Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium sacchari of Sugarcane Pokkah Boeng Disease

WANGChangmi, LUOZhiming, LIYinhu, WANGXiaoyan, ZHANGRongyue, LIJie, YINJiong, SHANHongli

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 114-118.

PDF(1493 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1493 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 114-118. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0277

Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium sacchari of Sugarcane Pokkah Boeng Disease

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Sugarcane pokkah boeng disease is a fungal disease caused by multiple species of Fusarium. In order to clarify the pathogen species of sugarcane pokkah boeng disease in Yunnan, thirty-three samples of sugarcane pokkah boeng disease were collected from Kaiyuan and Menglian in Yunnan, and strains FS1 and FS2 were isolated and purified, and their DNA was extracted; the primers of transcription elongation factor (EF-1α), tubulin gene (TUB2), polymerase gene (RPB2) were used for PCR amplification of the isolated strains. The result was that a clear and bright band consistent with the target band was obtained, and the products were sequenced and analyzed by BLAST on the NCBI website, the EF-1α, TUB2 and RPB2 sequences of strains FS1 and FS2 were compared with EF-1α (accession number: MK609907.1), TUB2 (accession number: MT011039.1) and RPB2 (accession number: MW238849.1) of Fusarium sacchari with 100% similarity and coverage. Phylogenetic trees of strains FS1 and FS2 were constructed by maximum likelihood method with MEGA6.0 software, and the results showed that FS1 and FS2 clustered on the same branch with F. sacchari. Therefore, based on the morphological characteristics of strains FS1 and FS2 and the results of molecular biological identification, the pathogen of sugarcane pokkah boeng disease was identified as F. sacchari. F. sacchari spores were inoculated with ‘Yunzhe 08-1609’, and the symptoms of leaf regression and leaf yellowing appeared on the 7th day of inoculation, the infected leaves were isolated and sequenced again. The sequence similarity and coverage between EF-1α of the isolated strain and EF-1α of F. sacchari (accession number: MK609907.1) were 100%. F. sacchari was shown to be the causal agent of sugarcane pokkah boeng disease in Kaiyuan and Menglian.

Key words

sugarcane / pokkah boeng disease / Fusarium sacchari / isolation / identification / PCR amplification / phylogenetic analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Changmi , LUO Zhiming , LI Yinhu , et al . Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium sacchari of Sugarcane Pokkah Boeng Disease[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(4): 114-118 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0277

