PDF(2573 KB)
Effect of Grass on Microenvironment Temperature and Humidity of Korla Fragrant Pear Orchard and Fruit Quality
WANGChunfeng, CHENGJiabao, XIONGQing, QINFei, ZHANGFeng
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 167-175.
PDF(2573 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(2573 KB)
Effect of Grass on Microenvironment Temperature and Humidity of Korla Fragrant Pear Orchard and Fruit Quality
The study aims to explore the effect of grass growing between rows on the microenvironment and fruit quality in Korla Fragrant Pear orchards, and to provide a theoretical basis for the promotion and application of grass growing technology in orchards in arid desert areas of Northwest China. In this study, a comparative treatment of grass growing and clean tillage was set up in the Korla Fragrant Pear orchard in the core production area of Korla Fragrant Pear. The temperature and humidity of the microenvironment of the lower, middle and upper layers of the canopy were monitored at fixed points throughout the year, and its impact on the orchard microenvironment and fruit quality was comprehensively analyzed. The results showed that: in terms of micro climate, grass growing treatment showed significant temperature and humidity buffering effect. Compared with clean tillage, the monthly average temperature of each canopy in the grass growing area was generally lower, and the temperature difference between treatments decreased with the increase of canopy, reflecting its stabilizing effect on the near-ground microclimate. The grass growing treatment can effectively reduce the temperature fluctuation in the middle and lower layers in winter, spring and summer, especially in the middle layer, with the temperature difference decreases by 13.36%-16.50%. At the same time, the grass growing treatment generally increased the relative humidity in the garden and significantly enhanced the humidity stability of each canopy (especially the middle and lower layers). The humidity difference in the lower layer decreased by 18.25% in winter, and that in the middle layer decreased by 14.81% in summer. In terms of fruit quality, the grass growing treatment significantly improved the comprehensive quality of Korla Fragrant Pear. In terms of appearance index, the single fruit weight was significantly increased by 19.23%, the fruit shape was effectively improved (the skew index was reduced by 18.75%) and the fruit hardness was reduced. In terms of internal indicators, the soluble sugar, sugar acid ratio and vitamin C content of grass growing treatment increased significantly by 4.16%, 8.48% and 8.75%, while the titratable acid content increased significantly by 8.70%, and the total polyphenols and total anthocyanins increased significantly by 135.27% and 40.82%, respectively. The inter row grass growing technology can effectively enhance the stability of temperature and humidity by improving the near ground microenvironment of Korla Fragrant Pear orchard, thus significantly improving fruit quality.
grass growing / Korla Fragrant Pear / temperature / relative humidity / fruit quality
| [1] |
秦文利. 行间生草种类对苹果园春季土壤蒸发、空气湿度和土壤贮水的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(1):48-62.
|
| [2] |
赵燕, 葛玉萍, 李磊. 宁夏枸杞果实品质及微域气候对行间生草种类的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2025, 42(3):698-708.
|
| [3] |
马仲炼, 马磊, 马永翠, 等. 果园生草对苹果叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(7):1480-1487.
|
| [4] |
周奥特, 宋金龙, 许盼云, 等. 行间生草对库尔勒香梨园土壤物理性状的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2020, 43(7):36-39.
|
| [5] |
吴振美, 盖志君, 孙梦洁, 等. 不同生草类型对冬枣园土壤理化性状和品质的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023, 43(25):43-45.
|
| [6] |
梁魁景, 于占晶, 侯晓杰, 等. 行间生草对桃叶片叶绿素氮含量和桃园土壤微生物的影响[J]. 现代农村科技, 2022(3):73-74.
|
| [7] |
孙鹏鹏, 查倩, 殷向静, 等. 葡萄园行间土壤覆盖方式对土壤理化性质及树体生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(10):115-121.
|
| [8] |
陈学森, 王艳廷. 力推果园生草建设生态文明[J]. 烟台果树, 2014,1:1-4.
|
| [9] |
李会科. 渭北旱地苹果园生草的生态环境效应及综合技术体系构建[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2008.
|
| [10] |
高方胜, 王明友. 生草对鲁西北果园生态环境及苹果光合特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(15):73-75.
|
| [11] |
张钊, 王野苹. 香梨品种种源问题的探讨[J]. 果树科学, 1993, 10(2):113-115.
|
| [12] |
井春芝. 库尔勒香梨产业问题分析与对策建议[J]. 西北园艺(综合), 2018(4):4-5.
|
| [13] |
张峰. 库尔勒香梨提质增效管理措施[J]. 果树资源学报, 2021, 2(2):56-57.
|
| [14] |
高启明, 李疆, 李阳. 库尔勒香梨研究进展[J]. 经济林研究, 2005, 23(1):79-82.
|
| [15] |
黄素芳, 高素梅, 王振亮, 等. 不同覆盖方式对枣园土壤水分、温度及病害发生的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2020(6):70-73.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
陈久红, 鲁晓燕, 李永丰, 等. 生草对库尔勒香梨梨园土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019(7):71-79.
|
| [18] |
余明杨, 陈燕, 郭凯璐, 等. 自然生草对梨园土壤理化性质及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2024(8):8-18.
|
| [19] |
张朋朋, 王小丫, 陶书田, 等. 果园生草栽培年限对库尔勒香梨果实形态特征和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(22):22-28.
|
| [20] |
曹建康, 姜微波. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2017.
|
| [21] |
聂继云, 李志霞, 匡立学, 等. NY/T 2742—2015,水果及制品可溶性糖的测定3,5-二硝基水杨酸比色法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
|
| [22] |
王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
|
| [23] |
张芳, 张欣, 逯露露, 等. 采摘时期对沙枣叶茶黄酮与多酚含量影响的研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2024, 65(9):41-50.
|
| [24] |
安景舒, 关晔晴, 程玉豆, 等. 5个梨品种果实不同部位的总酚、黄酮含量及其抗氧化能力分析[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2020, 20(3):162-166.
|
| [25] |
杨国才, 陈香颖, 王季春, 等. 柠檬酸—磷酸氢二钠缓冲液法提取紫甘薯花青素的工艺研究[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(4):653-656.
|
| [26] |
聂继云, 李静, 杨振锋, 等. 冷冻法测定梨的石细胞含量[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(1):133-135.
|
| [27] |
吴红敏. 柑橘园套种生草的气象生态效应研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2015.
|
| [28] |
李国怀, 章文才, 胡德文, 等. 生草栽培对桔园环境和柑桔产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 1997, 18(4):18-21.
|
| [29] |
郝紫微, 季兰. 我国果园生草研究现状与展望[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(3):486-490.
|
| [30] |
焦润安, 张舒涵, 李毅, 等. 生草影响果树生长发育及果园环境的研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(12):1610-1623.
|
| [31] |
谭博, 曹晓艳, 刘怀锋, 等. 果园生草对葡萄叶片荧光特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 29(6):683-688.
|
| [32] |
付学琴, 陈登云, 杨星鹏, 等. ‘南丰蜜橘’园生草对土壤团聚体养分和微生物特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(11):1655-1666.
|
| [33] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |