Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Main Wheat Varieties in Shandong Province During Germination Under Drought Stress

WANGJing, LIBaoqiang, KONGLingguo, FANQingfeng, TAIZongjun, WANGZefeng

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (17) : 1-5.

PDF(1218 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1218 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (17) : 1-5. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0435

Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Main Wheat Varieties in Shandong Province During Germination Under Drought Stress

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To clarify the drought resistance of the main wheat varieties cultivated in Shandong Province and to screen out wheat varieties suitable for dryland cultivation, this study used eight varieties, such as 'Jimai 60', as test subjects. Drought stress was simulated using 20% PEG-6000, and changes in various indicators during the germination period were measured. The membership function method was employed to comprehensively evaluate the relative coleoptile length, relative plumule length, relative radicle length, relative germination rate, relative germination potential, and stress germination index. The results showed that drought stress not only reduced the germination rate of wheat seeds but also inhibited the growth of the plumule, coleoptile, and radicle. The D values of the eight varieties were ranked as follows: 'Jimai 60' > 'Linmai 9' > 'Yannong 999' > 'Shannong 30' > 'Shannong 28' > 'Luyuan 502' > 'Yannong 1212' > 'Jimai 22'. Based on the D values, the eight main wheat varieties were classified into three categories: highly drought-resistant varieties were 'Linmai 9' and 'Jimai 60' ; moderately drought-resistant varieties were 'Yannong 999' and 'Shannong 30'; other varieties were sensitive. 'Linmai 9' and 'Jimai 60' are recommended as suitable varieties for dryland cultivation in Shandong Province.

Key words

germination period / drought resistance / PEG-6000 stress / membership function method / comprehensive evaluation

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Jing , LI Baoqiang , KONG Lingguo , et al . Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Main Wheat Varieties in Shandong Province During Germination Under Drought Stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(17): 1-5 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0435

References

[1]
李明辉. 山东粮食生产水资源配置及优化策略研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019:14-15.
[2]
陶韶思. 山东农业水资源利用现状与对策建议[J]. 现代农村科技, 2022(9):113-114.
[3]
安欣慧, 陈贵顺, 鞠晓影, 等. 不同小麦品种种子萌发期的抗旱性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(14):54-58.
[4]
关周博, 王士强, 陈亮, 等. 模拟干旱胁迫下冬小麦胚芽鞘长度变化及与抗旱性的关系研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(4):125-130.
[5]
白璐, 贾永红, 杨安娜, 等. 新疆春小麦品种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(22):20-24.
研究干旱胁迫条件下新疆春小麦不同品种间抗旱性的差异。以20% PEG-6000 作为水分胁迫剂,对10个新疆春小麦品种的发芽率、发芽势、相对芽长、相对根长、相对发芽率、萌发抗旱指数进行研究分析,并通过加权隶属函数法对供试材料的抗旱性进行了综合评价。结果表明:1)与对照相比,20%浓度的PEG胁迫后,发芽率、发芽势、相对芽长、相对根长、相对发芽率均受到抑制,不同品种降幅不同;2) 通过隶属函数法对上述指标进行综合评价分析,10份春小麦的综合评价值(D值)在0.01~0.82之间,中国春为强抗旱品种(1级),新春3号、新春6号、新旱688等3个品种为中抗品种(2级),新春2号、新春26号等2个品种为弱抗旱品种(3级),新春7号、新春17号、新春20号、新春21号等4个品种为不抗旱品种(4级)。因此,新旱688、新春3号、新春6号可作为新疆小麦抗旱育种的种质资源。
[6]
栗雨勤, 张文英, 王有增, 等. 作物抗旱性鉴定指标研究及进展[J]. 河北农业科学, 2004, 8(1):58-61.
[7]
李云, 李维平, 李秀峰. 不同品种冬小麦的抗旱性鉴定与分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(2):17-21.
[8]
鞠乐, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 等. 不同谷子品种(系)萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 生物技术进展, 2023, 13(4):556-564.
[9]
李晶晶, 贾腾蛟, 王丽艳, 等. PEG胁迫下玉米自交系萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(4):6-10.
[10]
梁玉芹, 宋秀兰, 刘云, 等. 黄瓜种子萌发期抗旱指数测定与分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(3):677-679.
[11]
王巍, 赵丹, 刘艳珍, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对4种颜色彩棉品种种子萌发期的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2023, 43(8):78-80.
[12]
姬俊华, 李成奇, 霍昱, 等. 聚乙二醇模拟干旱对不同基因型小麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2012, 31(9):87-88.
[13]
郁飞燕, 李保峰, 李巍, 等. PEJ-6000胁迫对不同品系小麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2012, 44(10):51-53.
[14]
王炜, 陈琛, 张晓洋, 等. 甘肃部分小麦品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 中国种业, 2020(10):56-59.
[15]
庄克章, 胡晓君, 吴荣华, 等. 18个玉米杂交种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(3):68-71.
[16]
景蕊莲, 胡荣海, 张灿军, 等. GB/T 21127—2007:小麦抗旱性鉴定评价技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[17]
吴奇, 周宇飞, 高悦, 等. 不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(8):1233-1246.
[18]
张恒栋, 黄婷婷, 杨敏, 等. 小麦萌芽期模拟水分胁迫下抗旱品种筛选初报[J]. 种子, 2014, 33(11):99-101.
[19]
王赞, 李源, 吴欣明, 等. PEG胁迫下鸭茅种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(1):50-55.
[20]
余贵海, 起雪宏, 王正启, 等. 14个玉米杂交种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(7):1499-1505.
[21]
陈荣敏, 杨学举, 梁凤山, 等. 利用隶属函数法综合评价冬小麦的抗旱性[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2002, 25(2):7-9.
[22]
王志泰, 马瑞, 马彦军, 等. 利用隶属函数法分析胡枝子抗旱性[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(9):119-123.
[23]
李素, 姜鸿明, 宫德衬, 等. 48份冬小麦主要田间农艺性状的主成分分析及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(7):25-30.
[24]
李晚忱, 付凤玲, 袁佐清, 等. 玉米苗期耐旱性鉴定方法研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2001, 14(3):29-32.
[25]
李龙, 毛新国, 王景一, 等. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 18(11):1-10.
[26]
孙绿, 李玉刚, 王圣健, 等. 模拟干旱条件下冬小麦品种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(6):109-115.
[27]
李国瑞, 马宏亮, 胡雯媚, 等. 西南麦区小麦品种萌发期抗旱性的综合鉴定及评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(4):479-487.
[28]
张军, 陈新宏, 王新军, 等. PEJ-6000处理下陕西栽培小麦萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(3):77-79.
[29]
陈天青, 王伟, 杨康林, 等. 小麦萌发期耐旱性材料的筛选与评价[J]. 种子, 2014, 33(10):81-84.
PDF(1218 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/