Research Progress on Soil Improvement and Fertilization for Recultivation

GUO Mengfan; WANG Chong; QU Mingshan; LIU Lei; NIE Qing; ZHUANG Minghao; LI Ting

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0028

PDF(1139 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (19) : 103-109. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0028

Research Progress on Soil Improvement and Fertilization for Recultivation

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Land recultivation can increase the area of cultivated land, provide a production basis for food security, reduce the occupation of cultivated land resources by non-agricultural land, and help protect agricultural ecology. Compared with the soil cultivated all year round, the recultivated soil has low soil fertility, poor physical structure and poor micro-ecological environment. It is necessary to improve the quality of recultivated soil through subsequent soil improvement technology and fertilization technology. Through the summary of the current soil improvement and fertilization technology in China, the current situation of sustainable utilization of recultivated soil was discussed, and the problems existing in the sustainable utilization of recultivated soil in China were pointed out and targeted suggestions were put forward, so as to provide guidance for better sustainable utilization of recultivated soil and ensure food security. The research showed that the improvement of recultivated soil should be analyzed according to different soil conditions. Suitable soil improvement methods should be selected for construction land, forest land and economic crop land to improve soil quality and improve soil nutrients. Re-tillage soil improvement mainly includes physical, chemical and biological improvement techniques. At present, combined improvement techniques are mostly used. The compound cultivated land could regulate soil nutrient status, improve soil conditions and create a good soil ecological environment for plant growth through fertilization. The main ways include adding organic fertilizer, trace element fertilizer, formula fertilization and agronomic measures to fertilize. In order to further promote the rational utilization of recultivated soil and clarify the improvement and fertilization mechanism of recultivated soil, it is necessary to improve the following aspects: constructing the conservation technology system of re-cultivated soil, and carrying out multi-angle and multi-level comprehensive management of recultivated soil; establishing the quality evaluation index system of recultivated soil; playing the ecological service function of recultivated land.

Key words

soil improvement / plant productivity / soil fertilization / organic fertilizer / trace element fertilizer / formula fertilization

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

GUO Mengfan , WANG Chong , QU Mingshan , et al . Research Progress on Soil Improvement and Fertilization for Recultivation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2025, 41(19): 103-109 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0028

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	宫卫东. 土地复垦存在的问题与对策探究[J]. 城市建筑空间, 2022, 29(S2):70-71. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	BHARTI B, RANA K M, GAUTAM B, et al. Organic amendments for soil reclamation: A review[J]. International journal of environment and climate change, 2023, 13(11):4068-4076. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	杨子江, 杨国和, 蔡春梦. 仿野生青钱柳丰产技术开发[J]. 绿色科技, 2020(3):83-87. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	ALAMEER A A H, ALI I A, A K D A. The effect of organic amendments and minerals on increasing soil fertility (A review)[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, 1262(4). Cited in this article [1]

[5]	孔令冉, 董雯昕, 杨天一, 等. 腐植酸在改良和培肥土壤中的作用[J]. 腐植酸, 2019(1):7-12. Cited in this article [2]

[6]	黎祖交. 建议从国家层面推动杂交构树生态养殖产业大发展——从学习贯彻2024年中央一号文件想到的[J]. 绿色中国, 2024(5):8-17. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	李昕遥. 耕地“非粮化”空间格局分异及影响因素研究——基于中国省际面板数据分析[J]. 现代农业研究, 2023, 29(10):22-28. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	李娜, 田云龙, 张蕾, 等. 中国化肥减量增效行动与技术研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42(1):1-10. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	杨朝磊, 李灿锋, 田瑜峰, 等. 云南省耕地“非粮化”现状及其生态环境效应[J]. 矿产勘查, 2020, 11(12):2573-2591. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	钱莉, 张韬. 基于审计视角的农业面源污染治理优化路径研究——以C市为例[J]. 山东农业工程学院学报, 2024, 41(2):79-85. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	谢治菊, 庄婷, 吴一鸣. “稻虾共作”助推撂荒地复耕增值的经验与建议[J]. 农村工作通讯, 2024(7):55-56. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	张古文, 孙丽霞. 盐碱地里种出致富“金豆子”——菜用大豆“浙农6号”复耕及盐碱地全程机械化生产模式示范应用[J]. 今日科技, 2024(7):54-55. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	沙县:撂荒耕地、山垅田复耕复垦种粮有序推进[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2024, 42(1):40. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	JETSADA W. Growth performance of dipterocarp species planted on abandoned mining area in southern Thailand[J]. Biotropia, 2020, 27(2):115-124. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	KAYNATH A, SHAMIMA I, MOHAN S S. Do farmers use waterlogged wastelands efficiently? An economic study on water chestnut farming in Bangladesh[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022, 30(12):33195-33205. Cited in this article [1]

