Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Metal-Support Interactions for Electrocatalytic Water Splitting

  • Aojie Yuan ,
  • Huan Liu ,
  • Danyang Hu ,
  • Lin Lan ,
  • Long Chen , *
Expand
  • School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering/State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Green Processing of Chemical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China

Received date: 2026-01-14

  Revised date: 2026-03-18

  Online published: 2026-03-20

Supported by

program for Strong Youth Technology Leading Talents(2023CB-11)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52302105)

Abstract

Metal-support interactions (MSIs) strategy play a critical role in designing and optimizing water-splitting catalysts. This review constructs a comprehensive framework for MSIs research, spanning from theoretical foundations to water-splitting applications. The fundamental concepts and historical evolution of MSIs are clarified, together with a taxonomic classification based on their physicochemical nature. On this basis, it delves into the formation mechanisms of various MSIs and systematically summarizes advanced characterization techniques used to analyze their electronic structures and interfacial properties. This review further explores how support properties, metal morphology, and preparation conditions collectively determine the strength and interaction mode of MSIs. A dedicated section introduces enhancement strategies, summarizing recent approaches for strengthening MSIs effects through defect engineering, interfacial design, and dynamic regulation. The applications of MSIs regulation in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and overall water splitting systems (OWS) are comprehensively discussed, along with the corresponding activity-enhancement mechanisms. It also outlines the challenges and future development directions in this field concerning atom-level precision control, operational condition characterization, and large-scale application.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 The formation and classification of MSIs

2.1 The formation of MSIs

2.2 The classification of MSIs

3 Characterization of MSIs

3.1 XANES

3.2 AC-TEM

3.3 Density functional theory of MSIs

3.4 Others

4 The formation and influencing factors of MSIs

4.1 Support

4.2 Metal

4.3 Interface temperature effect

5 Application of MSIs in HER and OER

5.1 HER

5.2 OER

6 Summary and outlook

6.1 Summary

6.2 Outlook

Cite this article

Aojie Yuan , Huan Liu , Danyang Hu , Lin Lan , Long Chen . Metal-Support Interactions for Electrocatalytic Water Splitting[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2026 , 38(3) : 443 -464 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20260112

1 Introduction

Metal-support interactions (MSIs) serve as a core regulatory tool in heterogeneous catalysis. Their fundamental value lies in inherently optimizing the electronic structure of catalysts, precisely controlling the adsorption energy barriers of reaction intermediates, and significantly enhancing the structural stability of catalytic systems under extreme reaction conditions through interfacial electron coupling, geometric restructuring, and synergistic effects of active sites[1]. Compared to single-component catalysts, MSIs endows supported catalysts with unique interfacial advantages: it can modulate the electron density distribution at active sites through charge transfer, suppress agglomeration and deactivation of active components via interfacial morphology reconstruction (e.g., encapsulation, alloying, mutual diffusion), and further enhance reaction kinetic efficiency through synergistic active sites, making it a key strategy for overcoming catalytic performance bottlenecks[2]. Driven by global energy transition and carbon neutrality goals, water electrolysis for hydrogen production-as the core technology for green hydrogen-has emerged as the pivotal link between renewable energy and the hydrogen economy due to its high product purity and zero-carbon emissions[3]. However, challenges such as sluggish multi-electron transfer kinetics in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), difficulties in regulating intermediate adsorption, and catalyst deactivation under harsh electrochemical conditions, coupled with the reliance of commercial catalysts on precious metals like iridium, ruthenium, and platinum, severely limit large-scale application[4]. As shown in Figure 1b, research on HER, OER, and functional catalysts has continued to grow in recent years, indicating that overcoming these bottlenecks through interfacial engineering strategies-such as MSIs regulation-has become a focal point in the field[5]. MSIs interface-tuning properties align exceptionally well with the performance requirements of water-splitting catalysts, offering a highly promising technical pathway to overcome these bottlenecks[6].
图1 (a) MSIs的表征及其主要分类;(b) 关于MSIs在电催化领域的已发表论文数量 (数据来源:Web of Science,检索日期:2025年10月18日);(c) MSIs的发展

Fig.1 (a) The characterization of MSIs and its main classification. (b) The number of published research articles for the MSIs in catalysis fields (data source: Web of Science, retrieved: October 18, 2025). (c) Development of MSIs

Within water electrolysis systems, MSIs has demonstrated clear application value and regulatory potential: For HER, MSIs can adjust the d-band center and local charge density of metal active sites, bringing hydrogen adsorption free energy (ΔGH*) closer to thermodynamic neutrality, thereby accelerating hydrogen adsorption-desorption kinetics.[7] For OER, it precisely modulates the adsorption strength of key intermediates such as *OH, *O, and *OOH, enhancing interfacial charge transfer efficiency and overcoming the kinetic limitations of multi-step proton-electron coupling reactions , Concurrently, MSIs-induced interfacial encapsulation and interaction effects effectively suppress sintering and dissolution of active metal components in harsh oxidation/reduction environments, significantly enhancing long-term catalyst stability[8]. However, current research still faces several critical shortcomings: First, the diverse nature of MSIs (electronic interactions, covalent interactions, strong interactions, etc.) leads to complex and conceptually ambiguous interfacial mechanisms, lacking a systematic classification framework tailored to specific water-splitting systems , Second, existing studies predominantly focus on static interface characterization, leaving the dynamic evolution of MSIs in real electrochemical environments-such as potential-dependent electron transfer and structural rearrangement during reactions-under-explored. Third, prior research is often confined to single reactions, specific catalyst types, or characterization techniques, lacking comprehensive integration of MSIs classification, structure-interaction-performance correlations, and design strategies[9]. Moreover, the structure-activity relationships between MSIs regulation and catalyst activity, selectivity, and stability remain unclear, hindering precise interface control and targeted catalyst design[10].
Therefore, this review systematically organizes and deeply analyzes MSIs in electrocatalytic water splitting systems: First, based on the nature and strength of interfacial interactions, we establish a dedicated classification system encompassing covalent-type (CMSIs), oxidation-induced-type (OMSIs), electron-type (EMSIs), and strong metal-support interactions (SMSIs, further subdivided into medium-strength MMSIs and weak interactions WMSIs)[11]. Second, it systematically elucidates the intrinsic mechanisms by which different types of MSIs regulate the electronic structure of HER/OER, optimize intermediate adsorption behavior, reconstruct interfacial reaction pathways, and enhance catalyst stability, Third, integrating advanced characterization techniques such as X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), in situ aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy (AC-TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to reveal interfacial structural features and electronic coupling patterns , Finally, based on the structure-interaction-performance correlation, summarize the latest application progress of MSIs in electrolytic water catalyst design, thoroughly discuss key challenges in current research such as dynamic regulation, mechanism quantification, and large-scale preparation, and outline future development directions including in situ regulation strategies and the integration of theoretical calculations with experiments[12]. This review aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for achieving precise interface regulation and constructing highly efficient, stable electrocatalysts for water splitting, thereby advancing the industrialization of water electrolysis hydrogen production technology[13].

2 The formation and classification of MSIs

2.1 The formation of MSIs

The interaction between metal particles and their supports has been recognized for nearly a century[14]. With the development of surface science and advanced characterization techniques, the MSIs concept has been further refined into several subtypes, including CMSIs, OMSIs, EMSIs, and SMSIs interactions[15]. These distinct types arise from different mechanisms such as electron redistribution, orbital hybridization, and structural reconstruction at the MSIs, all of which play crucial roles in determining catalytic activity and durability[1]. Since the strength and characteristics of these interactions are closely related to the physical and chemical properties of the catalyst system, the following section discusses the key external factors that govern MSIs formation and modulation in supported catalysts[16].

2.2 The classification of MSIs

Most of MSIs hold extensive practical application value in designed catalytic systems, with their performance largely determined by MSIs[17]. In electrocatalytic research, the type and strength of MSIs are significantly influenced by multiple factors, including the morphological structure of the support, metal loading, and reduction temperature[18]. For instance, reduction temperature serves as a critical parameter inducing SMSIs phenomena, with elevated temperatures typically inducing subshell migration within the support, thereby forming encapsulating structures around metallic nanoparticles[18]. As summarized in Table 1 below, numerous application cases have been documented for MSIs systems exhibiting diverse characteristics, which will be discussed in detail in subsequent sections.
表1 不同催化剂在MSIs作用下的催化性能比较[19]

Table 1 Comparison of catalytic performances of various catalysts under the action of MSIs[19]. Copyright, 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry

Types of MSI Catalyst Applications Methods Work Conditions Performances
CMSI Pt-TiN(C) HER Gas-phase synthesis 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 31 mV@10 mA/cm2
CMSI W/PdGa HER Hydrothermal and calcination 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 42 mV@10 mA/cm2
CMSI RuMo2C@CNT HER Solid-phase microwave pyrolysis 0.1 mol/L KOH 15 mV@10 mA/cm2
CMSI IrRu/T90G10 OER Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis 0.1 mol/L HClO4 54 mV@10 mA/cm2
CMSI 11.0 wt%Ir/ATO OER Delignin-impregnation-carbonization 0.1 mol/L KOH 300 mV@10 mA/cm² E1/2=0.82V
CMSI HsGDY/Cu3Pd-750 ORR In situ growth 1.0 mol/L KOH 0.870 V@57.7mA/cm2
CMSI PB@Met-700 ORR Pyrolysis 0.1 mol/L KOH E1/2=0.855V
CMSI Pt/MFO/NPC ORR Solvothermal method 0.1 mol/L KOH E1/2=0.835V
CMSI PTO-Vo-H/C ORR Hydrothermal and atomic layer deposition (ALD) 0.1 mol/L HClO4 E1/2=0.87V
CMSI Pt/TiO2@CNT ORR a sol-gel process 0.1 mol/L HClO4 E1/2=0.927V
CMSI SACs of Rh1-TiC HER Wetness impregnation 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 22 mV@10 mA/cm2
EMSI PtNP/MHCS HER Pre-precipitation 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 40 mV@10 mA/cm2
EMSI NiMo/Ti3C2Tx HER A wet chemical method 1.0 mol/L KOH HER current density of 10 mA/cm2@0.044 V
HOR HOR current density of 1.5 mA/cm2@0.1V
EMSI NiFe-MS/MOF@NF OER A simple one-step solvothermal reaction 1.0 mol/L KOH 230 mV@50 mA/cm2
HER 156 mV@50 mA/cm2

