Carbon Dots as Fluorescent Probes in Environmental Monitoring
Received date: 2025-06-23
Revised date: 2025-10-19
Online published: 2026-02-05
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52171089)
Liaoning Provincial Key Research and Development Program(2024JH2/102500080)
Fundamental Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education(LJKMZ20220514)
Postgraduate Education Reform Project of Shenyang University of Technology(SYJG20222036)
With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization,the types of environmental pollutants have multiplied,and sample matrices have become increasingly complex,placing higher demands on the selectivity and anti-interference capability of detection technologies. Conventional methods such as ICP-MS and GC-MS are limited by cumbersome sample pretreatment and high operational costs,making them unsuitable for rapid and on-site monitoring. Carbon dots (CDs),as a promising class of zero-dimensional carbon-based nanomaterials,offer a green and sensitive alternative for constructing fluorescent probes due to their exceptional optical properties,low toxicity,and tunable surface functionalities. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in CDs-based fluorescent probes for environmental monitoring,covering synthesis strategies,luminescence mechanisms,characterization techniques,and their applications in detecting metal ions,inorganic anions,and organic pollutants. Special emphasis is placed on the design principles and response mechanisms of three types of probes:fluorescence quenching,fluorescence enhancement,and ratiometric fluorescence sensing. Notably,ratiometric probes utilize built-in reference signals to achieve self-calibration in complex matrices,significantly improving accuracy and anti-interference performance. Furthermore,this review highlights the integration of CDs-based probes with smartphone-based sensing platforms,demonstrating their great potential for on-site,rapid,and visual detection of pollutants. These advances provide a clear pathway toward making environmental monitoring more convenient and intelligent. Finally,current challenges and future prospects in material design,mechanism studies,application expansion,and intelligent platform development are discussed,offering theoretical and technical support for further innovations in the field.
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Carbon dots
2.1 Synthesis of carbon dots
2.2 Carbon dots fluorescence detection mechanism
2.3 Characterization of carbon dots
3 The application of carbon dots in environmental detection
3.1 Environmental detection applications of fluorescence quenched carbon dots
3.2 Environmental detection applications of fluorescence enhanced carbon dots
3.3 Environmental detection applications of ratiometric fluorescent carbon dots
4 Conclusion and outlook
Congyin Zhang , Kuiyu Yi , Jia Feng , Hongwei Shi . Carbon Dots as Fluorescent Probes in Environmental Monitoring[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2026 , 38(2) : 298 -318 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20250625
图4 PC-CDs对Cu2+的荧光检测:(a) 添加不同浓度Cu2+时PC-CDs的荧光发射光谱;(b) PC-CDs荧光强度与Cu2+浓度关系;(c) F0/F与Cu2+浓度的校准曲线[50]Fig.4 Fluorescence detection of Cu2+ using PC-CDs.(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of PC-CDs with the addition of different concentrations of Cu2+;(b) relationship between the fluorescence intensity of PC-CDs and the concentration of Cu2+;(c) calibration curve of F0/F versus the concentration of Cu2+ [50] |
图5 N-CQDs探针对OTC的检测性能:(a) ON-CQDs与(b) WN-CQDs在加入不同浓度OTC后的荧光发射光谱,插图:荧光强度与OTC浓度的校准曲线[61]Fig.5 Detection performance of the N-CQDs probes for OTC. Fluorescence emission spectra of (a) ON-CQDs and (b) WN-CQDs with the addition of different concentrations of OTC. Insets:the corresponding calibration curves of fluorescence intensity versus OTC concentration[61] |
表1 荧光猝灭型碳点的检测性能对比Table 1 Comparison of detection performance in fluorescence quenching carbon dots |
| Analyte | Precursors | Synthesis Method | Linear Range/ (μmol/L) | LOD/ (μmol/L) | Response Time | Real Samples | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3+ | Citric acid (CA) and melamine | Hydrothermal method | 20~80 | 3.18 | 15 min | Tap water, Sand lake water | 48 |
| Fe3+ | 4,5-Difluoro-1,2-phenylenediamine and ethylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 0.2~300 | 0.08 | <5 min | Laboratory water, Dormitory water | 49 |
| Cu2+ | Pine-cone biomass | Microwave pyrolysis | 39.4~354.3 | 0.079 | 10 min | Wastewater effluent | 50 |
| Cu2+ | Riboflavin (C₁₇H₂₀N₄O₆) and Fe₃O₄ | Hydrothermal method | 3.15~787.4 | 1.51 | 30 min | Tap water,River water | 51 |
| Al3+ | Chitosan,and o-Phenylenediamine (OPD) | Microwave method | 10~100 | 0.2 | - | Tap water | 52 |
| Hg2+ | Glutathione (GSH),ammonium ferric citrate (AFC),and diethylenetriamine (DETA) | solvothermal method | 0.008~0.08 | 0.0054 | 3 min | Tap water,Yellow sea water | 53 |
| Co2+ | BTA and choline chloride | Solvothermal method | 5~250 | 1.2269 | 1 min | Industrial astewater | 54 |
| Pb2+ | Fenugreek seeds | Hydrothermal method | 39.5~395 | 9.345 | 2 min | - | 55 |
| Cr6+ | Phytic acid (PA) and L-arginine (Arg) | Hydrothermal method | 0.05~3 | 0.026 | 10 min | Water,Soil | 56 |
| Cr6+ | Citric acid and ethylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 0~34 | 0.11 | - | Tannery wastewater,Living cells | 57 |
| S2⁻ | Melamine,and 2,4-difluorobenzoic acid | Hydrothermal method | 0~30 | 0.168 | 1.5 min | Tap water | 58 |
| ClO⁻ | 3-Aminophenylboronic acid (3-APBA) and glutaric acid | Hydrothermal method | 0.1~1000 | 0.5 | 2 h | Tap water, Drinking water | 59 |
| TC | Citric acid and Urea | microwave-assisted method | 7~100 | 0.48 | 23 min | Tap water,River water,Lake water | 60 |
| OTC | ON-CQDs:Orange peel WN-CQDs:Watermelon peel | Hydrothermal method | ON-CQDs:2~100 WN-CQDs:0.25~100 | ON-CQDs:0.973 WN-CQDs:0.077 | 20 min | Tap water, Lake water, Soil | 61 |
| 4-NP | Sweet flagdried rhizomes | Microwave irradiation | 0~14.28 | 0.207 | 1 min | Tap water, River water | 62 |
| 2-NP/4-NP | o-phenylenediamine and oleic acid | carbonization | 0.74~134 | 2-NP:0.0064 4-NP:0.0048 | - | Industrial water, Drinking water, River water | 63 |
| FA | Tannic acid (TA) and urea | Hydrothermal method | 0.15~35 | 0.296 | - | - | 64 |
| Alachlor | p-Phenylenediamine | Microwave-assisted hydrothermal method | 0.005~150 | 2×10-4 | - | Soil | 65 |
| Humic acid | Pitaya seeds | Ultrasound-assisted hydrothermal method | 8.4~336.8 | - | 8 min | Tap water, Lake water, Flower bed soil,Botanical garden soil | 66 |
| Picric acid(PA) | L-serine and citric acid | Microwave-assisted | 0.0374~30 | 0.0018 | 2 min | Firework industrial effluents,Dye industrial effluents | 67 |
