N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline Affects Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice

Zhou Yanghai; Cai Cong; Yue Xiali

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090035

PDF(1212 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3) : 129-134. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090035

N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline Affects Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice

Author information +

History +

Abstract

To explore the plant growth regulating activity of N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline for rice and provide a basis for the practical application of N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline, the effects of N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline on rice germination parameters, root activity and morphological indexes of rice seedlings were investigated by paper germination method, Perti dish method and soilless cultivation method. The results showed that after presoaking seeds in the 2.5 mg/L N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline, the viability of rice seeds was promoted, the activity of α-amylase was significantly enhanced, the germination rate, root length and stem length were all increased significantly. The length of main root and lateral root, root surface area of rice seedlings were promoted with the treatment of 2.5-5 mg/L N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline. Root meristem was more active, and the activity of root system was enhanced. The lower concentration of N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline promotes the growth and development of rice, thus N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline compound has certain application prospects.

Key words

N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline / rice / seed germination / root meristem

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Zhou Yanghai , Cai Cong , Yue Xiali. N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline Affects Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2020, 36(3): 129-134 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090035

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	孙家隆 . 农药化学合成基础[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2013: 304. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	O'Neal T D, Bhalla P R, Cross B . Method for the control of stem growth and stem stiffness of graminaceous crops[P]. United States patent.US4643755.Feb. 17, 1987. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	O'Neal T D, Bhalla P R, Cross B . Substituted N-nitroaniline compounds and inorganic and organic salts thereof useful for enhancing auxiliary branching, canopy flowering and crop yield of plant and as lodging inhibitors therefor[P]. US4367339.Jan. 4, 1983. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	谢九皋 .植物生长调节剂( 双效素 ) 及其制备[P].中国专利, CN1125509. 1994 -12-2. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	张广忠, 杨燕茹, 郝爱友 . 含氟农药发展概况[J]. 有机氟工业, 2004(2):28-30. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	张一宾 . 全球除草剂市场的特点、新研发的除草剂及其合成和建议开发的除草剂品种[J]. 世界农药, 2012,34(4):1-6,15. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	杨吉春, 吴峤, 刘允萍 , 等. 含氟农药开发的新进展[J]. 农药, 2011,50(4):289. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	王建芬, 丁双阳 .王晓琳 . 含氟杀虫剂类农药的残留检测分析研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(2):68-72. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	陈长水, 徐胜臻, 岳霞丽 . 一种具有植物生长调节活性的化合物N-硝基-2,4,6-三氟苯胺的合成及应用[P]. 专利CN102311361. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	高俊凤 . 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社. 2005: 188-191. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	黄秋婵, 唐鸣, 李怡 . 改进水稻幼苗无土栽培方法的探讨[J]. 广西民族师范学院学报. 2013,30(3):15-17. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	赵艳艳, 胡晓辉, 邹志荣 , 等. 不同浓度5-氨基乙酰丙酸(ALA)浸种对NaCl胁迫下番茄种子发芽率及芽苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(1):62-70. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	刘明美, 李建农, 沈益新 . Pb ²+污染对多花黑麦草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 草业科学, 2007,24(1):52-54. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	高柱, 王小玲, 刘腾云 , 等. 重金属Cu污染对苏丹草种子发芽及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(25):199-204. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	耿立格, 宋春风, 王丽娜 , 等. 近红外光谱无损测定大豆种子生活力方法研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013,14(6):1208-1212. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	王忠 . 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 447-448. Cited in this article [1]

[17]

赵玉锦, 王台 . 水稻种子萌发过程中α淀粉酶与萌发速率关系的分析[J]. 植物学报, 2001,18(2):226-230.

http://www.chinbullbotany.com/CN/abstract/abstract10623.shtml

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

用丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳技术和3,5_二硝基水杨酸（DNS）测定还原糖法，对不同萌发时间农垦58F、农垦58S和农垦58种子胚中α_淀粉酶同工酶及其酶活性变化进行研究。0～36小时萌发过程中，农垦58F和农垦58S α_淀粉酶活性高于农垦58。胚中检测出五条酶。A2、A4和A5为上述种子共有酶带。A3为农垦58F和农垦58S特异性酶带。A1为农垦58特异性酶带。据此认为α_淀粉酶对水稻种子萌发速度起重要调控作用。A1和A3可能是调控种子发芽快慢的重要酶分子。

[18]	侯文平, 王成瑷, 赵磊 , 等. 贮存环境对水稻种子芽率及水分的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2014(8):27-30. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	卢新雄, 辛霞, 陈晓玲 , 等. 小麦种子在不同保存条件下的生活力丧失特性研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013,14(4):588-593. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	王进 . 锁阳种子生活力测定及前处理的方法[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014,50(1):83-87. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	向小亮, 宁书菊, 魏道智 . 根系的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(17):105-112. http://www.casb.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract20147.shtml Cited in this article [1] Abstract 本文简要介绍了国内外近年来在根系生理与分子生物学，根系细胞生物学以及研究方法方面的研究进展，以供根系研究参考。

[22]	孙虎威, 王文亮, 刘尚俊 , 等. 低氮胁迫下水稻根系的发生及生长素的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2014,51(5):1096-1102. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	胡香玉 . 不同供氮模式对水稻根系形态及生理特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(1):72-80. Cited in this article [1]

[24]

孙浩燕, 李小坤, 任涛 , 等. 浅层施肥对水稻苗期根系生长及分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014(12):2476-2484.

https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.12.020

http://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I12/2476

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

【目的】研究水稻生长前期不同施肥深度对水稻根系生长及分布的影响，揭示浅层施肥对水稻苗期生长的重要作用，以期为水稻的合理施肥提供依据。【方法】本试验于华中农业大学盆栽场进行，采用盆栽土柱培养试验方式，设置不施肥和施肥深度1、5、10、15 cm 共5个处理，分别于播种后10、20、30和40 d取样4次，研究不同施肥深度对水稻苗期根系生物量、根系形态指标、根系总吸收面积及活跃吸收面积、根系分布及地上部生物量的影响。【结果】播种后10 d，各处理间无显著差异；播种后20 d，施肥深度1 cm处理水稻根系生物量、形态指标参数、根系吸收面积等指标均显著优于其它处理，具体表现为施肥深度1 cm＞5 cm、10 cm、15 cm＞不施肥处理（CK）；地上部生物量也表现出相同趋势。播种后30 d，施肥深度1 cm处理的优势更加明显，与施肥深度5 cm相比，根系生物量、地上部生物量分别显著增加163.8%、121.5%。播种后40 d，地上部生物量表现为1 cm＞5 cm＞10 cm、15 cm＞CK，施肥深度5 cm处理分别比10 cm、15 cm处理增加37.6%和34.6%。播种后40 d，根系分布结果显示，各处理均有60%以上根系分布于0—10 cm土层；施肥处理根系在各土层的生物量均显著高于不施肥处理，其中施肥深度1 cm处理的10—15 cm、15—20 cm根系分布比例显著高于其他处理，与施肥深度5 cm相比，增幅达26.1%和84.0%。【结论】不同施肥深度对水稻苗期根系生长及分布产生明显的影响。整个试验期间，施肥深度1 cm处理根系生物量、各形态指标参数及根系吸收面积都表现出明显优势，根系活力及下层根系比重均有所提高，有利于良好根系构型的建成。适宜的浅层施肥可以明显促进水稻生长前期根系生长发育，同时地上部生物量表现出显著的优势，这也是对根系生长及分布状况的积极响应。

[25]	陶荣荣, 蔡晗, 朱庆权 , 等. 水稻高产高效的根-冠互作机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(5):1-4. Cited in this article [1]

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2020. Chinese Agricultural Association Bulletin. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Agricultural Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.