Research Progress on Role and Mechanisms of Foliar Fertilizer in Agricultural Production

HOUChenwei, GUOYaqing, CHENGCheng, WANGQi

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11) : 132-139.

PDF(1328 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1328 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11) : 132-139. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0601

Research Progress on Role and Mechanisms of Foliar Fertilizer in Agricultural Production

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study aims to sort out the impact of foliar fertilization on crop productivity. Through extensive research on a large number of domestic and foreign literatures, it reviews the development of foliar fertilizers, summarizes the types and characteristics of different foliar fertilizers, and concludes the roles of different types of foliar fertilizers in promoting plant growth and alleviating plant stress. Moreover, it takes the stomata and cuticle on the leaf surface as the entry point to summarize the mechanism of action of foliar fertilizers. Research has found that when reactive oxygen species accumulate in large quantities within plants, it will reduce photosynthetic efficiency and affect crop growth. Foliar fertilization can enhance the antioxidant activity of crops, regulate photosynthetic activity, energy metabolism and nutrient assimilation and other physiological processes to promote crop growth. Finally, the problems existing in the practical application of foliar fertilizers and the prospects for further exploring the mechanism by which foliar fertilizers regulate plant growth and development are discussed and prospected.

Key words

foliar fertilizer / type and characteristics / growth promoting effect / relieve environmental stress / mechanism of action

Cite this article

Download Citations
HOU Chenwei , GUO Yaqing , CHENG Cheng , et al. Research Progress on Role and Mechanisms of Foliar Fertilizer in Agricultural Production[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(11): 132-139 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0601

