Recent Advances in the Application of Element Doped Carbon Dots in Multimodal Biological Imaging
Received date: 2025-12-25
Revised date: 2026-03-13
Online published: 2026-03-21
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82360647)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82060599)
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20232BAB216101)
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20242BAB22006)
Carbon dots (CDs), as an emerging class of zero-dimensional carbon nanomaterials, have demonstrated significant potential in the field of biomedical imaging due to their unique photoluminescence properties, excellent biocompatibility, and low toxicity. This review systematically summarizes the recent progress in the application of CDs as dual-modal or multimodal probes in computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorescence imaging (FL). It particularly focuses on the synergistic effects of metal ion and heteroatom doping on the physicochemical properties of CDs, with an emphasis on their optical, magnetic, and X-ray attenuation characteristics. The findings reveal that element doping and surface functionalization can significantly enhance the performance of multimodal imaging. For instance, doping with metal ions or heteroatoms can effectively improve the relaxivity in MRI/FL dual-modal imaging and optimize the X-ray attenuation properties in CT/FL dual-modal imaging. Furthermore, some CD-based nanomaterials have successfully achieved MRI/CT/FL trimodal imaging, providing innovative solutions for precision medicine. Despite the progress made, CDs-based multimodal probes still face several challenges, including the imbalance in multimodal performance and the lack of comprehensive long-term biosafety assessments. For future clinical translation, further optimization of material design and the implementation of standardized toxicological evaluations will be essential. These efforts will significantly advance the diagnosis and treatment of diseases.
1 Introduction
2 Classification and synthesis of doped CDs
2.1 Solvothermal method
2.2 Microwave method
2.3 Pyrolysis method
2.4 Other methods
3 Properties of doped CDs
3.1 Optical properties
3.2 Biocompatibility
3.3 Magnetic properties
3.4 X-ray attenuation properties
4 Advances in multimodal imaging applications
4.1 Doped CDs for CT/FL imaging
4.2 Doped CDs for MRI/FL imaging
4.3 Doped CDs for MRI/CT/FL imaging
4.4 The potential of multimodal imaging for clinical applications
5 Conclusion
Zhihong Liu , Faqi Liang , Qitong Huang , Shuisheng Hu , Xiaofeng Lin , Weijia Zeng . Recent Advances in the Application of Element Doped Carbon Dots in Multimodal Biological Imaging[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2026 , 38(3) : 577 -600 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20251218
表1 碳点不同合成方法的优缺点对比Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of different synthesis methods for carbon dots |
| Synthesis methods | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Solvothermal method | Simple handling and easy preparation, High precision dimensional control, Flexible surface functionalization | Harsh reaction conditions |
