Effect of Maize and Peanut Intercropping on Crop and Soil Characteristics

SUNGuangtao, BAOGuirong, TAIJicheng, SARula, LIUNaijia, YUMiao, LIAnning

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 7-12.

PDF(1289 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1289 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 7-12. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0290

Effect of Maize and Peanut Intercropping on Crop and Soil Characteristics

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to study the influence of maize-peanut intercropping on crop and soil characteristics, this paper sets up the root separation test of corn and peanut potted plants to study the influence of maize and peanut intercropping on crop agronomic traits, physiological activities, soil microorganisms, soil enzyme activity and soil rapid nutrients. The results showed that maize-peanut intercropping affected the morphological and physiological indexes of crops. Plant height and relative chlorophyll content of peanut were increased by 71.4% and 11.3%, but root length, root weight and leaf weight were not significantly affected. Plant height, leaf fresh weight and root length of maize were increased by 43.9%, 122% and 45.6%, respectively. But there was no significant effect on the relative content of chlorophyll. Maize-peanut intercropping improved plant stress resistance, increased SOD and POD activities of peanut leaves by 66.7% and 129%, and decreased MDA content of peanut roots by 19.8%, respectively. The activities of SOD in leaves and roots of maize were increased by 39.9% and 17.0%, respectively, while MDA content in roots decreased by 61%. Maize-peanut intercropping changed soil available nutrient content, decreased peanut soil available N by 79.5%, but increased soil available P by 11.5%, and had no effect on soil available K content. It had no effect on maize soil available N and K, but decreased soil available P by 9.4%. Maize-peanut intercropping affected soil biological characteristics and increased soil enzyme activities, especially the alkaline phosphates activity. The soil alkaline phosphates activity in peanut and maize fields increased by 122% and 330%, respectively. The Maize-peanut intercropping could improve soil microenvironment and physiological activities of leaves and roots in seedling stage.

Key words

intercropping / soil characteristics / physiological activity / maize / peanut / agronomic traits / soil microorganisms / soil enzyme activity / soil available nutrients

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Guangtao , BAO Guirong , TAI Jicheng , et al . Effect of Maize and Peanut Intercropping on Crop and Soil Characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(5): 7-12 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0290

References

[1]
LI Y H, WANG L, ZHAO B, et al. Crop Productivity, economic advantage, and photosynthetic characteristics in a corn-peanut intercropping system[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(2):509.
[2]
DARCH T, GILES C D, BLACKWELL M S A, et al. Inter-and intra-species intercropping of barley cultivars and legume species, as affected by soil phosphorus availability[J]. Plant and soil, 2018, 427(1):125-138.
[3]
WU X LI, LI C S, LIU M, et al. Influence of pre-crops on growth and phosphorus uptake of maize and wheat in relay strip intercropping[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2021,127.
[4]
GILES D C, BROWN K L, ADU O M, et al. Response-based selection of barley cultivars and legume species for complementarity: Root morphology and exudation in relation to nutrient source[J]. Plant science, 2017,255:12-28.
[5]
FARANAK N, ALIREZA K, MEHDI N M. Investigation of biodiversity and some of the ecosystem services in the intercropping of corn, soybean and marshmallow[J]. International journal of plant production, 2019, 13(1):35-46.
[6]
焦念元, 侯连涛, 宁堂原, 等. 玉米花生间作氮磷营养间作优势分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2007(4):50-53.
[7]
李奇松. 玉米与花生间作互惠的根际生物学过程与机理研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2016.
[8]
焦念元, 李亚辉, 刘领, 等. 隔根对玉米Ⅱ花生间作光合特性与间作优势的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(6):886-894.
[9]
HAI Y X, LAN W, YAN F X, et al. Impact of increasing maize densities on agronomic performances and the community stability of productivity of maize/peanut intercropping systems[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(3):150.
[10]
LALRINSANGI K J, SINGH S, CHAUDHARY K, et al. Effect of intercropping with cowpea and maize with organic manure application on the physiological parameters[J]. International journal of plant & soil science, 2024, 36(6):601-615.
[11]
ANKITA B, MAHADEV P, SUSANTA D, et al. Inter-cropping patterns and nutrient management effects on maize growth, yield and quality[J]. Field crops research, 2024,310:109363.
[12]
NING C, XIAN Y L, YUE H Z, et al. Simulation of tomato and corn growth using a modified intercropping model considering radiation interception in two-dimensional space and air temperature stress[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2024,159:127290.
[13]
NASAR J, AHMAD M, GITARI H, et al. Maize/soybean intercropping increases nutrient uptake, crop yield and modifies soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities in the subtropical humid region based in Southwest China[J]. BMC plant biology, 2024, 24(1):434.
Intercropping, a widely adopted agricultural practice worldwide, aims to increase crop yield, enhance plant nutrient uptake, and optimize the utilization of natural resources, contributing to sustainable farming practices on a global scale. However, the underlying changes in soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities, which contribute to crop yield and nutrient uptake in the intercropping systems are largely unknown. Consequently, a two-year (2021-2022) field experiment was conducted on the maize/soybean intercropping practices with/without nitrogen (N) fertilization (i.e., N; 0 N kg ha and N; 225 N kg ha for maize and 100 N kg ha for soybean ) to know whether such cropping system can improve the nutrients uptake and crop yields, soil physio-chemical characteristics, and soil enzymes, which ultimately results in enhanced crop yield. The results revealed that maize intercropping treatments (i.e., NMI and NMI) had higher crop yield, biomass dry matter, and 1000-grain weight of maize than mono-cropping treatments (i.e., NMM, and NMM). Nonetheless, these parameters were optimized in NMI treatments in both years. For instance, NMI produced the maximum grain yield (10,105 and 11,705 kg ha), biomass dry matter (13,893 and 14,093 kg ha), and 1000-grain weight (420 and 449 g) of maize in the year 2021 and 2022, respectively. Conversely, soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., NSI and NSI) reduced such yield parameters for soybean. Also, the land equivalent ratio (LER) and land equivalent ratio for N fertilization (LER) values were always greater than 1, showing the intercropping system's benefits in terms of yield and improved resource usage. Moreover, maize intercropping treatments (i.e., NMI and NMI) and soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., NSI and NSI) significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the nutrient uptake (i.e., N, P, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn) of maize and soybean, however, these nutrients uptakes were more prominent in NMI and NSI treatments of maize and soybean, respectively in both years (2021 and 2022) compared with their mono-cropping treatments. Similarly, maize-soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., NMSI and NMSI) significantly (p < 0.05) improved the soil-based N, P, K, NH, NO, and soil organic matter, but, reduced the soil pH. Such maize-soybean intercropping treatments also improved the soil enzymatic activities such as protease (PT), sucrose (SC), acid phosphatase (AP), urease (UE), and catalase (CT) activities. This indicates that maize-soybean intercropping could potentially contribute to higher and better crop yield, enhanced plant nutrient uptake, improved soil nutrient pool, physio-chemical characteristics, and related soil enzymatic activities. Thus, preferring intercropping to mono-cropping could be a preferable choice for ecologically viable agricultural development.© 2024. The Author(s).
[14]
DONG Q Q, ZHAO X H, ZHOU D Y, et al. Maize and peanut intercropping improves the nitrogen accumulation and yield per plant of maize by promoting the secretion of flavonoids and abundance of bradyrhizobium in rhizosphere[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022,13:957336.
[15]