References

[1]
ZHAO F J, MA Y B, ZHU Y G, et al. Soil contamination in China: current status and mitigation strategies[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2015, 49(2):750-759.
[2]
周岩, 武继承. 土壤改良剂的研究现状、问题与展望[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 39(8):152-155.
[3]
李小明, 龙惊惊, 周悦, 等. 叶面肥的应用及研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(3):127-130.
[4]
BINDRABAN P S, DIMKPA C, NAGARAJAN L, et al. Revisiting fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants[J]. Biology and fertility of soils, 2015, 51:897-911.
[5]
沈云鹏. 叶面喷施低共熔溶剂对小麦生长和基施氮肥利用的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学,2023:2-7.
[6]
于广武. 叶面肥及其发展趋势[J]. 中国农资, 2006, 6(2):60-62.
[7]
李燕婷, 李秀英, 肖艳, 等. 叶面肥的营养机理及应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1):162-172.
[8]
KUMAR N, SAMOTA S R, VENKATESH K, et al. Global trends in use of nano-fertilizers for crop production: advantages and constraints—A review[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2023, 228:105645.
[9]
孙得芳, 王娜, 庞世花, 等. 叶面肥发展现状与展望[J]. 山东化工, 2017, 46(7):89-90.
[10]
赵贵, 刘文杰. 浅析叶面肥的施肥原理及特点[J]. 现代农业研究, 2009(4):19.
[11]
RAJASEKAR M, ANDHINI D U, SUGANTHI S. Supplementation of mineral nutrients through foliar spray-a review[J]. International journal of current microbiology and applied sciences, 2017, 6(3):2504-2513.
[12]
ADIL M, BASHIR S, ASLAM Z, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improved chlorophyll contents, physical parameters, and wheat yield under salt stress[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022, 13:932861.
[13]
王少鹏, 洪煜丞, 黄福先, 等. 叶面肥发展现状综述[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(4):96-98.
[14]
欧阳建怡. 三种叶面肥对榛子叶片光合作用与果实品质的影响[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学,2023:3-4.
[15]
马彩珺, 吕叶, 彭贤辉, 等. 叶面肥发展现状与展望[J]. 河南化工, 2017, 34(5):7-10.
[16]
JANUSZKIEWICZ R, KULCZYCKI G, SAMORAJ M. Foliar fertilization of crop plants in polish agriculture[J]. Agriculture, 2023, 13(9):1715.
[17]
陈洁. 叶面硅肥、硒肥阻控大豆富集镉的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学,2022:5-8.
[18]
NIU J H, LIU C, HUANG M L, et al. Effects of foliar fertilization: a review of current status and future perspectives[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2021, 21:104-118.
[19]
ROSSI L, FEDENIA L N, SHARIFAN H, et al. Effects of foliar application of zinc sulfate and zinc nanoparticles in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plants[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2019, 135:160-166.
[20]
FERNANDEZ V, BROWN P H. From plant surface to plant metabolism: the uncertain fate of foliar-applied nutrients[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2013, 4:289.
The application of agrochemical sprays to the aerial parts of crop plants is an important agricultural practice world-wide. While variable effectiveness is often seen in response to foliar treatments, there is abundant evidence showing the beneficial effect of foliar fertilizers in terms of improving the metabolism, quality, and yields of crops. This mini-review is focused on the major bottlenecks associated with the uptake and translocation of foliar-applied nutrient solutions. A better understanding of the complex scenario surrounding the ultimate delivery of foliar-applied nutrients to sink cells and organs is essential for improving the effectiveness and performance of foliar fertilizers.
[21]
ZULFIQAR U, HUSSAIN S, ISHFAQ M, et al. Foliar manganese supply enhances crop productivity, net benefits, and grain manganese accumulation in direct-seeded and puddled transplanted rice[J]. Journal of plant growth regulation, 2021, 40(4):1539-1556.
[22]
ZHANG Y, YIN H, ZHAO X, et al. The promoting effects of alginate oligosaccharides on root development in Oryza sativa L. mediated by auxin signaling[J]. Carbohydrate polymers, 2014, 113:446-454.
[23]
王娜, 杨思敏, 刘蓓蓓, 等. 植物生长调节剂对绿豆干物质积累动态与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(3):10-17.
[24]
庞强强, 陈日远, 刘厚诚, 等. 叶面喷施不同碳源对白菜生长、品质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(5):148-150.
[25]
TARANTINO A, LOPS F, DISCIGLIO G, et al. Effects of plant biostimulants on fruit set, growth, yield and fruit quality attributes of ‘Orange rubis®’ apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivar in two consecutive years[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2018, 239:26-34.
[26]
应武, 骆乐谈, 阮松林, 等. 不同生物刺激剂对鲜食玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(17):89-94.
为研究生物刺激剂对玉米的增产提质效果,试验探讨不同生物刺激剂对玉米的产量和品质方面的影响,为鲜食玉米的优质高产栽培提供技术支撑。以鲜食玉米‘钱江糯3号’为试验品种,以3种生物刺激剂(阿美滋、美基、保康灵1号)为供试药剂,设置6个处理(阿美滋1000倍液、阿美滋1500倍液、阿美滋2000倍液、美基3000倍液、保康灵1号300倍液、清水对照),研究大田常规施肥水平下药剂对‘钱江糯3号’的经济性状、产量及品质的影响。在阿美滋1500倍液喷施下,玉米的行粒数、单穗鲜重和单穗净重、产量均最高,蛋白质含量、粗纤维含量、还原糖含量、淀粉含量均居第3位;在保康灵1号300倍液喷施下,玉米的穗粗最高,单穗鲜重、单穗净重、产量均居第2位,蛋白质含量最高,脂肪含量最低,还原糖含量居第2位。阿美滋1500倍液在增加玉米产量上是最佳选择,保康灵1号300倍液则对提升玉米品质最有效果。建议生产上将阿美滋1500倍液与保康灵1号300倍液配合施用,这对鲜食玉米的增产提质效果最好。
