To comprehensively evaluatePaphiopedilum , this paper used analytic hierarchy process to appraise 12 Paphiopedilum species. The analytic hierarchy process model established for Paphiopedilum evaluation included goal level, restraint layer, and marker bed. The goal level included the comprehensive assessment of Paphiopedilum . The restraint layer referred to plant shape, flower and leaf. The marker bed contained branch number, plant height, crown breadth, flower color, flower diameter, florescence, scape, leaf color, leaf length, leaf width, and the number of leaf. In the restraint layer, flower had the biggest weight, the next was leaf. In the marker bed of flower, flower diameter had the biggest weight, followed by flower color and florescence. In the marker bed of leaf, the number of leaf had the biggest weight, followed by leaf color. By the AHP, 12 Paphiopedilum species could be classified 3 grades. The comprehensive scores of P. philippinense , P. tigrinum ,P. hirsutissimum ,P. purpuratum ,P. dianthum ,P. henryanum ,P. malipoense were the best, and were the first choice in actual production process.
Key words
Paphiopedilum;analytic hierarchy process;comprehensive evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 李宗艳,吴玉兰,彭坤. 兜兰属(Paphiopedilum)10种植物叶表皮微观结构特征比较[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(06): 723-729.
[2] 徐波,曾宋君,宋凤鸣,等. 兜兰茎腐病病原鉴定和生物学特性及室内药剂筛选研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014(14): 70-75.
[3] 陈红岩,张毓,张雪,等. 兜兰属植物引种栽培及应用研究[A]. 中国植物园, 2011 (10): 122-131.
[4] 尤佳妍. 几种兜兰的种胚发育及无菌萌发研究[D]. 北京林业大学, 2014.
[5] 刘晓莉. 14个樱花品种观赏性状综合评价和樱花园林应用研究[D]. 浙江农林大学, 2012.
[6] 虞晓芬,傅玳. 多指标综合评价方法综述[J]. 统计与决策, 2004(11): 119-121.
[7] 张鸭关,匡崇义,薛世明,等. 层次分析法(AHP)在优良牧草品种筛选中的应用[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(4): 151-154.
[8] 李昆仑. 层次分析在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J]. 武汉大学学报: 工学版, 2005, 38(1): 143-147.
[9] 刘遵春, 包东娥, 廖明安. 层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(8): 125-127.
[10]钱虹妹,杨学军,余洪波,等.应用ＡＨＰ法综合评价中国百合野生种资源[J]. 江苏农业科学,2006(8): 168-172.
[11]陈和明,江 南,朱根发,等.层次分析法在大花蕙兰品种选择上的应用[J]. 亚热带植物科学,2009,38(2): 30-32.
[12]刘毅. 陕西主要栽培银杏的观赏性状评价研究[D]. 西北农林科技大学, 2007.
[13]陈仲芳, 张 霖, 尚富德. 利用层次分析法综合评价湖北省部分桂花品种[J]. 园艺学报,2004,31(6):825-828.
[14]封培波,胡永红,张启翔,等.上海露地宿根花卉景观价值的综合评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2003,25(6): 84-87.
[15]刘玉莲,殷学波. 樱花品种园艺学性状的综合评价[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1996, 17(2) 39-43.
[16]李娜娜,张德平,朱珺,等. 利用层次分析法初选单头切花菊杂种F1代优良单株的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 02: 129-135.
[17]赵焕臣,许树柏. 层次分析法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986.
[18]陈俊愉,邓朝佐. 用百分制评选三种金花茶优选试验[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1986(3): 35-43.
[19] Neil S J, Keith S D, Paula A T, et al. A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral, 2000, treatment for depression [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996, 64(2):295-304.
[20]孙明,李萍,张启翔. 基于层次分析法的地被菊品系综合评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 03: 177-181.
