PDF(1291 KB)
Effects of Soil Conditioners and Microbial Agents on Safe Utilization of Cadmium-Arsenic Co-contaminated Dryland
LIURunmei, ZHOUGuoping, WANGFuzheng, SONGRuihu, HUXinggang, TANGJunyun
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 128-135.
PDF(1291 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(1291 KB)
Effects of Soil Conditioners and Microbial Agents on Safe Utilization of Cadmium-Arsenic Co-contaminated Dryland
To explore the safe utilization strategies for Cd and As co-contaminated pepper fields with excessive cadmium content, without modifying existing agricultural practices or compromising soil productivity, this study evaluated the effects of three amendments, namely Vedikang soil conditioner (WDK), Tuchuanbingke microbial agent (TCBK) and Jiangsu Tianxiang microbial agent (JSTX), on heavy metal dynamics in the soil-pepper system. The results showed that (1) WDK, TCBK and JSTX significantly reduced soil Cd content by 0.05-0.09 mg/kg (P<0.05) while increasing soil Cr content by 3.7-14.4 mg/kg (P<0.05). Notably, WDK and JSTX decreased soil As concentrations by 2.7 and 3.9 mg/kg, respectively, whereas TCBK exhibited a marginal As increment of 0.6 mg/kg (P<0.05). The effects of the three materials on the contents of mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb) in the soil were not significant (P>0.05). (2) Although Cd reductions in current-season peppers were statistically insignificant (0.018-0.027 mg/kg, P<0.05), all treatments significantly diminished Cd accumulation in previous-season peppers by 0.068-0.077 mg/kg (P<0.01). No significant alterations in Pb levels were observed across treatments, and Hg, As and Cr remained undetectable in pepper fruits. WDK and JSTX significantly increased the yield of peppers by 32.2% and 15.7%, respectively, while TCBK significantly reduced the yield by 7.8% (P<0.05). In summary, all three treatments, WDK, TCBK and JSTX, were effective in reducing soil Cd content and increasing soil Cr content, but their effects on soil As varied depending on the material, and had no significant impact on soil Hg and Pb. All three treatments could significantly reduce the Cd content of peppers in both current and previous seasons, but had no significant effect on the Pb content of peppers. WDK and JSTX could significantly increase the yield, while TCBK significantly reduced it.
microbial agents / soil conditioner / heavy metal / dryland / pepper
| [1] |
王寅, 谢荣焕, 李伟平, 等. 地块尺度农田重金属污染程度与来源分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(9):1979-1992.
|
| [2] |
李英, 商建英, 黄益宗, 等. 镉砷复合污染土壤钝化材料研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(4):837-850.
|
| [3] |
陈卫平, 杨阳, 谢天, 等. 中国农田土壤重金属污染防治挑战与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(2):261-272.
|
| [4] |
曾思燕, 于昊辰, 马静, 等. 中国耕地表层土壤重金属污染状况评判及休耕空间权衡[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(4):1036-1047.
|
| [5] |
易诗懿, 李笑诺, 陈欣悦, 等. 基于“源-径-汇”关系的土壤重金属污染风险空间区划研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(5):1323-1338.
|
| [6] |
李诗怡, 茹东周, 房友田, 等. 硅-铁改性生物质炭对水土环境中镉砷的吸附及钝化机制研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(6):1591-1604.
|
| [7] |
王一锟, 梁婷, 周国朋, 等. 不同生物质炭的镉吸附特征及对云南土壤镉污染的调控效应[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(1):151-162.
|
| [8] |
段路路, 杨一, 房朋, 等. 我国不同肥料品种中砷、铬、铅、镉、汞和铊的含量与评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(6):1152-1162.
|
| [9] |
王苗, 和丽萍, 和淑娟, 等. 丽江高铬区土壤-白菜铬迁移特征与阈值研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(7):1475-1482.
|
| [10] |
刘杏梅, 赵健, 徐建明. 污染农田土壤的重金属钝化技术研究——基于Web of Science数据库的计量分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(2):445-455.
|
| [11] |
谭梦迪, 冯天骄, 王平, 等. 近30年微生物菌剂改良土壤的研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2025,DOI:10.11766/trxb202401110020.
|
| [12] |
许立阳, 王亚男, 曾希柏, 等. 微生物菌肥对瘠薄稻田土壤养分及水稻生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(10):2350-2362.
|
| [13] |
陈娱, 王海娟, 王宏镔. 龙葵与3种外来入侵植物对Cd的富集和生理响应差异比较[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(9):1939-1950.
|
| [14] |
曹迟, 鲍广灵, 陶荣浩, 等. 不同调理剂对富硒高镉农田水稻降镉增硒效果研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(10):2155-2164.
|
| [15] |
唐乐斌, 黄凤艳, 吴辰润, 等. 土施调理剂联合叶喷阻隔剂下镉污染水田的安全利用效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(10):2288-2295.
|
| [16] |
王宇, 宋一凡, 张荣, 等. 土壤施用钝化剂与复合微生物肥对冬小麦镉积累的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(1):126-141.
|
| [17] |
周雪萍, 简桂宏, 程细江, 等. 珠三角典型重金属污染农田土壤调理剂筛选田间试验研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(9):1969-1978.
|
| [18] |
汪洁, 朱有为, 杨肖娥, 等. 农用地土壤可持续安全利用的研究与实践——以浙江省镉污染农田为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(6):1662-1674.
|
| [19] |
占楠彪, 谷端银, 李婷, 等. 中轻度重金属污染农田土壤的时空特征及改良[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(2):294-307.
|
| [20] |
曹巧滢, 江家泉, 王学江, 等. 新型碱性肥料治酸改土降镉的效果和机理[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(1):175-188.
|
| [21] |
卢维宏, 张乃明, 苏友波, 等. 联合施肥对复合污染农田水稻As、Cd吸收的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(10):2217-2226.
|
| [22] |
吴拓铮, 詹娟, 周嘉文, 等. 滇东地质高背景区土壤镉的伴矿景天修复及其对后茬水稻的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(5):1349-1359.
|
| [23] |
张雅睿, 黄益宗, 徐峰, 等. 螯合剂和有机酸对商陆修复镉砷污染农田的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(9):1936-1944.
|
| [24] |
景睿, 裴楠, 狄雪荣, 等. 赤铁矿与巯基坡缕石复配对砷镉复合污染土壤修复效应研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(2):285-293.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |