Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes

QIShuokun, ZHANGYiyang, MAYu, LIUHaolin, SHIJuncong, WULongguo

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 56-69.

PDF(1909 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1909 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 56-69. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0315

Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To explore the regulatory effects of brackish water irrigation concentrations on plant growth and fruit quality of tomato in the arid regions of Northwest China, a pot experiment was conducted using the cherry tomato cultivar ‘Xiangfei No.3’ as the test material. Four NaCl brackish water irrigation gradients were set: 0 g/L (CK), 1 g/L (T1), 2 g/L (T2), and 3 g/L (T3). We systematically analyzed the impacts of different treatments on tomato growth indicators (including plant height and stem diameter) and fruit quality indicators (such as soluble sugar, lycopene, organic acids, and sugar-acid ratio), followed by a comprehensive evaluation via principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that moderate brackish water irrigation significantly promoted tomato growth; the plant heights of T1, T2, and T3 treatments were all higher than that of CK at the mature stage. The T1 treatment exhibited the most significant promotion effect on soluble sugar accumulation, with the soluble sugar contents in the 1st to 5th ear fruits at the mature stage increased by 38.24%, 30.56%, 26.47%, 34.29%, and 24.14% respectively compared with CK. The T2 treatment significantly increased the lycopene content, where the lycopene contents in the 1st to 5th ear fruits at the mature stage were significantly higher than those of CK (P<0.05), with an increase range of 20.29%-29.31%. The T3 treatment achieved the highest sugar-acid ratio, which significantly optimized the flavor quality of fruits. At the green mature stage, the T1 treatment facilitated the accumulation of organic acids; the contents of malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and oxalic acid in the first four ear fruits were all higher than those of CK, and the organic acid contents in the 1st, 2nd, and 4th ear fruits ranked the highest among all treatments. The PCA evaluation indicated that fruit quality indicators under high-concentration brackish water irrigation ranked higher at the green mature stage, while those under suitable-concentration brackish water irrigation (T1-T2) performed best at the color turning and mature stages. This study clarified the optimal brackish water irrigation concentrations for different quality indicators, providing a theoretical basis and technical scheme for the safe application of brackish water irrigation in cherry tomato production in freshwater-scarce areas of Northwest China.

Key words

cherry tomatoes / brackish water / fruit quality / organic acids / lycopene / sugar-acid ratio / principal component analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
QI Shuokun , ZHANG Yiyang , MA Yu , et al . Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(1): 56-69 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0315

References

[1]
马中昇, 谭军利, 魏童. 中国微咸水利用的地区和作物适用性研究进展[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(3):70-75.
[2]
CHAUHAN C P S, SINGHA R B, GUPTA S K. Supplemental irrigation of wheat with saline water[J]. Agricultural water management, 2008, 95(3):253-258.
[3]
陈军, 关欣, 范翠枝, 等. 盐胁迫对番茄种子萌发中多胺形态变化和抗氧化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(6):1598-1609.
[4]
蒋丽媛, 赵伟, 杨圆圆, 等. 微咸水灌溉对蔬菜产量及土壤盐分离子的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(S2):17-21.
[5]
马嘉莹, 王兴鹏, 王洪博, 等. 咸水灌溉对土壤盐分分布及设施番茄生理特性的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(1):64-71.
[6]
丁富功, 卢奕霏, 康珍, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对油菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 17(3):73-80.
[7]
苟淇书. 不同矿化度灌溉水对土壤理化性质及冬小麦生长的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2022.
[8]
郑剑超, 王雷. 微咸水灌溉模式对番茄生长和产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022(1):53-55.
[9]
龚一丹. 水盐协同调控对番茄增产提质的影响[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2022.
[10]
申佳丽. 微咸水灌溉下设施黄瓜土壤—灌溉制度协同调控机制研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2023.
[11]
毕言鹏. 咸水沟灌对土壤理化性质和棉花产量的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2023.
[12]
王同林, 叶红霞, 郑积荣, 等. 番茄果实中主要风味物质研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8):1513-1522.
[13]
李金刚, 王少丽, 何平如, 等. 河套灌区番茄微咸水灌溉定额探讨[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4):327-335.
[14]
吴雯婷. 冬瓜果实可溶性固形物含量主效调控基因的精细定位[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2023.
[15]
张国新, 姚玉涛, 丁守鹏, 等. 微咸水滴灌对滨海区基质栽培番茄生长及品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(16):200-202.
[16]
武育芳, 杨官凯, 曹行行, 等. 不同基质下咸、淡水灌溉对番茄生长和品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(5):153-159.
[17]
贺文君. 微咸水灌溉对滨海盐碱土水盐分布和金银花生长的影响[D]. 烟台: 中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所, 2022.
[18]
徐进, 赵鹤, 任爽, 等. 盐胁迫对番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 蔬菜, 2020(8):20-23.
[19]
龙振东. 非均匀盐胁迫对番茄生长、产量及品质的影响[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2021.
[20]
李文龙, 林晨雪, 张娟. 不同颜色地膜对设施番茄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(15):40-45.
[21]
刘婵娟, 叶放, 徐顺安, 等. 蚯蚓粪肥配施对设施番茄生长、氮素利用和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2025, 51(3):437-448.
[22]
王晓艳, 高艳明, 李建设, 等. 分根区交替滴灌对樱桃番茄品质、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(11):2457-2464.
[23]
WANG L C, LI Y L, HAN Q B, et al. Effect of saline water irrigation on soil moisture and salinity and modeling transpiration of greenhouse-grown tomato in response to salt stress[J] International journal of agriculture and biology, 2020, 24(1):117-124.
[24]
鲁少尉, 齐飞, 李天来. 盐胁迫对番茄果实糖含量及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012(20):56-61.
[25]
张玉林, 杜艺, 柴旭田, 等. 不同生育时期油莎豆饲草离子特性和根系养分对不同种植模式的响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(1):104-110.
[26]
黄文, 郭竞, 李自娟, 等. 定植密度和留果穗数对春大棚番茄生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(22):79-82.
[27]
姚玉涛, 张国新, 孙叶烁, 等. 微咸水灌溉对设施番茄生长以及产量和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2021, 25(1):48-53.
[28]
张芙蓉, 高艳明, 李建设, 等. 不同浓度微咸水与分根区交替灌溉上下限对设施番茄生长与品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(7):1465-1474.
[29]
吴蕴玉, 金星, 徐元, 等. 秸秆覆盖条件下微咸水灌溉对番茄生长和产量品质的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015(7):21-24.
[30]
孙叶烁, 张国新, 丁守鹏, 等. 盐胁迫对樱桃番茄风味品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(4):838-844.
[31]
李宣志, 张金珠, 王振华, 等. 氮盐调控对膜下滴灌加工番茄光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(5):186-194.
[32]
王蓉, 田园, 杨柳, 等. 番茄果实不同发育时期有机酸组分及含量分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017(10):58-62.
PDF(1909 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/