Effect of Yellow River Water Drip Irrigation Coordinated with Soil Regulation Technology on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield

LI Zhengkui; XIA Yuhong; ZHAO Sha; HAN Tiankai; SUN Long; LIU Jiaxin; CHEN Min

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0456

PDF(1274 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 102-110. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0456

Effect of Yellow River Water Drip Irrigation Coordinated with Soil Regulation Technology on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of various soil conditioning techniques on soil physicochemical properties and maize yield under drip irrigation with Yellow River water under plastic film in the Hetao Irrigation District of Inner Mongolia, and screens optimal water-saving and soil-improving yield-increasing mode. Maize was used as the test crop, and single application of SAP, single application of PAM, mixed application of SAP + PAM ( S + P ), CK₁ ( film mulching control ) and CK₂ ( no film control ) were set up. Three irrigation quota gradients of 2376 m³/hm², 2673 m³/hm² and 2970 m³/hm² were used to carry out field experiments by drip irrigation under the Yellow River water film. The soil bulk density, organic matter content, water content, total salt content, maize yield and irrigation water production efficiency were measured. The results indicate that, compared to the control group, both water-retaining agents and soil amendments reduced soil bulk density to varying degrees. The combined application of water-retaining agents and soil amendments resulted in the most significant reduction in soil bulk density, with an average decrease of 0.13 g/cm³ compared to pre-sowing levels. The soil organic matter content under plastic film in all treatments was generally higher than that of the control, with the combined treatment yielding the highest soil organic matter content at an average of 49.47 g/kg. Under the various treatment conditions, the combined application of water-retaining agents and soil amendments produced the highest maize yield and irrigation water productivity, reaching 15.6 t/hm² and 17.58 kg/m³ respectively. For the same conditioning treatment, an irrigation quota of 2376 m³/hm² was found to be most conducive to enhancing irrigation water productivity. Overall, the combined application of water-retaining agents and soil amendments demonstrated considerable advantages in improving soil physicochemical properties, increasing maize yield, and enhancing irrigation water productivity, offering valuable insights for similar agricultural production studies.

Key words

water-retaining agent / soil amendment / drip irrigation with Yellow River water / conditioning technology / physicochemical properties / maize yield / Hetao Irrigation District

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LI Zhengkui , XIA Yuhong , ZHAO Sha , et al . Effect of Yellow River Water Drip Irrigation Coordinated with Soil Regulation Technology on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(6): 102-110 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0456

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	姚建武, 王艳红, 唐明灯, 等. 施用保水剂对旱地赤红壤持水能力及氮肥淋失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5):191-194. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	白文波, 王春艳, 李茂松, 等. 不同灌溉条件下保水剂对新疆棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(10):69-76. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	李华, 闫沛玉. 保水剂对土壤性质及含水量的影响研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(18):19-21. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	吴娜, 赵宝平, 曾昭海, 等. 两种灌溉方式下保水剂用量对裸燕麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(8):1552-1557. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	WOODHOUSE J, JOHNSON M S. Effect of super absorbent polymers on survival and growth of crop seedling[J]. Agricultural water management, 1991, 20(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(91)90035-H https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/037837749190035H Cited in this article [1]

[6]	夏茂林, 李洪臣. 不同粒径保水剂对土壤水分特性及干旱胁迫下烟苗生长发育的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(11):14-21. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	马征, 董晓霞, 张柏松. 不同保水剂对土壤团聚体组成及微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(5):122-128. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	李鹏, 田苗, 任安, 等. 土壤改良剂对松嫩平原盐碱土壤理化性状,水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2023(5):48-52. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	陆绍娟, 王占礼. 土壤改良剂聚丙烯酰胺的研究进展[J]. 人民黄河, 2016, 38(7):73-77. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	SHOCK C C, FEIBERT B G, SAUNDERS L D. A comparison of straw mulching and PAM for potato production[R]. O SU, Malheyr Experiment Station Special Report, 1997, 978:71-78. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	党秀丽, 黄毅. 超吸水性多聚物对作物幼苗存活和生长的影响[J]. 水土保持科技情报, 2001(3):17-19. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	SHOCK C, FEIBERT E, SAUNDERS M, et al. Treatment of soil with bright sum soil booster and polyacrylam ide as soil conditioners for improved seeding emergence[J]. Agronomy journal, 1992, 84:160-165. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	杜社妮, 白岗栓, 赵世伟, 等. 沃特和PAM保水剂对土壤水分及马铃薯生长的影响研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(8):72-79. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	张扬, 赵世伟, 梁向锋, 等. 保水剂对宁南山区马铃薯产量及土壤水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(3):27-32. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	刘纪霜, 罗兴录, 樊吴静, 等. 保水剂对土壤理化性状和木薯产量影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(33):253-258. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	宋海燕, 汪有科, 汪星, 等. 保水剂用量对土壤水分的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(3):33-36 Cited in this article [1]