[27]
BARRAJON C E, ALVAREZ M F J, BORRAS F. Metabolomic analysis of the effects of a commercial complex biostimulant on pepper crops-science direct[J]. Food chemistry, 2020, 310:125818.
[28]
FAHIMI F, SOURI M K, YAGHOBI F. Growth and development of greenhouse cucumber under foliar application of Biomin and Humifolin fertilizers in comparison to their soil application and NPK[J]. Journal of science and technology of greenhouse culture, 2016, 7(25):152-158.
[29]
SOURI M K, YARAHMADI B. Effect of amino chelates foliar application on growth and development of marigold (Calendula officinalis) plant[J]. Iranian journal of plant production technology, 2016, 15(2):109-119.
[30]
SOURI M, SOORAKI F Y, MOGHADAMYAR M. Growth and quality of cucumber, tomato, and green bean under foliar and soil applications of an aminochelate fertilizer[J]. Horticulture, environment, and biotechnology, 2017, 58:530-536.
[31]
HONG J, WANG C, WAGNER D C, et al. Foliar application of nanoparticles:mechanisms of absorption, transfer, and multiple impacts[J]. Environmental science: nano, 2021, 8(5):1196-1210.
[32]
KUMARASWAMY R V, SAHARAN V, KUMARI S, et al. Chitosan-silicon nanofertilizer to enhance plant growth and yield in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2021, 159:53-66.
[33]
KANJANA D. Foliar application of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on nutrient element concentrations, growth, physiological, and yield parameters of cotton[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 2020, 43(20):3035-3049.
[34]
AL-JUTHERY H W A, HABEEB K H, ALTAEE F J K, et al. Effect of foliar application of different sources of nano-fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat[J]. Bioscience research, 2018, 15(4):3988-3997.
[35]
RADY M M, MOSSA A T H, YOUSSOF A M A, et al. Exploring the reinforcing effect of nano-potassium on the antioxidant defense system reflecting the increased yield and quality of salt-stressed squash plants[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2023, 308:111609.
[36]
MESELHY G A, SHARMA S, GUO Z, et al. Nanoscale sulfur improves plant growth and reduces arsenic toxicity and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2021, 19; 55(20):13490-13503.
[37]
KHOT L R, SANKARAN S, MAJA J M, et al. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review[J]. Crop protection, 2012, 35:64-70.
[38]
RILLING M C, RYO M, LEHMANN A, et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity[J]. Science, 2019, 366(6467):886-890.
Soils underpin terrestrial ecosystem functions, but they face numerous anthropogenic pressures. Despite their crucial ecological role, we know little about how soils react to more than two environmental factors at a time. Here, we show experimentally that increasing the number of simultaneous global change factors (up to 10) caused increasing directional changes in soil properties, soil processes, and microbial communities, though there was greater uncertainty in predicting the magnitude of change. Our study provides a blueprint for addressing multifactor change with an efficient, broadly applicable experimental design for studying the impacts of global environmental change.Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
[39]
ZHOU P, LONG B, WANG R, et al. Increase in the active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine Isatis indigotica through iron nanoparticles supplementation versus carbon nanotubes: a comparative study[J]. Environmental science: nano, 2022, 9(8):2966-2978.
[40]
WANG S, WANG F, GAO S. Foliar application with nano-silicon alleviates Cd toxicity in rice seedlings[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2015, 22:2837-2845.
[41]
WANG Y, WANG L, MA C, et al. Effects of cerium oxide on rice seedlings as affected by co-exposure of cadmium and salt[J]. Environmental pollution, 2019, 252:1087-1096.
