structural design, can significantly expand the application scope of natural graphite.
Artificial graphite is produced by high-temperature calcination of organic materials, and its pore structure can be adjusted by controlling the preparation process, thereby optimizing lithium-ion transport performance. Artificial graphite has fewer surface defects, a uniform particle size distribution, and exhibits high cycling performance, excellent rate capability, and high safety, making its overall performance superior to that of natural graphite. However, due to the high energy consumption associated with high-temperature graphitization, artificial graphite is more expensive. Thanks to its outstanding performance, artificial graphite occupies the majority share of the power battery market as well as the high-end consumer electronics market.

3 Lithium-ion batteries

Although graphite anodes have been in use for more than 30 years, they still occupy a central position as the primary anode material in lithium-ion battery systems and represent the lithium-ion battery anode material with the largest market share[22].This success stems from the outstanding properties of graphite. In terms of capacity, the theoretical specific capacity of a graphite anode can reach 372 mAh/g (corresponding to the chemical formula LiC6), meaning that under ideal conditions, a unit mass of graphite can store a relatively large number of lithium ions. At the same time, its charge–discharge equilibrium electrode potential is low and relatively stable (~0.1 V vs Li⁺/Li). This characteristic of a low electrode potential enables graphite to achieve a higher battery output voltage when paired with cathode materials, thereby enhancing the energy density of the battery[23].

3.1 Challenges Facing Graphite Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Although graphite has numerous advantages in lithium-ion batteries and has achieved tremendous success, the continuous development of industries such as new energy vehicles has led to higher performance demands for lithium-ion batteries to meet consumer expectations for high power, long range, and extended service life. As a critical component of lithium-ion batteries, the graphite anode faces numerous challenges in terms of cycling performance, rate performance, and other aspects.
The rate performance of graphite anodes is considered the primary factor limiting the fast-charging capability of lithium-ion batteries[24-25]. Mao et al.[26]designed a three-electrode symmetric cell to separately investigate the performance of the NCM811 cathode and the graphite anode under fast-charging conditions. The results showed that the NCM811 cathode exhibited a relatively stable voltage plateau and capacity retention across different discharge rates (C/10 to 4C) (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the graphite anode displayed rapid capacity decay at rates above 1 C, severely limiting the fast-charging performance of lithium-ion batteries (Fig. 2b). Further analysis of the areal capacity and the N/P ratio revealed that as the charging rate increased, the effective capacity of the graphite anode decreased significantly (Fig. 2c). Moreover, during charging, when the charging rate exceeds the rate at which lithium ions can be intercalated into the graphite crystal, the resulting electrochemical polarization, ohmic polarization, and concentration polarization cause the electrode potential of the graphite anode to fall below the equilibrium potential of Li+/Li, leading to the deposition of lithium metal and the formation of lithium dendrites on the graphite electrode (Fig. 2d), which poses serious safety concerns and further restricts the high-rate charging of graphite[27].
图2 (a) 对称电池中NMC811正极的电压分布, 电极在C/5下锂化,以不同的速率去锂化;(b) 对称电池中石墨负极的电压分布, 电极在C/5时脱锂, 并以不同的速率锂化;(c) NMC 811正极和石墨负极在不同速率下的面积容量以及由此产生的N/P比;(d) 来自NMC 811||石墨全电池的电极在充电速率性能测试后的图像[26]

Fig.2 (a) Voltage profiles of NMC811 in the cathode symmetric cell. The electrode was lithiated at C/5 and delithiated at various rates. (b) Voltage profiles of graphite in the anode symmetric cell. The electrode was delithiated at C/5 and lithiated at various rates. (c) Areal capacity of the NMC811 cathode and graphite anode at each rate and the resulting N/P ratio. (d) Images of electrodes from the NMC811/Graphite full cell after charging rate performance test. Reproduced with permission[26]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier

The cycle life of graphite anodes is another critical factor affecting the service life of lithium-ion batteries, and enhancing cycle performance represents a major challenge currently facing graphite anodes. There are many reasons for capacity fade or even failure in graphite anodes, such as the exfoliation of graphite caused by the co-intercalation of solvated lithium ions, which leads to structural degradation of the graphite[28]; meanwhile, as shown in Figure 3, the unstable SEI layer undergoes dynamic evolution during cycling, with expansion and dissolution occurring. The SEI layer on the graphite surface gradually thickens over repeated charge–discharge cycles, further consuming lithium ions and solvent while increasing battery resistance[29]; the lithiation potential of the graphite anode (~0.1 V vs Li⁺/Li) is very close to the equilibrium electrode potential of lithium, making lithium deposition highly likely under practical operating conditions. This not only reduces the battery’s capacity but also poses safety risks[30-32].
图3 石墨负极失效示意图[32]

Fig.3 Schematic diagram of graphite anode failure[32]. Reproduced with permission[32]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier

3.2 Modification Methods and Research Progress

3.2.1 Surface Coating

Ideally, the SEI film should be a good Li+ion conductor and an electronic insulator, with long-term cycling stability required for practical applications[33-34]. However, this is not the case in reality. Therefore, constructing a coating with good ionic conductivity and high mechanical strength on the graphite surface through surface coating is an effective method to enhance the performance of graphite anodes.
As shown in Figure 4a, Xin et al.[35] constructed a MoO x-MoN x (MoON) coating on the graphite surface. The resulting MoON@Gr anode delivers a reversible capacity of 340.3 mAh·g-1 after 4000 cycles at a 6 C rate, while retaining the intact structure of graphite and exhibiting a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the interface. Studies have shown that the MoON coating possesses high ionic conductivity (5 mS/cm), a high electron work function (4.66 eV), a low Li+migration energy barrier (0.91 eV), a high Young’s modulus (9.65 GPa), and a low desolvation energy (1.18 eV), which are the key factors responsible for the significant enhancement in the performance of the graphite anode.
图4 (a) MoON@Gr合成示意图[35];(b) P-S-石墨形成机制示意图[36];(c) 聚焦离子束穿过单个LBCO包覆石墨颗粒的横剖面的SEM图像[37];(d) MoS2包覆石墨的SEI形成示意图[38]

Fig. 4 (a) Synthetic schematic diagram of MoON@Gr. Reproduced with permission[35]. Copyright 2024, Wiley; (b) schematic of the formation mechanism of P-S-graphite. Reproduced with permission[36]. Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. (c) SEM image of focused-ion beam cross-section through a single graphite particle showing the conformal LBCO encapsulation of the particle. Reproduced with permission[37]. Copyright 2022, Wiley. (d) Schematic description of the SEI composition and reaction coordinates for MoS2-NG.; Reproduced with permission[38].Copyright 2025, Wiley

Sun et al.[36]used MD and DFT methods to investigate the impact of different SEI components on the solvation structure of Li+. They found that, due to the strong interaction between Li+ and Li3P, a low-solvent-coordination solvation structure of Li+ can form near the inner Helmholtz plane. In addition, the high ionic conductivity of Li3P facilitates the desolvation process of Li+ and enables rapid Li+ transport through the SEI. Based on these findings, Sun et al.[36] developed a P-S-Graphite anode (Fig. 4b) that in situ generates an SEI containing Li3P during cycling. The results show that an Ah-scale battery with a P-S-graphite anode and an NCM622 cathode exhibits excellent performance under high-rate charging conditions, sustaining 2,500 cycles at a 8 C rate with a capacity retention of 81.7%.
Dasgupta et al.[37]used atomic layer deposition to coat solid electrolyte Li3BO3-Li2CO3(LBCO) onto graphite, forming an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) (Fig. 4c). Compared with naturally formed SEIs, the LBCO coating exhibits lower impedance and can delay the deposition of metallic lithium. Ultimately, the LBCO-coating strategy enabled 4 C charging without sacrificing energy density. Suh et al.[38]coated MoS2onto the surface of natural graphite (Fig. 4d). During initial charging, MoS2reacts with Li+, forming an SEI layer rich in Li2S and metallic Mo clusters on the graphite particle surface. This process generates a robust SEI layer with high ionic conductivity, effectively enhancing the performance of the graphite anode.

3.2.2 Structural Design

Graphite's unique layered structure provides space for lithium-ion storage, but its anisotropic nature means that lithium ions can only be inserted from the edge planes, which limits the lithium-ion transport rate[39].By expanding the interlayer spacing of graphite[40]and designing porous structures[41], the structure of graphite can be optimized to increase the lithium-ion diffusion rate and enhance cycling performance[14].
Cheng et al.[42]used KOH etching to treat natural graphite, thereby fabricating a porous-structured graphite anode. As shown in Figure 5a, etching a porous surface into the graphite significantly increases the number of sites for lithium-ion insertion/extraction and reduces the diffusion distance of lithium ions. The electrochemical performance comparison of the resulting porous graphite is shown in Figure 5b: at a 10 C rate, the capacity of the porous graphite shows virtually no decay, and the multi-channel structured graphite anode exhibits better charge-discharge capability, cycling performance, and higher Coulombic efficiency than the pristine graphite material.
图5 (a) KOH蚀刻石墨合成示意图;(b) 多孔石墨与原始石墨性能对比; 经许可转载自文献[42],版权©2015爱思唯尔

Fig.5 Schematic scheme of (a) pristine graphite and (b) KOH etched graphite. Reproduced with permission[42]. Copyright 2015, Elsevier

To address the capacity decay caused by the expansion of graphite materials, Zou et al.[43]used an intercalation reaction between a mixture of H2SO4and H2O2and natural flake graphite to prepare mildly expanded graphite (MEG). The working mechanism of MEG is illustrated in Figure 6: the intercalation reaction used increases the interlayer spacing of MEG slightly from 0.3358 nm to 0.3370 nm, and the preparation process introduces numerous defects, such as pores, channels, and stacking faults. The increased interlayer spacing and porous structure buffer the volume changes of graphite during cycling, thereby significantly enhancing the cycling stability of the graphite anode. The porous structure also provides more sites for lithium storage, greatly increasing the reversible capacity of MEG.
图6 MEG增强石墨负极性能的原理[43]

Fig.6 Mechanism of the enhancement of capacity and cycle stability of MEG. Reproduced with permission[43].Copyright 2009, Elsevier

3.2.3 Electrolyte Engineering

During the first week of charge and discharge, the electrolyte decomposes on the surface of the graphite anode to form the SEI, whose structure and composition are largely determined by the properties of the electrolyte. Under low-temperature conditions, the viscosity of the electrolyte increases, ionic conductivity decreases, and the desolvation process of Li+is slow, which is considered a key factor limiting the low-temperature performance of graphite anodes[44]. Therefore, optimizing the electrolyte through electrolyte engineering is an effective approach to enhancing the high- and low-temperature performance, rate capability, and cycle stability of graphite anodes. Optimization of the electrolyte can be carried out by focusing on parameters such as ionic diffusivity, electrical conductivity, viscosity, desolvation energy, and other critical factors.
Currently, mainstream ester-based electrolytes have high viscosity and melting points, making them unable to meet the low-temperature performance requirements of lithium-ion batteries[45].The low viscosity and low melting point of ether solvents make them the best choice for fast charging and low-temperature lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, linear ether solvent molecules irreversibly co-intercalate into graphite layers during cycling, severely disrupting the crystal structure of graphite. Cyclic ethers can effectively address this issue. Wang et al.[46]developed cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) as a non-co-intercalating ether solvent. CPME contains a cyclopentyl group with significant steric hindrance, which imparts weak solvation ability and a wide liquid-phase temperature range to the electrolyte.
Electrolyte additives also play a very important role in the electrolyte, and the addition of different additives can bring about different performance improvements to the graphite anode[47-48]. For example, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) has a reduction potential (1.37 V vs. Li/Li+) higher than that of the EC solvent, causing it to decompose prior to the initial lithiation of the graphite anode. Ultimately, the decomposition of the FEC additive forms inorganic compounds such as LiF and Li2O, which exhibit high ionic conductivity. These compounds can increase the density, robustness, and chemical/electrochemical stability of the SEI film, improve surface kinetics, suppress the continuous decomposition of the electrolyte, thereby reducing side reactions and extending the cycle life of the graphite anode[49].
表1 使用不同改性方法的石墨负极性能表现

Table 1 Performance of graphite anode with different modification methods

Methods Materials Cycle performance (rate, cycle times, capacity retention rate) Rate performance (rate, specific capacity)
Surface engineering MoON@Gr[35] 6 C, 4000, 85% 5 C, 300 mAh/g
P-S-graphite[36] 8 C, 2500, 81.7% 10 C,130 mAh/g
Al2O3@graphite[50] 0.4 A/g, 100, 83% 4 A/g, 337 mAh/g
SGT@FC-N[51] 1 C, 900, 93% 15 C, 170 mAh/g
Structure design KOH-etched graphite[52] 6 C, 100,74% 6 C, 74 mAh/g
Expanded graphite[53] 1 A/g, 700, 100% 5 A/g, 208 mAh/g
Nitrogen-doped hollow graphite[54] 1 A/g, 500, 100% 3 A/g, 200 mAh/g
porous graphite nanosheet[44] 4 C, 500, 90% 8 C, 325 mAh/g
Electrolyte engineering 1.8 M LiFSI in DOL[55] 20 C, 4000, 80% 50 C, 180 mAh/g
1 M LiTFSI in FEC/CPME[46] 1 C, 300, 85% 5 C, 150 mAh/g
0.02 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC[56] 0.5 C, 200, 77.4% 2 C, 140 mAh/g
LHCE[57] 4 C, 200, 85.5% 4 C, 220 mAh/g

4 Sodium-ion batteries

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have become a research hotspot in the energy storage field due to their abundant resources and low cost[58-59]. Among the various components of sodium-ion batteries, the performance of the anode material plays a crucial role in determining the overall battery performance. Graphite, as a conventional anode material, has achieved great success in lithium-ion batteries, but its application in sodium-ion batteries faces numerous challenges. Consequently, research has been conducted on the modification of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries[60].

