Determination for Fertilizer Rate and Compound Fertilizer Ratio for Black Soil Farming

ZHOUDaowei, LIQiang, HUJuan, YUDafu, SHIJibo

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 103-112.

PDF(1306 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1306 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 103-112. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0029

Determination for Fertilizer Rate and Compound Fertilizer Ratio for Black Soil Farming

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to simplify the determination method of fertilizer application rate and accurately match the types and proportions of fertilizers. Utilizing a modified formula for calculating fertilizer rate, a trade-off selection method for determining fertilizer rate and a relative abundance method for matching type ratios were established. The trade-off selection method was used to calculate the required fertilizer rate for planting corn, wheat, and peanuts in sandy black calcareous soil, loamy black calcareous soil, and typical black soil in the Northeast Black Soil Region, which are close to the actual local fertilizer rate and indicate that the local fertilizer rate are not excessive. The relative abundance method was used to calculate the mixing or compound fertilizer ratios needed for different crops in various plots, recommending a N:P2O5:K2O ratio of 25:10:15 for preparing mixed or compound fertilizers for corresponding soil types in the Northeast Black Soil Region to match suitable fertilizer rate. Under the scenario where the amount of available nutrients supplied from the soil equals the loss from the applied fertilizer, the fertilization rate should follow the principle,how much is needed for crops growing, how much to apply.

Key words

fertilizer rate / type ratio / trade-off selection method / relative abundance method / black soil

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHOU Daowei , LI Qiang , HU Juan , et al . Determination for Fertilizer Rate and Compound Fertilizer Ratio for Black Soil Farming[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(2): 103-112 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0029

References

[1]
陈伦寿. 农田施肥原理与实践[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1984.
[2]
黄建国. 植物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2015.
[3]
白由路. 测土配方施肥原理与实践[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
[4]
陈新平, 张福锁. 通过“3414”试验建立测土配方施肥技术指标体系[J]. 中国农技推广, 2006(4):36-39.
[5]
农业农村部. 农业部关于印发《测土配方施肥技术规范(2011年修订版)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2011-09-22). https://www.moa.gov.cn/ztzl/ctpfsf/gzdt/201109/t20110922_2293389.htm.
[6]
王圣瑞, 陈新平, 高祥照, 等. “3414”肥料试验模型拟合的探讨[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(4):409-413.
[7]
杜君, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 等. 养分平衡法在冬小麦测土推荐施肥中的应用研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(1):7-13.
[8]
孙晋鑫, 黄高鉴, 郭军玲, 等. 氮磷钾不同配比对知母产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(11):33-39.
[9]
纪志超, 王欣欣, 王连会, 等. 荞麦—大豆轮作条件下不同配比N、P、K肥对作物产量与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(3):213-217.
[10]
梁紫薇, 黄少珍, 曾瑞锟, 等. 肥料用量和养分配比对蔬菜生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(22):94-102.
选择深圳市郊区常年连作菜地,采用田间小区试验方法,设置对照、常规施肥、减量施肥10%、优化施肥(减量施肥50%,氮磷钾优化配比)等不同处理,研究不同肥料用量和养分配比条件下减施化肥对蔬菜生长及土壤肥力的影响。试验以叶菜为供试蔬菜,连续种植2茬。结果表明,与不施肥处理相比,施肥显著增加蔬菜产量和氮、磷、钾养分吸收量,肥料增产贡献率为32.3%~37.7%,且化肥减施与常规施肥处理之间肥料贡献率无显著差异。常规施肥模式下蔬菜氮、磷、钾养分利用率分别为13.98%、5.39%、31.95%,优化施肥相比常规施肥显著提高蔬菜磷肥和钾肥利用率1.87倍、26.3%。施肥对土壤pH、有机质含量无明显影响,常规施肥、减量施肥10%提高土壤碱解氮含量12.27%~27.83%、有效磷含量26.49%~44.24%、速效钾含量13.17%~35.30%。与常规施肥相比,优化施肥显著降低土壤有效磷含量19.96%~23.65%、速效钾含量22.29%~23.23%。各处理土壤综合肥力指数为1.34~1.43,均属于II级水平,连续2茬短期施肥管理对土壤肥力指数无显著影响。总体上,常年连作菜地系统优化施肥即化肥减施50%并优化氮磷钾养分投入比例,可在蔬菜产量不降低的情况下维持土壤肥力水平,降低土壤有效磷累积导致的面源污染风险。
[11]
孙义祥, 郭跃升, 于舜章, 等. 应用“3414”试验建立冬小麦测土配方施肥指标体系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(1):197-203.
[12]
沙清, 赵忠东. 现行的“养分平衡法”施肥配方计算公式的重大缺陷[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2012(3):102-103.
[13]
HOLECHEK J L. Range management, principles and practices[M]. 6th ed. NewJersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 2011.
[14]
COLLINS M. Forages: An introduction to grassland agriculture[M]. 7th ed. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.2018.
[15]
周道玮, 田雨, 胡娟, 等. 草地农业基础[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
[16]
STANFORD G. Rationale for optimum nitrogen fertilization in corn production.[J]. Journal of environmental quality 1973, 2(2):159-165.
[17]
WOODARD J, BLY C. Relationship of nitrogen management to winter wheat yield and grain protein in South Dakota[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 1998, 21:2,217-233.
[18]
MORRIS T F, MURRELL T S, BEEGLE D. et al. Strengths and limitations of nitrogen rate recommendations for corn and opportunities for improvement[J]. Agronomy journal, 2018, 110(1):1-137.
\nNitrogen recommendations for individual corn fields are less accurate than desired.
[19]
周鸣铮, 中国的测土施肥[J]. 土壤通报, 1987(1):7-11.
[20]
余常兵, 李志玉, 廖伯寿, 等. 湖北省花生平衡施肥技术研究Ⅵ:花生氮肥用量[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(4):677-678.
[21]
GOULDING K, JARVIS S, WHITMORE A. Optimizing nutrient management for farm systems[J]. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences, 2008, 363:667-680.
Increasing the inputs of nutrients has played a major role in increasing the supply of food to a continually growing world population. However, focusing attention on the most important nutrients, such as nitrogen (N), has in some cases led to nutrient imbalances, some excess applications especially of N, inefficient use and large losses to the environment with impacts on air and water quality, biodiversity and human health. In contrast, food exports from the developing to the developed world are depleting soils of nutrients in some countries. Better management of all essential nutrients is required that delivers sustainable agriculture and maintains the necessary increases in food production while minimizing waste, economic loss and environmental impacts. More extensive production systems typified by ‘organic farming’ may prove to be sustainable. However, for most of the developed world, and in the developing world where an ever-growing population demands more food, it will be essential to increase the efficiency of nutrient use in conventional systems. Nutrient management on farms is under the control of the land manger, the most effective of whom will already use various decision supports for calculating rates of application to achieve various production targets. Increasingly, land managers will need to conform to good practice to achieve production targets and to conform to environmental targets as well.
[22]
TOSELLI M, BALDI E, FERRO F, et al. Smart farming tool for monitoring nutrients in soil and plants for precise fertilization[J]. Horticulturae, 2023, 9:1011.
The current political, social, and economic conditions place, more than ever, the need to sustainably supply nutrients for plants, integrating low-impact, crop-adapted, variable-rate-application fertilizer solutions, at the center of attention. Fertilization plans should be based on the monitoring of soil fertility to address the proper rate of fertilizer application along with the development of techniques able to increase nutrient uptake efficiency. Monitoring and modelling analysis of the effects of agronomic management in different pedoclimatic conditions can provide several advantages, that include higher nutrient efficiency, increase in plant growth and yield, decreased fertilization costs, increased profit, reduced environmental impact. This approach should enter into a framework of precision farming methodologies for the distribution of nutrients adopted at different levels (region, farm, field, plot), to obtain the maximum efficiency of inputs.
[23]
陈尚谨. 北平地区人尿利用之研究1:人尿,人粪干与硫酸铵氮肥肥效之比较[J]. 土壤学报, 1948, 48(1):83-88.
[24]
南京农学院兴化样板工作组, 江苏省里下河地区“沤改旱”种绿肥的经验[J]. 土壤学报, 1966, 14(2):189-194.
[25]
黄德明. 大田肥料试验设计与数据处理[J]. 农业科技资料, 1978(6):29-38.
[26]
杨熙仁. 肥料的增产效应与经济合理施肥[J]. 土壤通报, 1982(5):29-32.
[27]
李仁岗. 根据肥料效应函数确定经济合理施肥量[J]. 土壤通报, 1983(3):24-28.
[28]
MIAO Y X, BOBBY A, ZHANG F S. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China, A review[J]. Agronomy for sustainable development, 2011, 31(2):397-414.
[29]
MEENA R S. Nutrient dynamics for sustainable crop production[M]. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2020.
[30]
BAUM E M, SAWYER E J, NAFZIGER D E, et al. The optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate for maize in the US Midwest is increasing[J]. Nature communications, 2025, 16(1):404.
[31]
张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
[32]
李慧, 徐明岗, 朱平, 等. 长期培肥我国典型黑土玉米氮肥效应的演变趋势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报2015, 21(6):1506-1513.
[33]
AHMED S E, AHMED S E, AHMED I A, et al. Traditional, modern, and molecular strategies for improvingthe efciency of nitrogen use in crops for sustainable agriculture: a fresh look at an old issue[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2022, 22:3130-3156.
Reactive nitrogen (N) plays a pivotal role in supplying N to plants and soil microbes, but it has negative environmental impacts through influencing the quality of water and air, which in turn influences human health. Thus, there is an urgent necessity to maximize N benefits while reducing the negative impacts on the environment. Improving crop N use efficiency (NUE) is required for environmental conservation and agricultural sustainability. Thus, the pivotal objective of this article is to introduce the modern developments and imminent prospects of improving crops NUE using various complementary methods. Here, the approaches of site-specific N management, use of synthetic and biological nitrification inhibitors, microbial nitrate (NO3−) immobilization stimulation, and stimulation of the dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), adopting agroforestry system, breeding techniques, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, omics approaches, and potential new targets and overexpression of N-related genes were presented as effective approaches to improving NUE. Optimal rate, time, application methods, using specially formulated forms of fertilizer, and using nitrification inhibitors are the most agricultural practices linked with improving NUE. The fertilizer recommendations could be often justified across the field rather than a uniform application using spatial variability of nutrient content. Restoring soil NO3−retention capacity and adopting agroforestry system can also be promising ways to improve NUE. Furthermore, the use of genetic modification or the development of new cultivars that use N more efficiently is critical. In addition, omics data, including transcriptomics and metabolomics, not only advance our current understanding of N reactions but also help us move towards strategies, which are more effective in improving NUE and enhancing crop production. In conclusion, this article strongly advocates the use of integrated approaches with a private insight of genetics and agricultural management when managing N.
[34]
马若男, 李强, 周道玮. 农田氮肥残留效应及其影响因素[J]. 土壤与作物, 2024, 13(2):201-214.
[35]
李仁岗, 王淑敏, 王克武, 等, 冬小麦对土壤氮和肥料氮的吸收及氮素平衡的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 1982(4):21-22.
PDF(1306 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/