图7 NCQDs 对甲醛的荧光增强响应与双模式检测:(a) NCQDs 溶液荧光光谱随甲醛浓度的变化;(b) 荧光强度与浓度的定量关系;(c) 反应前后荧光寿命衰减曲线;(d) NCQDs/PVA薄膜气体传感示意图;(e~g) 薄膜在空气、水汽和甲醛气体中的荧光显微图像;(h) 从甲醛气体切换回空气环境时的荧光可逆性[79]Fig.7 Fluorescence enhancement response and dual-mode detection of FA by NCQDs. (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of NCQDs solution with increasing FA concentrations;(b) the quantitative relationship between fluorescence intensity and FA concentration;(c) fluorescence lifetime decay curves of NCQDs before and after reaction with FA;(d) schematic diagram of the NCQDs/PVA composite film for FA gas sensing;(e~g) fluorescence microscope images of the film under ambient air,water vapor,and FA gas;(h)fluorescence reversibility upon switching from FA gas back to air environmen[79] |
表2 荧光增强型碳点的检测性能对比Table 2 Comparison of detection performance in fluorescence enhancement carbon dot |
| Analyte | Precursors | Synthesis Method | Linear Range/ (μmol/L) | LOD/ (μmol/L) | Response Time/min | Real Sample | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al3+/Hg2+ | (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) and citric acid | Solvothermal method | Al3+:1~200 Hg2+:0.05~240 | Al3+:0.81 Hg2+:0.0196 | 5 | Tap water, Yellow river water | 68 |
| Hg2+ | Citric acid and sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na₂S·9H₂O) | Hydrothermal method | 0~100 | 0.07667 | 2 | Tap water, Groundwater Sewage plant effluent, Lead-containing seepage water | 69 |
| Pb2+ | Gallic acid (GA) and N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) | Hydrothermal method | 30~120 | 0.715 | - | Tap water,RO water, distilled water | 70 |
| Cu2+/S2⁻ | Hexamethylene-tetramine and ammonium citrate | Hydrothermal method | Cu2+:0.05~5 S2⁻:0.05~10 | Cu2+:0.025 S2⁻:0.032 | 10 | Tap water, Lake water | 71 |
| F⁻ | Citric acid and urea | Hydrothermal method | 20~300 | 0.65 | 1 | Tap water, Taihu lake water | 72 |
| F⁻ | 2,3-diaminopyridine,and selenourea | Hydrothermal method | 2~60 | 0.39 | - | Tap water, Milk | 73 |
| ClO⁻ | Adenine (AD) and ethylenediamine (EDA) | Hydrothermal method | 10~1000 | 0.82 | - | Tap water, pool water, River water | 74 |
| PO43⁻ | Paper mill sludge (PMS) | Hydrothermal method | 0.103~5.16 | 0.034 | 30 | Tap water, Natural water | 75 |
| PO43⁻ | Sodium citrate and urea | Microwave method | 0~1000 | 5.2 | - | - | 76 |
| TC/Fe3+ | o-phenylenediamine and urea | Microwave-assisted method | TC:0.1~10 Fe3+:1~70 | TC:0.0555 Fe3+:0.1011 | <1 | Tap water, Milk | 77 |
| OTC | Neutral red and thiourea | Hydrothermal method | 2~50 | 0.023 | 2 | Milk products | 78 |
| FA | Alkali lignin (AL) and m-phenylenediamine (MPDA) | Hydrothermal method | 50~2000 | 4.64 | 1 | Gaseous FA | 79 |
图8 (a) CDs和CCM(20 μmol/L)与不同浓度的ClO-(0~1500 μmol/L)混合的荧光光谱;(b) ClO-浓度和荧光强度之间的线性关系(F435/F540)[88]Fig.8 (a) Fluorescence spectra of CDs and CCM (20 μmol/L) mixed with various concentrations of ClO- (0~1500 μmol/L);(b) linear relationship between the ClO- concentration and fluorescence intensity (F435/F540)[88] |
图14 智能手机生物传感器(SBS)的便携式设备与光学设计:(a) SBS的设计图与实物照片;(b) 定制SBS-App的用户界面与操作流程;SBS的组件分解图(c)与内部光路示意图(d)[102]Fig. 14 Smartphone-based biosensor (SBS):portable device and optical design.(a) Design diagram and photograph of the SBS;(b) user interface and operational flowchart of the custom SBS-App;parts assembly drawing of the SBS(c) and internal light path schematic(d)[102] |
表3 比率型荧光碳点的检测性能对比Table 3 Comparison of detection performance for ratiometric fluorescent carbon dots |
| Analyte | Precursors | Synthesis Method | Linear Range/ (μmol/L) | LOD/ (μmol/L) | Response Time | Real Sample | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3+ | Gallic acid and o-henylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 0~50 | 0.8 | 5 min | Tap water,Spring water | 82 |
| Cu2+ | Pu-erh tea | Brewing with hot water | 0~170 | 0.051 | 1 h | --- | 83 |
| Al3+ | p-phenylenediamine and toluene | Solvothermal method | 0~35 | 0.09 | 5 min | Tap water,Ultrapure water | 84 |
| Hg2+ | Citric acid and glutathione | Microwave-assisted method | 0.1~90 | 0.041 | 5 min | Tap water,River water, Lake water | 85 |
| Hg2+ | Ascorbic acid and thiourea | Microwave-assisted method | 0.05~7.0 | 0.018 | 5 min | Tap water,River water | 87 |
| Pb2+ | BCDs:Sodium citrate and polyacrylamide RCDs:p-Phenylenediamine and ethanol | Hydrothermal method | 0~0.2 | 2.89×10-3 | 5 min | Tap water,Lake water | 86 |
| ClO⁻ | Glutathione | Hydrothermal method | 1~1500 | 0.03654 | 30 s | Tap water,Swimming pool water,Milk | 88 |
| PO43⁻ | GCDs:Perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic (PTCDA) and triethylamine (TEA) RCDs:p-phenylenediamine (p-PDA) | Hydrothermal method | 0~55 | 0.09 | 2 min | Tap water,Lake water, Soil extracts | 89 |
| CN⁻ | Citric acid and ethylenediamine anhydrous | Hydrothermal method | 0.008~75 | 0.008 | 10 min | Tap water,Cassava roots,Sprouted potatoes,Liquor | 90 |
| S2⁻ | Citric acid and urea | Hydrothermal method | 1~50 | 0.35 | 2 min | River water,wastewater | 91 |
| F⁻ | o-Phenylenediamine and citric acid | Hydrothermal method | 0.5~150 | 0.0558 | 1 min | Tap water,Surface water | 92 |
| F⁻ | Alizarin carmine and citric acid | Hydrothermal method | 150~1200 | 7.998 | 1 min | Tap water,Toothpaste,Milk | 93 |
| TC | Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and Eu(NO3)3 | Hydrothermal method | 0~80 | 0.003 | 2 min | River water,Milk,Honey,Serum | 94 |
| OTC | Spinach | Solvothermal method | 0~40 | 0.41 | 30 s | River water,Tap water,Mineral water,Milk,Pork | 95 |
| FA | N-(phosphonomethyl)iminodiacetic acid (PMIDA) and branched polyethyleneimine(BPEI) | Hydrothermal method | 0~40 | 0.47 | 100 min | Bean sprout | 96 |
| Carbaryl | Citric acid and ethylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 5×10-4~1 | 2.5×10-4 | 30 min | Strawberry | 97 |
| Glyphosate | L-glutathione and formamide | Microwave-assisted | Low range: 0~59;High range:0~2957 | 0.177 | - | - | 98 |
| BPA | Sodium citrate and ethylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 0.1~100 | 0.02 | 3 min | Tap water,River water, Lake water | 99 |
| 4-NP | Melamine and o-phenylenediamine | Microwave radiation | 0.083~80 | 0.083 | 2 min | Tap water,Sewage, Yongjiang river water | 100 |
| Thiram | Citric acid and polyethylenimine | Solvothermal method | 0~10 | 0.059 | 4 min | Tap water,Apple peel, Milk | 101 |
| Chlorpyrifos | Citric acid and ethylenediamine | Hydrothermal method | 0.005~0.060 | 0.00145 | 60 min | Apple,Cabbage | 102 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
(陈倍宁, 王恩语, 杨正爽, 付翯云. 环境化学, 2024, 43(3): 875.)
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |