Research Progress on Live Haploid Breeding of Maize

ZHANGJun, WUJuanjuan, LUOZhexi

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 7-17.

PDF(1402 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1402 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 7-17. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0454

Research Progress on Live Haploid Breeding of Maize

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study aims to systematically summarize the application of maize live haploid technology in maize molecular breeding, with focus on exploring the selection methods, formation mechanisms, identification methods, doubling methods, and application in population improvement of maize live haploid high-frequency induction lines, providing reference and guidance for the large-scale application of live haploid breeding technology. This study used a literature review method to summarize the relevant research results and practical experience on maize haploid technology, and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of various methods in practical applications. The research results indicated that maize live haploid technology played an important role in breeding excellent inbred lines and population improvement. Through high-frequency induction line breeding, a large number of excellent haploid plants had been successfully obtained; the identification and doubling methods effectively improved haploid formation and stability. The live haploid technology had shown significant doubling effects in population improvement, providing new ideas and methods for maize breeding. In summary, maize live haploid technology is an efficient and rapid breeding method with broad application prospects. In the process of corn breeding, combining live haploid technology can accelerate the pace of quality improvement and yield increase, providing strong support for the healthy development of the corn industry.

Key words

corn / live haploid / breeding / formation mechanism / identification / double / molecular breeding / excellent inbred lines / population improvement

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Jun , WU Juanjuan , LUO Zhexi. Research Progress on Live Haploid Breeding of Maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(10): 7-17 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0454

References

[1]
联合国粮农组织. 粮食和农业数据[EB/OL]. 2024-08-02. https://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#home.
[2]
国家统计局. 2023年中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2023.
[3]
KUO C, GUO Z C, LI Z, et al. Anther culture and haploid breeding of maize in China[J]. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, 1994,25:149-161.
[4]
GORDILLO G A, GEIGER H H. Optimization of DH-line based recurrent selection procedures in maize under a restricted annual loss of genetic variance[J]. Euphytica, 2008,161:141-154.
[5]
GUHA S, MAHESHWARI S C. In vitro production of embryos from anthers of Datura[J]. Nature, 1964,204:497.
[6]
WĘDZONY M, FORSTER B P, ŻUR I, et al. Progress in doubled haploid technology in higher plant[J]. Advances in haploid production in higher plants, 2009, 1(1):1-33.
[7]
CHASE S S. Monoploid frequencies in a commerical double cross hybrid maize, and in its component single cross hybrids and inbred lines[J]. Genetics, 1949, 34(3):328-332.
[8]
徐庆玉, 王春英, 张秀清. 玉米花药培养单倍体育种中几个问题的探讨[J]. 山东农业科学, 1991(4):30.
[9]
ALATORTSEVA T A, TYRNOV V S. Possibilities of diagnosis of parthenogenesis by culture in vitro of unpollinated ovaries[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1997(1):71-75.
[10]
ALATORTSEVA T A, TYRNOV V S. Reproduction of haploid and diploid maize forms in vitro[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 2001(1):75-76.
[11]
KIMBER G, REILEY R. Haploid angiosperms[J]. The botanical review, 1963, 29(4):480-531.
[12]
PRIGGE V, SCHIPPRACK W, MAHUKU G, et al. Development of in vivo haploid inducers for tropical maize breeding programs[J]. Euphytica, 2012, 185(1):481-490.
[13]
RÖBER F K, GORDILLO G A, GEIGER H H. In vivo haploid induction in maize- Performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding[J]. Maydica, 2005(1):275-283.
[14]
COE E H. A Line of maize with high haploid frequency[J]. The American naturalist, 1959,93:381-382.
[15]
KERMICLE J L. Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize[J]. Science, 1959,166:422-424.
[16]
COE E H J, SARKAR K R. The detection of haploids in maize[J]. Journal of heredity, 1964, 55(1):231-233.
[17]
CHANG M T. Stock 6 induced double haploidy is random[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1992, 66(1):98-99.
[18]
SARKAR K R, PANDEY A, GAYEN P, et al. Stabilization of high haploid inducer lines[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1994, 68(1):64-65.
[19]
KERMICLE J L. Pleiotropic effects on seed development of the indeterminate gametophyte gene in maize[J]. American journal of botany, 1971, 58(1):1-7.
[20]
KINDIGER B, HAMANN S. Generation of haploid in maize: A modification of the indeterminate gametophyte(ig) system[J]. Crop science, 1993, 33(1):342-344.
[21]
ENALEEVA N, OTKALO O, TYRNOV V. Cytological expression of ig mutation in megagametoophyte[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 2005, 69(1):121.
[22]
HUANG B Q, SHERIDAN W F. Embryo Sac development in the maize indeterminate gametophyte1 mutant: Abnormal nuclear behavior and defective microtubule organization[J]. The plant cell, 1996, 8(8):1391-1407.
The indeterminate gametophyte1 mutation in maize has been known to disrupt development of the female gametophyte. Mutant embryo sacs have abnormal numbers and behavior of micropylar and central cell nuclei, which result in polyembryony and elevated ploidy levels in the endosperm of developing kernels. In this study, we confirm abnormal nuclear behavior and present novel findings. In contrast to the normal form, there is no obvious polarity in two-nucleate embryo sacs or in the micropylar cells of eight-nucleate embryo sacs. We show that the second and third mitoses are not fully synchronized and that additional mitoses can occur in all of the nuclei of the mutant embryo sac or in just the micropylar or central regions. After cellularization, individual micropylar cells can undergo mitosis. Abnormal microtubular behavior results in irregular positioning of the nuclei, asynchronous microtubular patterns in different pairs of nuclei, and abnormal phragmoplasts after the third mitotic division. These results indicate that in addition to acting primarily in controlling nuclear divisions, the indeterminate gametophyte1 gene acts secondarily in regulating microtubule behavior. This cytoskeletal activity most likely controls the polarization and nuclear migration underlying the formation and fate of the cells of the normal embryo sac.
[23]
EVANS M M S. The indeterminate gametophyte1 gene of maize encodes a LOB domain protein required for embryo Sac and leaf development[J]. The plant cell, 2007, 19(1):46-62.
[24]
LIN B Y. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize[J]. Genetics, 1984, 107(1):103-115.
Maize kernels inheriting the indeterminate gametophyte mutant (ig) on the female side had endosperms that ranged in ploidy level from diploid (2x) to nonaploid (9x). In crosses with diploid males, only kernels of the triploid endosperm class developed normally. Kernels of the tetraploid endosperm class were half-sized but with well-developed embryos that regularly germinated. Kernels of endosperm composition other than triploid or tetraploid were abortive.-Endosperm ploidy level resulting from mating ig/ig x tetraploid Ig similarly was variable. Most endosperms started to degenerate soon after pollination and remained in an arrested state. Hexaploid endosperm was exceptional; it developed normally during the sequence of stages studied and accounted for plump kernels on mature ears. Since such kernels have diploid maternal tissues (pericarp) but triploid embryos, the present finding favors the view that endosperm failure or success in such circumstances is governed by conditions within the endosperm itself.-Whereas tetraploid endosperm consisting of three maternal genomes and one paternal genome is slightly reduced in size but supports viable seed development, that endosperm having two maternal and two paternal chromosome sets was highly defective and conditioned abortion. Thus, development of maize endosperm evidently is affected by the parental source of its sets of chromosomes.