References

[1]
DOEHLEMANN G, ÖKMEN B, ZHU W, et al. Plant pathogenic fungi[J]. Microbiology spectrum, 2017, 5(1):701-726.
[2]
DA SILVA S A C, DINIZ A G, TIAGO P V, et al. Entomopathogenic Fusarium species: A review of their potential for the biological control of insects, implications and prospects[J]. Fungal biology reviews, 2020, 34(1):41-57.
[3]
王喜刚, 杨波, 郭成瑾, 等. 宁夏回族自治区马铃薯镰刀菌根腐病病原菌的分离鉴定与致病性测定[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(3):609-619.
[4]
孙磷. 新疆棉花茎腐病的初步研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2021
[5]
暴怡雪. 基于组学技术解析甘蔗梢腐病菌的遗传分化及冬季致病机制[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2020.
[6]
杨波. 西北地区马铃薯镰刀菌根腐病发生危害调查、病原菌鉴定及ISSR遗传多样性分析[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2019.
[7]
张笑宇, 焦建, 周洪友, 等. 胡萝卜镰刀菌根腐病病原菌的鉴定[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016(8):64-69.
[8]
MOHAMMADI A, NEJAD R F, MOFRAD N N. Fusarium verticillioides from sugarcane, vegetative compatibility groups and pathogenicity[J]. Plant protection science, 2012, 48(2):80-84.
[9]
DASHTIPOOR S, ZAFARI D. Pathogenicity of Fusarium species, the causative agent of Pokkah boeng sugarcane disease, and the antagonistic effect of Trichoderma afroharzianum on it[J]. Biological control of pests and plant diseases, 2023, 12(1):29-45.
[10]
LIN Z Y, XU S Q, QUE Y X, et al. Species-specific detection and identification of Fusarium species complex, the causal agent of sugarcane pokkah boeng in China[J]. Plos one, 2014, 9(8):e104195.
[11]
BAO Y X, SUN H J, LI Y F, et al. First report of Fusarium oxysporum isolate gx3 causing sugarcane Pokkah boeng in Guangxi of China[J]. Plant disease, 2016, 100(8):1785.
[12]
SAMACO M, CUEVA F M. Molecular characterization of Fusarium spp. associated with sugarcane Pokkah boeng from the Philippines using partial Translation Elongation Factor-1α (TEF-1α) gene sequences[J]. Sugar tech, 2019, 21(4):619-630.
[13]
BAO Y, HUANG Z, LI T, et al. First report of Fusarium andiyazi causing pokkah boeng disease of sugarcane in China[J]. Plant disease, 2019, 104(1):286.
[14]
BAO Y, XU Y, WANG S, et al. First report of Fusarium sacchari that causes sugarcane wilt disease in China[J]. Plant disease, 2019, 104(8):2289.
[15]
MENG J R, HUANG H J, LI Y X, et al. First report of Fusarium sacchari causing sugarcane pokkah boeng in China[J]. Plant disease, 2019, 104(5):1553.
[16]
WANG J, CHAI Z, BAO Y, et al. First report of Fusarium commune causing root rot disease of sugarcane (var. badila) in China[J]. Plant disease, 2017, 102(8):1660.
[17]
王伟超. 甘蔗梢腐病病原菌鉴定及其遗传多样性分析[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2022.
[18]
MAHLANZA T, RUTHERFORD R S, SNYMAN S J, et al. In vitro generation of somaclonal variant plants of sugarcane for tolerance to Fusarium sacchari[J]. Plant cell reports, 2013, 32(2):249-262.
[19]
郭强, 马文清, 陈海生, 等. 广西崇左市甘蔗梢腐病病原菌的分离鉴定及生物学特性测定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(8):1728-1734.
[20]
李婕, 李银煳, 普家荣, 等. 两种甘蔗梢腐病病原分子检测技术体系的建立及应用[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2022, 30(6):1210-1218.
[21]
O’DOMELL K, KISTLER H C, CIGELNIK E, et al. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: Concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 1998, 95(5):2044-2049.
[22]
王群, 毕云青, 何成兴, 等. 半边红李炭疽病病害调查及病原菌鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(15):128-136.
