Effects of Different Amounts of Biochar-based Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Yield and Quality of Celery

LIU Yu; ZHANG Mengjia; WANG Rui; ZHANG Xuelian; JIN Qiang; YAN Shi; WANG Weirui

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0215

PDF(1359 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 141-145. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0215

Effects of Different Amounts of Biochar-based Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Yield and Quality of Celery

Author information +

History +

Abstract

To explore the effects of different biochar-based fertilizers on soil properties and celery yield in facility settings, a plot experiment was used to compare the single application of organic fertilizer (T₁), the single application of biochar (T₂, the amount of biochar was 12 t/hm²), and the combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer (T₃ to T₅, with biochar application rates of 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 t/hm²) on soil nutrients, celery yield and quality. The results showed that the T₄ treatment had the highest celery yield and the lowest nitrate content, which was beneficial to increasing yield and income. In terms of soil nutrients, the application of biochar increased soil organic matter and available potassium to varying degrees, but reduced soil available phosphorus content and EC value, with little effect on total nitrogen content. The increase in organic matter content compared to T₁was 1.41% to 12.54%, and the increase in available potassium content was 4.13% to 9.81%. Regarding soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, the combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer in all treatments (T₃ to T₅) significantly increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 15.60%, 3.24% and 14.40%, respectively; only the T₄ treatment increased soil microbial biomass carbon content compared to T₁. In conclusion, the combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer can improve soil physical and chemical properties and microbial activity to varying degrees, increase celery yield and quality. In the experiment, the application of 12 t/hm² of commercial organic fertilizer and 3.0 t/hm² of biochar had the best overall effect.

Key words

biochar / soil properties / yield / quality / celery

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LIU Yu , ZHANG Mengjia , WANG Rui , et al . Effects of Different Amounts of Biochar-based Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Yield and Quality of Celery[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(2): 141-145 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0215

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	闫实, 于跃跃, 梁金凤, 等. 京郊设施菜地施肥和土壤肥力现状初探[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(5):125-133. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	郭佩瑶, 刘美玲, 曾玉华. 设施土壤连作障碍及其防控措施研究进展[J]. 西北园艺, 2023(2):1-5. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	刘玉学, 刘微, 吴伟祥, 等. 土壤生物质炭环境行为与环境效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(4):977-982. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	孙宇龙, 张永利, 苏有健, 等. 生物质炭对土壤物理结构性状和水分特征影响的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(23):25-32. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	王亚琼, 牛文全, 李学凯, 等. 生物质炭对日光大棚土壤团聚体结构的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4):190-195. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	杨莉, 勾颖, 文子伟, 等. 生物质炭对连作参地土壤肥力及微生物特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 3(6):1244-1253. Cited in this article [2]

[7]	邢存芳, 侯建伟, 杨莉琳. 生物质炭对花椒根际土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(5):1098-1106. Cited in this article [2]

[8]	朱培蕾, 仇建玲, 周怀文, 等. 化肥减施下不同生物质炭对大棚辣椒生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2024(6):101-106. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	李大伟, 周加顺, 潘根兴, 等. 生物质炭基肥施用对蔬菜产量和品质以及氮素农学利用率的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(3):433-440. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	张影, 刘星, 焦瑞锋, 等. 生物质炭与有机物料配施的土壤培肥效果及对玉米生长的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9):1287-1297. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	孙宇龙, 张永利, 苏有健, 等. 生物质炭对土壤物理结构性状和水分特征影响的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(23) :25-32. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	马晓霞, 王莲莲, 黎青慧, 等. 长期施肥对玉米生育期土壤微生物量碳氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17):5502-5511. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	ROY S, SINGH J S. Consequences of habitat heterogeneity for availability of nutrients in a dry tropical forest[J]. Journal of ecology, 1994(82):503-509. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	赵泽州, 王晓玲, 李鸿博, 等. 生物质炭基肥缓释性能及对土壤改良的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(5):886-897. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	YIN D W, YANG X Y, WANG H Z, et al. Effects of chemical-based fertilizer replacement with biochar-based fertilizer on albic soil nutrient content and maize yield[J]. Open life sciences, 2022(17):517-528. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	方远鹏, 谢晏芬, 赵宇婷, 等. 不同生物质炭基肥施用量对土壤养分及烤烟质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(10):14-20. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	张文玲, 李桂花, 高卫东. 生物质炭对土壤性状和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(17):153-157. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	徐阳春, 沈其荣, 冉炜. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(1):89-96. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	马晓霞, 王莲莲, 黎青慧, 等. 长期施肥对玉米生育期土壤微生物量碳氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17)):5502-5511. Cited in this article [1]

[20]

沈芳芳, 张哲, 袁颖红, 等. 生物质炭配施有机肥对旱地红壤酶活性及其微生物群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(18):65-74.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0502

Cited in this article [2] Abstract

研究生物质炭配施有机肥对旱地的土壤养分的影响,可为旱地农作物的土壤改良提供理论依据。针对中亚热带第四纪红黏土发育的旱地红壤,本研究通过室内培养试验,向土壤中施用生物质炭配施有机肥,探索土壤微生物生物量碳和氮(MBC、MBN)、酶活性（脲酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶）和微生物群落组成的变化。试验共设置5种处理,分别为对照(CK,0 g/kg)、水稻生物质炭配施有机肥(RM,50 g/kg)、玉米生物质炭配施有机肥(CM,50 g/kg)、小麦生物质炭配施有机肥(WM,50 g/kg)和单施有机肥(M,40 g/kg)。为尽量消除误差,试验数据采用归一化处理,即实测值减CK值后除以各处理所添加的C、N量。结果表明：生物质炭配施有机肥(RM、CM、WM)处理均显著降低了旱地红壤MBC、MBN含量、脲酶活性和总PLFAs量,以WM处理的降幅最大,降幅分别是单施有机肥（M处理）的33.89%、69.03%、47.62%和23.30%;RM处理显著提高了蔗糖酶和过氧化氢酶活性,升幅分别是M处理的91.49%和28.94%。相比单施有机肥,生物质炭配施有机肥降低了土壤总PLFAs含量（平均为-16.89%）、真菌PLFA (-38.17%)、土壤真菌PLFA/细菌PLFA比值(F/B)(-40.63%)和土壤革兰氏阴性菌PLFA/革兰氏阳性菌PLFA比值(G<sup>-</sup>/G<sup>+</sup>)(-4.3%),而提高了土壤细菌PLFA (+5.18%)、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(+0.38%)和土壤细菌压力指数(BSI,+11%)。主成分分析表明RM处理与其他处理之间差异较大。综之,不同物料生物质炭配施有机肥引起土壤微生物量、酶活性和微生物群落组成的变化差异较大,其中影响最大的是水稻生物质炭配施有机肥处理,可为温室气体减排提供参考。

[21]	芮绍云, 袁颖红, 周际海, 等. 改良剂对旱地红壤微生物量碳、氮及可溶性有机碳、氮的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(5):260-265. Cited in this article [1]