4.1 Current Status and Challenges of Graphite Anodes in Sodium-Ion Batteries

Sodium and lithium are elements in the same group, sharing similar physicochemical properties; however, they also exhibit significant differences in electrochemical applications[61].The equilibrium electrode potential of Li+/Li is -3.04 V, whereas that of Na+/Na is -2.71 V. This results in a narrower operating voltage window for sodium-ion batteries compared to lithium-ion batteries, which to some extent prevents electrolyte decomposition and enhances the safety and stability of the battery. Additionally, since lithium ions react with aluminum to form alloys, lithium-ion batteries cannot use aluminum as a current collector and must instead rely on the more expensive copper; in contrast, sodium ions do not react with aluminum, allowing aluminum to be used as a current collector and thereby reducing battery manufacturing costs[62].
Despite their safety and cost advantages, the practical application of sodium-ion batteries still faces many challenges. The operating principle of sodium-ion batteries is similar to that of lithium-ion batteries; however, in ester-based electrolytes, graphite has a theoretical specific capacity of only 35 mAh/g[63-64]. Early views suggested that the primary reason for the low capacity of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries lies in the larger ionic radius of sodium ions. The ionic radius of sodium ions is 0.102 nm, compared to 0.076 nm for lithium ions; the larger ionic radius results in greater transport resistance for sodium ions within graphite, leading to poorer performance of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries. However, alkali metals with even larger ionic radii, such as potassium ions, exhibit higher reversible capacities in graphite, indicating that the larger ionic radius of sodium ions alone is not the primary cause of the low capacity of graphite in sodium-ion batteries. To investigate the main reasons for the poor performance of graphite in sodium-ion batteries, Goddard et al.[65]used first-principles calculations and found that the Gibbs free energy change for the insertion of Na+into the graphite anode is positive, indicating that the process of Na+insertion into the graphite anode is thermodynamically unfavorable and is the primary reason for the low capacity of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries. Based on this, Goddard et al. suggest that increasing the interlayer spacing of graphite or enhancing the defect concentration in graphite can reduce the Gibbs free energy change associated with Na+insertion into the graphite anode, thereby improving the electrochemical performance of graphite anodes. Graphite exhibits extremely low sodium storage capacity in ester-based electrolytes; studies have shown that under ether-based electrolyte conditions, graphite can achieve a specific capacity close to 120 mAh/g, with excellent rate capability and cycling performance. Nevertheless, the sodium storage capacity of graphite in ether-based electrolytes remains far lower than that of hard carbon anode materials (~300 mAh/g), which limits the use of graphite as an anode material in sodium-ion batteries. A deeper understanding of how to enhance the sodium storage capacity of graphite is still lacking.

4.2 Modification Strategies for Graphite Anodes

Currently, the application of graphite in sodium-ion batteries still faces challenges such as low first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, poor electrolyte stability, and weak rate performance. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed various modification strategies, including structural modification, surface modification, and intercalation modification, to enhance the performance of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries.

4.2.1 Structural modification

To enhance the sodium storage performance of graphite anodes, increasing the interlayer spacing of graphite is one of the most commonly used structural modification methods. Expanded graphite (EG) is a key material prepared by oxidizing and partially reducing graphite. Strong oxidants are used to oxidize the graphite, resulting in a material whose primary structure remains layered, while the interlayer spacing of the graphite is significantly increased and its structure undergoes complex changes. Oxidation introduces a large number of oxygen-containing functional groups into the graphite interlayers, which not only increases the interlayer spacing but also enhances the conductivity of the graphite, thereby creating favorable conditions for sodium ion insertion into the graphite anode[66]..
Wang et al.[67]used an improved Hummers method to prepare graphene oxide, which was partially reduced through heat treatment to effectively regulate the interlayer spacing of graphite, yielding an expanded graphite with an interlayer spacing of approximately 0.43 nm. At a current density of 20 mA/g, the expanded graphite anode synthesized via the improved Hummers method and heat treatment exhibits a high reversible capacity of about 300 mAh/g in sodium-ion batteries, demonstrating the superior electrochemical performance of expanded graphite in sodium-ion batteries. The structural evolution of graphite, graphene oxide, and expanded graphite is shown in Figure 7[68].
图7 石墨、氧化石墨和膨胀石墨的结构示意[68]

Fig.7 Structural schematic of graphite, graphite oxide and expanded graphite[68]. Reproduced with permission.Copyright 2024, Springer Nature

4.2.2 Surface modification

Surface modification methods such as coating protective layers and ball-milling activation can enhance the sodium storage performance of graphite anodes by expanding the interlayer spacing of graphite, introducing more active sites, or reducing the surface area, thereby improving the Coulombic efficiency of graphite and reducing the risk of sodium dendrite formation[67,69]..
In 2023, Liang et al.[70]in situ synthesized a ZIF-8 coating layer on the surface of graphite, which provided additional sodium-ion storage sites and significantly enhanced the electrochemical performance of the anode material. At a high current density of 20 A/g, the material exhibited a first-cycle Coulombic efficiency of 86% and a reversible capacity of 90 mAh/g, demonstrating its excellent rate performance. Moreover, the composite material showed good stability and capacity retention: after 15,000 cycles and 20,000 cycles, the capacity retention rates were 96% and 94%, respectively, indicating a long operational lifespan. In addition, researchers have also employed mechanical activation to enhance the electrochemical performance of graphite anodes. Lee et al.[71]obtained mechanically activated graphite through ball milling. The resulting mechanically activated graphite exhibited a high reversible capacity of 290.5 mAh/g at a current density of 10 mA/g, and a reversible capacity of 157.7 mAh/g at a current density of 1 A/g, representing a significant improvement over pristine graphite.

4.2.3 Intercalation modification

To improve the performance of graphite anodes in sodium-ion batteries, intercalation modification is also a commonly used approach. Intercalation modification refers to a method of inserting specific guest molecules or ions into the interlayer spaces of layered materials, thereby enhancing the electrochemical performance of graphite materials. In 2021, Li et al.[72]prepared a highly stable composite material, AlCl3-MGIC, by intercalating AlCl3 into microcrystalline graphite. After using DEGDME as the solvent, AlCl3-MGIC exhibited excellent electrochemical performance. At a current density of 200 mA/g, after 100 cycles, the AlCl3-MGIC anode still retained a specific capacity of 202 mAh/g; after 900 cycles, the capacity retention of the AlCl3-MGIC anode reached as high as 98%, with a specific capacity of 198 mAh/g. In 2023, Lan et al.[73]introduced metal chlorides enhanced by sulfonyl chloride into graphite, yielding the intercalated compound material BiCl3-GICs. Raman spectroscopy analysis showed that the electronic interaction between graphite and BiCl3 weakened during the discharge process in the first cycle, creating favorable conditions for Na+ insertion. At a current density of 1 A/g, BiCl3-GICs exhibited a high reversible capacity of 213 mAh/g; as the current density increased to 5 A/g, BiCl3-GICs still maintained a reversible capacity of 170 mAh/g, fully demonstrating the superior high-rate performance of BiCl3-GICs. Liu et al.[74]replaced traditional ester-based electrolytes with short-chain ether solvents (DME/DEGDME) to induce the formation of ternary graphite intercalation compounds (t-GICs). Through a co-intercalation reaction of Na+ with the solvent, graphite, which was originally hydrophobic toward sodium, was transformed into a sodium-affinity matrix. After modification, the interlayer spacing of graphite increased from 0.335 nm to 1.158 nm, providing more active sites for sodium storage; at the same time, the operating voltage of the modified graphite decreased to 0.18 V, a significant improvement compared to conventional graphite anodes (0.6–0.8 V). At a C-rate of 6, the optimal t-GIC electrode exhibited a high reversible capacity of 588.4 mAh/g, 4.9 times that of a conventional graphite anode (120 mAh/g), and this electrode maintained a Coulombic efficiency of over 99.7% over 550 cycles, with a high capacity retention rate. Chen et al.[75]modified the graphite anode in sodium-ion batteries by intercalating Bi nanoparticles into graphite. They first obtained an intermediate product, K-Bi-GIC, through co-melting of a K-Bi alloy with graphite, and then, through potassium removal using ethanol, retained Bi nanoparticles on the nanoscale (~10 nm) within the graphite layers, forming a “sandwich structure” in which graphite serves as a conductive protective layer and Bi nanoparticles act as active centers. At a current density of 80 mA/g, the Bi@Graphite electrode exhibited a high reversible capacity of 164 mAh/g, representing a 45% improvement over pristine graphite (110 mAh/g).