2.2.1 SMSIs

MSIs constitute a central concept in heterogeneous catalysis, describing the strong or weak mutual influence between the support and the loaded metallic nanoparticles[20]. This interaction can significantly alter the electronic properties of catalyst, geometric structure, and ultimately its reaction performance[21]. Among these, SMSIs represent a distinct and critical subset of MSIs. Their defining characteristics extend far beyond mere physical anchoring, manifesting as support-induced electronic modification or even physical encapsulation of metal particles under conditions such as high-temperature reduction[22]. This leads to profound alterations in catalytic behavior.
Based on these methods, this study provides a paradigmatic example demonstrating the SMSIs effect in the Ru NRs/TiN system. The HRTEM image clearly shows the distinct interface formed between Ru nanorods and the TiN substrate, with lattice fringes corresponding to the (002) plane of Ru and the (200) plane of TiN, providing the structural basis for SMSIs. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (Fig.2a) reveals no distinct Ru crystalline diffraction peaks in Ru NRs/TiN, suggesting that Ru species may be highly dispersed due to strong interactions with TiN or masked by the support signal. More critically, XPS results (Fig.2b,c) reveal a negative shift of 0.41 eV in the Ru 3d binding energy and a positive shift of 0.32 eV in the Ti 2p binding energy in Ru NRs/TiN compared to Ru NRs/C. This phenomenon unequivocally demonstrates electron transfer from the TiN support to Ru species, forming an interface for electronic reconstruction. This SMSIs induces charge redistribution not only to optimize hydrogen adsorption free energy and enhance intrinsic HER activity, but also to significantly strengthen the bond between the metal and the support, thereby conferring exceptional stability upon the catalyst.
图2 (a) Ru NRs/TiN催化剂的XRD图谱;(b) Ru NRs/TiN和Ru NRs/C的Ru 3p XPS谱图;(c) Ru NRs/TiN和TiN的Ti 2p XPS谱图[23]; (d) WO3纳米线、IrOx@WO3、RuOx@WO3和 Ir-RuOx@WO3的合成过程,IrOx@WO3、RuOx@WO3和Ir-RuOx@WO3的(e) Ru 3p、(f) Ir 4f及(g) O 1s高分辨XPS谱图[8]

Fig.2 (a) XRD patterns of Ru NRs/TiN catalyst. (b) Ru 3p XPS spectra of Ru NRs/TiN and Ru NRs/C. (c) Ti 2p XPS spectrum of Ru NRs/TiN and TiN[23]. Copyright, 2022, Elsevier. (d) Schematic diagram describes the synthesis of WO3 nanowires, IrOx@WO3, RuOx@WO3, and Ir-RuOx@WO3. High-resolution XPS spectra of (e) Ru 3p, (f) Ir 4f, and (g) O 1s of IrOx@WO3, RuOx@WO3 and Ir-RuOx@WO3[8].Copyright, 2024, American Chemical Society

2.2.2 WMSIs

Compared with the SMSIs, WMSIs exhibits a lower interaction intensity and a narrower range of action. Consequently, the ability of WMSIs to modulate the electronic structure of metal active sites is restricted[24]. WMSIs primarily involves physical adsorption or relatively weak van der Waals forces between the metal and the support. In such systems, the support mainly serves as a conductive scaffold and a platform for dispersing metal nanoparticles, while the intrinsic catalytic activity is predominantly governed by the exposed metal surface.
In terms of catalytic activity, the water electrolysis process encompasses two sub-processes, namely the HER and the OER[25]. The OER, being the rate-determining step, proceeds relatively slowly. Due to the relatively weak interaction strength, WMSIs generally exhibit a limited capability to regulate and optimize the electronic structure of metal active sites compared with stronger interaction modes. As a result, their direct contribution to enhancing catalytic activity in water electrolysis has often been considered less pronounced[26]. Nevertheless, such weak interactions can still influence the local adsorption environment and may indirectly affect the reaction pathway.
Regarding stability, the electrolytic water reaction typically occurs under conditions of high current density, strong alkalinity, or strong acidity[27]. Under such harsh operating environments, weak metal-support interactions may provide comparatively limited structural anchoring for metal nanoparticles, which could potentially lead to structural evolution or aggregation during long-term operation. However, the actual stability behavior can strongly depend on the nature of the support and the reaction environment[3].
From the perspective of catalytic mechanisms, the OER in electrolytic water involves a complex four-electron transfer process, which is often accompanied by catalyst restructuring phenomena[28]. Because WMSIs induce only subtle electronic perturbations, their ability to directly tailor the multi-electron transfer process in water electrolysis may be relatively limited compared with stronger interaction modes. However, the weak interaction environment may provide structural flexibility that facilitates catalyst reconstruction during electrocatalytic operation. In addition, WMSIs may play a role in dynamic reconfiguration or the initial adsorption of precatalysts before their transformation into the active phase[28]. Typical WMSI electrocatalysts include metal nanoparticles supported on inert or weakly interacting substrates, such as Pt/C, Pd/C and Ni/C systems. In these catalysts, the carbon support primarily functions as a conductive scaffold and dispersion platform for metal nanoparticles, while the catalytic activity is mainly determined by the exposed metal active sites[29].

2.2.3 MMSIs

MMSIs are an interaction force between WMSIs and SMSIs. MMSIs particularly refer to interactions that emphasize the synergistic effects arising from electronic interactions between conductive metal oxide supports (such as WO3) and supported metal/metal oxide nanoparticles[30]. This is crucial for enhancing conductivity and regulating the adsorption behavior of reaction intermediates.
This study employs a series of characterization techniques to clearly demonstrate the MMSIs effect between Ir-RuOx and the WO3 support. The schematic synthesis diagram in Fig.2d visually illustrates the loading process of Ir-RuOx nanoparticles onto WO3 ultra-fine nanowires. Electron microscopy results confirm that IrOx, RuOx, and Ir-RuOx nanoparticles are successfully and uniformly loaded onto WO3 nanowires. Crucially, loading different nanoparticle types induces distinct crystal plane exposures on WO3, directly reflecting structural interactions between the metal and support. Further critical evidence emerges from XPS analysis: As depicted in Fig.2e and 2f, compared to samples bearing a single metal, the binding energy of the Ir 4f orbital in Ir-RuOx@WO3 exhibits a positive shift, while that of the Ru 3p orbital shows a negative shift. This clearly indicates significant charge redistribution between the Ir-Ru bimetallic complex and WO3, with electrons transferring from Ir via the WO3 support to Ru, thereby optimizing the electronic structure of the active sites. Concurrently, the O 1s spectrum in Fig.2g reveals that Ir-RuOx@WO3 exhibits the highest surface hydroxyl (Ov) content. These hydroxyl groups, serving as key active species for the oxygen evolution reaction, demonstrate enrichment closely correlated with MMSIs-induced interfacial electronic effects and oxygen vacancy formation. Collectively, these imaging evidences confirm that MMSIs not only stabilizes nanoparticles but, crucially, synergistically enhances catalyst activity and stability by modulating electronic structure and increasing active sites.

2.2.4 OMSIs

The OMSIs work (breakthrough work on SMSIs for oxidizing atmospheres) originates from the research of Mou et al. in 2012[31]. They detected the phenomenon of oxygen-induced SMSIs in Au/ZnO catalysts[32]. When oxidized at 300 ℃, Au nanoparticles would be encapsulated by ZnO, accompanied by electron transfer from Au to the support[33]. The current work extends the excitation conditions of SMSIs (from OER) for the first time. In 2016, Tang et al. discovered a similar oxidized SMSIs phenomenon in Au catalysts loaded with non-oxides (hydroxyapatite and phosphate)p metals are also applicable to such oxidative SMSIs and formally introduced the concept of “OMSIs” to differentiate it from the classical SMSIs triggered by reducing conditions[34]. Generally, OMSIs is employed at medium to high temperatures and in oxidizing atmospheres, which significantly broadens the application range of catalysts for reactions such as oxidation or selective oxidation[35]. Due to the different catalytic reaction conditions, OMSIs hardly ever occurs during water electrolysis.