[16]

LIVIA

A V

, CLAUDIO

, CHIARA

, et al. Translocation of potential toxic elements from soil to black cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) growing in an abandoned mining district area of the Apuan Alps (Tuscany, Italy)[J]. Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020, 42(8):2413-2423.

Cited in this article [1]

[17]	JOSÉ M S, RUBÉN L, A C G, et al. Cultivation of Solanum tuberosum in a former mining district for a safe human consumption integrating simulated digestion[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2017, 97(15):5278-5286. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	冯治凤, 刘斌. 原位化根治技术对景电灌区盐碱地土壤酶活性和玉米籽粒品质的影响[J]. 南方农机, 2024, 55(4):52-55. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	姚毓春, 杨玉前. 东北率先实现农业现代化的优势、困境及路径[J]. 学习与探索, 2024(2):90-97. Cited in this article [1]

[20]

李廷强, 郝点. 我国耕地“非粮化”现状及其复耕培肥技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6):1703-1712.

https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.013

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

近年来,工商资本下乡、土地流转、种植结构调整导致我国耕地“非粮化”现象普遍,直接威胁“18亿亩耕地保护红线”和国家粮食安全。“非粮化”耕地大致分为耕层剥离型和耕层未剥离型两类,前者原有耕层破坏、犁底层缺失,后者可能存在酸化、盐渍化等障碍问题,二者均不同程度地降低土壤肥力,不利于粮食可持续生产。国内外学者针对退化土壤改良做了大量研究,包括客土换土、障碍因子消减、生物培肥等措施,然而针对“非粮化”土壤的整治尚无系统研究成果。本文利用国家统计年鉴数据,结合文献分析,对我国耕地“非粮化”现状及改良、复耕、培肥关键技术进行系统总结,并指出未来的发展方向。

[21]

陈浮, 华子宜, 马静, 等. 耕地“非粮化”对土壤健康的影响及其机理——以徐州市城乡结合部为例[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(11):2210-2221.

https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2023.11.09

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

【目的】本文旨在探明非粮化行为对土壤健康的潜在损害，为科学评估非粮化对耕地生产力和生态功能影响提供科学依据。【方法】利用实地踏勘、采样分析、模型评价和数据统计与分析等方法，从徐州市城乡结合部现状为设施大棚、果园、杨树林、草地、公路景观林和撂荒地等6类典型非粮化田块和对照耕地共采集80个表层土样，测定土壤物理、化学、生物及重金属污染等23项指标，并构建耕地健康评价模型探索非粮化对耕地健康的影响。【结果】研究表明：①非粮化显著改变了土壤理化和生物指标，非粮化土壤纤维二糖水解酶、碱性磷酸酶和细菌多样性指数显著低于对照样（P < 0.05）。设施大棚土壤有机质、总磷、有效磷、有效钾、总氮和硝态氮含量最高，且与其他5种非粮化类型存在显著性差异（P < 0.05）；②与对照样相比，6类非粮化导致耕地土壤生产力、持水净水、碳固存、养分循环和生物多样性等不同的功能或多或少产生失衡，甚至处于亚健康状态；③结构方程模型拟合显示土壤养分、酶活性、生物多样性指数和重金属污染指数主导了非粮化土壤的健康分异。【结论】非粮化对耕地健康有影响，且不同行为的健康损害差异大，这一结果为非粮化分类整治、稳固粮食安全指明了方向。