5 Potassium-ion batteries

5.1 Potassium Storage Mechanism of Graphite Anodes

As in lithium-ion batteries, the potassium storage mechanism of graphite anodes in potassium-ion batteries is primarily based on the reversible intercalation and deintercalation of potassium ions between graphite layers. In 2015, Ji et al.[76]found that the theoretical capacity of the potassium ion intercalation compound KC8, formed by the insertion of potassium ions into graphite, can reach 279 mAh/g. Potassium ion intercalation in graphite typically proceeds through several stages, with each stage corresponding to different potassium ion intercalation compounds (K-GICs). Subsequent research has gradually deepened our understanding of the potassium storage mechanism in graphite anodes. In 2015, Jian et al.[77]studied and reported the electrochemical potassium storage performance of graphite anodes, proposing that the three distinct stages of potassium ion insertion into graphite correspond to different potassium ion intercalation compounds: KC36, KC24, and KC8. In the same year, Luo et al.[78]used experimental and theoretical computational methods to propose a different staging of potassium ion insertion into graphite, suggesting that potassium ions undergo three stages—KC24, KC16, and KC8—during the insertion process. In 2019, Liu et al.[79]combined experimental observations with density functional theory simulations to link the process of potassium ion insertion into graphite with the evolution of its structure and composition. They proposed that potassium ion insertion into graphite can be divided into five stages: the fifth stage (KC60), the fourth stage (KC48), the third stage (KC36), the second stage (KC24 and KC16), and the first stage (KC8), with clear and distinct transitions between the five stages. At the same time, Liu et al.[78]also innovatively proposed two mechanisms within the second stage: intra-stage transitions from KC24 to KC16 and inter-stage transitions. This finding further refined our understanding of the process of potassium ion insertion into graphite anodes and provided a new theoretical basis for the development of potassium-ion batteries.

5.2 Challenges of Graphite Anodes in Potassium-Ion Batteries

Although potassium ions and lithium ions share similar chemical properties and energy storage mechanisms, their behavior in graphite materials differs significantly. The ionic radius of potassium is 0.138 nm, approximately 1.8 times that of lithium, and this larger ionic radius poses substantial challenges for the use of graphite anodes in potassium-ion batteries. The larger ionic radius of potassium results in greater resistance to diffusion into the interlayer spaces of graphite, leading to poor transport kinetics and consequently poor electrochemical performance of graphite anodes in potassium-ion batteries. Meanwhile, during the insertion of potassium ions into graphite to form KC8, the graphite undergoes an expansion of approximately 60% along the Caxis. This significant expansion severely compromises the structural integrity of the graphite anode, resulting in poor cycle stability in potassium-ion batteries[76,80-81]. Jian et al.[77]measured a graphite capacity of 273 mAh/g in potassium-ion batteries at a low current rate of 0.025 C, which is close to the theoretical capacity of KC8; however, after 50 cycles at a rate of 0.5 C, the capacity decayed from 197 mAh/g to 100 mAh/g, with a capacity retention of only 50.8%, rendering the battery unsuitable for practical use.

5.3 Modification Method

To improve the electrochemical performance of graphite anodes in potassium-ion batteries, various methods such as microcrystal regulation, heteroatom doping, and coating modification have been employed to modify graphite and enhance its performance in potassium-ion batteries.

5.3.1 Microcrystal Regulation

Graphite anodes have large lateral dimensions and high carbon-layer stacking in the longitudinal direction, resulting in long ion-diffusion distances and low ion-mobility between graphite anode layers. This leads to poor cycling and rate performance of graphite[82]. Reducing the particle size of graphite through mechanical grinding and other methods can, to a certain extent, shorten the diffusion distance of potassium ions in the graphite anode, thereby improving the electrochemical performance of the graphite anode[83].
In 2019, Carboni et al.[84]used a simple ball-milling process to reduce the particle size of graphite from 30–40 μm to 20–25 μm, with the concomitant exfoliation of graphene layers during this process. At a current density of 25 mA/g, the capacity of the pristine graphite was 115 mAh/g, whereas the ball-milled graphite exhibited a capacity of 211 mAh/g, representing an 83.5% increase in capacity. Furthermore, the pristine graphite lost 50% of its capacity after 10 cycles, while the ball-milled graphite anode retained more than 150 mAh/g even after 100 cycles, demonstrating a significant improvement in cycling stability. Rahman et al.[85]subjected commercial graphite to ball milling in the presence of acetone. In electrochemical tests at a current density of 100 mA/g, the modified graphite achieved an initial reversible capacity of 227 mAh/g, with a capacity retention of as high as 98% after 500 cycles. This result also demonstrates that the specialized ball-milling treatment can enhance graphite performance to a certain extent. After ball milling, the charge–discharge curve of the graphite anode still exhibits a distinct low-voltage plateau, reflecting the formation of potassium-ion intercalation compounds and indicating that ball milling has only a minor impact on the structure of graphite. Ball-milling is low-cost, fast, and can serve as a method for the large-scale preparation of modified graphite.
In addition to ball milling, some scholars have employed other methods to modify and regulate the microcrystalline structure of graphite. Xiao et al.[86]constructed 2.5–5 nm nanoscale pores in synthetic graphite, providing rapid K+transport channels. By introducing defects, they reduced the graphite microcrystallite size from 39.4 nm to 24.6 nm while preserving the long-range ordered structure of graphite. At a 0.1 C rate, the modified graphite exhibited a reversible capacity as high as 306 mAh/g, representing an approximately 17.7% improvement over the pristine synthetic graphite (260 mAh/g). At a 2 C rate, the reversible capacity of the modified graphite was 29 mAh/g, an 81.25% improvement over the pristine synthetic graphite (16 mAh/g), demonstrating a significant enhancement in electrochemical performance.

5.3.2 Heteroatom doping

In the research on graphite anodes, heteroatom doping is widely recognized as an effective method for enhancing the electrochemical performance of carbon materials. During the process of doping heteroatoms into graphite anodes, defect formation often occurs, and the defects generated in graphite can provide more active sites for potassium ion insertion. Moreover, if larger-sized atoms such as S or P are used for doping, the interlayer spacing of graphite can be expanded, facilitating the insertion and extraction of potassium ions and enhancing the cycling and rate performance of graphite anodes[87-89]..
Among the numerous studies on heteroatom doping, nitrogen doping of graphite anodes has made significant progress. First, nitrogen has a higher electronegativity than carbon; when nitrogen atoms are incorporated into the graphite anode, the interaction between the graphite anode and potassium ions is enhanced. Second, after nitrogen doping, three main structural configurations emerge in the graphite anode: pyrrolic nitrogen, pyridinic nitrogen, and graphitic nitrogen. Pyrrolic and pyridinic nitrogens provide active sites for potassium ions, facilitating their insertion into the graphite anode, while graphitic nitrogen enhances conductivity by providing charge carriers. At the same time, nitrogen doping improves the wettability of graphite, ensuring that the solid–liquid interface is fully utilized[90]. Wang et al.[91]prepared nitrogen-doped graphite foams with varying nitrogen concentrations and configurations using an improved chemical vapor deposition method. The shift of the (002) peak to lower diffraction angles in the XRD patterns confirms the increased interlayer spacing of graphite after nitrogen doping. The researchers conducted electrochemical tests using the highest-nitrogen-content nitrogen-doped graphite foam NGF-8.47 obtained in the experiment as the anode in a potassium-ion battery. At a current density of 40 mA/g, NGF-8.47 delivered a reversible capacity of 231.4 mAh/g. When the current density was increased to 200 mA/g, the capacity of undoped graphite rapidly decayed to 6 mAh/g, whereas NGF-8.47 retained a capacity of 112 mAh/g, demonstrating the enhancement of graphite’s electrochemical performance through nitrogen doping. Ma et al.[92]improved the potassium-ion storage performance of carbon nanosheets through edge nitrogen/sulfur co-doping, using thiourea as both the nitrogen and sulfur source. By controlling the amount of thiourea and the high-temperature carbonization conditions, they obtained a series of N/S co-doped carbon nanosheets. At a current density of 0.1 A/g, the reversible capacity of the N/S co-doped carbon nanosheets reached 368.2 mAh/g, exceeding the theoretical capacity of KC8(270 mAh/g). At a current density of 1 A/g, after 2,800 cycles, the N/S co-doped carbon nanosheets still maintained a reversible capacity of 205.8 mAh/g. At a high current density of 10 A/g, the N/S co-doped carbon nanosheets exhibited a reversible capacity of 106.1 mAh/g, demonstrating excellent fast-charging performance.