2.2.5 CMSIs

CMSIs represent a more advanced and synergistic paradigm, distinguished by the fact that the support no longer functions merely as an inert scaffold or simple electron regulator[36]. Instead, it participates directly and actively in the catalytic reaction alongside the loaded metal atoms, jointly forming a functional active site that collaboratively accomplishes complex multi-step reaction pathways[11].
In this scenario, the interaction between metal and support typically involves the formation or rearrangement of interfacial chemical bonds, leading to the creation of new interfacial active motifs in which both components contribute directly to the catalytic process. Demonstrating CMSIs necessitates not only characterizing electron interactions between metal and support (e.g., XPS, XAS), but crucially revealing the synergistic mechanism where support and metal fulfill distinct roles and mutually enhance each other during reactions through theoretical calculations and in situ techniques[37]. Therefore, CMSIs are generally identified when the support participates as a structural and chemical component of the active site rather than merely modifying the electronic state of the metal center.
In 2015, the Qiao and Zhang team first revealed the phenomenon of possible chemical bond displacement interactions (CMSIs) within gold/iron oxide single-atom catalytic systems[38]. The study found that positively charged surface-anchored gold atoms formed via CMSIs exhibit high-valency characteristics (with a higher proportion of covalent bonds)[39]. This property endows the catalyst with exceptional stability and outstanding catalytic activity.
This study employs an ingenious single-atom alloy (SAA) model to elucidate the CMSIs effect between Ru single atoms and Ni metal supports. The synthetic schematic depicts atomically dispersed Ru anchored onto a two-dimensional Ni substrate. AC-HAADF-STEM imaging (Fig.3g), directly confirms the uniform distribution of Ru in a single-atom form across the Ni support, establishing the foundation for forming a unique dual-site active center. XAS provides electronic evidence for CMSIs: the Ru K-edge XANES spectrum (Fig.3e) indicates a valence state close to metallic, while the EXAFS spectrum (Fig.3f) exhibits a peak at ~2.16 Å, unequivocally pointing to Ru-Ni coordination rather than Ru-Ru or Ru-O coordination. Theoretical calculations (Fig.3a~d) mechanistically elucidate the core of CMSIs: charge density difference maps reveal electron transfer from the Ni substrate to Ru single atoms (Fig.3a,b). This electronic rearrangement endows the Ru-Ni bisite with a significantly stronger adsorption energy for NO3- (-0.158 eV) compared to the Ni-Ni site (0.092 eV). Furthermore, pCOHP and PDOS analyses (Fig.3c and 3d) reveal stronger interactions and orbital hybridization between the Ru-Ni site and the NO3- intermediate. This indicates that during the NO3RR process, the Ru site primarily facilitates the efficient adsorption and activation of NO3- molecules, whilst the Ni support, owing to its exceptional hydrogen evolution capability, supplies the active hydrogen (H) required for the hydrogenation step. Together, they synergistically complete the entire process from nitrate ion activation to deep hydrogenation and deoxygenation, yielding N2, encapsulating the very essence of the CMSIs effect.
图3 (a) 和(b) 分别显示了NO3-在Ni和Ru1Ni表面吸附前后巴德电荷分析及电荷密度差,黄色和绿色分别代表电荷积累和电荷耗尽;(c) Ni、Ru原子与吸附NO3-中的O原子之间的投影轨道哈密顿布局。蓝色和红色分别代表成键态和反键态;(d) NO3-吸附在Ni和Ru1Ni催化剂上的PDOS图;(e) Ru1Ni SAA、Ru标样和RuO2的XANES光谱;(f) Ru1Ni SAA、Ru标样和RuO2的的EXAFS光谱;(g) Ru1Ni SAA的AC-HAADF-STEM图像[40];(h) Pt-MoS2和MoS2的XRD谱图;(i) Pt-MoS2和纯MoS2的Mo 3d能级的XPS谱图;(j) Pt-MoS2和Pt纳米颗粒的XPS谱图;(k) HRTEM图像;(l) 傅里叶变换图像[41]

Fig.3 (a) and (b) is Barder charge analysis and charge density difference before and after adsorption of NO3- on Ni and Ru1Ni surfaces, where yellow and green represent the charge accumulation and depletion. (c) The -pCOHP between Ni, Ru atoms, and O atoms of adsorbed NO3-. The blue and red represent the bonding and antibonding states, respectively. (d) The PDOS plots of NO3- adsorption on Ni and Ru1Ni catalysts. (e) Normalized XANES spectra of Ru1Ni SAA, Ru foil, and RuO2. (f) EXAFS spectra of Ru1Ni SAA, Ru-foil and RuO2. (g) AC-HAADF-STEM image of Ru1Ni SAA[40]. Copyright, 2024, Wiley. (h) XRD spectra of the Pt-MoS2 and MoS2. (i) XPS spectra of Pt-MoS2 and pure MoS2. (j) XPS spectra of Pt-MoS2 and Pt nanoparticles. (k) HRTEM image. (l) FFT image[41]. Copyright, 2021, Elsevier.

The emergence of charge transfer and even the formation of chemical bonds at the metal-support interface is ascribed to the electronic metal-support interaction EMSIs. Single-atom-support interactions of noble metals are frequently attributed to CMSIs.

2.2.6 EMSIs

EMSIs specifically denotes phenomena where the electronic structure of a metal is modulated primarily through electron transfer and orbital hybridization between the metal and substrate[42]. In contrast to CMSIs, EMSIs mainly operate through interfacial charge redistribution that alters the electronic configuration of the metal active sites without necessarily forming new catalytic sites composed of both metal and support atoms. This does not necessarily involve substrate encapsulation or atomic migration as observed in classical SMSIs[43].
The essence of EMSIs lies in directly optimizing the adsorption strength of reaction intermediates at the metal active sites through interfacial charge redistribution, thereby enhancing catalytic performance. In this interaction mode, the support primarily acts as an electronic regulator that tunes the d-band structure or charge density of the metal centers, rather than directly participating as part of the catalytic active site.
EMSIs was first proposed by Rodriguez and colleagues in 2012 as a novel category of SMSIs within Pt cluster-CeO2 support systems[44]. When Pt clusters are dispersed on a ceria support, the corresponding electronic perturbations at the Pt cluster-substrate interface are termed EMSIs, which significantly modulates the d-band centers of active sites. Correspondingly, Professor Tang (2014) also observed the EMSIs effect in various single-atom catalysts (SACs), where it regulates the charge state of isolated metal centers[45]. Unlike SMSIs, which necessitate high temperatures and reducing conditions, EMSIs apply across a broad range from low to moderate temperatures and function in both reducing and oxidizing atmospheres[46]. Notably, EMSIs typically do not involve the formation of new geometric atomic interfaces, focusing instead on electronic interactions between the metal and support.
This study provides clear evidence for the EMSIs effect by constructing Pt-MoS2 heterojunctions. XRD patterns (Fig.3h) reveal a slight shift in the characteristic peaks of MoS2 after Pt loading. HRTEM images (Fig.3k) and FFT diffraction patterns (Fig.3l) precisely reveal a distinct heterojunction interface between Pt nanoparticles and the MoS2 substrate, along with a defined crystallographic orientation relationship, providing the necessary structural foundation for EMSIs occurrence. More direct evidence emerges from XPS analysis: As depicted in Fig.3i and 3j, compared to pristine MoS2 and Pt nanoparticles, both the Mo 3d and S 2p binding energies in the Pt-MoS2 heterojunction exhibit negative shifts, while the Pt 4f binding energy shows a positive shift. This clearly reveals electron transfer from Pt nanoparticles to MoS2 supports, forming Pt―S bonds, direct evidence for EMSIs occurrence. This electron transfer significantly optimizes the electronic structure of Pt atoms at the interface. Collectively, these characterizations paint a comprehensive picture: robust EMSIs forms between Pt and MoS2, effectively modulating the electronic structure of active sites via interfacial electron transfer, ultimately synergistically enhancing catalytic activity and stability[41].
Within the Pt-MoS2 system, EMSIs stability originates from the ‘electron anchoring’ effect formed after charge transfer: the localised electric field and charge redistribution layer established at the Pt/MoS2 interface effectively anchor Pt atoms to the carrier surface, even without physical encapsulation. In electrochemical testing, Pt-MoS2 catalysts exhibited significantly lower activity decay after thousands of cycles compared to physically mixed controls, proving the persistent existence of EMSI as the fundamental cause of stability differences. Naturally, this stability relies on the energy level matching between Pt and MoS2, which provides the thermodynamic basis for EMSI’s long-term maintenance[41].

2.2.7 Summary

This section systematically elaborates on six major subcategories of MSIs, revealing their continuous spectrum and unique mechanisms-from weakly electron-perturbing WMSIs and moderately synergistic MMSIs to strongly structurally encapsulated SMSIs, from classically reduction-induced SMSIs and oxidation-atmosphere-triggered OMSIs to electron-transfer-centric EMSIs and chemically synergistic CMSIs. For water electrolysis catalysis, EMSIs and CMSIs demonstrate outstanding advantages in precisely regulating active site electronic structures and constructing synergistic reaction centers, serving as key strategies to enhance the intrinsic activity of HER/OER. MMSIs, as a crucial intermediate-strength interaction, plays a balancing role by optimizing electron synergy between metals and conductive supports (e.g., metal oxides), enhancing charge transport and regulating intermediate adsorption. Meanwhile, SMSIs remains irreplaceable for enhancing catalyst long-term durability under harsh electrolytic conditions due to its ability to form stable encapsulation structures. For practical applications, ideal catalyst design must balance activity, stability, and fabrication feasibility, often achieved by integrating synergistic effects from multiple MSIs types-such as combining the structural robustness of SMSIs, the electronic synergy of MMSIs, and the precise electronic modulation capabilities of EMSIs/CMSIs. Future research will focus on understanding and achieving precise construction and dynamic regulation of such composite interfaces at the atomic scale to advance the practical application of high-performance water-splitting catalysts.

3 Characterization of MSIs

To truly comprehend the pivotal role of MSIs in water electrolysis catalysis, the key lies in transcending the limitations of static characterization to reveal its essence at the dynamic and mechanistic levels[47]. The value of modern advanced characterization techniques lies not only in their unprecedented spatial resolution but also in their capacity to capture transient interfacial structures under operational conditions[48]. To achieve this, we must integrate: radiation (particularly in XAFS) capable of precisely probing local electronic structures and coordination environments under reaction conditions, XPS, which furnishes quantitative information on surface species and evidence of charge redistribution, and TEM/STEM, which ultimately provides intuitive evidence in real space[49]. These three techniques complement each other, collectively forming the cornerstone for analyzing the MSIs effect from the electronic to the atomic level, and from static to dynamic perspectives[50]. This approach tightly links the macroscopic performance of catalysts with their microscopic interfacial mechanisms.