[22]	BOGDANOV A V, SHATROVA A S, TSYRENDYLYKOVA L B, et al. Use of organomineral sewage sludge for recultivation of disturbed by mining and processing industry lands[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 839(4). Cited in this article [1]

[23]	刘洋. 流转农地中的“两非”问题研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	张韶阳, 樊丹丹, 孔维栋. 增温对干旱区土壤微生物多样性及其固碳功能的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(6):1817-1823. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	田景, 张美玲, 王晨, 等. 基于DAYCENT模型的甘南高寒草甸土壤有机碳含量动态模拟及影响因素的灰色关联度分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2024, 44(6):384-394. Cited in this article [1]

[26]	童永尚, 张春平, 董全民, 等. 氮素形态对高寒人工草地植物群落生物量分配及优势种叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(6):1655-1663. Cited in this article [1]

[27]

陈保冬, 付伟, 伍松林, 等. 菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1):1-20.

https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2023.0075

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

在陆地生态系统中, 土壤、植被与大气之间有着可观的碳交换通量, 陆地生态系统碳循环也和全球气候变化密切关联。菌根真菌可与绝大多数陆地植物建立菌根共生关系, 通过矿质养分-碳交换连接起生态系统地上与地下部分, 深度参与和影响陆地生态系统的碳循环过程。该文从碳的输入, 土壤有机质的形成、稳定和分解等4个关键环节分别论述了菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳循环中的作用。研究表明, 菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳的输入过程中扮演关键角色, 其通过改善植物矿质营养, 参与植物逆境响应, 影响植物的光合作用强度, 以及调控植物多样性与生产力之间的关系等多种途径, 维持或提高植被初级生产力; 大气中的CO₂被植物固定后, 一部分碳经由菌丝网络输送到土壤中, 随后经微生物的分解和转化, 与矿物结合或被团聚体包裹而被稳定在土壤中; 同时, 菌根真菌通过影响根际激发效应和菌丝际生物化学过程, 如分泌特定胞外酶, 与菌丝际微生物互作, 驱动芬顿反应, 以及与腐生微生物竞争等, 调控土壤有机质的分解和转化过程。考虑到菌根真菌对环境和气候变化的敏感性, 该文还探讨了全球变化因子对菌根真菌介导的碳循环过程的影响。最后, 该文对未来研究方向进行了展望, 并提出以下建议: 依托联网研究, 全面解析菌根真菌参与陆地生态系统碳循环的机理过程及其环境依赖性; 加强定量研究, 将菌根真菌的作用纳入生态系统碳循环模型; 构建菌根应用技术体系, 推进菌根真菌的生态和农业应用, 提升陆地生态系统“碳汇”功能, 为实现国家碳中和目标和应对气候变化提供可选择的技术方案。

[28]	王凯, 孙星星, 秦光蔚, 等. 我国土壤改良修复工程技术研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(20):40-48. Cited in this article [1]

[29]	刘庚炜, 高雅琪, 邵泽璇, 等. 土壤盐渍化修复技术研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2024(1):99-107. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	莫爱, 周耀治, 杨建军. 矿山废弃地土壤基质改良研究的现状､问题及对策[J]. 地球环境学报, 2014, 5(4):292-300. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	张鸿龄, 孙丽娜, 孙铁珩, 等. 矿山废弃地生态修复过程中基质改良与植被重建研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(2):460-467. Cited in this article [1]

[32]	李成玉, 程思贤, 马海彬, 等. 豫南砂姜黑土水浇地不同产田土壤理化性状及其与作物产量的相关性[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(4):74-81. Cited in this article [1]

[33]

李泽霞, 陈爱华, 董彦丽. 灌溉方式对半干旱区侧柏人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022(3):61-66.