Effects of CeO NPs (200 mg.L) on rice (Oryza sativa L.) alone or co-exposure with cadmium (Cd) and salt (sodium chloride, NaCl) were investigated in hydroponic systems for two weeks. Physiological results show that rice biomass was significantly inhibited when NaCl or CdCl added alone or in co-exposure treatment. CeO NPs significantly relieve the chlorophyll damage under CdCl environmental stress. The presence of CeO NPs alleviated both stressors induced damages to rice as indicated by the reduced proline level. Additionally, CeO NPs triggered the antioxidant defense systems to counteract the oxidative stress caused by NaCl and CdCl. The level of 8-OHdG, one of the most important indicators for genotoxicity, in rice suggest that the presence of CeO NPs reduced the DNA damage in NaCl treated rice. Elemental analysis indicated that co-exposure to NaCl and CdCl slightly decreased the Cd content as compared to the one in the CdCl alone treatment, and this co-exposure also significantly reduced the Na content when comparing with the NaCl alone treatment. Taken together, our findings suggest that CeO NPs could alleviate the CdCl and NaCl stresses, but could not completely change the phenotype of both contaminants treated rice.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[42]
ZHOU P, ZHANG P, HE M, et al. Iron-based nanomaterials reduce cadmium toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by modulating phytohormones, phytochelatin, cadmium transport genes and iron plaque formation[J]. Environmental pollution, 2023, 320:121063.
[43]
HUSSAIN B, LIN Q, HAMINDY, et al. Foliage application of selenium and silicon nanoparticles alleviates Cd and Pb toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 712:136497.
[44]
RIZWAN M, ALI S, REHMAN M Z, et al. Alleviation of cadmium accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) by foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biochar to contaminated soil[J]. Environmental pollution, 2019, 248:358-367.
[45]
LIAN J, ZHAO L, WU J, et al. Foliar spray of TiO2 nanoparticles prevails over root application in reducing Cd accumulation and mitigating Cd-induced phytotoxicity in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 239:124794.
[46]
JI Y, ZHOU Y, MA C, et al. Jointed toxicity of TiO2NPs and Cd to rice seedlings: NPs alleviated Cd toxicity and Cd promoted NPs uptake[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2017, 110:82-93.
[47]
MAJEED A, MUHAMMAD Z. Plant abiotic stress tolerance[M]. Springer international publishing, 2019:83-99.
[48]
TOMAR R S, KATARIA S, JAJOO A. Behind the scene: critical role of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in salt stress tolerance[J]. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 2021, 207(4):577-588.
[49]
NAWAZ F, SHEHZAD M A, MAJEED S, et al. Agronomic crops[M]. Springer Singapore, 2020:129-147.
[50]
NAZ T, IQBAL M M, TAHIR M M, et al. Foliar application of potassium mitigates salinity stress conditions in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) through reducing NaCl toxicity and enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes[J]. Horticulturae, 2021, 7(12):566.
[51]
HAJIHASHEMI S, KAZEMI S. The potential of foliar application of nano-chitosan-encapsulated nano-silicon donor in amelioration the adverse effect of salinity in the wheat plant[J]. BMC plant biology, 2022, 22(1):148.
Nano-materials ameliorate the adverse effect of salinity stress on the physiological and biochemical processes in plants. The present investigation was designed to evaluate the physiological mechanisms through which a nano-chitosan-encapsulated nano-silicon fertilizer (NC-NS) can ameliorate the adverse effect of salinity stress on the wheat plants, and compare it with nano-chitosan (NC) and nano-silicon (NS) application. Nano-silicon was encapsulated with a chitosan-tripolyphosphate (TPP) nano-matrix by ionic gelation method for its slow release. The wheat plants were exposed to foliar application of distilled water, NC, NS, and NC-NS with two NaCl irrigation levels at 0 (distilled water) and 100 mM.The foliar application of NC, NS, and NC-NS induced a significant increase in the function of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems of the wheat plants to equilibrate cellular redox homeostasis by balancing HO content in the leaves and roots, as compared with salt-stressed plants without treatment. The plant's foliar-sprayed with NC, NS, and NC-NS solution exhibited a significant increase in the molecules with osmotic adjustment potentials such as proline, free amino acids, glycine betaine, and sugars to protect cells against osmotic stress-induced by salinity. The observed increase in the antioxidant power and osmoregulatory at NC, NS, and NC-NS application was accompanied by the protection of lipid membrane, proteins and photosynthetic apparatus against salinity stress.In the present study, the beneficial role of NC, NS, and NC-NS application, particularly NC-NS, in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity stress on antioxidant systems and osmotic adjustment in wheat is well documented. An overview of the result of present study assists researchers in providing a potential solution for this increasing salinization threat in crops.© 2022. The Author(s).
