Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land

QIN Xinke; LI Qi; LI Yuhang; ZHANG Huiyuan; HE Changlong; HUANG Xinrui; ZHANG Weizhen; LEI Ningfei; PEI Xiangjun

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0577

PDF(1830 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11) : 64-73. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0577

Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land

QIN Xinke ¹^,² ,
LI Qi ¹^,²^,³ ,
LI Yuhang ¹^,² ,
ZHANG Huiyuan ¹^,² ,
HE Changlong ¹^,² ,
HUANG Xinrui ¹^,² ,
ZHANG Weizhen ¹^,²^,³ ,
LEI Ningfei ¹^,²^,³ ,
PEI Xiangjun ¹^,²^,³

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In recent years, land desertification has become one of the most important and pressing ecological environmental issues globally, biological soil crusts can form protective layers with a certain coverage, thickness, and well-developed structure, which is conducive to the ecological restoration of desertified land. However, the impact of biological-chemical composite crusts on desertified land remains unclear. This study selected sandy soil from the Hetian region of Xinjiang, constructed soil crust layers by adding SJP organic materials combined with different types and concentrations of mosses (Fissidens sp., Plagiomnium sp., Bryum sp.) and algae (Anabaena azollae, Oscillatoria sp., Trebouxia sp.), and selected the optimal configuration scheme based on soil nutrient content, enzyme activity, and microbial community structure characteristics. The results showed that the contents of soil organic carbon, available potassium, available phosphorus, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and pH increased continuously with the increase of treatment time under different types and concentrations of treatments. Soil enzyme activity was generally improved compared to the blank control group. The soil crust layers significantly affected soil microbial diversity, with dominant species belonging to Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Firmicutes. The study on microbial diversity showed that each treatment group had a significant impact on soil bacterial diversity, and the bacterial communities of the signature species differed at the genus level. Based on principal component analysis, the optimal soil crust scheme was determined to be 30 g/m² Fissidens sp. + 10 g/m² Anabaena azollae, this study provided certain technical support for the ecological restoration of desertified land.

Key words

SJP-modified organic materials / biological soil crusts / soil nutrients / soil enzyme activity / soil microorganisms

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

QIN Xinke , LI Qi , LI Yuhang , et al . Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(11): 64-73 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0577

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	蔡丽红. 土地沙漠化原因及林业防沙治沙措施[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2023, 13(5):188-190. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	周颖, 杨秀春, 金云翔, 等. 中国北方沙漠化治理模式分类[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(3):9. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	陆超, 黄丽丽, 张芳, 等. 土地沙漠化原因及防沙治沙策略[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2023, 46(6):45-47,53. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	陈亚宁. 我国西北地区沙化土地治理的成功经验及启示——以新疆为例[J]. 国家治理, 2023(24):48-55. Cited in this article [1]

[5]

闵庆文, 刘寿东, 杨霞. 内蒙古典型草原生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J]. 草地学报, 2004(3):165-169,175.

https://doi.org/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2004.03.001

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

本文参照Constanza等的思路与方法,以内蒙古典型草原生态系统有机物生产为基础,分别采用市场价值法、替代市场法等估算其主要服务功能的经济价值。结果表明:内蒙古典型草原生态系统服务功能的总经济价值3325.9×108元/a,其中,气体调节价值272.3×108元/a,占8.19%;水土保持价值2988.0×108元/a,占89.84%;涵养水源价值为18.2×108元/a,占0.55%;有机物质生产价值27.52×108元/a,占0.83%;生物多样性保护价值16.1×108元/a,占0.48%;生态旅游价值3.8×108元/a,占0.11%;在各种服务功能中,水土保持价值最为重要;因此,加强草原生态环境建设对于维持区域生态安全具有重要意义。

[6]	民勤连古城保护局. “民勤沙漠化防治与生态修复技术集成试验示范研究”项目在民勤启动[J]. 甘肃林业, 2008(3):1. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	周竞红. 沙产业开发与沙区发展——基于内蒙古的探索之路[J]. 开发研究, 2018(3):6. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	李建华. 农林牧复合系统实践意义的探讨[J]. 现代化农业, 2004(11):12-14. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	FEDERICO R, LI H, LIU Y D, et al. Cyanobacterial inoculation (cyanobacterisation): perspectives for the development of a standardized multifunctional technology for soil fertilization and desertification reversal[J]. Earth-science reviews, 2017,171:28-43. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	李守中, 肖洪浪, 宋耀选, 等. 腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被区生物土壤结皮对降水的拦截作用[J]. 中国沙漠, 2002(6):90-94. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	CHAN H P, LI X R, RONG L J, et al. Effects of superabsorbent polymer on cyanobacterial biological soil crust formation in laboratory[J]. Arid land research and management, 2015, 29(1):55-71. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	BU C B M A. Successful field cultivation of moss biocrusts on disturbed soil surfaces in the short term[J]. Plant and soil, 2018, 429(1a2). Cited in this article [1]