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为探究黄土高原半干旱区不同灌溉方式对侧柏人工林土壤理化性质的影响，在兰州市小青山水土保持科技示范园区侧柏人工林地选取喷灌、穴灌和漫灌3个灌溉处理开展试验，通过田间试验与室内分析相结合的方法，分析不同灌溉方式下土壤理化指标的变化特征。结果表明，不同处理侧柏人工林土壤含水量、孔隙度及持水量均随土层深度的增加而减小，土壤容重表现出相反的趋势。不同灌溉方式下，喷灌地土壤容重和含水量均小于漫灌地，孔隙度和持水量均大于穴灌地和漫灌地。不同灌溉方式的土壤养分指标也有所不同，土壤有机碳、全氮、水解性氮、速效钾基本均随土层深度的增加而减小，且表现为喷灌地>漫灌地>穴灌地，土壤pH、有效磷变化无明显规律。3种灌溉方式中喷灌改善土壤理化性质的效果最好，是一种更适合于侧柏人工林的灌溉措施。

[34]	邹彤, 林强, 陈志琴, 等. 土壤重金属无机钝化剂及其有机改良化钝化剂对稻田镉钝化和温室气体排放的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2024, 44(5):435-445. Cited in this article [1]

[35]	KURGANOVA I, MERINO A, GERENYU D L V, et al. Mechanisms of carbon sequestration and stabilization by restoration of arable soils after abandonment: A chronosequence study on phaeozems and chernozems[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 354(C):113882. Cited in this article [1]

[36]	徐继隆. 石灰、生物炭对酸性重金属污染土壤的改良效果及环境经济评价[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2022. Cited in this article [1]

[37]	张婷, 石爱丽, 任杰, 等. 粉煤灰在农业中的应用研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(20):127-130. Cited in this article [1]

[38]	杨艳征, 张银鸽, 李畅, 等. 微碱性土壤施用烟秆生物炭与磷酸盐降低小麦籽粒镉积累[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(12):5769-5777. Cited in this article [1]

[39]	李建承, 王奉军, 柴宗越, 等. 兰州新区土壤盐碱化治理与生态保护机制研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022, 33(12):13-15. Cited in this article [1]

[40]	左静. 生物质炭对污染土壤水稻、小麦籽粒镉、铅吸收的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017. Cited in this article [1]

[41]	黄萍, 张武. 不同有机肥施用对西蓝花营养价值及土壤改良的影响[J]. 现代农业研究, 2024, 30(1):63-67. Cited in this article [1]

[42]	厉桂香, 于田利, 牛超然, 等. 园林废弃物资源化利用及堆肥技术研究进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2023, 46(24):120-122. Cited in this article [1]

[43]	秦文淑, 王莉, 田甜, 等. 有机肥结构特征对污染土壤Cd形态的影响[J]. 四川环境, 2014, 33(4):24-28. Cited in this article [1]

[44]	ZAID K, YANG X J, FU Y Q, et al. Engineered biochar improves nitrogen use efficiency via stabilizing soil water-stable macroaggregates and enhancing nitrogen transformation[J]. Biochar, 2023, 5(1). Cited in this article [1]

[45]	孟磊, 霍汉鑫, 李昊, 等. 土壤改良剂对废弃离子型稀土矿酸性沙化土壤改良效果研究[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分), 2020, 72(6):93-96. Cited in this article [1]

[46]	张晓. 基于铁改性生物炭的复合材料对硫化铜矿酸性土壤特性及金属离子固定机理研究[D]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2024. Cited in this article [1]

[47]	王旭东, 任雪冰, 汤舒, 等. 污泥生物炭在土壤改良中的应用研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6):165-173. Cited in this article [1]

[48]	曹子璇. 石油污染土壤的生物修复技术研究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2023, 41(9):131-133. Cited in this article [1]

[49]	李慧文, 向华. 微生物功能菌肥在重金属污染土壤改良中的应用研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2018(9):66-68. Cited in this article [1]

[50]	裴佳楠. 微生物强化植物修复铅污染土壤研究[J]. 工业微生物, 2024, 54(1):54-56. Cited in this article [1]

[51]

X X

, LIU

J Y

, LIU

X S

, et al. Optimizing phosphorus application rate and the mixed inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria can improve the phosphatase activity and organic acid content in alfalfa soil[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(18):11342.