探明绥江半边红李炭疽病为害程度及病原菌的种类,可为李树炭疽病的防控提供依据。以绥江县2个主要种植区会仪镇和新滩镇的6个半边红李果园为研究对象,对炭疽病为害状况进行了调查,并对炭疽病原菌进行分离保存;利用病原菌分生孢子形态及核糖体ITS序列对绥江半边红李树炭疽病致病菌进行了种类鉴定和分析。病害调查表明,新滩镇比会仪镇的危害程度严重。单孢分离获得15株分离株,各分离株平板菌落形态略有差异,获得4类不同的分生孢子,经回接验证均致病。rDNA ITS序列系统进化分析初步推定半边红李炭疽病的病原菌为胶孢炭疽复合群(Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex)和暹罗炭疽复合群C. siamense species complex。该研究探查了半边红李炭疽病的为害状况,获得了李炭疽菌的单胞分离菌株,初步鉴定了半边红李炭疽菌归属的复合群。
[23]
林镇跃, 阙友雄, 刘平武, 等. 植物致病镰刀菌的研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2014(1):58-64.
[24]
朱海霞, 程亮, 郭青云. 3株镰刀菌的鉴定、对野燕麦的致病力及其对5种作物的影响[J]. 中国生物防治, 2010, 26(S1):84-89.
[25]
冯乐乐, 竹龙鸣, 谢华, 等. 浙江省鲜食大豆炭疽病病原分离及抗性鉴定[J]. 植物病理学报, 2021, 51(6):840-849.
[26]
张祥丽, 曹瑱艳, 杨怡华, 等. 铁皮石解镰刀菌根腐病病原菌的鉴定及其对链霉菌发酵液的敏感性分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(1):258-266.
根腐病是危害浙江省铁皮石斛的重要病害之一,鉴定根腐病的病原菌是有效防治该病害的前提条件。为进一步明确前期经柯赫法则验证为病原菌的镰刀菌(编号为GF-14)分类地位,本研究通过形态学鉴定,并结合内源转录间隔区(rDNA-ITS)、翻译延伸因子(TEF-1α)和RNA聚合酶基因(RPB1和RPB2)等序列的同源性比对及系统发育分析,确认该致病菌属于变红-木贼镰刀菌复合种群Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex。进一步采用菌丝生长速率法,测定了该病原菌对多种杀菌剂的敏感性,并选取对菌丝生长抑制效果最佳的杀菌剂进行田间防效的测定。结果表明:本实验室分离获得的生防菌淀粉酶产色链霉菌Streptomyces diastatochramogenes 1628发酵液对该致病菌的抑制效果最佳,发酵液稀释10倍后抑制率高达98.22%;而宁南霉素、井冈霉素则对该致病菌无显著抑制作用。菌株对峙试验发现淀粉酶产色链霉菌1628对菌株GF-14的菌丝生长抑制率为32.65%。田间防效试验表明其发酵液对铁皮石斛根腐病病株具有防治效果,为34.90%。本研究明确了铁皮石斛镰刀菌根腐病病原菌的分类地位,并筛选到能有效抑制该病原菌的微生物杀菌剂,为后续铁皮石斛根腐病的防治提供依据。
[27]
DUAN C X, Du Q, Tang Z L, et al. First report of maize ear rot caused by Fusarium sacchari in China[J]. Plant disease, 2019, 103(10):2647.
[28]
黄海荣, 徐林, 李翔, 等. 274个甘蔗常用亲本主要叶部病害和黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(7):1485-1496.
甘蔗优良亲本的选择和利用是决定甘蔗品种选育的关键因素,甘蔗亲本资源单个性状研究较多,但是,多种病害的综合性评价较少。为了解甘蔗亲本抗病性,优化甘蔗杂交亲本选择和组合,在广西农业科学院甘蔗研究所海南甘蔗杂交基地筛选常用甘蔗亲本274个,包括引进美国(US)15份、引进其他国家(GW)31份、引进中国台湾(TWCHN)25份、引进国内其他地区(GN)92份和自育亲本(GT)111份,进行甘蔗叶部白条病、叶焦病、赤腐病、轮斑病、花叶病、黄叶综合症(黄叶病)、梢腐病、黄斑病8种甘蔗叶片主要病害的抗病性评价和甘蔗黑穗病发病率调查,并利用灰色关联度分析锤度与中国甘蔗8个主要病害的关联度和亲本的抗病性加权关联度分析。结果表明,轮斑病是甘蔗常用亲本群体中发病最普遍的病害,有214个亲本发生病害,发病比例达78.10%,但其抗病级别7~9级只有9个亲本,总体感病程度较轻。亲本群体感病数最少的3个病害分别为白条病、梢腐病和黄斑病。美国和中国台湾是我国大陆甘蔗最重要的亲本来源地,已育成多个优良品种。美国引进亲本群体感染白条病、叶焦病和黄叶病的发病比例最高,分别为20.00%、33.33%和33.33%,但其他叶部病害的发病比例较低;中国台湾引进亲本群体中,轮斑病、黄叶病和叶焦病的发病比例较高;国内其他地区引进和自育亲本群体的发生病害比例较一致,属于中间水平,但自育亲本群体的轮斑病发病比例高达80.18%。黑穗病是中国大陆危害最严重的甘蔗病害。美国15个亲本群体的黑穗病发病比例为13.33%,且其中最大发病率仅为2.17%,属于感染亲本多但病害发病较轻;中国台湾引进亲本群体的黑穗病发病比例为24.00%,且其中最大发病率为10%,在各来源地亲本中发病率最高;甘蔗亲本叶部病害与锤度之间的相关性分析表明,其中梢腐病与锤度关联度最高为0.960,而黑穗病最低为0.711。灰色关联度加权分析常用亲本的抗病性表现为:F171、Tai98-2817、RB92-579、YuanL7、YueY R1、GF2、GT03-1462、GT08-120抗病性优良,而YZ99-596、CP01-1178、YunY06-450、CP94-1100、CP09-4256抗病性差。以欧式距离分类法对274个常用亲本的8个叶部病害和黑穗病进行模糊聚类分析,常用亲本可分为6类,其中第一类群是ROC28、MeiY8、YG45、YZ11-1204、GT05-1141和GT09-268,中抗轮斑病和黄斑病,高抗其他病害。本研究对甘蔗杂交亲本材料的选择和优化提供参考,对甘蔗育种材料的创制具有重要意义。
[29]
DOHARE S, MISHRA M M, KUMAR B. Effect of wilt on juice quality of sugarcane[J]. Annals of biology, 2003, 19(2):183-186.
[30]
单红丽, 李文凤, 张荣跃, 等. 甘蔗梢腐病暴发流行原因及产量糖分损失测定[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(3):40-42.
[31]
PAUL S K, MAHMUD N U, GUPTA D R, et al. First report of Fusarium sacchari causing sugarcane wilt in Bangladesh[J]. Plant disease, 2022. 106(1):319.
[32]
WANG J H, PENG X D, LIN S H, et al. First report of fusarium head blight of wheat caused by Fusarium sacchari in China[J]. Plant disease, 2015, 99(1):160.
[33]
吴安忠, 程崖芝, 巫升鑫, 等. 烟草镰刀菌根腐病的病原鉴定[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2018, 24(2):135-140.
[34]
MOHD M H. First report of Fusarium sacchari causing leaf blotch of orchid (Dendrobium antennatum) in Malaysia[J]. Crop protection, 2021, 143(1):105559.
PDF(1493 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/