[13]	李新荣, 谭会娟, 回嵘, 等. 中国荒漠与沙地生物土壤结皮研究[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(23):15. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	CHEN L, JIA X H, WU B, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on the characteristics of hygroscopic and condensate water deposition in alpine sandy lands[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2018,38:5037-5046. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	ZHAO L N, LIU Y B, WANG Z R, et al. Bacteria and fungi differentially contribute to carbon and nitrogen cycles during biological soil crust succession in arid ecosystems[J]. Plant and soil, 2020,447:379-392. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	EMILIO R C, JAYNE B, BURKHARD B, et al. Dryland photoautotrophic soil surface communities endangered by global change[J]. Nature geoscience, 2018, 11(3):185-189. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	许文文, 赵燕翘, 王楠, 等. 人工蓝藻结皮对沙区表层土壤酶活性及其恢复速率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7):9. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	李新荣, 回嵘, 赵洋. 中国荒漠生物土壤结皮生态生理学研究[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	李勋, 程晓彬, 彭彬, 等. 生物土壤结皮在沙化土壤修复中的研究与应用[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(13):32-34,37. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	ZHOU X B, ZHAO Y G, BELNAP J, et al. Practices of biological soil crust rehabilitation in China: experiences and challenges[J]. Restoration ecology,2020,28:S45-S55. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	唐东山, 王伟波, 李敦海, 等. 人工藻结皮对库布齐沙地土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2007(3):339-344. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	吴易雯, 饶本强, 刘永定, 等. 不同生境对人工结皮发育及表土氮、磷含量及其代谢酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(1):52-59. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	黄婷, 岳西杰, 葛玺祖, 等. 基于主成分分析的黄土沟壑区土壤肥力质量评价——以长武县耕地土壤为例[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010(3):8. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	李骏盈, 陈林, 李育中, 等. 几种苔藓植物的组织培养[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011(S1):6. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	王楠, 许文文, 赵燕翘, 等. 荒漠蓝藻规模化培养试验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022(4):42. Cited in this article [1]

[26]

赵燕翘, 连煜超, 许文文, 等. 中国人工蓝藻结皮研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2023, 43(5):214-222.

https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00071

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

沙漠化是中国面临的主要生态环境问题之一。持续遏制沙漠化、修复沙化土地是中国生态建设的紧迫任务。通过人工植被种植、机械固沙、化学固沙和工程固沙的方式进行生态恢复和沙漠化防治是中国主要的治沙方法和途径，但也存在一定的局限性，如水分限制和环境污染等。在生态文明建设和绿色发展的背景下，对固沙和沙化土地治理方法提出了更高的要求。生物土壤结皮（Biological soil crusts，BSCs）广泛分布在中国沙区，能够在气候干旱、辐射强、降水量极低的沙漠地区生长，不仅能够减少沙面的侵蚀，还能增加土壤肥力，提高土地质量，控制沙面径流入渗平衡。蓝藻是BSCs形成的先锋物种，并在BSCs发育后期的物种形成和演替中发挥着重要作用。然而，自然条件下BSCs形成往往需要10~20 a，因此通过人工培育加速BSCs形成，即人工生物土壤结皮固沙技术，可显著缩短固沙时间、加速生态恢复速率。基于近年来中国学者对人工BSCs，尤其是人工蓝藻结皮的研究，从固沙蓝藻种选择、培养方式/模式、人工蓝藻结皮属性、影响因子以及其应用进行综述，分析当前研究的主要进展，并展望未来人工蓝藻结皮的研究方向，以期为中国人工BSCs的研究提供依据。

[27]	许书军. 典型荒漠苔藓人工繁殖特征与抗御干热环境胁迫的生理生化机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007. Cited in this article [1]

[28]	ZHAO Y, WANG N, ZHANG Z S, et al. Accelerating the development of artificial biocrusts using covers for restoration of degraded land in dryland ecosystems[J]. Land degradation & development, 2021, 32(1):285-295. Cited in this article [1]

[29]	田云飞, 安俊芳, 陶士敏. 重铬酸钾氧化-分光光度法测定土壤有机碳含量的研究[J]. 现代化工, 2020, 40(4):5. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	孙兰香. 乙酸铵浸提——火焰光度计法测定土壤速效钾[J]. 现代农业科技, 2008(17):199. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	李立平, 张佳宝, 邢维芹. 0.5 mol/L NaHCO₃提取土壤氮磷钾的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2009, 40(2):338-343. Cited in this article [1]

[32]

刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 等. 调控措施对祁连山中度退化高寒草甸土壤的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4):988-994.