| Microwave method | environmental friendliness, rapid synthesis | limitations in product purity and quantum yield |
| Pyrolysis method | strong process stability, high crystallinity of the products | Harder surface finishing |
图1 不同多模态掺杂CDs的制备途径:(A) 水热法合成I-CDs的合成路径及其在荧光/CT双模成像中的示意图应用[33];(B) 溶剂热法合成Fe-CQDs的路线及其在MRI/FL双模成像中的示意图[42];(C) 采用硅胶柱色谱法分离四种溶剂热法制备的Mn-CDs[43];(D) 微波法制备Gd-CDs的合成路径及其在MRI/FL双模成像中的示意图[44];(E) 简单热解法制备Gd-CDs的合成路径及其在MRI/FL双模成像中的示意图[45];(F) 经低温热解制备并用DTPA对CQDs进行表面修饰的Gd-CDs合成路径示意图[46];(G) 经煅烧制备的Gd-CQDs合成路径及其原子配位固定机制。合成路径及其原子配位固定机制示意图[47];(H) 采用高能脉冲法制备的GC/CS示意图[48]Fig.1 Preparation paths of different multimodal doped CDs. (A) Synthesis pathway for the preparation of I-CDs by hydrothermal method and its schematic application in FL/CT dual-modal imaging[33]. Copyright 2015, Informa UK Limited; (B) Synthesis pathway for the preparation of Fe-CQDs by solvothermal method and its schematic application in MRI/FL dual-modal imaging[42]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature; (C) Separation of four Mn-CDs prepared by solvothermal method using silica gel column chromatography[43]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier; (D) Synthesis pathway for the preparation of Gd-CDs by microwave method pathway and schematic diagram of its MRI/FL dual-modal imaging application[44]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society; (E) Synthetic pathway of Gd-CDs prepared by simple pyrolysis and schematic diagram of its MRI/FL dual-modal imaging application[45]. Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry; (F) Schematic diagram of the synthetic pathway of Gd-CDs prepared by low-temperature pyrolysis followed by the surface functionalization of the CQDs with DTPA[46]. Copyright 2015, Elsevier; (G) Synthetic pathway of Gd-CQDs prepared by calcination and its atomic coordination immobilization mechanism. Schematic diagram of the synthetic pathway and its atomic coordination fixation mechanism[47]. Copyright 2026, Royal Society of Chemistry; (H) Schematic diagram of GC/CS prepared by high-energy pulse method[48]. Copyright 2019, IOP Publishing Ltd. |
图2 掺杂碳点的光学特性及生物相容性:(A) 从左至右:Gd-CDs在水中的紫外-可见吸收光谱和光致发光光谱,插图为日光下(左)和紫外灯下(右)的照片,激发波长在320~400 nm(每10 nm递增)时记录的Gd-CDs光致发光光谱,Gd-CDs在不同pH值PBS溶液中紫外光下的照片图[51];(B) 乳酸、碘己醇和IDC在365 nm紫外光下的紫外-可见吸收峰[52];(C) Gd-CDs的体外细胞毒性测定[34];(D) 不同浓度Tb-CDs的细胞存活率测定[53];(E) 不同浓度Gd/Yb@CDs对4T1细胞和HeLa细胞增殖的影响(左),以及小鼠经Gd/Yb@CDs治疗30天后是否出现体重波动(右)[55];(F) 静脉注射一定剂量(8.65 mg/kg,以Gd计)的Gd/Yb@CDs 15天前后(脾、肺、心、肝、肾)的器官切片[55]Fig.2 Optical properties and biocompatibility of doped CDs. (A) From left to right: UV-Vis absorption and PL spectra of Gd-CDs in water, with inset showing daylight (left) and UV (right) photos; photoluminescence spectra under excitation from 320 to 400 nm in 10 nm steps; and digital photos of Gd-CDs in PBS under UV light at different pH levels[51]. Copyright 2020, Future Medicine Ltd.; (B) UV-visible absorption peaks of lactic acid, iohexanol, and IDC under 365 nm UV light[52]. Copyright 2022, American Association for the Advancement of Science; (C) In vitro cytotoxicity assay of Gd-CDs[34]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier; (D) Cell viability assay of Tb-CDs at different concentrations[53]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry; (E) The effects of different concentrations of Gd/Yb@CDs on the proliferation of 4T1 cells and Hela cells (left), with or without body weight fluctuations (right) in mice treated with Gd/Yb@CDs for 30 days[55]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society; (F) Organ sections (spleen, lung, heart, liver, kidney) before and after intravenous injection of a certain dose (8.65 mg/kg, calculated as Gd) of Gd/Yb@CDs for 15 days[55]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. |
图3 掺杂碳点的磁性性能:(A) Gd-CDs 和Gd-C不同浓度下Gd³+与1/T1的线性拟合(左),不同浓度Gd³+的Gd-CDs和Gd-CDs-FA的T1加权图像[58];(B) 不同Fe²+浓度的Fe-CDs与1/T2的线性拟合[59];(C) 不同Gd³+浓度的Gd-CQDs@N-Fe3O4纳米颗粒与1/T1的对比(左)及不同Fe²+浓度与1/T2的对比(右)[60];(D) 分别对应不同浓度Hf-CDs和碘海醇的CT加权图像[65];(E) 不同浓度Hf-CDs和碘海醇的CT值线性拟合图[65];(F) CT图像中不同浓度I-CDs的CT图像[67]Fig.3 Magnetic properties of doped CDs. (A) Linear fitting of Gd-CDs and Gd-C ifferent concentrations of Gd3+ versus 1/T1 (left), and T1-weighted images of Gd-CDs and Gd-CDs-FA with different concentrations of Gd3+[58]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier; (B) Linear fitting of Fe-CDs with different concentrations of Fe2+ versus 1/T2[59]. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag; (C) Gd-CQDs@N-Fe3O4 nanoparticles with different concentrations of Gd3+ versus 1/T1 (left) and different concentrations of Fe2+ versus 1/T2 (right)[60]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (D) CT-weighted images corresponding to different concentrations of Hf-CDs and Iohexol, respectively[65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (E) Linear fits of CT values of different concentrations of Hf-CDs and Iohexol[65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (F) CT images of different concentrations of I-CDs in the CT images[67]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. |
表2 常用临床造影剂及其他类型纳米探针的性能参数Table 2 Performance parameters of commonly used clinical contrast agents and other types of nanoprobes |
| Materials | Imaging | r1/ (mL/(mol·s)) | r2/(mL/(mol·s)) | CT values(in HU)/ (mL/mg) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iodixanol | CT | — | — | 7.7 | 76 |
| Iobitridol | CT | — | — | 31.83 | 54 |
| Iohexol | CT | — | — | 4.233 | 77 |
| Gd-DTPA | MRI | 6.27 | — | — | 34 |
| GdAuNP(Type A) | MRI | 3.403 | 44.56 | — | 78 |
| GdAuNP(Type B) | MRI | 4.450 | 56.86 | — | 79 |
| GdAuNP(Type C) | MRI | 5.603 | 90.29 | — | |
| GdAuNP(Type D) | MRI | 4.244 | 49.14 | — | |
| RGD@Fe3O4-Au/Gd | MRI | 23.5 | 36.8 | — | |
| Fe3O4-SWCNT@M1 | MRI | — | 201.79 | — | 80 |
| Cu2-xSe@MnO2 | MRI | 7.51 | — | — | 81 |
| MnCO3-FP | MRI/FL | 5.8 | 49.5 | — | 82 |
| ZrMOF@MnO2 | MRI/FL | 5.97 | — | — | 83 |
| Fe3O4@PGLL | MRI/FL | — | 628.6 | — | 84 |
| Fe3O4-Ag2S | MRI/CT | — | 267.48 | 3.03 | 85 |
| HA-FeWO4 | MRI/CT | 0.64 | 6.63 | 5.388 | 77 |
| Gd-AuNPr | MRI/CT | 23.1 | — | 959.3 | 86 |
表3 用于CT/FL双模态成像的掺杂碳点的合成方法、原材料及表征Table 3 Synthetic methods, raw materials and characterization results of doped CDs for CT/FL dual modality imaging |
| Magnetic CDs | Synthesis methods | Feedstocks | FLQY /% | Emission wavelength /nm | CT values(in HU)/(mL/mg) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-CDs | Hydrothermal | Iodixanol and glycine, | — | 475 | — | 33 |