[17]	李中阳, 吕谋超, 樊向阳, 等. 不同类型保水剂对冬小麦水分利用效率和根系形态的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(12):6. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	王以兵, 丁林, 张新民. 免储水灌注水播种条件下保水剂使用对玉米生长发育的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(4):152-156. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	杨永辉, 武继承, 吴普特, 等. 保水剂对小麦生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3):133-137. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	耿桂俊, 白岗栓, 杜社妮, 等. 保水剂施用方式对土壤水盐及番茄生长的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(3):65-70. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	张淑芬. 坡耕地施用聚丙烯酰胺防治水土流失试验研究[J]. 水土保持科技情报, 2001(2):18-19. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	TERRY R E, NELSON S D. Effect of polyacrylamide and irrigation method on il physical properties[J]. Soil science, 1986, 141:317-320. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198605000-00003 http://journals.lww.com/00010694-198605000-00003 Cited in this article [1]

[23]	介石磊, 李有田. 保水剂对上壤持水特性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2000(1):22-24. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	安东, 李新平, 张永宏, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对碱积盐成土改良效果研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(5):115-118. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	解开治, 徐培智, 严超, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对南方酸性土壤的改良效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009(20):6. Cited in this article [1]

[26]	谢伯承, 薛绪掌, 王纪华, 等. 保水剂对土壤持水性状的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2003, 23(6):44-46. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	耿桂俊. 地表覆盖及保水剂与PAM对河套灌区土壤水热盐和番茄生长的影响[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2011. Cited in this article [1]

[28]	申丽霞, 兰印超, 李若帆. 不同降解膜覆盖对土壤水热与玉米生长的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1):200-206. Cited in this article [1]

[29]	胡敏, 苗庆丰, 史海滨, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对春玉米生长发育及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2):173-177. Cited in this article [1]

[30]

李婷, 李世清, 占爱, 等. 地膜覆盖、氮肥与密度及其互作对黄土旱塬春玉米氮素吸收、转运及生产效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(8):1504-1517.

https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.08.008

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

【目的】以紧凑型玉米品种先玉335为供试作物，研究地膜覆盖、施氮量、种植密度及其互作对春玉米氮素吸收转运及利用效率的影响，以期为黄土高原半干旱区春玉米高产高效栽培提供理论依据。【方法】2013—2014年春玉米生长季，设置覆盖方式（覆膜和不覆膜）、施氮量（2013年为0、170、200和230 kgN·hm-2，2014年为0、170、225和280 kgN·hm-2）和种植密度（5.0×104、6.5×104和8.0×104 株/hm2）3个因子，分析不同处理的氮素累积与转运、产量及氮肥生产效率。【结果】地膜覆盖显著增加了玉米吐丝前氮素累积量，促进了吐丝后氮素累积和吐丝前累积氮素的再转移，从而显著提高了籽粒氮素累积量和籽粒产量。覆盖方式与氮肥或密度互作显著影响春玉米氮素吸收、累积和转移。地膜覆盖条件下更多的氮肥（200—230 kgN·hm-2）或更高的密度（6.5×104—8.0×104株/hm2）投入能有效促进吐丝前储存更多的氮素向籽粒转运，提高吐丝后期氮同化量及其对籽粒的贡献率，从而提高了籽粒氮素累积量；而不覆盖条件下当施氮量超过170 kg N·hm-2或密度超过5.0×104株/hm2时，吐丝后氮同化量及其对籽粒的贡献显著减少，从而导致吐丝前氮素储备的增加未能有效增加籽粒氮素累积。氮肥与密度互作显著影响氮素累积、吸收和转移。氮肥偏生产力（PFPN）和氮素收获指数（NHI）与吐丝前氮素累积量、氮素转移量、吐丝后氮素累积量及籽粒产量呈正相关，达到了显著水平。从春玉米氮素累积、转移及与产量和氮肥偏生产力关系看，全膜双垄沟播种植技术的合理施氮量为200—230 kgN·hm-2、密度为8.0×104株/hm2，其产量可达13.7—14.6 t·hm-2，PFPN可达64.8—68.7 kg·kg-1。【结论】地膜覆盖与适宜的施氮量和种植密度相结合的综合管理实践，有利于促进灌浆期营养器官储存氮向籽粒转移和吐丝后氮同化的协同增加，从而实现高产和高氮肥生产力。

[31]

王富, 魏占民, 付晨星, 等. PAM与SAP联合施用对旱作坡耕地的水分保蓄影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2020(8):55-58.

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为研究PAM和SAP联合施用对坡耕地土壤水分和马铃薯生长的影响效果，在内蒙古卓资县以不施材料为对照，设置喷施PAM+混施SAP与混施PAM+混施SAP各3组试验处理。结果表明：PAM和SAP联合施用后可以提高0～40 cm土层含水率，并且含水率随施用量增加而提高。H3与P3与对照相比最大增加26.97%和21.04%。施用PAM和SAP可提高苗期坡耕地0~80 cm土层贮水量，土壤贮水量与施用量呈正相关；但在马铃薯其他生育期，处理后的土壤贮水量低于对照。从播种到收获期，P2的马铃薯生物量达到最大，其水分利用效率比对照增加29.54%。因此，适量的施用PAM和SAP可改善土壤水分环境，增加马铃薯产量。