3.1 XANES

Synchrotron radiation techniques, particularly XAFS spectroscopy, have emerged as powerful probes for resolving the local electronic structure and coordination environment within metal-ligand interactions[51]. In studies of the CuSAs-N/TiO2 system (Fig.4d), the Ti K-edge XANES spectrum reveals that the absorption edge position of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2 lies between that of TiN and TiO2, indicating that nitrogen doping increases the electron density of titanium and slightly reduces its oxidation state. Its EXAFS spectrum further confirms alterations in Ti-O/Ti-N bond lengths, revealing successful N incorporation into the TiO2 lattice to form Ti-N bonds, fundamentally altering the electronic properties of support. Concurrently, the Cu K-edge XANES (Fig.4e) indicates that the valence state of Cu single atoms lies between +1 and +2. The Cu-O coordination peak observed at ~1.53 Å in the EXAFS spectrum suggests that Cu atoms are atomically dispersed and bonded to support oxygen sites, forming a localized Cu-O3 configuration. Collectively, these results demonstrate that N doping not only modulates the intrinsic electronic structure of supports but also enhances the electronic interaction between the Cu single atom and the N-TiO2 support by strengthening the coupling between the p orbitals (O 2p, N 2p) and the metallic d orbitals (Ti 3d, Cu 3d) of support. This constitutes the core manifestation of MSIs.
图4 (a) TiO2、N(1.0)/TiO2、Cu(24)-TiO2和Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2的XRD谱图;(b) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2、CuO、Cu2O和Cu标样的EXAFS谱图;(c) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2、TiN、Ti标样和TiO2的EXAFS谱图;(d) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2、Ti标样、TiN和TiO2的Ti的XANES谱图;(e) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2、CuO、Cu2O和Cu标样的XANES谱图[52];(f) 和(g) 是所有催化剂与标准样品的XANES谱图; 所有催化剂中Cu (h) 和Ru (i) 的EXAFS光谱(含标准参考物),以及(j) 5/10 ML催化剂中Ru和Cu的WT-EXAFS的二维等高线图[53]

Fig.4 (a) XRD spectra of TiO2, N(1.0)/TiO2, Cu(24)-TiO2 and Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2. (b) EXAFS spectra of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2, CuO, Cu2O and Cu foil. (c) EXAFS spectra of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2, TiN, Ti foil and TiO2. (d) XANES spectra of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2, Ti foil, TiN and TiO2. (e) XANES spectra of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2, CuO, Cu2O and Cu foil[52]. Copyright, 2024, Elsevier. (f) and (g) XANES spectra of all catalysts. Insets in f and g are the magnified views of the selected XANES region. EXAFS spectra of Cu (h) and Ru (i) of all catalysts with standard references, and corresponding 2-dimensional contour map (j) WT-EXAFS of Ru and Cu in a 5/10 ML catalyst[53]. Copyright, 2023, American Chemical Society.

In the Ru-Cu metal/metal catalyst system (Fig.4f~j), XAFS further reveals the fine-tuned regulation of MSIs by hydroxyl coverage. Cu K-edge XANES (Fig.4g) shows the Cu absorption edge progressively shifting towards higher energies with increasing HO- coverage, reflecting elevated oxidation states and indicating electron transfer from Cu to Ru regions across the interface. Meanwhile, the Ru K-edge XANES (Fig. 4f) exhibits an absorption edge position intermediate between Ru foil and RuO2, further confirming HO-’s role as an electron ‘magnet’ attracting electrons across the Ru-Cu interface and enhancing interfacial charge flow. Moreover, the Ru-O coordination peak intensity in the Ru K-edge EXAFS (Fig. 4h) intensifies with increasing HO- coverage, while the Ru-Ru metallic bond signal broadens and weakens. This indicates that HO- modification not only alters Ru’s local coordination environment but also induces a slight lattice stretching, thereby strengthening the electron coupling and structural correlation between the metal and the support. Collectively, these spectroscopic evidences reveal that modulating the coverage of surface modifiers (such as HO-) can effectively enhance the inherently weak metal-metal MSIs, thereby achieving charge redistribution and optimized catalytic performance.
In summary, XAFS serves as a pivotal technique for characterizing MSIs. It not only precisely detects the valence state, coordination structure, and electronic rearrangement induced by support modification at the metal center but also unveils the microscopic mechanisms of interfacial charge transfer and orbital coupling[54]. This provides indispensable experimental evidence for understanding and designing high-performance MSIs catalysts. Looking ahead, advancements in in situ XAS hold promise for real-time tracking of dynamic evolution under operational conditions. This will enable a more comprehensive elucidation of its true role and regulatory patterns within catalytic reactions.

3.2 AC-TEM

In elucidating the fine structure of MSIs, particularly within metal/metal composite systems, aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (AC-HAADF-STEM) has played a pivotal role. As demonstrated in Figure 5a, high-resolution imaging of the Ru-Cu catalyst enabled direct observation of the distinct heterojunction interface formed between Ru species and the Cu support. The selected area diffraction patterns in Fig. 5a and the high-resolution images in Fig.5a1 and 5a2 distinctly resolve the lattice fringes of Cu(111) and Ru(101), visually illustrating the attachment state of Ru nanoclusters or nanocrystals onto the Cu support. These AC-HAADF-STEM images provide the most direct structural evidence for the intimate interfacial contact between Ru and Cu. This interface constitutes the physical foundation for charge exchange and SMSIs, robustly confirming the successful implementation of the MSIs effect within this metal/metal catalyst.
图5 (a) Ru-Cu的HRTEM图像;(b) 5/10 ML的HRTEM图像得到的相应渲染图;(c) Ru-Cu的HAADF-STEM图像及相应的渲染图[53];(d) 和(e) 为0.1 Pt掺杂MoO3的TEM图像;(f) 0.1 Pt掺杂MoO3的HRTEM图像;(g) 和(h) 分别为0.1 Pt掺杂MoO3和1.0 Pt掺杂MoO3的HAADF-STEM图像[55]

Fig.5 (a) HRTEM images of Ru-Cu. (b) Rendered images derived from the of 5/10 ML HRTEM image. (c) HAADF-STEM and corresponding rendered images of Ru-Cu[53]. Copyright, 2023, American Chemical Society. (d) and (e) is the TEM characterization of 0.1Pt doped MoO3. (f) HRTEM image of 0.1Pt doped MoO3. (g) and (h) the aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM images of 0.1Pt doped MoO3 and 1.0Pt doped MoO3[55]. Copyright, 2022, Elsevier.

Furthermore, in studies of Pt-doped MoO3, AC-HAADF-STEM imaging reveals the precise positioning of Pt single atoms within the MoO3 lattice. Fig. 5g demonstrates that at low doping levels, isolated Pt atoms (marked by blue circles) uniformly occupy Mo lattice sites without significant lattice distortion, indicating Pt is stably anchored within the substrate via Pt-O coordination bonds. Conversely, at elevated Pt doping levels, Pt atoms aggregate into nanoclusters (Fig. 5h). This contrast provides compelling evidence that moderate MSIs is crucial for achieving stable single-atom dispersion, excessive metal loading renders MSIs insufficient to overcome surface energies, thereby inducing aggregation. Consequently, aberration-corrected electron microscopy not only confirms the presence of metal in a single-atom state but also reveals MSIs intensity and its decisive role in determining catalyst structural stability by contrasting structural differences under varying preparation conditions.

3.3 Density Functional Theory of MSIs

Theoretical calculations provide an essential understanding of the MSIs and their role in governing catalytic activity during water electrolysis. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations reveal how the coordination environment and interfacial coupling between metal centers and supports influence adsorption energetics, reaction barriers, and structural stability under operating conditions[56].
Theoretical calculations are systematically employed to elucidate the origin and regulation mechanisms of MSIs within metal-metal (M1-M2) heterostructures. Fig.6a~d clearly demonstrates, through a comparative analysis of bonding characteristics between metal-oxide and metal-metal support systems, that the relatively longer metal-metal bond distances inherently result in slower and insufficient charge transfer at the interface, consequently yielding WMSIs. Building upon this insight, the authors employ the Ru-Cu system as a model to further elucidate the physical essence of MSIs through theoretical calculations. As depicted in Fig.6b, when two metals with differing work functions (Φ) contact each other, electrons flow from the metal with the lower work function (Cu) to the metal with the higher work function (Ru), generating a contact potential (eΔΦ) that establishes an internal electric field at the interface. However, as depicted in Fig.6c, the theoretical contact potential between Ru and Cu is merely 0.06 V, indicating an intrinsically weak MSIs incapable of effectively modulating catalytic performance.
图6 (a) 金属-氧化物支撑体与金属-金属支撑体相互作用及键合特性示意图;(b) 关于金属1-金属2 (M1-M2) 支撑体相互作用起源及相关接触电位的根本观点,Evac为真空能,EF-M1为M1的费米能级,EF-M2为M2的费米能级,ΦM1 为M1的功函数,ΦM2为M2的功函数;(c) Ru与Cu之间的理论接触电位仅为0.06 V;(d) HO-修饰对Ru-Cu催化剂所产生优势的示意图[53]; (e) Co@4 N-掺杂石墨烯/MoS2的(f) OER和(g) HER吉布斯自由能图及稳定性图[57];(h) 制备样品的EPR信号;(i) Pt 4f,(j) O 1s的XPS光谱[58]

Fig.6 (a) Diagram describing the interaction and bonding properties of the metal-oxide support and metal-metal support. (b) The fundamental viewpoint of metal1-metal2 (M1-M2) supports the interaction origin and related contact potential. Evac is the vacuum energy, EF‑M1 is the Fermi level of M1EF‑M2 is the Fermi Level of M2, ΦM1 is the work function of M1, and ΦM2 is the work function of M2. (c) Theoretical contact potential between ruthenium (Ru) and copper (Cu) is only e0.06 V. (d) Schematic illustrations of advantages induced by hydroxyl (HO-) modification for Ru-Cu catalysts[53]. Copyright, 2023, American Chemical Society. (e) HER and (f) OER Gibbs free energy diagrams and (g) stability diagram for Co@4 N-doped graphene/MoS2[57]. Copyright, 2025, Elsevier. (h) EPR signals of the prepared samples. XPS spectra of the prepared samples: (i) Pt 4f, and (j) O 1s[58]. Copyright, 2024, Wiley.