| I-CQDs-C225 | Hydrothermal | citric acid and iohexol | 18 | — | — | 67 |
| IDC | Hydrothermal | LA and iohexol | — | — | — | 52 |
| hf-CD | Hydrothermal | CA, HfCl4 and thiourea | — | — | 7.21 | 65 |
| P, W-CDs | solvothermal | o-phenylenediamine, Sodium phosphotungstate Octadecahydrate and N, N-dimethylformamide | 16.5 | — | — | 54 |
| P, W, Hf-CDs-1 | solvothermal | o-phenylenediamine, Sodium phosphotungstate Octadecahydrate and N, N-dimethylformamide | 27.3 | 540 | — | |
| P, W, Hf-CDs-2 | solvothermal | o-phenylenediamine, Sodium phosphotungstate Octadecahydrate and N, N-dimethylformamide | 14.2 | 630 | — | |
| Fe3O4@Au HNPs | — | — | — | — | 122.12 | 87 |
LA: Lactobionic acid. CA: Citric acid. |
图4 掺杂碳点在CT/FL双模态成像中的应用:(A) 大鼠静脉注射碘标记的碳纳米球(40mg/kg)前后的三维X射线CT成像(左图为注射前,左二图为注射后),大鼠静脉注射碘标记的碳纳米球后的体内CT成像与分析,蓝色箭头和灰色箭头分别代表肾脏和膀胱(右图)[33];(B) 向H22激素小鼠注射铪-CDs后,在肿瘤内注射前(0 min)以及注射后1 min、24 h、48 h和72 h进行的体内荧光成像[65];(C) 静脉注射Hf-CDs后不同时间点获取的主要器官(肿瘤、肝脏和膀胱)的自上而下CT图像,三维重建、冠状面及三维重建图像(左),以及注射碘海醇后冠状面、轴向和三维重建的CT成像效果(右)[65]Fig.4 Doped CDs for CT/FL imaging. (A) 3-D x-ray CT imaging before and after intravenous injection of I-CDs (40 mg /kg) in rats (left one before injection, left two after injection), In vivo CT imaging and analysis after intravenous injection of I-CDs in rats, Blue arrows and gray arrows represent kidney and bladder (right), respectively[33]. Copyright 2015, Informa UK Limited; (B) In vivo fluorescence imaging by injecting Hf-CDs into H22 hormonal mice before (0 min) and after intratumoral injection for 1 min, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h[65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (C) Top-down CT images of major organs (tumor, liver, and bladder) acquired at different times after intravenous injection of Hf-CDs, respectively. Three-dimensional reconstruction, coronal as well as three-dimensional reconstruction images (left), and CT imaging effects of coronal, axial and three-dimensional reconstruction after iohexol injection (right)[65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. |
表4 用于MRI/FL双模态成像的掺杂碳点的合成方法、原材料及表征Table 4 Synthetic methods, raw materials and characterization results of doped CDs for MRI/FL dual-modality imaging |
| Magnetic CDs | Synthesis methods | Feedstocks | FLQY /% | Emission wavelength /nm | r1/ (mL/(mol·s)) | r2/ (mL/(mol·s)) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gd-CQDs | calcination | Tris base, gadopentetic acid and betaine hydrochloride | — | 445 | — | — | 47 |
| Gd-CQDs | Microwave | Sucrose, Gd2O3 and DEG | 5.4 | 521 | 11.356 | 14.026 | 44 |
| Gd(III)/CQDs | Pyrolysis | GdPM | 8.9 | 488 | 5.5 | — | 36 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | CA, EDA and Gd2O3 | 43.6 | 450 | 6.06 | — | 38 |
| Gd-CQDs | MSN-templated | Gd(NO3)3 and Gd-DTPA | 30.2 | 420 | 10 | — | 49 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | CA, DETA and GdCl3 | 69.89 | 488 | 14.33 | — | 88 |
| Gd-CQDs | Pyrolysis | GdCl3·6H2O, Gd-DTPA, CA and BPEI | 40 | 445 | 57.52 | — | 45 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | L-Arginin and Gd-DTPA | 57.75 | 425 | 6.27 | — | 34 |