[25]
刘志增, 宋同明. 玉米高频率孤雌生殖单倍体诱导系的选育与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2000(5):570-574.
[26]
才卓, 徐国良, 刘向辉, 等. 玉米高频率单倍生殖诱导系吉高诱系3号的选育[J]. 玉米科学, 2007(1):1-4.
[27]
刘治先, 杨菲, 丁照华, 等. 玉米单倍体诱导材料的鉴定和快速选系技术研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2008(3):12-14.
[28]
LI L, XU X, JIN W, et al. Morphological and molecular evidences for DNA introgression in haploid induction via a high oil inducer CAUHOI in maize[J]. Planta, 2009, 230(2):367-376.
The phenomenon of maternal haploid induction in maize was first described many years ago, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. In this study, the Stock-6-derived, haploid-inducing line CAUHOI with high kernel oil content (KOC), was used as the pollinator to produce maternal haploids from the maize hybrid ZD958 with low KOC. CAUHOI is homozygous for the dominant marker gene R1-nj. Haploids were identified by morphological and cytological investigations. The frequency of haploid induction from this cross was 2.21%. Unexpectedly, many haploid kernels had weakly pigmented purple color on the embryo, and some haploid kernels had high KOC. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis showed that 43.18% of the haploids carried segments from CAUHOI, and a small proportion (average 1.84%) of the genome of CAUHOI was introgressed into haploids. Haploid kernels with high KOC had a higher frequency of segment introgression from CAUHOI (2.92%) than that in haploid kernels with low KOC (1.79%), showing that the marker gene R1-nj and high-oil genes from CAUHOI were expressed during the development of some haploid embryos, and confirmed that the DNA introgression from the inducer parent occurred during maternal haploid induction. Together, these results suggested that the chromosome elimination was probably responsible for haploid induction in maize, and late somatic elimination might occur. Several possible mechanisms underlying haploid formation are discussed.
[29]
CHALYK S T. Creating new haploid-inducing lines of maize[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1999, 73(1):53-54.
[30]
DONG X, XU X, MIAO J, et al. Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2013, 126(7):1713-1720.
[31]
HU H, SCHRAG T A, PEIS R, et al. The genetic basis of haploid induction in maize identified with a novel genome-wide association method[J]. Genetics, 2016, 202(4), 1267-1276.
In vivo haploid induction (HI) triggered by pollination with special intraspecific genotypes, called inducers, is unique to Zea maysL. within the plant kingdom and has revolutionized maize breeding during the last decade. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying HI in maize are still unclear. To investigate the genetic basis of HI, we developed a new approach for genome-wide association studies (GWAS), termed conditional haplotype extension (CHE) test that allows detection of selective sweeps even under almost perfect confounding of population structure and trait expression. Here, we applied this test to identify genomic regions required for HI expression and dissected the combined support interval (50.34 Mb) of the QTL qhir1, detected in a previous study, into two closely linked genomic segments relevant for HI expression. The first, termed qhir11(0.54 Mb), comprises an already fine-mapped region but was not diagnostic for differentiating inducers and noninducers. The second segment, termed qhir12(3.97 Mb), had a haplotype allele common to all 53 inducer lines but not found in any of the 1482 noninducers. By comparing resequencing data of one inducer with 14 noninducers, we detected in the qhir12 region three candidate genes involved in DNA or amino acid binding, however, none for qhir11 We propose that the CHE test can be utilized in introgression breeding and different fields of genetics to detect selective sweeps in heterogeneous genetic backgrounds.Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.
[32]
SUDHA K N, WILLEM M, ALBRECHT E M, et al. Dissection of a major QTL qhir1 conferring maternal haploid induction ability in maize[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2017, 130(1):1113-1122.
[33]
KELLIHER T, STARR D, RICHBOURG L, et al. Matrilineal, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction[J]. Nature, 2017,542:105-109.
[34]
ZHANG Z, QIU F, LIU Y, et al. Chromosome elimination and in vivo haploid production induced by stock 6-derived inducer line in maize[J]. Plant cell reports, 2008, 27(1):1851-1860.
[35]
LIU C, LI X, MENG D, et al. A 4-bp insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase a generates haploid induction in maize[J]. Molecular plant, 2017, 10(5):520-522.
[36]
BYLICH V G, CHALYK S T. Existence of pollen grains with a pair of morphologically different sperm nuclei as a possible cause of the haploid-inducing capacity in ZMS line[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1996, 70(1):70-76.
[37]
KATO A. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is effective in chromosome doubling of maize seedling[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1997, 36(1):36-37.
[38]
KASHA K J, KAO K N. High frequency haploid production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)[J]. Nature, 1970,225:874-876.
[39]
GERNAND D, RUTTEN T, PICKERING R, et al. Elimination of chromosomes in Hordeum vulgare× H. bulbosum crosses at mitosis and interphase involves micronucleus formation and progressive heterochromatinization[J]. Cytogenetics and genome research, 2006, 114(2):169-174.
[40]
ZHAO X, XU X, XIE H, et al. Fertilization and uniparental chromosome elimination during crosses with maize haploid inducers[J]. Plant physiology, 2013, 163(2):721-731.
Producing maternal haploids via a male inducer can greatly accelerate maize (Zea mays) breeding process. However, the mechanism underlying haploid formation remains unclear. In this study, we constructed two inducer lines containing cytogenetic marker B chromosome or alien centromeric histone H3 variant-yellow fluorescent protein vector to investigate the mechanism. The two inducer lines as the pollinators were crossed with a hybrid ZhengDan958. B chromosomes were detected in F1 haploids at a low frequency, which was direct evidence to support the occurrence of selective chromosome elimination during haploid formation. We found that most of the inducer chromosomes were eliminated in haploid embryonic cells during the first week after pollination. The gradual elimination of chromosomes was also detected in the endosperm of defective kernels, although it occurred only in some endosperm cells as late as 15 d after pollination. We also performed a genome-wide identification of single nucleotide polymorphism markers in the inducers, noninducer inbred lines, and 42 derived haploids using a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism array. We found that an approximately 44-Mb heterozygous fragment from the male parent was detected in a single haploid, which further supported the occurrence of paternal introgression. Our results suggest that selective elimination of uniparental chromosomes leads to the formation of haploid and possible defective kernels in maize as well, which is accompanied with unusual paternal introgression in haploid cells.
[41]
CHOE E S, CARBONERO C H, MULVANEY K, et al. Improving in vivo maize doubled haploid production efficiency through early detection of false positives[J]. Plant breeding, 2012, 131(3):399-401.
[42]
COUTO E G D O, DAVIDE L M C, BUSTAMANTE F D O, et al. Identification of haploid maize by flow cytometry morphological and molecular markers[J]. Ciênc. agrotec., 2013, 37(1):25-31.
[43]
KHOKHLOV S S, TYRNOV V S, GRISHINA E V, et al. Haploidy and breeding[J]. Nauka, 1976, 27(1):221.
[44]
李春红, 孟祥启, 蒋有绎. 玉米花药培养及再生植株倍性鉴定[J]. 华北农学报, 1993(2):64-68.
对影响玉米花药培养的几个因素及再生植株的倍性鉴定的结果表明、基因型是影响玉米花培效果的重要因素,杂交种的花培效果好于不稳定系,不稳定系又好于自交系。N6与正14两种培养基都适于花药培养,但正14培养基优于N6培养基。特别是液体培养基效果更好。花药接种的适宜时期为单核中期和后期。单核后期又稍好于单核中期,单核早期的花药不能诱导愈伤组织。单倍体与二倍体花粉植株之间叶片气孔保卫细胞长度差异极显著,长度小于29μm的为单倍体。大于29μm的为二倍体或多倍体。鉴定的准确性可达到95%。因此可利用测量气孔保卫细胞长度的方法鉴定花粉植株的倍性。
[45]
ROTARENCO V A, MASLOBROD S N, ROMANOVA I M, et al. Gamma-irradiation of seeds with haploid and diploid embryos[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 2007, 11(1):11-12.
[46]
CHASE S S. Monoploids and monoploid-derivatives of maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Botanical review, 1969, 35(1):117-167.
[47]
BELICUAS R P, GUIMARÃES T C, PAIVA V L, et al. Androgenetic haploids and SSR markers as tools for the development of tropical maize hybrids[J]. Euphytica, 2007, 156(1-2):95-102.
[48]
COUTO E G D O, DAVIDE L M C, BUSTAMANTE F D O, et al. Identification of haploid maize by flow cytometry morphological and molecular markers[J]. Ciência e agrotecnologia, 2013, 37(1):25-31.
[49]
魏俊杰. 玉米单倍体加倍技术及育性恢复机理初探[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2001.
[50]
CHALYK S T, OSTROVSKY V V. Comparison of haploid and diploid maize (Zea mays L.) plants with identical genotypes[J]. Genetika i selektsiya, 1993, 47(1):77-80.
[51]
SHATSKAYA O A, ZABIROVA E R, SHCHERBAK V S. Autodiploid lines as sources of haploid spontaneous diploidization in corn[J]. Maize genetics cooperation newsletter, 1994, 68(1):51-52.
[52]
GAYEN P, SARKAR K R. Cytomixis in maize haploids[J]. Indian journal of genetics & plant breeding, 1996, 56(1):79-85.
[53]
TESTILLANO P, GEORGIEV S, MOGENSEN H L, et al. Spontaneous chromosome doubling results from nuclear fusion during in vitro maize induced microspore embryogenesis[J]. Chromosoma, 2008, 112(7):342-349.
[54]
SEANEY R R. Studies on monoploidy in maize[M]. New York: Cornell University, 1955:187-188.
[55]
BORDES J, VAULX R D D, Lapierre A, et al. Haplodiploidization of maize (Zea mays L.) through induced gynogenesis assisted by glossy markers and its use in breeding[J]. Agronomie, 1997, 17(1):291-297.
[56]
ZABIROVA E, CHUMAK M, SHATSKAIA O. Technology of the mass accelerated production of homozygous lines[J]. Kukuruza I Sorgo N, 1996, 4(1):17-19.
[57]
EDER J, CHALYK S. In vivo haploid induction in maize[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2002, 104(4):703-708.
[58]
文科, 黎亮, 刘玉强, 等. 高效生物诱导玉米单倍体及其加倍方法研究初报[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2006(5):17-20.
[59]
WAN Y, WIDHOLM J M. Effect of chromosome-doubling agents on somaclonal variation in the progeny of doubled haploids of maize[J]. Plant breeding, 1995, 114(3):253-255.
[60]
WEGENAST T, UTZ H F, LONGIN C F, et al. Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: V. Selection strategies for testcross performance with variable sizes of crosses and S1 families[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2010, 121(7):1391-1393.
[61]
刘文国, 王绍平, 张世煌. 先锋公司的育种研发管理经验对我们的启示[J]. 北京农业, 2010(20):14-17.
[62]
CARENA M J, HALLAUER A R, MIRANDA FILHO J B. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding[M]. New York: Springer, 2010.
[63]
ROTARENCO V A, DICU G, MIHAILOV M, et al. Selection and breeding experiments at the haploid level in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Journal of plant breeding and crop science, 2012, 4(5):72-79.
[64]
CHALYK S T, ROTARENKO V A. Use of matroclinous haploid plants in recurrent selection in corn[J]. Genetika, 2001, 37(12):1642-1649.
[65]
ROTARENCO V, CHALYK S, EDER J. Utilization of maize haploids plants in a recurrent selection procedure[J]. Journal of genetics and breeding, 2004, 58(1):61-72.
PDF(1402 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/