To overcome this limitation, theoretical calculations further revealed the potential for regulating MSIs through hydroxyl (HO-) modification. Fig.6d schematically illustrates how HO-, acting as an electron modulator, not only induces interfacial charge migration but also optimizes the adsorption behaviour of reactive intermediates at active Ru sites. Theoretical modelling with varying HO- coverage demonstrated that introducing HO- significantly enhances charge accumulation at the Ru-Cu interface, thereby strengthening the MSIs. This theoretical prediction provides clear guidance for subsequent experimental design: controllable enhancement of metal-metal interface MSIs can be achieved by regulating HO- coverage, thereby optimising the kinetics of non-acidic HER. Consequently, theoretical calculations in this study not only elucidate the electronic origin of MSIs but also offer quantitative control strategies, demonstrating that interfacial charge transfer is the core mechanism for MSIs enhancement.
In this work, Fig. 6e, 6f, and 6g reveal, through systematic theoretical calculations, the composition of the MSIs within MoS2/NGr-Co SACs and its regulatory mechanism on catalytic performance. The figures present Gibbs free energy diagrams for the HER and OER reaction pathways on the Co@4 N-doped graphene/MoS2 model, alongside corresponding stability plots. Specifically, Fig.6e indicates an adsorption free energy (ΔGH) of 0.50 eV for H* during the HER process. Whilst this value is marginally above the ideal threshold, it nonetheless demonstrates appreciable hydrogen evolution activity. More critically, Fig.6f reveals the free energy changes of intermediates during the OER process, where the highest energy barrier is merely 0.46 eV-approaching the ideal value (0.4 eV). This confirms the configuration exhibits outstanding thermodynamic activity for oxygen evolution. The stability diagram in Fig.6g further confirms the catalyst’s robust structural stability under OER conditions, with its oxidation resistance markedly enhanced as the coordination number of the Co atom increases from 1 N to 4 N.
Theoretical calculations played a pivotal role in this study, not only quantifying the electronic effects of MSIs but also elucidating the origin of its catalytic activity. By constructing Co single-atom models with varying nitrogen coordination environments (1 N, 3 N, 4 N), calculations revealed that the Co-N4 coordination structure constitutes the optimal active site. This configuration substantially reduces the energy barriers for key steps in the OER process, such as OH→O and O→OOH. Concurrently, Bader charge analysis revealed pronounced electron loss at Co and Mo atoms, alongside electron enrichment at N and S atoms, at the MoS2/NGr-Co interface. This directional charge transfer behaviour constitutes the core manifestation of MSIs, optimising the adsorption energy of reaction intermediates and thereby enhancing overall water splitting performance. Thus, theoretical calculations not only confirm Co-N4 as a key component of MSIs but also elucidate its microscopic mechanism for enhancing catalytic activity through regulating interfacial charge distribution.
Overall, theoretical simulations clarify that the MSIs fundamentally determines the catalytic efficiency and stability of these systems. The interfacial charge redistribution, coordination-dependent adsorption behavior, and band structure alignment together create a favorable environment for both HER and OER. These insights provide a solid theoretical foundation for rationally designing next-generation water-splitting catalysts through precise control of metal-support coupling at the atomic level.

3.4 Others

In this work, EPR and XPS characterization were effectively employed to elucidate the specific composition and electronic structural alterations of the MSIs[47], thereby underpinning the high catalytic performance of PtRu/WO3-Ov. EPR testing (Fig.6h) provides crucial supplementary evidence within this characterization framework, directly confirming the presence and increased concentration of oxygen vacancies (Ov) via signal intensity at g=2.003. The strongest EPR signal was observed in PtRu/WO3-Ov, indicating that microwave treatment and alloying introduced oxygen vacancies. These vacancies not only enhanced WO3 conductivity but also provided active sites for MSIs, facilitating electron transfer and the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of reaction intermediates. The XPS analysis in Fig. 6i,j clearly demonstrates the electron transfer phenomenon induced by MSIs. The binding energy of the W 4f orbitals in PtRu/WO3-Ov relative to the WO3-Ov support (from 35.76/37.86 eV to 36.10/38.20 eV) shows a positive shift, indicating electron flow from the WO3-Ov support towards the PtRu alloy and reflecting electron donation from the support to the metal core manifestation of MSIs. Concurrently, the negative shift in the Pt 4f orbitals (e.g., Pt 4f {7/2} decreasing from 71.25 eV) in Figure 6i further confirms electron accumulation at the Pt surface. This electron-rich state optimizes the occupation of the d-band orbitals of Pt, facilitating the desorption of hydrogen intermediates and thereby enhancing catalytic activity. Moreover, the O 1s spectrum in Fig.6j reveals a slight positive shift in the binding energies of lattice oxygen and Ov on PtRu/WO3-Ov. This indicates that electrons do not preferentially migrate to oxygen sites but instead redistribute via MSIs, reinforcing the synergistic effects between the metal and supports.
Consequently, XPS and EPR collectively establish a comprehensive chain of evidence: XPS reveals MSIs-induced electronic rearrangement and metal-support bonding, while EPR validates the enhancement of support defects (such as Ov). These defects further amplify the MSIs effect, ultimately enabling the catalyst to exhibit outstanding HER activity across a broad pH range.
Beyond core characterization techniques such as XAFS, XPS, and aberration-corrected electron microscopy, a suite of auxiliary methods-particularly fundamental electrochemical approaches-provides crucial complementary evidence for elucidating the MSIs effect and its influence on catalytic behavior[59]. For instance, cyclic voltammetry (CV) can be employed to detect characteristic redox peaks of the metal center. When strong MSIs forms, the d-band electronic structure of the metal undergoes alteration, leading to a systematic shift in its redox peak positions[60]. This directly reflects the electronic effects induced by MSIs. The Tafel slope, meanwhile, provides corroboration from a reaction kinetics perspective: MSIs modifies the rate-determining step by optimizing the adsorption energy of reaction intermediates at active sites, thereby inducing significant changes in the apparent Tafel slope. Furthermore, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) quantitatively assesses interfacial charge transfer resistance[61]. Strong MSIs typically enhances electron transport at the metal-support interface, manifesting as reduced charge transfer resistance. This provides direct electrochemical evidence for MSIs enhancement of charge migration efficiency.
Concurrently, multiple characterization techniques provide robust corroboration for the presence and intensity of MSIs. STEM coupled with elemental mapping visually delineates the spatial distribution and dispersion of metallic species on the support[62]. Raman spectroscopy, sensitive to local lattice vibrations, effectively detects defects (e.g., oxygen vacancies) or lattice strain induced by MSIs in the support[63]. XRD, examining long-range ordered structures, reveals that if metallic species are highly dispersed to the single-atom level, corresponding metallic crystal diffraction peaks will not appear in the XRD pattern[64]. Conversely, if MSIs induces minor alterations in the support lattice parameters, this may cause shifts in diffraction peaks. Furthermore, infrared spectroscopy employing carbon monoxide as a probe molecule (CO-DRIFTS) serves as a highly sensitive characterization technique. Electron transfer between metal sites and supports alters the electron density of metal, causing a systematic shift in the stretching vibration frequency of adsorbed CO molecules (e.g., blue shift for increased electron density, red shift for decreased density). This constitutes a classical method for demonstrating interfacial electronic effects.
Mastery of multiple MSIs characterization techniques must be accompanied by a deep understanding of the physical essence, information dimensions, and inherent limitations of each method. Future research hinges on the organic integration and correlative analysis of these techniques, enabling cross-scale, multidimensional precision characterization of catalysts-from macroscopic morphology and crystal structure to microscopic electronic structure and coordination environment[65]. Only through this ‘multidimensional perspective’ strategy can a clear ‘structure-performance’ relationship be established, propelling MSIs research beyond phenomenological observation towards a new phase of mechanism-driven regulation and rational design.

4 The formation and influencing factors of MSIs

The manifestation of MSIs in catalytic systems depends strongly on several controllable parameters, including the composition and structure of the support, the nature and particle size of the metal species, and the experimental conditions such as temperature and atmosphere. These factors collectively determine the degree of charge transfer, dispersion, and interfacial stability of the supported metal, thereby modulating the overall catalytic performance. The following subsections examine each of these factors in detail.

4.1 Support

The physicochemical properties of the support material play a decisive role in the formation and strength of MSIs. Parameters such as support composition, electronic structure, surface defects, and oxygen vacancies govern how charge redistribution occurs at the metal-support interface[66]. Defect engineering, particularly through the introduction of oxygen vacancies, has proven to be an effective strategy to enhance interfacial coupling and improve catalytic performance.
For example, Chen et al. constructed Ru cluster-modified NiFe layered double hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) catalysts by introducing oxygen vacancies (Vo••) into the support lattice. As illustrated in Fig.7a, these defects alter the local coordination environment and induce metastabilization of interfacial Ru sites, thereby strengthening the MSIs effect. The modulation of the work function between Ru clusters and defect-rich NiFe-LDH (Fig.7b) confirms the enhanced charge transfer capability, while the partial density of states (PDOS) analyses (Fig.7d) reveal a clear shift in the d-band centers of both Ru and Ni atoms, indicative of electronic coupling across the interface. Structural and vibrational characterizations, such as FT-IR spectra (Fig.7c), further demonstrate that the introduction of vacancies modifies the lattice microstructure and interfacial bonding, ultimately improving the catalyst’s electrical conductivity and durability in seawater electrolysis.
图7 (a) 受界面Vo••影响的Ru位点亚稳态化机理示意图;(b) Ru团簇与d-NiFe LDH之间的功函数;(c) 沿Z方向的平面平均电位;(d) Ru/NiFe LDH、Ru/d-NiFe LDH和d-NiFe LDH中Ni 3d轨道的PDOS[58]; (e) Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF的TEM图像;(f) Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF的AC-HAADF-STEM图像;(g) Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF、PtO2和Pt标样的归一化Pt K边XANES谱图;(h) Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF、PtO2 和Pt标样的k3加权FT-EXAFS光谱;(i) Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF的k3加权 EXAFS 信号的小波变换[37]

Fig.7 (a) Schematic diagram of the interfacial Vo•• affected Ru site metastablization mechanism. (b) The work function between the Ru clusters and d-NiFe LDH. (c) Planar average potential along the Z-direction. (d) PDOS of Ni 3d orbits of Ru/NiFe LDH, Ru/d-NiFe LDH, and d-NiFeLDH[58]. Copyright, 2024, Wiley. (e) TEM images of Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF. (f) AC-HAADF-STEM images of Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF. (g) Normalized Pt K-edge XANES of Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF, PtO2 and Pt foil, respectively. (h) The k3-weighted FT-EXAFS spectra of Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF, PtO2 and Pt foil. (i) Wavelet transform for k3-weighted EXAFS signal of Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF[37]. Copyright, 2024, Wiley.