JIANG Y H, KHAN M U, LIN X Q, et al. Evaluation of maize/peanut intercropping effects on microbial assembly, root exudates and peanut nitrogen uptake[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry: PPB. 2021,171:75-83.
[16]
CHIKOWO R, TAGWIRA F, PIHA M. Agronomic effectiveneness of poor quality manure supplemented with phosphate fertiliser on maize and groundnut in a maize-groundnut rotation[J]. African crop science journal, 1999, 7(4).
[17]
李庆凯. 玉米//花生缓解花生连作障碍机理研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2020.
[18]
左元梅, 王贺, 李晓林, 等. 石灰性土壤上玉米/花生间作对花生根系形态变化和生理反应的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1998(5):558-563,644.
[19]
乔月彤. 间作和施氮对玉米、花生和大豆产量和氮素积累的影响[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2022.
[20]
QI Q D, XIN H Z, YUE X S, et al. Border row effects improved the spatial distributions of maize and peanut roots in an intercropping system, associated with improved yield[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2024,15(I):1414844.
[21]
董奇琦, 袁洋, 杜琪, 等. 玉米花生带状间作对植株氮吸收和土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(6):1296-1306.
为探明玉米花生带状间作模式下植株氮吸收利用和土壤微生物群落特征,设置玉米单作(SM)、花生单作(SP)和玉米花生间作(IMP)三种种植模式,系统分析了不同种植模式下氮素吸收利用规律,并采用16S/ITS测序技术明确玉米花生带状间作系统下根际土壤细菌/真菌群落结构变化。结果表明,间作玉米边行优势明显,地下和地上部干物质积累量和氮积累量显著高于单作玉米和间作玉米中间行。间作玉米和间作交互区根际土壤细菌和真菌多样性和丰富度降低,而间作花生根际真菌多样性和丰富度增加,其中变形菌门、担子菌门、子囊菌门等有益菌最为显著富集。土壤中细菌和真菌存在复杂的相关性,变形菌门与子囊菌门正相关。间作丰富了物种功能多样性,参与氨基酸运输、代谢和碳水化合物代谢的细菌和腐生营养型真菌的显著富集,改善了植物养分吸收,促进了植株生长发育。可见,玉米花生间作可通过优化土壤微生物的群落结构,促进植株对氮素的吸收和利用,本研究为玉米花生带状间作氮营养互促吸收提供了科学依据。
[22]
唐秀梅, 黄志鹏, 吴海宁, 等. 玉米/花生间作条件下土壤环境因子的相关性和主成分分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(2):223-230.
可下载PDF全文。
[23]
HAN F, GUO R, HUSSAIN S, et al. Rotation of planting strips and reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application can reduce nitrogen loss and optimize its balance in maize-peanut intercropping[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2023,143.
[24]
BUGILLA F B, SANTO K G, KHALID A A, et al. Effects of spatial row arrangement and time of planting intercrops on performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under maize (Zea mays L.) -groundnut intercropping system in Ejura[J]. American journal of plant sciences, 2023, 14(3):264-289.
[25]
FENG C, MA X H, FENG L S, et al. Effects of maize/peanut intercropping system on nodulation of peanut in northwest Liaoning[J]. IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, 2021, 634(1):12028.
[26]
吴林坤, 李奇松, 李倩, 等. 玉米和花生间作根际细菌群落结构与PICRUSt的功能预测[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(18):7485-7496.
[27]
DONG X T, MANUEL D B, GUI Y Z, et al. Maize-alfalfa intercropping alleviates the dependence of multiple ecosystem services on nonrenewable fertilization[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, 2024,373:109141.
[28]
YU H Z, RUN Z Z, SHU C Z, et al. Impact of nitrogen use efficiency towards ammonia-oxidizing microbes in rhizosphere soil of intercropped soybean and maize[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2024:1-18.
[29]
YONG Y Z, FENG Y Z, ZHAN X S, et al. Effects of maize/peanut intercropping on yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization under different nitrogen application rates[J]. Agriculture, 2024, 14(6):893.
[30]
HAN F, GUO S Q, WEI S, et al. Photosynthetic and yield responses of rotating planting strips and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application in maize-peanut intercropping in dry farming areas[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022,13:1014631.
[31]
QI Q D, HUI J S, YUE X S, et al. Metagenomic insights into nitrogen cycling functional gene responses to nitrogen fixation and transfer in maize-peanut intercropping[J]. Plant, cell & environment, 2024.
[32]
PAN J, YI Z W, YU P Z, et al. Enhanced productivity of maize through intercropping is associated with community composition, core species, and network complexity of abundant microbiota in rhizosphere soil[J]. Geoderma, 2024,442:116786.
[33]
ZHAO X H, DONG Q Q, HAN Y, et al. Maize/peanut intercropping improves nutrient uptake of side-row maize and system microbial community diversity[J]. BMC microbiology, 2022, 22(1):14.
Intercropping, a diversified planting pattern, increases land use efficiency and farmland ecological diversity. We explored the changes in soil physicochemical properties, nutrient uptake and utilization, and microbial community composition in wide-strip intercropping of maize and peanut.The results from three treatments, sole maize, sole peanut and intercropping of maize and peanut, showed that intercropped maize had a marginal advantage and that the nutrient content of roots, stems and grains in side-row maize was better than that in the middle row of intercropped maize and sole maize. The yield of intercropped maize was higher than that of sole cropping. The interaction between crops significantly increased soil peroxidase activity, and significantly decreased protease and dehydrogenase activities in intercropped maize and intercropped peanut. The diversity and richness of bacteria and fungi decreased in intercropped maize rhizosphere soil, whereas the richness of fungi increased intercropped peanut. RB41, Candidatus-udaeobacter, Stropharia, Fusarium and Penicillium were positively correlated with soil peroxidase activity, and negatively correlated with soil protease and dehydrogenase activities. In addition, intercropping enriched the functional diversity of the bacterial community and reduced pathogenic fungi.Intercropping changed the composition and diversity of the bacterial and fungal communities in rhizosphere soil, enriched beneficial microbes, increased the nitrogen content of intercropped maize and provided a scientific basis for promoting intercropping in northeastern China.© 2022. The Author(s).
[34]
GUO F, WANG M L, SI T, et al. Maize-peanut intercropping led to an optimization of soil from the perspective of soil microorganism[J]. Archives of agronomy and soil science, 2021, 67(14):1986-1999.
PDF(1289 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/