5.3.3 Coating modification

Coating modification is also a commonly used method for modifying graphite materials. Coating modification refers to a modification approach in which materials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene are uniformly coated onto the surface of graphite materials. The coating layer on the surface of graphite materials can be regarded as the “shell” of the graphite anode, which can enhance the cycling stability of graphite by mitigating volume expansion during charge and discharge. To further enhance the effectiveness of the coating layer, heteroatom doping can be introduced into the coating layer, providing more active sites for potassium-ion insertion, facilitating the intercalation and deintercalation of potassium ions, and improving the rate performance of graphite materials.
Tian et al.[90]used urea as a carbon source and synthesized nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets (NC)-coated multilayer graphite (NC@MG) by designing a multifunctional layer on the graphite surface, thereby enhancing the structural and cycling stability of the graphite anode in potassium-ion batteries. At the same time, the generated carbon nanosheets provided more adsorption sites for potassium ions on the anode surface, increasing the capacity of the graphite anode. Electrochemical tests were conducted using this NC@MG as the anode material in potassium-ion batteries at a current density of 50 mA/g, and NC@MG exhibited a high capacity of 232.2 mAh/g, which is higher than that of the pristine graphite anode. Moreover, after 1000 cycles, the capacity retention of NC@MG reached 97.5%, fully demonstrating the enhancement of rate performance and cycling stability of the graphite anode through coating modification. Wang et al.[93]followed the preparation process shown in Figure 8and used chemical reduction to coat graphene oxide (GO) onto the surface of expanded graphite (EG), forming an rGO-modified composite structure. Raman spectroscopy and XRD results confirmed that the introduction of rGO increased the interlayer spacing of graphite from 0.335 nm to 0.342 nm, facilitating the insertion and extraction of potassium ions. The composite material exhibited a relatively high capacity of 450 mAh/g at a current density of 50 mA/g, and even when the current density was increased to 800 mA/g, the composite still retained a capacity of 126 mAh/g, representing a significant improvement over uncoated expanded graphite. Xiong et al.[94]employed an innovative approach that enhances potassium-ion storage performance by in situ chemical regulation of the graphitization degree of carbon fibers. First, MnO2nanosheets were grown via KMnO4oxidation etching, and then nitrogen-doped carbon-coated graphite was prepared via oxidative polymerization, organically combining a highly graphitized core with a defect-rich interfacial layer. At a current density of 0.1 A/g, the optimized CNF@NC-5 electrode still maintained a high reversible capacity of 294.9 mAh/g after 100 cycles; at a high current density of 2 A/g, the CNF@NC-5 electrode retained a capacity of 98.3 mAh/g after 2000 cycles, with significantly improved electrochemical performance.
图8 复合材料EG/rGO的制备流程示意[93]

Fig.8 schematic diagram of preparation process of EG/rGO. Reproduced with permission[93]. Copyright 2021, Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica

6 Multivalent metal-ion batteries

Higher theoretical specific capacity and abundant natural resources have made multivalent metal-ion batteries a focus of widespread attention, and they are regarded as an important development direction for new secondary batteries[95].However, due to the high charge density and small ionic radius of multivalent ions (Mg2+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Al3+) and the relatively small interlayer spacing of graphite, the high charge density of multivalent ions leads to poor kinetic performance during their diffusion between graphite layers. This results in significant resistance to the insertion and extraction of metal ions within the graphite layers, thereby limiting the release of graphite capacity and its cycling reversibility. Using graphite directly as the negative electrode in multivalent metal-ion batteries is thermodynamically infeasible[96].Nevertheless, in a suitable electrolyte, a solvent co-intercalation mechanism can enable multivalent ions to form ternary graphite intercalation compounds with graphite, allowing for rapid and reversible ion insertion and extraction[96-97]. Through anion intercalation reactions, graphite can also serve as a cathode material in dual-ion batteries[98-99]. In addition, novel graphite materials such as graphene, with their outstanding physicochemical properties, can also play a unique role in multivalent-ion batteries.

6.1 Magnesium-ion batteries

Inspired by the co-intercalation mechanism of solvated sodium ions, Kim et al.[100]investigated the co-intercalation behavior of magnesium ions with linear ether solvents (such as DEGME and DME) and graphite. Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, they explored the feasibility of magnesium ions co-intercalating into graphite with linear ether solvents, demonstrating that magnesium ions can indeed be intercalated into graphite via a co-intercalation mechanism. In electrochemical tests, graphite electrodes using DME/DEGDME as the solvent exhibited a reversible capacity of 180 mAh/g and a equilibrium electrode potential of 1 V (vsMg/Mg2+). This points to a new direction for research on graphite as a negative electrode material in magnesium-ion batteries.
In addition to being used as a negative electrode material, graphite can also serve as a positive electrode material in magnesium-based dual-ion batteries. Tang et al.[101]constructed a magnesium-ion dual-ion battery using an organic small molecule as the negative electrode, expanded graphite (EG) with a high potential and rapid anion diffusion kinetics as the positive electrode, and an ionic liquid as the electrolyte. After 500 cycles at a 5 C rate, the capacity retention was 95.7%, demonstrating excellent cycling stability. In this battery system, expanded graphite serves as the positive electrode; its layered structure and large interlayer spacing provide favorable conditions for anion intercalation. During charge and discharge, anions in the electrolyte can undergo intercalation reactions with the graphite. The rapid anion diffusion kinetics enable the battery to achieve high charge–discharge efficiency.

6.2 Calcium-ion batteries

The co-intercalation reaction of calcium ions and solvent molecules makes graphite a viable anode material for calcium-ion batteries, with the co-intercalation reaction being electrolyte-dependent. Kang et al.[102]investigated various combinations of calcium salts and solvents and found that a dimethylacetamide (DMAc)-based electrolyte enables calcium ion insertion into graphite by forming a ternary GIC [Ca-(DMAc)4]50. The intercalation of calcium ions into the graphite electrode is reversible, and the graphite anode can ultimately be cycled for 200 cycles at a current density of 100 mA/g with negligible capacity fade. Xu et al.[99]studied the relationship between the electrolyte and the insertion behavior of calcium ions, elucidating the critical role of anions in regulating the solvation structure of calcium ions and their subsequent insertion into graphite. The study found that electrostatic interactions between calcium ions and anions govern the configuration of solvated calcium ions in DMAc-based electrolytes and graphite intercalation compounds. DFT and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicate that the interaction between Ca2+ and anions determines the coordination number of Ca2+ in graphite intercalation compounds, and it is suggested that a moderate strength of interaction between calcium ions and anions is conducive to forming an appropriate coordination number and solvation shell for calcium ions.

6.3 Zinc-ion batteries

Dendritic crystal growth and surface side reactions are major reasons for the poor cycling performance of zinc-ion batteries. Foroozan et al.[103]directly grew a monolayer of graphene (Gr) on the surface of a copper current collector as an electrodeposition substrate. Using optical microscopy and XRD, they demonstrated that zinc electrodeposited on the Gr substrate exhibits a dense, uniform, and non-dendritic morphology, successfully achieving controlled adjustment of the zinc electrodeposition morphology. At a current density of 5 mA/cm2,the battery can achieve a cycle life of up to 400 cycles. This is attributed to the lattice match between the Gr layer and zinc, which reduces the nucleation overpotential of zinc. Theoretical calculations indicate that Gr has a strong affinity for zinc, allowing zinc atoms to distribute uniformly across the entire Gr surface. The compatibility between Gr and zinc promotes subsequent uniform zinc deposition. At the same time, this approach enhances the corrosion resistance of copper, making it a suitable current collector material for zinc-water batteries. Zhao et al.[104]developed a novel 3D composite zinc anode, which consists of nitrogen-doped graphene nanofiber clusters anchored on a multi-channel carbon array. This 3D graphene array boasts a high specific surface area and porosity, effectively reducing the local current density, controlling the concentration gradient of zinc ions, and ensuring a uniform electric field distribution, thereby enabling uniform deposition of metallic zinc. The 3D graphene array anode exhibits outstanding rate performance and cycling stability, withstanding more than 3,000 cycles at a current density of 120 mA/cm2 and achieving a Coulombic efficiency as high as 99.67%.

6.4 Aluminum-ion batteries

Al-ion battery transition-metal-based cathode materials face challenges such as insufficient intercalation sites, poor ion-conduction channels, and sluggish diffusion kinetics of bulky aluminum salt anions (AlCl4 -and Al2Cl7 -)[105-107]. To address these issues, Lee et al.[108]developed acid-treated expanded graphite (AEG) and base-etched graphite (BEG) as novel cathode materials for Al-ion batteries. SEM was used to observe the surface morphologies of pristine graphite, AEG, and BEG, with the results shown in Figure 9. AEG exhibits a disordered layered structure with a surface covered by abundant micrometer- to nanometer-scale pores. By surface-treating pristine graphite in an acidic medium, the interlayer spacing is expanded (d 002= 0.3371 nm), which can accelerate diffusion kinetics and the intercalation kinetics of AlCl4 -ions. An Al-ion battery using AEG demonstrates a Coulombic efficiency of 99.1% after 10,000 cycles at a high rate of 10 A/g, with a specific capacity of 80 mAh/g. BEG, treated with KOH solution, features a disordered layered structure with a high defect-site density and a larger interlayer spacing (d 002= 0.3384 nm), enabling it to accommodate more AlCl4 -ions. An Al-ion battery based on a BEG cathode achieves a Coulombic efficiency of 99.9% after 10,000 cycles at a high rate of 10 A/g, with a specific capacity of 91 mAh/g. This indicates that surface-modified graphite materials can enable Al-ion batteries with high energy density, long cycle life, and fast charge-discharge performance.
图9 原始石墨(PG)、AEG、BEG的SEM图. (a~c) 低分辨率电镜图; (d~i) 高分辨率电镜图[108]

Fig. 9 SEM images of PG, AEG, and BEG. (a~c) low resolution and (d~i) high-resolution images of samples in different magnification. Reproduced with permission[108].Copyright 2021, Springer Nature

7 Conclusion and Outlook

Against the backdrop of energy transition and carbon neutrality, developing metal-ion secondary batteries is a crucial approach to addressing energy storage challenges. As one of the key materials in metal-ion secondary batteries, graphite, with its unique layered structure, excellent conductivity, and abundant reserves, exhibits broad application potential across various metal-ion battery systems. In lithium-ion batteries, graphite anodes are already widely used, yet their performance still falls short of meeting the demand for fast charging and long cycle life. In sodium-ion and potassium-ion batteries, graphite faces challenges such as low capacity and significant volume expansion. For multivalent metal-ion batteries, graphite demonstrates unique advantages through solvent co-intercalation mechanisms or by serving as a cathode material.
This review presents the research progress of graphite in various secondary batteries. Currently, graphite materials still face numerous challenges. To advance the application of graphite in more metal-ion batteries and develop high-performance secondary batteries, future research should focus on the following issues:
(1) Understanding the storage mechanism of ions in graphite materials. Different metal ions, due to factors such as charge and ionic radius, exhibit distinct interactions with graphite and structural changes in graphite during the ion insertion/extraction process. Only by understanding the storage mechanism of metal ions in graphite materials can we provide theoretical guidance for modifying graphite tailored to different battery systems.
(2) Investigate novel modification strategies to enhance electrochemical performance. For example, to improve the rate performance of graphite anodes, more effective surface-coating materials can be developed to enhance the interfacial migration of ions; more efficient structural design approaches can be adopted to increase the interlayer spacing of graphite, thereby further boosting the capacity of graphite materials; and combining graphite with other materials is also a viable strategy for enhancing electrochemical performance.
(3) Utilizing novel graphite-based materials. Graphite-derived materials (such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, reduced graphene oxide, etc.), owing to their unique two-dimensional planar structure, exhibit outstanding physicochemical properties. Developing and employing novel graphite materials is an important approach to realizing high specific energy secondary batteries.
[1]
Liu T F, Zhang Y P, Jiang Z G, Zeng X Q, Ji J P, Li Z H, Gao X H, Sun M H, Lin Z, Ling M, Zheng J C, Liang C D. Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12(5): 1512.

[2]
Gür T M. Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11: 2696.

[3]
Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J M. Science, 2011, 334(6058): 928.

[4]
Usiskin R, Lu Y X, Popovic J, Law M, Balaya P, Hu Y-S, Maier J. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2021, 6(11): 1020.

[5]
Gao Y, Zhang H, Peng J, Li L, Xiao Y, Li L, Liu Y, Qiao Y, Chou S L. Carbon Energy, 2024, 6(6): e464.

[6]
Min X, Xiao J, Fang M H, Wang W A, Zhao Y J, Liu Y G, Abdelkader A M, Xi K, Kumar R V, Huang Z H. Energy Environ. Sci., 2021, 14(4): 2186.

[7]
Man Y H, Jaumaux P, Xu Y F, Fei Y T, Mo X Y, Wang G X, Zhou X S. Sci. Bull., 2023, 68(16): 1819.

[8]
Tang B Y, Shan L T, Liang S Q, Zhou J. Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12(11): 3288.

[9]
Zhao L, Ding B C, Qin X Y, Wang Z J, Lv W, He Y B, Yang Q H, Kang F Y. Adv. Mater., 2022, 34(18): 2106704.

[10]
Huang K S, Tian S Q, Xu H, Fang C, Wu L Y, Wang H J, Liu F L, He W J, Zhang X G. Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 505: 159326.

[11]
Kim M H, Kim J, Choi S H, Wi T U, Choi A, Seo J, Lim C H, Park C, Lee H W. ACS Energy Lett., 2023, 8(9): 3962.

[12]
Moon J, Lee H C, Jung H, Wakita S, Cho S, Yoon J, Lee J, Ueda A, Choi B, Lee S, Ito K, Kubo Y, Lim A C, Seo J G, Yoo J, Lee S, Ham Y, Baek W, Ryu Y G, Han I T. Nat. Commun., 2021, 12: 2714.

[13]
Shi H, Barker J, Saïdi M Y, Koksbang R. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143(11): 3466.

[14]
Liu Y Y, Shi H D, Wu Z S. Energy Environ. Sci., 2023, 16(11): 4834.

[15]
Asenbauer J, Eisenmann T, Kuenzel M, Kazzazi A, Chen Z, Bresser D. Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2020, 4(11): 5387.

[16]
Winter M, Besenhard J O, Spahr M E, Novák P. Adv. Mater., 1998, 10(10): 725.

[17]
Jache B, Adelhelm P. Angew. Chem.., 2014, 53(38): 10169.

[18]
Dresselhaus M S, Dresselhaus G. Adv. Phys., 2002, 51(1): 1.

[19]
Li D P, Zhu M, Chen L N, Chen L, Zhai W, Ai Q, Hou G M, Sun Q, Liu Y, Liang Z, Guo S R, Lou J, Si P C, Feng J K, Zhang L, Ci L J. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 5(15): 1800606.

[20]
Yamagata S, Takahara I, Wang M Q, Mizoguchi T, Yagi S. J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 846: 156469.

[21]
Tao L, Xia D W, Sittisomwong P, Zhang H R, Lai J W, Hwang S, Li T Y, Ma B Y, Hu A Y, Min J, Hou D, Shah S R, Zhao K J, Yang G, Zhou H, Li L X, Bai P, Shi F F, Lin F. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146(24): 16764.

[22]
Zhang H, Yang Y, Ren D S, Wang L, He X M. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 36: 147.

[23]
Nitta N, Wu F X, Lee J T, Yushin G. Mater. Today, 2015, 18(5): 252.

[24]
Tomaszewska A, Chu Z Y, Feng X N, O’Kane S, Liu X H, Chen J Y, Ji C Z, Endler E, Li R H, Liu L S, Li Y L, Zheng S Q, Vetterlein S, Gao M, Du J Y, Parkes M, Ouyang M, Marinescu M, Offer G, Wu B. eTransportation, 2019, 1: 100011.

[25]
Cai W L, Yao Y X, Zhu G L, Yan C, Jiang L L, He C X, Huang J Q, Zhang Q. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49(12): 3806.

[26]
Mao C Y, Ruther R E, Li J L, Du Z J, Belharouak I. Electrochem. Commun., 2018, 97: 37.

[27]
Zhao W B, Zhao C H, Wu H, Li L J, Zhang C C. J. Energy Storage, 2024, 81: 110409.

[28]
Ming J, Cao Z, Wahyudi W, Li M L, Kumar P, Wu Y Q, Hwang J Y, Hedhili M N, Cavallo L, Sun Y K, Li L J. ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3(2): 335.

[29]
An S J, Li J L, Daniel C, Mohanty D, Nagpure S, Wood D L III. Carbon, 2016, 105: 52.

[30]
Wang H S, Cui Y. ECS Meet. Abstr., 2020, MA 2020- 2(68): 3441.

[31]
Lu X K, Lagnoni M, Bertei A, Das S, Owen R E, Li Q, O’Regan K, Wade A, Finegan D P, Kendrick E, Bazant M Z, Brett D J L, Shearing P R. Nat. Commun., 2023, 14: 5127.

[32]
Barré A, Deguilhem B, Grolleau S, Gérard M, Suard F, Riu D. J. Power Sources, 2013, 241: 680.

[33]
Peled E, Menkin S. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2017, 164(7): A1703.

[34]
Tan J, Matz J, Dong P, Shen J F, Ye M X. Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11(16): 2100046.

[35]
Niu M, Dong L W, Yue J P, Li Y Q, Dong Y Y, Cheng S C, Lv S, Zhu Y H, Lei Z T, Liang J Y, Xin S, Yang C H, Guo Y G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63(21): e202318663.

[36]
Tu S B, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Chen Z H, Wang X C, Zhan R M, Ou Y T, Wang W Y, Liu X R, Duan X R, Wang L, Sun Y M. Nat. Energy, 2023, 8(12): 1365.

[37]
Kazyak E, Chen K H, Chen Y X, Cho T H, Dasgupta N P. Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12: 2102618.

[38]
Suh J H, Han S A, Yang S Y, Lee J W, Shimada Y, Lee S-M, Lee J W, Park M S, Kim J H. Adv. Mater., 2025, 37(7): 2414117.

[39]
Persson K, Sethuraman V A, Hardwick L J, Hinuma Y, Meng Y S, van der Ven A, Srinivasan V, Kostecki R, Ceder G. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1(8): 1176.

[40]
Zhang D, Zhang W Z, Zhang S R, Ji X H, Li L. J. Energy Storage, 2023, 60: 106678.

[41]
Deng T S, Zhou X P. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2016, 20(10): 2613.

[42]
Cheng Q, Yuge R, Nakahara K, Tamura N, Miyamoto S. J. Power Sources, 2015, 284: 258.

[43]
Zou L, Kang F Y, Zheng Y P, Shen W C. Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54(15): 3930.

[44]
Xu J, Wang X, Yuan N Y, Hu B Q, Ding J N, Ge S H. J. Power Sources, 2019, 430: 74.

[45]
Logan E R, Hall D S, Cormier M M E, Taskovic T, Bauer M, Hamam I, Hebecker H, Molino L, Dahn J R. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2020, 124(23): 12269.

[46]
Wang Z C, Han R, Huang D, Wei Y M, Song H Q, Liu Y, Xue J Y, Zhang H Y, Zhang F R, Liu L W, Weng S X, Lu S W, Xu J J, Wu X D, Wei Z X. ACS Nano, 2023, 17(18): 18103.

[47]
Zhang H, Song Z B, Fang J J, Li K, Zhang M, Li Z K, Yang L Y, Pan F. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2023, 127(6): 2755.

[48]
Li Y C, Cao Z, Wang Y, Lv L Z, Sun J Y, Xiong W X, Qu Q T, Zheng H H. ACS Energy Lett., 2023, 8(10): 4193.

[49]
Ko M, Jayasubramaniyan S, Kim S, Kim J, Kim D, Reddy N S, Ma H, Nam S Y, Sung J. Carbon, 2024, 219: 118808.

[50]
Kim D S, Kim Y E, Kim H. J. Power Sources, 2019, 422: 18.

[51]
Liu Y H, Yang S, Guo H R, Wang Z, Liu J H, Chen N, Gong X Z. Energy Storage Mater., 2024, 73: 103806.

[52]
Kim J, Nithya Jeghan S M, Lee G. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2020, 305: 110325.

[53]
Ye L, Wang C H, Cao L, Xiao H G, Zhang J F, Zhang B, Ou X. Green Energy Environ., 2021, 6(5): 725.

[54]
Yang X Y, Zhan C Z, Ren X L, Wang C, Wei L, Yu Q T, Xu D P, Nan D, Lv R T, Shen W C, Kang F Y, Huang Z H. J. Solid State Chem., 2021, 303: 122500.

[55]
Sun C C, Ji X, Weng S T, Li R H, Huang X T, Zhu C N, Xiao X Z, Deng T, Fan L W, Chen L X, Wang X F, Wang C S, Fan X L. Adv. Mater., 2022, 34(43): 2206020.

[56]
Li C, Liang Z Y, Wang L N, Cao D F, Yin Y C, Zuo D X, Chang J, Wang J, Liu K, Li X, Luo G F, Deng Y H, Wan J Y. ACS Energy Lett., 2024, 9(3): 1295.

[57]
Jiang L L, Yan C, Yao Y X, Cai W L, Huang J Q, Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(7): 3402.

[58]
Nayak P K, Yang L T, Brehm W, Adelhelm P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(1): 102.

[59]
Choi J W, Aurbach D. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 1(4): 16013.

[60]
Qiao S Y, Zhou Q W, Ma M, Liu H K, Dou S X, Chong S K. ACS Nano, 2023, 17(12): 11220.

[61]
Hwang J Y, Myung S T, Sun Y K. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(12): 3529.

[62]
Li Y, Chen M H, Liu B, Zhang Y, Liang X Q, Xia X H. Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10(27): 2000927.

[63]
Li Z Q, Zhang L Y, Ge X L, Li C X, Dong S H, Wang C X, Yin L W. Nano Energy, 2017, 32: 494.

[64]
Kondo Y, Fukutsuka T, Miyazaki K, Miyahara Y, Abe T. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, 166(3): A5323.

[65]
Liu Y Y, Merinov B V, Goddard W A III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2016, 113(14): 3735.

[66]
Xiong K, Qi T S, Zhangb X. Electroanalysis, 2025, 37(1): 1.

[67]
Luo W, Shen F, Bommier C, Zhu H L, Ji X L, Hu L B. Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49(2): 231.

[68]
Wen Y, He K, Zhu Y J, Han F D, Xu Y H, Matsuda I, Ishii Y, Cumings J, Wang C S. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 4033.

[69]
Jara A D, Betemariam A, Woldetinsae G, Kim J Y. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2019, 29(5): 671.

[70]
Liang X Y, Mao Z F, Shi X J, Zhang T Q, Zheng Z, Jin J, He B B, Wang R, Gong Y S, Wang H W. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11(34): 18097.

[71]
Lee S C, Kim Y H, Park J H, Susanto D, Kim J Y, Han J, Jun S C, Chung K Y. Adv. Sci., 2024, 11(28): 2401022.

[72]
Li Z, Tian Z L, Zhang C Z, Wang F, Ye C, Han F, Tan J, Liu J S. Nanoscale, 2021, 13(23): 10468.

[73]
Lan S Q, Ren W C, Wang Z, Yu C, Yu J H, Liu Y B, Xie Y Y, Zhang X B, Wang J J, Qiu J S. New Carbon Mater., 2024, 39(3): 538.

[74]
Lyu L L, Zheng Y C, Hua Y K, Li J E, Yi Y Y, Sun Y, Xu Z L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63(48): e202410253.

[75]
Chen J, Fan X L, Ji X, Gao T, Hou S, Zhou X Q, Wang L N, Wang F, Yang C Y, Chen L, Wang C S. Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11(5): 1218.

[76]
Yang L N, Zhao Y, Ma C L, Han G Y. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 2021, 32(19): 24446.

[77]
Jian Z L, Luo W, Ji X L. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(36): 11566.

[78]
Luo W, Wan J Y, Ozdemir B, Bao W Z, Chen Y N, Dai J Q, Lin H, Xu Y, Gu F, Barone V, Hu L B. Nano Lett., 2015, 15(11): 7671.

[79]
Liu J L, Yin T T, Tian B B, Zhang B W, Qian C, Wang Z Q, Zhang L L, Liang P, Chen Z, Yan J X, Fan X F, Lin J Y, Chen X H, Huang Y Z, Loh K P, Shen Z X. Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9(22): 1900579.

[80]
Tan W, Yang F, Lu Z G, Xu Z H. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2022, 5(10): 12143.

[81]
Wang J Y, Bi J Q, Wang W L, Xing Z, Leng M Z, Xie L L. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2021, 25(8/9): 2361.

[82]
Wrogemann J M, Fromm O, Deckwirth F, Beltrop K, Heckmann A, Winter M, Placke T. Batter. Supercaps, 2022, 5(6): e202200045.

[83]
Rahman M M, Hou C P, Mateti S, Tanwar K, Sultana I, Glushenkov A M, Chen Y. J. Power Sources, 2020, 476: 228733.

[84]
Son D K, Kim J, Raj M R, Lee G. Carbon, 2021, 175: 187.

[85]
Ma L B, Lv Y H, Wu J X, Xia C, Kang Q, Zhang Y Z, Liang H F, Jin Z. Nano Res., 2021, 14(12): 4442.

[86]
Xiao A Y, Chen Y X, Liu Z Y, Zhou R, Xue Y F, Zhang Q W, Jiang J M, Zhuang Q C, Ju Z C, Song H H. J. Alloys Compd., 2024, 981: 173696.

[87]
Zhao Y, Yang L N, Ma C L, Han G Y. Energy Fuels, 2020, 34(7): 8993.

[88]
Zhang J, Cao Z, Zhou L, Liu G, Park G T, Cavallo L, Wang L M, Alshareef H N, Sun Y K, Ming J. ACS Energy Lett., 2020, 5(8): 2651.

[89]
Sha M, Liu L, Zhao H P, Lei Y. Carbon Energy, 2020, 2(3): 350.

[90]
Zheng F C, Yang Y, Chen Q W. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 5261.

[91]
Jiang M C, Sun N, Ali Soomro R, Xu B. J. Energy Chem., 2021, 55: 34.

[92]
Ma F T, Li Z, Zhao Z J, Mu J L, Wu X Z, Zhou P F, Zhou T, Zhou J. J. Energy Storage, 2024, 102: 114256.

[93]
Wang J, Yin B, Gao T, Wang X Y, Li W, Hong X X, Wang Z Q, He H Y. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(2): 2012088.

[94]
Xiong S S, Wu Q, Gao Y, Li Z P, Wang C, Wang S, Li Z, Hou L, Gao F M. Adv. Sci., 2024, 11(23): 2401292.

[95]
Liang Y L, Dong H, Aurbach D, Yao Y. Nat. Energy, 2020, 5(9): 646.

[96]
Li Y Q, Lu Y X, Adelhelm P, Titirici M M, Hu Y S. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48(17): 4655.

[97]
Qin M S, Liu M C, Zeng Z Q, Wu Q, Wu Y K, Zhang H, Lei S, Cheng S J, Xie J. Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12(48): 2201801.

[98]
Wang G, Wang F X, Zhang P P, Zhang J, Zhang T, Müllen K, Feng X L. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(39): 1802949.

[99]
Yi Y Y, Xing Y D, Wang H, Zeng Z H, Sun Z T, Li R J, Lin H J, Ma Y Y, Pu X J, Li M M, Park K Y, Xu Z L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63(24): e202317177.

[100]
Kim D M, Jung S C, Ha S, Kim Y, Park Y, Ryu J H, Han Y K, Lee K T. Chem. Mater., 2018, 30(10): 3199.

[101]
Lei X, Zheng Y P, Zhang F, Wang Y, Tang Y B. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 30: 34.

[102]
Park J, Xu Z L, Yoon G, Park S K, Wang J, Hyun H, Park H, Lim J, Ko Y J, Yun Y S, Kang K. Adv. Mater., 2020, 32(4): 1904411.

[103]
Foroozan T, Yurkiv V, Sharifi-Asl S, Rojaee R, Mashayek F, Shahbazian-Yassar R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(47): 44077.

[104]
Mu Y B, Li Z, Wu B K, Huang H D, Wu F H, Chu Y Q, Zou L F, Yang M, He J F, Ye L, Han M S, Zhao T S, Zeng L. Nat. Commun., 2023, 14: 4205.

[105]
Wu L, Sun R M, Xiong F Y, Pei C Y, Han K, Peng C, Fan Y Q, Yang W, An Q Y, Mai L Q. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20(35): 22563.

[106]
Wang H L, Bai Y, Chen S, Luo X Y, Wu C, Wu F, Lu J, Amine K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(1): 80.

[107]
Zhang K Q, Kirlikovali K O, Suh J M, Choi J W, Jang H W, Varma R S, Farha O K, Shokouhimehr M. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2020, 3(7): 6019.

[108]
Kim J, Raj M R, Lee G. Nano-Micro Lett., 2021, 13(1): 171.

Outlines

/