This example highlights that tailoring the electronic structure of the support through defect engineering provides an efficient approach to strengthening MSIs and optimizing the interfacial charge dynamics in electrocatalytic systems.

4.2 Metal

The strength and characteristics of MSIs depend not only on the intrinsic properties of the support but also on the type, valence state, and particle size of the loaded metal. Different metals possess distinct electronic configurations and bonding affinities, which influence charge transfer and orbital coupling at the interface[67]. The geometric scale of the metal species, ranging from nanoparticles and clusters to single atoms, further determines the extent of electronic overlap and interfacial area, thereby affecting the MSIs strength and catalytic behavior.
Meng et al report Pt single atoms anchored on NiCrO3 (Pt SACs-NiCrO3/NF), where electron transfer from Ni and Cr to Pt optimizes the local electronic environment and facilitates both water dissociation and hydrogen adsorption in the hydrogen evolution reaction (Fig.7g,h). Although involving different metals and reaction systems, both studies demonstrate that the type and dispersion of the loaded metal strongly influence MSIs formation and catalytic performance. Xiao investigates Cu-loaded nitrogen-doped TiO2 (CuSAs-N/TiO2) to reveal how the MSIs varies with metal type and local coordination. Nitrogen incorporation into the TiO2 lattice introduces localized electronic states and enhances the hybridization between Cu 3d and Ti 3d/O 2p orbitals, promoting interfacial electron delocalization and improving the hydrogen adsorption energetics. Cu species are atomically dispersed on the N-doped TiO2 surface without aggregation (Fig.8b~d). The synergistic interaction between Cu atoms and the nitrogen-doped TiO2 lattice strengthens the MSIs and significantly improves photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity[52].
图8 (a) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2的HRTEM图像;(b) 图(d)中标记的晶格条纹的线扫描原子强度分布图;(c) Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2的AC-HAADF-TEM图像;(d) 经高斯滤波降噪处理的Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2图像[24];(e) MAOs及Ni/MAO催化剂的形成路径;(f) Ni/MAO催化剂的Ni L边光谱;(g) 和 (h) Ni/MAO1000上CO2吸附和CO2甲烷化的原位DRIFT谱;(i) Ni/MAO催化剂上CO2甲烷化的反应机理[69]

Fig.8 (a) HRTEM images of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2. (b) the line scan atomic intensity profiles of lattic fringes marked in (d). (c) raw AC-HAADF-TEM images. (d) the corresponding noise reduction images by Gaussian filter of Cu(24)-N(1.0)/TiO2[52]. Copyright, 2024, Elsevier. (e) The formation pathway of MAOs and Ni/MAO catalysts. (f) Ni L-edge spectra of Ni/MAO catalysts. (g) and (h) In situ DRIFT spectra of CO2 adsorption and CO2 methanation over Ni/MAO1000. (i) Proposed mechanism of CO2 methanation over Ni/MAO catalysts[69]. Copyright, 2023, Elsevier.

4.3 Interface temperature effect

Reaction temperature plays an essential role in determining the formation and strength of MSIs. Thermal treatment affects the crystallization, surface energy, and defect structure of the support, as well as the electronic state and dispersion of the loaded metal[68]. Increasing the calcination temperature usually enhances interfacial contact and facilitates phase reconstruction, thereby strengthening the MSIs and improving catalytic stability.
Ren prepared a series of Ni/MAO catalysts by calcining Mg-Al layered double hydroxide (MgAl-LDH) precursors at different temperatures to regulate the MSIs strength between Ni and the oxide support. The formation pathway from MgAl-LDH to (Mg, Al)Ox (MAO) supports, and Ni/MAO catalysts shows that higher calcination temperature promotes the transformation of MgAl-LDH into a well-crystallized MgAl2O4 spinel structure (Fig.8e). This structure provides a stable framework for Ni anchoring and enhances the interfacial electronic coupling between Ni and the support. Ni L-edge XAS spectra show that the L2 and L3 peaks gradually shift to lower energies as the calcination temperature increases (Fig.8f), indicating an increase in electron density around Ni and stronger electron transfer between Ni and the oxide support. As a result, Ni/MAO1000 exhibits the highest CO2 conversion rate during methanation, reaching 1821 mmol CO2·mol/Ni·min at 400 ℃, which surpasses the catalysts prepared at lower calcination temperatures. In-situ DRIFTS spectra provide additional insights into the reaction pathway. The spectra of CO2 adsorption identify carbonate (CO32-), bicarbonate (HCO3-), carboxylate (COOH), and formate (*HCOO) intermediates, while the methanation spectra show increasing intensities of *HCOO and CH4 peaks with temperature (Fig.8g,h). These observations confirm that the formate pathway dominates CO2 methanation on Ni/MAO1000. The stronger MSIs formed at high temperature facilitates the adsorption and transformation of these intermediates, thereby enhancing catalytic activity and stability.
Overall, temperature adjustment provides an effective strategy to modulate MSIs through phase transitions and interfacial electronic rearrangements. High-temperature treatment improves the crystallization and electronic coupling between the metal and support, stabilizes small Ni particles, and strengthens the adsorption and conversion of intermediates, leading to superior performance in CO2 methanation.

5 Application of MSIs in HER and OER

MSIs play a vital role in enhancing the activity and durability of electrocatalysts for water splitting. Recent studies demonstrate that rational regulation of these interactions can effectively tune the electronic structure of active sites, stabilize catalytic centers, and accelerate interfacial charge transfer during both the HER and OER[70].

5.1 HER

In noble metal systems, a representative example is the NO2-Pt-Cl2 structure, which achieves high intrinsic activity through strong coordination between the Pt centers and functionalized carbon supports. The catalyst preparation involves introducing nitro groups onto nitrogen-doped carbon, followed by the adsorption of Pt precursors to form a stable NO2-Pt-Cl2 configuration (Fig.9a). The absence of Pt-Pt bonds and the clear atomic dispersion of Pt species indicate a strong interaction between Pt and the support, which prevents aggregation under electrochemical conditions (Fig.9b,c). This interaction optimizes the local electronic environment of Pt, enhancing proton adsorption and facilitating charge transfer during HER. As a result, the catalyst exhibits a low overpotential of 25 mV at 10 mA/cm2 and maintains almost unchanged performance after extensive cycling (Fig.9d,e). The strong MSIs provides both high activity and remarkable structural stability under acidic conditions.
图9 (a) NC-NO2-PtCl2的制备过程;(b) NC-NO2-PtCl2的STEM图像;(c) Pt标样、Pt/C、PtO2、H2PtCl6和NC-NO2-PtCl2在R空间k²加权的FT-EXAFS光谱; (d) LSV曲线;(e) Pt/C与NC-NO2-PtCl2的循环LSV稳定性对比[71];(f) MoS2-NGr-Co SACs的合成流程图;(g) MoS2-NGr-Co SACs、MoS2-Co SACs及MoS2催化剂的XRD图;(h) MoS2-NGr-Co SACs及 Co 标样、Co3O4、CoO 和 CoPc 参比样品的FT-EXAFS谱图, MoS2-NGr-Co SACs、MoS2-Co SACs 和 MoS2FS的(i) OER极化曲线;(j) HER极化曲线;(k) 电极极化曲线;(l) 不同电流密度下MoS2-NGr-Co SACs电极的电化学稳定性分析;(m) 催化剂MoS2-NGr-Co SACs在10 mA/cm2时的电压与典型文献报道值的比较[57];(n) LSV曲线(电流值按几何面积归一化);(o) 80 ℃下IrOx/VO-TiO2和商用TiO2阳极的PEM电解槽的极化曲线[1]

Fig.9 (a) Illustration showing the fabrication process of NC-NO2-PtCl2, starting from the NC-cluster and converting it into NC-NO2 and NC-NO2-PtCl2. Dashed areas in NC-cluster, NC-NO2, and NC-NO2-PtCl2 are magnified and described as atomic ball-and-stick models. (b) STEM image of NC-NO2-PtCl2 showing an atomic distribution of Pt signals. (c) k2-Weighted FT-EXAFS spectra of Pt foil, Pt/C, PtO2, H2PtCl6, and NC-NO2-PtCl2 in R-space. (d) LSV curves. (e) Comparison of cyclic LSV stability between Pt/C and NC-NO2-PtCl2[71]. Copyright, 2025, Wiley. (f) The synthesis procedure of MoS2-NGr-Co SACs. (g) XRD pattern of MoS2-NGr-Co SACs, MoS2-Co SACs, MoS2 catalysts. (h) FT-EXAFS of MoS2-NGr-Co SACs, as well as Co foil, Co3O4, CoO, and CoPc reference. (i) OER polarization curves. (j) HER polarization curves. (k) Polarization curves of electrodes: MoS2-NGr-Co SACs, MoS2-Co SACs, and MoS2 FS. (l) Electrochemical stability analysis of MoS2-NGr-Co SACs electrode at different current densities. (m) Comparison of the cell voltage of the target catalyst, MoS2-NGr-Co SACs, at 10 mA cm-2 with that reported in typical literature[57]. Copyright, 2025, Elsevier. (n) LSV curves (the currents are normalized by geometric area). (o) Polarization curves of PEM water electrolyzers with IrOx/VO-TiO2 and commercial TiO2 anodes at 80 ℃[1]. Copyright, 2025, American Chemical Society.

In non-noble metal systems, heterostructure engineering offers another effective way to modulate MSIs. A typical study constructs Co-based catalysts supported on nitrogen-doped graphene coupled with MoS2 nanosheets, forming an integrated MoS2-NGr-Co interface (Fig.9f~h). The electronic coupling between the Co centers, MoS2, and NGr enables efficient charge redistribution at the interface, which strengthens the adsorption of key intermediates and lowers reaction barriers for both HER and OER. The catalyst displays a low OER overpotential of 310 mV and high HER activity with a small overpotential of 200 mV at 10 mA/cm2Fig.9i,j). When used as both electrodes for overall water splitting, it achieves a cell voltage of only 1.49 V to deliver 10 mA/cm2, outperforming many reported non-noble metal systems (Fig.9k,9m). These results confirm that the optimized MSIs within the heterostructure effectively promotes the dual catalytic reactions and ensures long-term stability.

5.2 OER

In this paper, Fig. 9n presents the OER polarisation curves of IrOx sub-2 nm clusters in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4. By comparing the electrochemical performance of IrOx catalysts supported on different supports (TiO2, VO-TiO2, and VTi-TiO2), it visually demonstrates the regulatory effect of MSIs on OER activity. Results indicate that IrOx/VO-TiO2 exhibits the lowest overpotential (250 mV) at a current density of 10 mA/cm2, significantly outperforming IrOx/VTi-TiO2 (273 mV) and IrOx/TiO2 (303 mV). This performance disparity is directly attributable to the adsorption-type MSIs induced by the VO-TiO2 support. It’s a relatively weaker interaction that optimizes the electronic structure of IrOx, shifting the d-band centre downward. This weakens the binding strength with oxygen intermediates, thereby enhancing OER reaction kinetics. Conversely, the stronger embedded MSIs induced by VTi-TiO2 did not yield higher activity. Instead, its excessive electronic regulation restricted the desorption of reaction intermediates, resulting in slightly inferior performance.
Fig.9o further extends the MSIs effect to practical application, presenting the polarisation curves at 80 ℃ for an electrolyzer assembled with an IrOx/VO-TiO2 anode and a commercial Pt/C cathode within a proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis cell. Results indicate that at 1.6 V, the IrOx/VO-TiO2‖Pt/C system achieves a current density of 240 mA/cm2, double that of the commercial IrO2‖Pt/C system. This significant performance enhancement not only validates the superiority of absorptive MSIs at the laboratory scale but also demonstrates its feasibility and efficiency in practical PEM electrolyzers. A comprehensive analysis of Fig. 9n and 9o reveals that stronger MSIs is not necessarily superior. Instead, moderate electron transfer must be achieved by regulating the type of carrier defects (such as oxygen vacancies), thereby maximizing catalytic activity while maintaining stability. This discovery provides clear theoretical guidance and experimental evidence for designing highly efficient and stable acidic OER catalysts.
In summary, both systems demonstrate that rational design of MSIs, whether through coordination engineering in noble metal catalysts or electronic coupling in non-noble metal heterostructures, provides a powerful strategy to enhance catalytic performance for water electrolysis. The optimization of MSIs regulates the local electronic structure, stabilizes active centers, and accelerates charge transport, which collectively enable efficient and sustained hydrogen production, providing crucial guidance for the design of high-performance water-splitting catalysts.

6 Summary and outlook

6.1 Summary

This paper systematically reviews the pivotal role of MSIs in electrocatalytic water splitting. It constructs a comprehensive cognitive framework spanning from microscopic mechanisms to macroscopic performance, encompassing theoretical foundations, formation mechanisms, characterization techniques, and regulation strategies, alongside their specific applications in the HER, OER, and overall water splitting. Research indicates that by rationally designing support properties, metal morphology, and preparation conditions, the intensity and pattern of MSIs can be effectively modulated. This optimizes the electronic structure of active sites, enhances interfacial charge transfer, and improves catalyst stability. Particularly, advances in defect engineering, interfacial structure design, and dynamic regulation offer novel approaches to intensifying MSIs effects.

6.2 Outlook

Despite significant advances in MSIs research and its immense potential for enhancing water-splitting catalysts, numerous challenges persist. Current research has demonstrated the ability to preliminarily modulate the intensity and patterns of MSIs through support defect engineering (such as regulating oxygen vacancies and titanium vacancies). Future work should integrate atomic-scale synthesis techniques (e.g., confined growth, atomic layer deposition) with high-accuracy theoretical calculations (e.g., first-principles-based machine learning potential function, microkinetic simulations) to achieve quantitative design and precise construction of the local coordination environment, electron transfer number, and bonding strength at MSIs interface active sites. Establishing quantitative structure-property relationships between MSIs intensity/type (e.g., adsorption-type and insertion-type) and key catalytic descriptors (e.g., d-band centers, reaction intermediate adsorption energies, rate-limiting step energy barriers) will transcend current qualitative correlations, enabling rational catalyst design tailored to specific reactions. Existing characterization methods (e.g., XPS, HRTEM, EPR) are predominantly performed pre-reaction or under static conditions, making it challenging to capture the dynamic evolution of MSIs under actual electrochemical conditions (applied potential, reaction intermediate adsorption, local pH/electric field variations). There is an urgent need to develop and integrate multiple in situ/operational characterization techniques, such as: electrochemical in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy to track real-time changes in the valence state and coordination structure of metal active sites, electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy to observe potential-driven interfacial structural rearrangement at the atomic scale, and online electrochemical mass spectrometry to correlate MSIs states with the generation/consumption kinetics of key reaction intermediates. This will reveal the stability and reconstruction mechanisms of MSIs within actual catalytic cycles, providing a basis for designing robust interfaces resistant to dynamic deactivation. Existing research has primarily focused on the role of strong interactions (SMSIs, CMSIs) in enhancing activity and stability, while the potential regulatory function of WMSIs in multi-electron, multi-step reactions (such as OER) remains underappreciated. Future work should systematically investigate the subtle effects of WMSIs on reaction intermediate adsorption energies, interfacial proton-electron transfer rates, and catalyst surface reconstruction kinetics within specific model catalytic systems, integrating surface-sensitive in situ spectroscopy with theoretical calculations. Particularly in non-precious metal or low-loading precious metal catalysts, WMSIs may provide essential electronic modulation and stabilization without inducing excessive structural encapsulation, warranting reevaluation of its value.
Advancing MSIs catalysts from laboratory to practical electrolysers requires bridging the substantial gap between academic stability demonstrations (typically tens to hundreds of hours) and industrial requirements (thousands of hours of continuous operation). A critical yet underexplored challenge lies in catalyst durability under intermittent power loads, which are inherent to renewable energy coupling (e.g., solar and wind). These fluctuating conditions exacerbate key failure modes such as metal leaching and Ostwald ripening, leading to rapid performance degradation. MSIs offer a promising pathway to mitigate these issues by strengthening metal-support bonding, anchoring active sites against dissolution, and suppressing atomic migration under potential cycling. Future MSIs’ research should therefore prioritize the design of interfaces that maintain structural integrity and electronic coupling under dynamic on-off cycling and variable load conditions. This includes systematic investigation of how MSIs influence leaching thermodynamics and ripening kinetics, as well as the development of accelerated stress tests that mimic real-world renewable profiles to validate long-term durability.
In summary, MSIs, as a cross-scale core regulatory strategy, will continue to drive the design and development of highly efficient and stable water-splitting catalysts. Through the deep integration of multidisciplinary approaches and precise cross-scale characterization, future MSIs research is poised to transition from phenomenological description to mechanism-driven rational design, providing a robust scientific foundation for the large-scale application of green hydrogen energy.
[1]
Chu Q Y, Niu Y P, Tao H L, Liu H L, Li Q, Lian C, Li J K. ACS Catal., 2025, 15(3): 1942.

[2]
Dai J, Sun Y F, Liu Z W, Zhang Y Y, Duan S B, Wang R M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024: e202409673.

[3]
Leybo D, Etim U J, Monai M, Bare S R, Zhong Z Y, Vogt C. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, 53(21): 10450.

[4]
Li D D, Ma P T, Niu J Y, Wang J P. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2019, 392: 49.

[5]
Luo Z J, Wang J, Zhou W, Li J S. Molecules, 2023, 28(5): 2262.

[6]
Quach V D, Wojcieszak R, Ghazzal M N. ChemNanoMat, 2023, 9(11): e202300329.

[7]
An Q Z, Bo S W, Jiang J J, Gong C, Su H, Cheng W R, Liu Q H. Adv. Sci., 2023, 10(4): 2205031.

[8]
Li X Y, Gu Z H, Cheng J F, Zhang G Z, Zheng F H, Huang J W, Xu J X, Wei G H, Zhang J L. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2024, 7(11): 12958.

[9]
Chen H H, Li H B, Chen S Q, Sheng L, Zhang Z R, Wu W L, Fan M H, Wang L Z, Yang B. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 328: 122480.

[10]
Li Y Q, Liu X, Xu J L, Chen S R. Small, 2024, 20(45): 2402846.

[11]
Ma Z C, Yang T F, Huang J R, Hu S X, Ge B C, Liu Y, Gao S Y. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2025, 233: 193.

[12]
Xiao G F, Lu R H, Liu J F, Liao X B, Wang Z Y, Zhao Y. Nano Res., 2022, 15(4): 3073.

[13]
Zhao Y Z, Wu H Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Qin W J, Liu S J, Liu J F, Qin Y P, Zhang D Y, Chu A M, Jia B R, Qu X H, Qin M L. Energy Storage Mater., 2022, 50: 186.

[14]
Chen L W, Zhang L Y, Qiao S. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2025, 692: 137534.

[15]
Chen Z M, Li X Y, Xu G Y, Xiao T C, Wang D C, Wang C F, Zhang K H, Li J, Pan Y, Qiao Y, Zhang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64: e202413788.

[16]
Feng W H, Zhang W, Lin Q Y, Zhang H S, Qiao J Y, Xia L H, Moloto N, He W, Sun Z M. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, 12(30): 18866.

[17]
Gao L, Zhong X, Chen J N, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhang B S. Chin. Chemical Lett., 2023, 34(9): 108085.

[18]
Guan Z Y, Zhang L Y, Xie Y Q, Wu D T, Yuan B K, Wu L C, Shen G Z, Tan G B, Guo F J. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2026, 702: 139037.

[19]
Chen J, Zhang Y T, Zhang Z H, Hou D Y, Bai F N, Han Y, Zhang C X, Zhang Y J, Hu J. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11(16): 8540.

[20]
Guo Y L, Liang J X, Huang Y K, Yang J Y, Zhang Q, Wang A Q, Qiao B T, Li J, Zhang T. Acc. Chem. Res., 2025, 58(15): 2440.

[21]
Zou J X, Li C F, Wang L. Nano Lett., 2025, 25(4): 1536.

[22]
Han C, Zhang S Q, Zhang H M, Dong Y N, Yao P F, Du Y N, Song P, Gong X, Xu W L. eScience, 2024, 4(5): 100269.

[23]
Yang Y J, Wu D X, Li R S, Rao P, Li J, Deng P L, Luo J M, Huang W, Chen Q, Kang Z Y, Shen Y J, Tian X L. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2022, 317: 121796.

[24]
Han S H, Wang X J, Bao J, Yang Q H, Zeng X F, Cao D P. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2026, 36(18): e22524.

[25]
He K Y, Wei S Y, Zhou Q, Zhang Y, Li D Y, Liu Y L, Cai W W, Yu F, Zhou H Q. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35(27): 2419609.

[26]
He W H, Xiang Y J, Xin M D, Zhai W M, Qiao S C, Zhang N, Qiu L M, Yan S Y, Liu F, Wang J Q, Xu G T, Liu J X, Li M F. Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 525: 170627.

[27]
Hou Z Q, Cui C H, Yang Y N, Zhang T. Small, 2023, 19(29): 2207170.

[28]
Li H W, Guo P, Huang B Y, Ji D, Li G X, Zhao X H. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2025, 177: 151514.

[29]
Li J M, Cheng Z X, Zhu J P, Chen H X, Xu X X, Wang Y H, Liu J Z, Xu Z F, Wang L D. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy, 2024, 352: 124049.

[30]
Li X Q, Li Y Y, Li H Q, Li W K, Cheng Y J, Lin H P, Huang W J, Xiong S Y. ACS Nano, 2025, 19(37): 33485.

[31]
Li Y Y, Yang J Y, Qiao B T, Zhang T. Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 69: 292.

[32]
Liu D, Fu J H, Xiao Z Y, Cui W H, An Q D, Huang J H. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2026, 14(10): 5849.

[33]
Liu H W, Shi W H, Guo Y Q, Mei Y J, Rao Y, Chen J L, Liu S J, Lin C, Nie A M, Wang Q, Yuan Y F, Xia B Y, Yao Y G. ACS Nano, 2024, 18(43): 29724.

[34]
Liu W, Liu H P, Cui R H, Cao Z L, Dong Z J, Luo L L. Small, 2024, 20(4): 2305122.

[35]
Lu Y, Wei L H, Hu Y, Xu Z H, Chen H W, Zhang N, Lu Q Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147(51): 47091.

[36]
Lv J N, Yang Q W, Liang T T, Sun X T, Rong W T, Dai Q Q, Gao Y Z, Wang L F, Xu X H, Liu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147(31): 27708.

[37]
Meng F, Zhu L H, Li R P, Jiang J, Li Y Q, Wu Y Z, Fan Y H, Ren P H, Xu H, Wang D, Zhang J Q, An M Z, Yang P X. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35(10): 2416678.

[38]
Meng Y X, Tuo Y F, Xue Y, Yan X F, Luo Z K, Yang Q R, Chernyshikhin S, Yan Y L, Lin M, Zhao Y F, Meng X G. Carbon Energy, 2026, 8(2): e70127.

[39]
Na G H, Zheng H S, Chen M P, Sun H C, Wu Y W, Li D Q, Chen Y, Zhao B R, Zhao B, Zhou T, He T W, Zhang Y X, Zhao J H, Zhang Y M, Zhang J, Liu F, Cui H, Liu Q J. Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 72: 211.

[40]
Wu Z Y, Kang X X, Wang S, Song Y H, Xie F T, Duan X M, Yang J P. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34(45): 2406917.

[41]
Shan A X, Teng X A, Zhang Y, Zhang P F, Xu Y Y, Liu C R, Li H, Ye H Y, Wang R M. Nano Energy, 2022, 94: 106913.

[42]
Ou Y, Li S D, Wang Z, Xu X Q, Guo X Y, Chen Q L, Sun T L, Zhu Y H. Mater. Today Nano, 2025, 32: 100713.

[43]
Popović A, Marić I, Bele M, Rems E, Huš M, Pavko L, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Bijelić L, Grgur B, Hodnik N, Smiljanić M. ACS Catal., 2025, 15(15): 13444.

[44]
Qi S, Wang J Y, Wang Y M, Chen R B, He H, Zhang J W, Yang X, Huo Q H, Liang T Y, You J, Wan D, Li L L, Ma P Y, Shang C Y, Zhang X, Yang H P, Hu Q, He C X. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2026, 36(23): e16357.

[45]
Ren Q M, Zhao X Y, Zhou L P, Song L H, Tian J T, Nie J S, Liu P, Ye D Q, Wang Z. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2025, 13(41): 35690.

[46]
Shin D, Huang R, Jang M G, Choung S, Kim Y, Sung K, Kim T Y, Han J W. ACS Catal., 2022, 12(13): 8082.

[47]
Tian C A, Liu R, Lv Z H, Wang C L, Liu W Y, Dong F L, Feng X, Yang W X, Wang B. Adv. Energy Mater., 2025, 15(36): e01952.

[48]
Wang B, Yang Q L, Li B, Ma H Y, Xuan Y, Gao C, Liang Y J, Zhang K H, Chang Q W, Broesicke O, Wang H L, Wang D, Luan T, Han K H, Lu C M, Crittenden J. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 332: 122753.

[49]
Wang C F, Zhuge X R, Chen Y S, Zong Y X, Xiao W P, Chen D H, Wang J S, Ma T Y, Wang L, Wu Z X. Nano Energy, 2025, 140: 111050.

[50]
Wang H Y, Gao Z R, Sun B W, Mu S Y, Dang F X, Guo X W, Ma D, Shi C. Chem Catal., 2023, 3(10): 100768.

[51]
Smiljanić M, Bele M, Pavko L, Hrnjić A, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Bijelić L, Kamšek A R, Nuhanović M, Marsel A, Gašparič L, Kokalj A, Hodnik N. Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 517: 164204.

[52]
Xiao B, Shen C C, Luo Z G, Li D Q, Zi B Y, Zhou T, Sun H C, Chen M P, Zhang J, Zhu Z Q, Liu F, Cui H, Liu Q J. Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 499: 156331.

[53]
Liu Y, Li H, Liu X H, Wang Y X, Wang L L, Yang T, Jadhav A R, Zhang J Q, Wang Y, Wu M B, Lee J Y, Kim M G, Lee H. ACS Nano, 2024, 18(1): 874.

[54]
Wang X, Ding J, Song W Q, Yang X Y, Zhang T, Huang Z C, Wang H Z, Han X P, Hu W B. Adv. Energy Mater., 2023, 13(23): 2300148.

[55]
Zhu Y A, Luo Y, Yao J, Dai W J, Zhong X, Lu T, Pan Y. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 440: 135957.

[56]
Tang R R, Yan P, Zhou Y T, Yu X Y. EES Catal., 2024, 2(4): 932.

[57]
Chen K, Yadav S, Inico E, Cao Y H, Di Liberto G, Dao V, Uthirakumar P, Pacchioni G, Lee I H. Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 521: 166979.

[58]
Chen Y, Liu Y D, Zhai W F, Liu H, Sakthivel T, Guo S W, Dai Z F. Adv. Energy Mater., 2024, 14(21): 2400059.

[59]
Wei J, Tang H, Sheng L, Wang R Y, Fan M H, Wan J L, Wu Y H, Zhang Z R, Zhou S M, Zeng J. Nat. Commun., 2024, 15: 559.

[60]
Wu D, Wan H, Lin J S, Zheng Z C, Kuang C W, Chen G, Zhang N, Liu X H, Ma R Z. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy, 2026, 380: 125783.

[61]
Wu P P, Lyu S S, Tian Y, Zhao D J, Ye J W, She M N, Song S, Ding T, Li X G. Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 475: 146051.

[62]
Xu G Y, Yue M F, Qian Z X, Du Z Y, Xie X Q, Chen W P, Zhang Y J, Li J F. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11(28): 15204.

[63]
Zhang B Z, Ma L X, Shen J, Tian X, Zhang R G, Ding M Y. ACS Catal., 2026, 16(1): 491.

[64]
Zhang M T, Zhou T T, Bukhvalov D, Han F Y, Wang C Q, Yang X F. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 337: 122976.

[65]
Zhou B W, Wang J P, Guo L F, Li H D, Xiao W P, Xu G R, Chen D H, Li C X, Du Y M, Ding H, Zhang Y H, Wu Z X, Wang L. Adv. Energy Mater., 2024, 14(48): 2402372.

[66]
Xu Y, Xue K, Li F R, Song C, Ai M H, Han Z H, Shi C X, Gao R J, Huang Z F, Zhang X W, Pan L, Zou J J. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2025, 13(45): 39414.

[67]
Xue W C, Lin W. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2025, 700: 138319.

[68]
Yu Z K, Jiang M X, Dai S, Zhan W C, Wang Z Q, Gong X Q. Nat. Commun., 2025, 16: 9072.

[69]
Ren J, Lei H, Mebrahtu C, Zeng F, Zheng X S, Pei G, Zhang W H, Wang Z D. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2024, 340: 123245.

[70]
Yuan Y, Rong J F, Zheng L F, Hu Z, Hu S, Wu C C, Zhuang Z B. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2024, 52: 687.

[71]
Lee J W, Din H U, Im T, Hwang C K, Kim J M, Lee J H, Jeong S. Carbon Energy, 2025, 7(5): e720.

Outlines

/