[52]
MUSTAFA N, RAJA N I, ILYAS N, et al. Exogenous application of green titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) to improve the germination, physiochemical, and yield parameters of wheat plants under salinity stress[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(15):4884.
[53]
ALSAEEDI A, EL-RAMADY H, ALSHAAL T, et al. Silica nanoparticles boost growth and productivity of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses by balancing nutrients uptake[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2019, 139:1-10.
The role of amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) in enhancing growth and yield of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses was assessed. A field experiment under greenhouse conditions was established using 4 different levels of SiNPs (100, 200, 300 and 400 mg kg) and 3 different watering regimes calculated based on crop evapotranspiration (ET) (100, 85 and 70% of ET). Electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio of irrigation water were 1.7 dS m and 4.63 respectively. The results revealed that SiNPs improved growth and productivity of cucumber regardless of quantity of supplied water; however, the greatest increase corresponded to irrigating cucumber at the rate of 85% of ET. Applying SiNPs at rate of 200 mg kg showed the greatest increase specially when cucumber plants received 85% of their ET causing an increase of 20, 51 and 156% in plant height, chlorophyll and fruit yield, respectively, compared to untreated plants. These increases could be due to alerting nutrient uptake as SiNPs clearly increased contents of nitrogen (by 30%), potassium (by 52, 75 and 41% in root, stem and leaf, respectively) and silicon (by 51, 57, 8 and 78% in root, stem, leaf and fruit, respectively). Otherwise, same treatment reduced sodium uptake by 38, 77 and 38% in root, stem and leaf, respectively; consequently, potassium-sodium ratio increased by 149, 735 and 127% in root, stem and leaf, respectively. The significant role of SiNPs in mitigating water deficit and salinity stresses could be referred to high silicon content found in leaf which regulates water losses via transpiration. Also, high K content found in roots of cucumber helps plants to tolerate abiotic stresses as a result of maintaining ion homeostasis and regulating the osmotic balance as well as controlling stomatal opening which helps plants to adapt to salinity and water deficit stresses.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
[54]
AKRAM N A, SALEEM M H, SHAFIQ S, et al. Phytoextracts as crop biostimulants and natural protective agents—a critical review[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(21):14498.
[55]
EL-BELTAGI H S, AL-OTAIBI H H, PARMAR A, et al. Application of potassium humate and salicylic acid to mitigate salinity stress of common bean[J]. Life, 2023, 13(2):448.
[56]
丁振中, 曾哲灵, 龚劲松, 等. NaCl胁迫下壳寡糖对油菜苗生长的影响[J]. 生物化工, 2018, 4(3):29-33.
[57]
LEE B R, ZAMAN R, AVICE J C, et al. Sulfur use efficiency is a significant determinant of drought stress tolerance in relation to photosynthetic activity in Brassica napus cultivars[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:184350.
[58]
FATOLLAHPOUR G M, RASHIDI V, MIRSHEKARI B, et al. Effects of nano-fertilizers on physiological and yield characteristics of pinto bean cultivars under water deficit stress[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 2020, 43:2898-2910.
[59]
ZAHEDI S M, HOSSEINI M S, DANESHVAR H M N, et al. Mitigation of the effect of drought on growth and yield of pomegranates by foliar spraying of different sizes of selenium nanoparticles[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2021, 101:5202-5213.
[60]
GHIYASI M, REZAEE D Y, AMIRNIA R, et al. Foliar applications of ZnO and its nanoparticles increase safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) growth and yield under water stress[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(1):192.
[61]
HEYDARNEJADIYAN H, MALEKI A, BABAEI F. The effect of zinc and salicylic acid application on grain yield, essential oil and phytochemical properties of fennel plants under drought stress[J]. Journal of essential oil bearing plants, 2020, 23(6):1371-1385.
[62]
SHAHZAD A N, FATIMA A, SARWAR N, et al. Foliar application of potassium sulfate partially alleviates pre-anthesis drought-induced kernel abortion in maize[J]. International journal of agriculture & biology, 2017, 19(3):495-501.
[63]
MAHDAVI K A, MASOUD S J, AMINI D M, et al. Sesame (Sesame indicum L.) biochemical and physiological responses as affected by applying chemical, biological, and nano-fertilizers in field water stress conditions[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 2020, 43(3):456-475.