https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.009

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

研究不同调控措施(春季休牧、春季休牧-划破草皮、春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥、春季休牧-划破草皮-播种、春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种)对祁连山中度退化高寒草甸植被、土壤理化性质和土壤微生物生物量的影响。结果表明: 各调控措施均显著增加了退化高寒草甸植被盖度以及地上、地下生物量,春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥与春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种两种措施下植被物种丰富度显著增加,春季休牧-划破草皮-播种与春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种措施下物种优势种为补播草种青海草地早熟禾。中度退化高寒草甸土壤(对照)pH和容重显著高于各调控措施样地,春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种措施下土壤含水量、土壤有机碳、全氮、全钾含量及碳氮比、氮磷比均最高,分别为21.3%、22.30 g·kg-1、2.77 g·kg-1、19.93 g·kg-1、8.3、3.5。春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种措施下退化草地土壤微生物生物量氮、磷(分别为104.98和40.74 mg·kg-1)显著高于其他措施,而退化草地在春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥措施下土壤微生物生物量碳(240.72 mg·kg-1)显著高于其他措施。雷达图表明,调控措施对退化草地植被特征(地上、地下生物量)、土壤理化性质(含水量、有机碳、全氮、全磷、全钾)及土壤微生物生物量(碳、氮、磷)特征影响显著,且春季休牧-划破草皮-施肥-播种措施对研究区退化草地的修复效果最佳。

[33]	陈家坊, 方柏. 应用硫酸重铬酸钾消煮液的土壤氮素测定法[J]. 土壤学报, 1955(2):125-128. Cited in this article [1]

[34]	马有芳, 陈式谷. 土壤中全氮、全磷联合快速消化法——硫酸钾—高氯酸—硫酸消化法[J]. 土壤, 1983(6):240-242. Cited in this article [1]

[35]	王金成, 井明博, 张绍鹏, 等. 油污胁迫下土壤微生物群落结构对外源施用玉米秸秆生物质炭的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(3):11. Cited in this article [1]

[36]	吕晶阳, 沈逸凡, 肖维阳, 等. 气温急变带工程创面植生层土壤及微生物群落特征研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2023, 34(2):114-120. Cited in this article [1]

[37]	侯芸芸. 小陇山国家级自然保护区土壤理化性质及其与土壤微生物群落特征的相关性研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2013. Cited in this article [1]

[38]	李颖, 朱炜, 徐新泉, 等. 利用主成分分析对不同覆盖时间毛竹林土壤质量进行评价——以浙江长兴毛竹林为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(1):85-91. Cited in this article [1]

[39]	魏新, 郑小锋, 张硕新. 秦岭火地塘不同海拔梯度森林土壤理化性质研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(3):6. Cited in this article [1]

[40]	张雨虹, 张韶阳, 张树煇, 等. 毛乌素沙地苔藓结皮对沙化土壤性质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(6):1585-1597. Cited in this article [1]

[41]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社,1986. Cited in this article [1]

[42]	费裕翀, 黄樱, 刘丽, 等. 中亚热带紫色土丘陵区几种典型人工林土壤质量评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(9):8. Cited in this article [1]

[43]	王娟, 谷雪景, 赵吉. 羊草草原土壤酶活性对土壤肥力的指示作用[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25(4):5. Cited in this article [1]

[44]	BANAFSHE K, FARSHID N, NAFISEH N, et al. Diversity of soil cellulase isoenzymes is associated with soil cellulase kinetic and thermodynamic parameters[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2011, 43(8):1639-1648. Cited in this article [1]

[45]	尹亚琳. 库布其沙地生物结皮微生物群落特征及其稳定性研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2022. Cited in this article [1]

[46]	杨山, 李小彬, 王汝振, 等. 氮水添加对中国北方草原土壤细菌多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3):8. Cited in this article [1]

[47]	李晓捷. 六盘山林区主要森林群落物种多样性研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2007. Cited in this article [1]

[48]	郑鹏, 张玥. 野生生境青刺果根际土壤细菌群落结构多样性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023(22):148-153,157. Cited in this article [1]

[49]

赵娜, 孟平, 张劲松, 等. 华北低丘山地不同退耕年限刺槐人工林土壤质量评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2):351-358.

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

以华北低丘山地退耕还林区的耕地、农田撂荒地、退耕10年刺槐林和退耕43年刺槐林为研究对象,采用土壤质量综合指数探讨退耕措施对土壤质量的影响.结果表明: 随着退耕年限的增加,退耕刺槐人工林土壤养分的表层富集作用显著,且0～5 cm土层土壤改良效果增强;与耕地相比,退耕刺槐人工林的土壤物理性状得到改善,养分含量增加,土壤微生物生物量显著提高.不同土地利用类型的土壤质量综合指数为退耕43年刺槐林(0.542)>退耕10年刺槐林(0.536)>撂荒地(0.499)>耕地(0.498),说明退耕地人工造林改善了华北低丘山地退耕地区的土壤质量. 