Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields

ZHANG Zhouna; ZHOU Huaping; ZHANG Mingkui

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0596

PDF(1113 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 61-66. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0596

Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The objective of farmland soil phosphorus (P) management is to meet the P needs of crop growth while reducing the risk of soil P runoff loss. Therefore, it is essential to look for the conditioner agent which can reduce the water-soluble P in the P-rich soils and has little effect on the available P. In this study, calcium chloride, gypsum, limestone powder, ferrous sulfate and aluminium sulfate containing calcium, iron and aluminium were selected as conditioning agents, the effects of the five kinds of conditioner agents on the forms of P in three kinds of vegetable soils (calcareous, neutral and acidic soils) with different pH were studied by laboratory simulation experiment. The results showed that the forms of P in the three soils could be changed by applying the conditioner agents. Calcium chloride, gypsum and limestone powder could promote the transformation of Ca₂-P, Al-P, Fe-P to Ca₈-p and Ca₁₀-P, while ferrous sulfate and aluminium sulfate could promote the transformation of Ca₂-P, Ca₈-P and Ca₁₀-P into Al-P and Fe-P. The reduction of Ca₂-P was most obvious when applied with ferrous sulfate or aluminium sulfate, followed by application of limestone powder. The pH value of calcareous and neutral soils could be obviously reduced by applying calcium chloride or gypsum, and the pH value of the soils increased by applying limestone powder, while application of ferrous sulfate or aluminum sulfate significantly reduced pH of the soils. Both available P and water-soluble P in the soils were decreased by adding each of the five different conditioner agents, and the reduction effect of water-soluble P was greater than that of bio-available P. The most obvious reduction of soil water-soluble P was found at application of ferrous sulfate or aluminum sulfate. Based on the objectives of soil P management and the change of soil pH value after application of the agents, it was recommended that the suitable conditioner agents for reducing water-soluble P in calcareous phosphorus-rich soil was aluminum sulfate or calcium chloride, while aluminum sulfate, calcium chloride or limestone powder were suitable for reducing water-soluble P in neutral P-rich soil, and limestone powder, calcium chloride and gypsum were suitable for reducing water-soluble P in acid P-rich soil.

Key words

P-rich soil / conditioner agent / soil P stability / P forms / available P / water-soluble P

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHANG Zhouna , ZHOU Huaping , ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(12): 61-66 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0596

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	杨东, 陈益, 唐静, 等. 强酸性土壤磷肥用量对莴笋产量、品质及磷素利用效率的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1):158-164. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	周宝库, 张喜林. 长期施肥对黑土磷素积累、形态转化及其有效性影响的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(2):143-147. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	黄庆海, 李茶荀, 赖涛, 等. 长期施肥对红壤性水稻土磷素积累与形态分异的影响[J]. 土壤与环境, 2000, 9(4):290-293. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	李艾芬, 章明奎. 浙北平原不同种植年限蔬菜地土壤氮磷的积累及环境风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(1):122-127. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	高秀美, 汪吉东, 刘兆普, 等. 集约化蔬菜地土壤磷素累积特征及流失风险[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(1):82-86. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	韩张雄, 董亚妮, 王曦婕, 等. 设施蔬菜地施用磷肥对土壤及环境中磷素积累的影响研究现状[J]. 中国农业信息, 2016(20):70-72. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	张英鹏, 李彦, 李景超, 等. 连续淋洗对山东省主要土壤磷素有效性及磷库的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 93(6):21-24,38. Cited in this article [1]

[8]

童文彬, 邱志腾, 章明奎. 植物有效磷与水溶性磷对土壤磷素积累的响应研究[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(1):37-42.

https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18100017

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

以浙江省河谷平原、水网平原、滨海平原和丘陵山地等4类地貌的耕地为例,探讨了植物有效磷和水溶性磷随土壤磷素积累的变化特征。结果表明：植物有效磷和水溶性磷均随土壤磷素积累呈现明显的增加,它们随土壤磷素积累的增加量存在转变点。当土壤全磷达到0.80~0.95 g/kg以上时,植物有效磷随土壤磷素积累的增幅明显地增强;而当植物有效磷分别为42~62、165~265 mg/kg以上时,土壤水溶性磷水平发生了明显的2个递增过程。总体上,河谷平原土壤中植物有效磷和水溶性磷发生明显变化时土壤积累磷的临界值相对较低。由于易释放态磷占土壤磷的比例随磷积累的增加而增加,研究认为控制土壤磷素的过度积累可有效降低土壤磷素的流失。

[9]	应金耀, 阮弋飞, 邬奇峰, 等. 钱塘江附近农田土壤磷的积累及其流失的潜在风险[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(1):26-32. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	张汉荣. 平和‘琯溪蜜柚’果园剖面土壤磷特性及其改善措施[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(33):98-103. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	杨洁. 典型冬季蔬菜种植区农田土壤磷积累、固定特性及流失风险评估[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2020. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	张子璐, 刘峰, 侯庭钰. 我国稻田氮磷流失现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10):3292-3302. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	HECKRATH G, BROOKES P C, POULTION P R, et al. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk experiment[J]. Journal of environmental quality, 1995, 24(6):904-910. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	SHAFQAT M N, PIERZYNSKI G M. Long-term effects of tillage and manure applications on soil phosphorus fractions[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2010, 41(9):1084-1097. Cited in this article [2]