Cited in this article [1]

[52]	林晓燕, 梁鹏, 熊云武, 等. 景观植物结合改良剂修复盐和锌锰复合污染土壤[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(2):140-146. Cited in this article [1]

[53]	黄河, 张超兰, 周永信, 等. 芘污染土壤的根瘤菌-植物修复效应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(7):1466-1472. https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.07.021 Cited in this article [1] Abstract 可下载PDF全文。

[54]	高宪雯. 微生物—植物在石油—重金属复合污染土壤修复中的作用研究[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2013. Cited in this article [1]

[55]	胡安然. 不同植物-改良剂协同修复对干旱矿区土壤的改良效果[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2023. Cited in this article [1]

[56]	汤宗光. 蚯蚓在我国生态农业中的应用及研究进展[J]. 现代农村科技, 2023(6):95-96. Cited in this article [1]

[57]	郭富强, 潘磊, 戴家生. 土壤镉(Cd)污染的生物修复技术[J]. 浙江国土资源, 2021(S1):1-5. Cited in this article [1]

[58]	JAVIER H E, ANAHÍ D, CAMILO J B. Large-scale ecologically-based farming systems foster earthworm communities and their contribution to ecosystem processes[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2023, 185. Cited in this article [1]

[59]	雒军. 减氮配施有机肥/凹凸棒石对当归产量和品质的影响及机制研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃中医药大学, 2022. Cited in this article [1]

[60]	张嫒嫒. 有机肥施用37年后土壤理化性质与环境效应分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2023. Cited in this article [1]

[61]	PALLAVI B, ANUPAM D, SUBORNA C R, et al. Soil aggregation controls biological activities on long-term integration of organic amendments and inorganic fertilizers in rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2023, 54(13):1865-1876. Cited in this article [1]

[62]	赵峻锋. 马铃薯田有机肥施用对土壤物理性状及团聚体有机碳的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2023. Cited in this article [1]

[63]	乔丙颖, 胥婷婷, 张洋, 等. 不同有机肥替代比例对青稞产量、养分利用和土壤性质的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2024, 41(5):1062-1070. Cited in this article [1]

[64]	SINGH P, SUYAL C D, KUMAR S, et al. Long-term organic farming impact on soil nutrient status and grain yield at the foothill of Himalayas[J]. Frontiers in environmental science, 2024, 12:1378926. Cited in this article [1]

[65]	于菲. 长期施用有机肥对松嫩平原西部盐碱土壤肥力和玉米产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2024. Cited in this article [1]

[66]	GIOACCHINI P, BALDI E, MONTECCHIO D, et al. Effect of long-term compost fertilization on the distribution of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates[J]. Catena, 2024, 240:107968. Cited in this article [1]

[67]	邱诗春, 周静, 卿晨, 等. 有机肥用量对水稻产量、净光合速率及土壤生物活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(22):107-113. Cited in this article [1]

[68]	胡岚, 梁波, 陈云峰, 等. 长期施用不同肥料对橘园土壤生物群落结构的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(1):80-87. Cited in this article [1]

[69]	刘梦圆. 农产品质量安全责任保险对农户绿色生产行为的影响及机制研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2023. Cited in this article [1]

[70]	朱娜. 番茄测土配方施肥技术探讨[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2015. Cited in this article [1]

[71]	赵颖. 韩城市设施蔬菜配方施肥技术应用效果研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022. Cited in this article [1]

[72]	陈艳芬. 榆林市马铃薯和玉米测土配方施肥技术研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021. Cited in this article [1]

[73]	VARUN P, NAVEEN D, PAL S D, et al. Long-term effect of prescription-based fertilization on culturable soil microorganisms and carbon dynamics in Northwest Himalayas[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2024, 55(3):398-410. Cited in this article [1]

[74]	贾雪岚. 蔬菜施用微肥关键技术[J]. 河南农业, 2024(5):24-25. Cited in this article [1]

[75]	王秀俊, 曹秀芝. 旱直播水稻苗期生长异常的原因及对策[J]. 农技服务, 2009, 26(9):33. Cited in this article [1]

[76]	LIU Y M, LIU D Y, ZHAO Q Y, et al. Zinc fractions in soils and uptake in winter wheat as affected by repeated applications of zinc fertilizer[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2020, 200:104612. Cited in this article [1]

[77]	孙丹阳. 微肥长期应用的土壤环境效应评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2024. Cited in this article [1]