[64]
MONTALVO D, DEGRYSE F, DA SILVA R C, et al. Agronomic effectiveness of zinc sources as micronutrient fertilizer[J]. Advances in agronomy, 2016, 139:215-267.
[65]
XIAO H, RODRIGUES R R, BONIERBALE M, et al. Foliar application of Fe resonates to the belowground rhizosphere microbiome in Andean landrace potatoes[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2018, 131:89-98.
[66]
李永琪, 李鹏程, 刘爱忠, 等. 棉花叶面施肥研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3):15-19.
[67]
EL-JENDOUBI H, V ÁZQUEZ S, CALATAYUD Á, et al. The effects of foliar fertilization with iron sulfate in chlorotic leaves are limited to the treated area. A study with peach trees (Prunus persica L. Batsch) grown in the field and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) grown in hydroponics[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2014, 5:2.
[68]
韦冬萍, 韦剑锋, 吴炫柯, 等. 叶面追肥对马铃薯干物质积累、营养状况及土壤养分的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2013, 42(8):57-61.
在施肥总量相同基础上,以马铃薯品种合作88号为试材,于现蕾后分别叶面喷施0.5%尿素、0.3%KH2PO4及其混合溶液各3次,每次喷液量为1 500kg/hm2,研究叶面追肥对马铃薯干物质积累、营养状况及土壤养分的影响。结果表明:不同叶面追肥对马铃薯及土壤的影响有较大差异。其中喷施0.5%尿素或0.5%尿素+0.3%KH2PO4处理能明显提高马铃薯干物质积累量、生物产量、鲜薯经济产量及叶片氮含量,但明显降低了土壤有机质、氮及磷含量;喷施0.3%KH2PO4处理对马铃薯叶片和土壤钾含量提高作用最为明显,但显著降低块茎氮、磷及钾含量。可见,在设置试验条件下,叶面追施氮肥的增产效果较好。
[69]
LI C, WANG P, LOMBI E, et al. Absorption of foliar-applied Zn fertilizers by trichomes in soybean and tomato[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2018, 69(10):2717-2729.
The present study investigated the role of trichomes in absorption of foliar-applied zinc fertilizers in soybean and tomato. Using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy for in situ analyses of hydrated leaves, we found that upon foliar application of ZnSO4, Zn accumulated within 15 min in some non-glandular trichomes in soybean, but not in tomato. However, analyses of cross-sections of soybean leaves did not show any marked accumulation of Zn in tissues surrounding trichomes. Furthermore, when near-isogenic lines of soybean differing 10-fold in trichome density were used to compare Zn absorption, it was found that foliar Zn absorption was not related to trichome density. Therefore, it is suggested that trichomes are not part of the primary pathway through which foliar-applied Zn moves across the leaf surface in soybean and tomato. However, this does not preclude trichomes being important in other plant species, as they are known to be highly diverse. We also compared the absorption of Zn when supplied as either ZnSO4, nano-ZnO, or bulk-ZnO, and found that absorption from ZnSO4 was about 10-fold higher than from nano- and bulk-ZnO, suggesting that it was mainly absorbed as soluble Zn. This study improves our understanding of the absorption of foliar-applied nutrients.
[70]
WARAICH E A, AHMAD R, ASHRAF M Y, et al. Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants[J]. Acta Agriculturae scandinavica, section b-soil & plant science, 2011, 61(4):291-304.
[71]
RAJA V, QADIR S U, ALYEMENI M N, et al. Impact of drought and heat stress individually and in combination on physio-biochemical parameters, antioxidant responses, and gene expression in Solanum lycopersicum[J]. Biotech, 2020, 10:1-18.
[72]
ROSSMANN A, BUCHNER P, SAVILL G P, et al. Foliar N application at anthesis alters grain protein composition and enhances baking quality in winter wheat only under a low N fertiliser regimen[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2019, 109:125909.
[73]
KAYA C, ASHRAF M. Foliar fertilization: A potential strategy for improving plant salt tolerance[J]. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 2024, 43(2):94-115.
[74]
RALIYA R, FRANKE C, CHAVALMANE S, et al. Quantitative understanding of nanoparticle uptake in watermelon plants[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:198920.
[75]
HASANUZZAMAN M, FUJITA M, OKU H, et al. Plant nutrients and abiotic stress tolerance[M]. Springer Singapore, 2018:95-117
[76]
ISHFAQ M, KIRAN A, UR-REHMAN H, et al. Foliar nutrition: potential and challenges under multifaceted agriculture[J]. Environmental and experimental botany, 2022, 200:104909.
[77]
BURKHARDT J, BASI S, PARIYAR S, et al. Stomatal penetration by aqueous solutions-an update involving leaf surface particles[J]. New phytologist, 2012, 196(3):774-787.
[78]
DING Y, ZHAO W, ZHU G, et al. Recent trends in foliar nanofertilizers: A review[J]. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(21):2906.
[79]
PATIL B, CHETAN H T. Foliar fertilization of nutrients[J]. Marumegh, 2018, 3(1):49-53.
PDF(1328 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/