| Gd-CQDs@N- Fe3O4 | Hydrothermal | CA, EDA, GdCl3 and N-Fe3O4 | 1.29 | 500 | 5.16 | 116.5 | 60 |
| Gd-CDs | Hydrothermal | CA, Gd-DTPA and DETA | 78.05 | 452 | 7.37 | — | 84 |
| Gd-CDs-bev | Hydrothermal | CA, BEV, Gadovist and EDA | 82.5 | — | 7.61 | — | 35 |
| Gd-CDs-fa-bev | Hydrothermal | CA, FA, BEV, Gadovist and EDA | 83.67 | — | 6.03 | — | 35 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | Starch, Gadovist and PEI | 13.20 | — | 0.2198 | 0.1315 | 89 |
| Gd-CDs-FA | Hydrothermal | FA, CA and EDC | 48.20 | 456 | 13.56 | — | 58 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | Tumeric, Gadoteric acid and PEI | — | — | 0.3663 | 1.8246 | 90 |
| Gd@CNDs(1.5T) | Hydrothermal | β-alanine, EDTA and GdCl3 | — | — | 7.92±0.02 | 8.98±0.01 | 91 |
| Gd@CNDs(7.0T) | Hydrothermal | β-alanine, EDTA and GdCl3 | — | — | 10.5±0.3 | 18.08±0.27 | 91 |
| Gd-CQDs | Hydrothermal | Dextran, Gadovist and PEI | — | — | 0.272 | — | 92 |
| Gd/Ru-CDs | Microwave | CA, GdCl3, Ru2Cl3 and PEI | 29.57 | 637 | 6.38 | — | 93 |
| Gd-CQDs | solvothermal | OPD, GdCl3 and Gd(NO3)3 | 6.3 | — | 6.4 | 38.6 | 94 |
| Gd-CQDs | solvothermal | OPD and Gd(NO3)3·6H2O | 7.4 | 550 | — | — | 94 |
| Gd-CDs | Hydrothermal | Sucrose and GdCl3·6H2O | 0.41 | 440 | — | — | 95 |
| Mn-CDs | solvothermal | PDA and MnCl2·4H2O | 6.75 | 555 | 7.28 | — | 43 |
| Mn-CDs | Microwave | CA, urea and MnCl2 | 10 | 525 | 6.23 | — | 96 |
| Mn-CDs | Pyrolysis | lemon extract, EDA and Mn(OAc)2·4H2O | 35.71 | 463 | 0.341 | 2.015 | 97 |
| Mn-CQDs | Hydrothermal | Mn, TPP and CA | 13 | 480 | — | — | 98 |
| Mn-CQDs@A/Ce6 | Hydrothermal | MnCl2·4H2O, Ce6, Waste green tea and FA | 12 | 440 | 13.888 | 80.036 | 99 |
| Mn-CDs-NHF | Pyrolysis | NHF, MnCl2 | — | — | 17.75 | 84.46 | 100 |
| Mn-CDs | solvothermal | Mn(AcO)2·4H2O and OPD | — | 560 | 8.8 | 83.4 | 101 |
| Mn-CDs | solvothermall | MnCl2·4H2O and OPD | — | 560 | 9.7 | 89 | |
| Mn-CDs | solvothermal | Mn(AcO)2·4H2O and CA | — | 620 | 4.8 | 42.2 | |
| Mn-CDs | solvothermal | MnCl2·4H2O and FA | — | 620 | 6.7 | 67.1 | |
| Mn-CDs | Hydrothermal | Manganese citrate and urea | 23 | — | 7.4 | — | 102 |
| Mn, S,N-CDs | Hydrothermal | D-(+)-glucose, EDA, EDTA,f luorescein, mPDA, oPDA and E-MnSO4·H2O | 53.9 | 515 | 32.3 | — | 103 |
| Ho-Mn-CQDs | Hydrothermal | HoCl3·6H2O, MnCl2 and Cysteine | 71.45 | 477 | 4.37 | 21.93 | 104 |
| BCQD@Mn | Hydrothermal | citric acid, urea, MnCl2·4H2O and TA | 7.24 | 490 | 2.43 | — | 105 |
| C-Fe3O4 | Hydrothermal | FeCl3⋅6H2O, FeCl2⋅4H2O and γ-PGA | 21.6 | — | — | 154.1 | 59 |
| Fe-CDs | Hydrothermal | FeSO4·7H2O, GSH, EDTA | 3.8 | 450 | 3.92 | 4.99 | 42 |
| Fe-CDs | Hydrothermal | Sucrose, FeCl2,and FeCl3 | 31 | 470 | — | 118.3 | 106 |
| Fe-CDs | pyrolysis | lemon extract, EDA and (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O | 41.72 | 457 | — | — | 97 |
| Co-CDs | pyrolysis | lemon extract, EDA and Co(OAc)2·2H2O | 75.07 | 459 | — | — | 97 |
| Ni-CDs | pyrolysis | lemon extract, EDA and Ni(OAc)2·2H2O | 50.84 | 458 | — | — | |
| HoBCDs | Hydrothermal | CA, BPEI and Ho-DTPA | 8.2 | 441 | 0.1128 | — | 107 |