[78]	WANG S Z, XU L, HAO M D. Impacts of long-term micronutrient fertilizer application on soil properties and micronutrient availability[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022, 19(23):16358. Cited in this article [1]

[79]	李丽霞. 微肥对作物产量、品质的影响及其生态环境效应[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006. Cited in this article [1]

[80]

周国勤, 申冠宇, 陈真真, 等. 微量元素对小麦产量品质的影响研究[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(1):11-15.

https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0118

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为探究微量元素钼、锌不同施肥方式对小麦灌浆速率以及产量的影响，为生产中科学配施微量元素提供理论依据，以‘郑麦113’为试验材料，设置不同的锌肥施肥方式和钼肥的施用，分别是：CK：N15-P₂O₅10-K₂O10，底追比4:6；Z1：在N15-P₂O₅10-K₂O10（底追比4:6）基础上，底施7.5 kg/hm²的钼酸铵；Z2：在N15-P₂O₅10-K₂O10（底追比4:6）基础上，底施7.5 kg/hm²的钼酸铵和15 kg/hm²的硫酸锌；Z3：在N15-P₂O₅10-K₂O10（底追比4:6）和底施7.5 kg/hm²的钼酸铵的基础上，返青期、拔节期叶面喷施7.5 kg/hm²的硫酸锌；Z4：在N15-P₂O₅10-K₂O10（底追比4:6）和底施7.5 kg/hm²的钼酸铵的基础上，灌浆期叶面喷施 7.5 kg/hm²的硫酸锌肥两次（小麦扬花结束后4天喷第一次，隔一周后喷第二次）。分析微量元素钼、锌对小麦产量和品质的影响。结果表明：与CK相比，钼肥的施用，提高了小麦产量、蛋白质含量以及湿面筋含量。其中锌肥作为底肥撒施，提升最明显，提高小麦灌浆速率和产量。施用微量元素可以促进小麦生长发育，达到提质丰产效果。

[81]	刘春奎. 钼锌配施对冬小麦的作用及其机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021. Cited in this article [1]

[82]	田贵荣. 农机农艺结合对提高小麦机播质量的影响[J]. 南方农机, 2024, 55(7):63-65. Cited in this article [1]

[83]	申丽霞, 孙雪岚. 山西省有机旱作农业实施成效及发展对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(9):201-204. Cited in this article [1]

[84]	罗优, 韩天华, 蒋朝臣, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤养分和烟草生长发育的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(7):68-71. Cited in this article [1]

[85]

于淑慧, 朱国梁, 牟小翎, 等. 花生与绿肥轮作对土壤含水量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(8):74-79.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0340

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

探讨在冬春裸地上种植绿肥对后茬作物春花生养分含量、土壤含水量和土壤肥力的影响，为山东地区春花生等冬闲田建立一种合理的轮作方式提供理论依据。在田间试验条件下，设置了春花生—冬闲田、夏花生—冬小麦、春花生—二月兰和春花生—毛叶苕子4种轮作处理。结果表明：种植二月兰和毛叶苕子绿肥作物，可促进后茬作物花生氮磷钾养分增加，二月兰增加程度高于毛叶苕子。种植二月兰和毛叶苕子绿肥作物，可提高后茬作物花生土壤含水量和土壤肥力，在0~20 cm土层中，2021年，与春花生—冬闲田相比，春花生—二月兰、春花生—毛叶苕子土壤相对含水量分别升高了4.70%、6.14%，在20~40、40~60 cm土层中也表现出相似趋势，2022年与2021年相比，表现出相似规律；与春花生—冬闲田相比，春花生—二月兰处理有机质、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾含量平均增加了5.71%、8.98%、7.22%和7.72%，春花生—毛叶苕子处理有机质、碱解氮含量平均增加了4.54%、14.91%。可以利用春花生种植期间的冬春裸地种植一季冬绿肥，促进后茬作物养分积累量增加，改善土壤肥力。

[86]	MA D K, YIN L N, JU W L, et al. Meta-analysis of green manure effects on soil properties and crop yield in northern China[J]. Field crops research, 2021,266. Cited in this article [1]