[15]	GALE P M, MULLEN M D, CIESLIK C, et al. Phosphorus distribution and availability in response to dairy manure applications[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2000, 31(4):553-565. Cited in this article [1]

[16]

李若楠, 武雪萍, 张彦才, 等. 减量施磷对温室菜地土壤磷素积累、迁移与利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20):3944-3952.

https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.20.010

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

【目的】针对过量施磷问题，定位研究日光温室蔬菜生产磷肥减施潜力，明确适宜施磷范围。【方法】以北方温室蔬菜主栽种类黄瓜和番茄为研究对象，采用冬春茬黄瓜-秋冬茬番茄种植模式，在基础土壤有效磷（Olsen-P）40.2 mg·kg^-1下，设计不施磷肥（P0）、减量施磷（P1）和农民常规施磷量（P2）3个磷肥用量水平。P0、P1、P2处理对应黄瓜单季施磷肥（P2O5） 0、300、675 kg·hm^-2，番茄单季施磷肥（P2O5） 0、225、675 kg·hm^-2。3年6季定位研究蔬菜生产磷素盈亏、土壤有效磷供应与迁移，分析产量变化，推荐合理施磷范围。【结果】（1）农民常规施磷量年盈余磷 480.0 kg P·hm^-2·a^-1，每盈余磷 100 kg P·hm^-2主根区0—20 cm土层Olsen-P增加2.7 mg·kg^-1，3年0—20 cm土层Olsen-P平均含量70.2 mg·kg^-1，2010年番茄季0—20 cm土层磷素饱和度（DPSM3）为80%，磷素土壤深层迁移明显。（2）减量施磷较农民常规磷量下降61.1%，3年磷素盈余量下降71.0%—77.3%，0—20 cm土层Olsen-P含量下降18.6%—43.5%，3年均值为49.3 mg·kg^-1，接近瓜果类蔬菜Olsen-P农学阈值，关键生育期磷素吸收量无显著变化，产量保持在中高水平不降低；经过3年种植，0—20 cm土层DPSM3下降21个百分点，20—60 cm土层Olsen-P平均含量下降9.3%—30.1%，减施磷肥有效缓解了土壤磷素深层迁移。（3）不施磷肥导致土壤磷素亏缺，蔬菜从土壤中每攫取磷 100 kg P·hm^-2，P0处理0—20 cm土层Olsen-P含量下降3.4 mg·kg^-1，3年0—20 cm土层Olsen-P平均含量30.5 mg·kg^-1，虽产量没有显著降低，但是2008年番茄高产下（140 t·hm^-2）磷素吸收量较P1、P2处理下降19.8%—30.0%，产量呈降低趋势。（4）依据上述推荐：土壤有效磷含量≥40 mg·kg^-1的温室，冬春茬黄瓜产量水平170 t·hm^-2下施用P2O5不宜超过300 kg·hm^-2，秋冬茬番茄产量水平100 t·hm^-2下施用P2O5不宜超过225 kg·hm^-2。【结论】华北平原温室蔬菜生产减施磷肥潜力较大。对于种植一段时间（≥3年）的温室，较农民常规减施磷60%，可以显著改善磷素盈余状况，缓解土壤有效磷积累，降低土壤磷素深层迁移量，保证黄瓜番茄持续中高产水平生产。

[17]	黄双勇, 李发林, 曾瑞琴, 等. 土壤富磷琯溪蜜柚果园减量化施肥技术应用[J]. 福建热作科技, 2016, 41(2):16-18. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	姬红利, 颜蓉, 李运东, 等. 施用土壤改良剂对磷素流失的影响研究[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(2):203-209. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	马妍, 刘振海, 刘陆涵, 等. 三种环境材料复合对土壤水肥保持同步增效的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(12):2471-2478. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	MOORE P A, DANIEL T C, EDWARDS D R. Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia loss from poultry manure with aluminum sulfate[J]. Journal of environmental quality, 2000, 29(1):37-49. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005:154-157. Cited in this article [2]

[22]	蒋柏藩. 石灰性土壤无机磷有效性的研究[J]. 土壤, 1992, 24(1):61-64. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	LINDSAY W L. Chemical Equilibria in Soils[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	雷宏军, 刘鑫, 朱端卫. 石灰改良对酸性土壤磷解吸动力学特征的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008(2):165-168. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	刘小玉, 付登强, 杨伟波, 等. 酸性土壤植物磷铝互作研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(8):182-183,195. Cited in this article [1]

[26]	洪灿. 土壤改良剂对酸性土壤磷的生物有效性和土壤物理性质的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	麻万诸, 章明奎. 改良剂降低富磷蔬菜地土壤磷和氮流失的作用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(5):22-27. Cited in this article [1]