DEG: Diethylene glycol. GdPM: Gadopentetate monomeglumine. EDA: Ethylenediamine. Gd-DTPA: Diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid. DETA: Diethylenetriamine. BPEI: Branched polyethylenimine. BEV: Bevacizumab. FA: Folic acid. EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraaceti acid. OPD,oPDA: o-phenylenediamine. PDA: p-phenylenediamine. TPP: Tetraphenylporphyrin. NHF: N-Hydroxyphthalimide. mPDA: m-Phenylenediamine. TA: Tannic acid. γ-PGA: Poly-γ-glutamic acid. GSH: Glutathione. Ho-DTPA: diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid hydrate holmium(III) dihydrogen salt. |
图5 掺杂碳点在MRI/CT/FL多模态成像中的应用:(A) 不同浓度Gd³+条件下,纯CQDs、GdCl3和钆布醇在24 h、48 h和72 h时的存活率[95];(B) Gd/Ru-CDs的MRI/荧光双模态成像以及肿瘤光动力治疗示意图[93];(C) MRI活体成像(左)与荧光活体成像(右)示意图[108];(D) 小鼠注射前、注射后立即及注射15 min后的T2加权活体成像示意图[106];(E) TPFe-CDs与对照组ROSUP在单光子与双光子激发下经照射产生的活性氧(ROS)示意图[109]Fig.5 Doped CDs for MRI/FL imaging. (A) Survival rates of unadulterated CQDs, GdCl3, and gadobutrol at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, respectively, for different concentrations of Gd3+[95]. Copyright 2024, MDPI; (B) Schematic of MRI/FL dual-modality imaging of Gd/Ru-CDs as well as photodynamic treatment of tumors[93]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature; (C) Schematic of in vivo imaging by MRI (left), and in vivo imaging by FL (right)[108]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society; (D) Mouse Schematic of in vivo T2-weighted imaging before, immediately after, and 15 min after injection[106]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society; (E) Schematic of ROS production by irradiation under single-photon versus two-photon excitation for TPFe-CDs versus control ROSUP[109]. Copyright 2024, Published by Elsevie. |
表5 用于MRI/CT/FL多模态成像的掺杂碳点的合成方法、原材料及表征Table 5 Synthetic methods, raw materials and characterization results of doped CDs for MRI/CT/FL multimodal imaging |
| Doped CDs | Synthesis methods | Feedstocks | FLQY /% | Emission wavelength/nm | r1/ (mL/(mol·s)) | r2/ (mL/(mol·s)) | CT values(in HU)/ (mL/mg) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I@CNDs-Fe3O4 | Hydrothermal | FeCl3·6H2O, FeCl2·4H2O and sea vegetable | 22.3 | — | — | 177.4 | 180 | 110 |
| Gd/Yb-CDs | Hydrothermal | Na2EDTA, GdCl3, YCl3 and L-arginine | 16.82 | 418 | 6.65 | — | 45.42 | 55 |
| Mn,Dy-CDs | Hydrothermal | CA, Na2EDTA, MnCl2·4H2O, DyCl3·6H2O, aminophylline hydrate | 3.6 | 462 | 7.47 | 42.686 | 47.344 | 17 |
| Bi,Gd-CDs | Hydrothermal | PDA, GdCl3·6H2O, Na2EDTA, GSH and Bi(NO3)3·5H2O | 5.11 | 518/ 602 | 4.29 | — | 164.66 | 111 |
| Mn,S,N-CDs | Hydrothermal | FeSO4·7H2O, MnSO4·H2O, CuSO4, MgSO4, ZnSO4·7H2O, D-(+)-glucose and EDA | 53.9 | 515 | 32.3 | — | — | 103 |
| Gd/Yb-CDs | Hydrothermal | Gd(NO3)3·6H2O, Yb(NO3)3·5H2O, CA, urea | 14.2 | — | 11.16 | — | 40.17 | 112 |
Na2EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
(何静, 陈佳, 邱洪灯. 化学进展, 2023, 35(5): 655.)
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
(党永强, 黄瑞, 冯香钰, 刘国阳, 朱由余, 张亚婷. 化学进展, 2024, 36(4): 575.)
|
| [12] |
(王军丽, 王亚玲, 郑静霞, 于世平, 杨永珍, 刘旭光. 化学进展, 2018, 30(8): 1186.)
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
(秦苗, 徐梦洁, 黄棣, 魏延, 孟延锋, 陈维毅. 化学进展, 2020, 32(9): 1264.)
|
| [19] |
(马婷, 邓春宇, 李杰, 王周玉, 周倩, 余孝其. 化学进展, 2025, 37(4): 519.)
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |