PDF(2269 KB)
Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality
ZHOUChunyan, TAONing, FANMeina, WANGLirong
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 77-83.
PDF(2269 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(2269 KB)
Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality
This study aims to clarify the impact of compound microbial inoculants applied via foliar spraying on fruit color development, maturation, and quality attributes. Using 4-year-old ‘Fujiminori’ grape and ‘Busan 88’ cherry tomato as experimental materials, and two bacterial agent concentration treatment groups (T1: diluted 500 times, T2: diluted 300 times) and a blank control group (CK) were set up. The plants were sprayed at the initial fruit coloring stage and re-sprayed after 10 days. The coloring process, quality, and yield parameters were measured. The results showed that: (1) the color-promoting effect was significant. Under the T2 treatment, the time required for grapes to reach 90% coloration was 12 days earlier than CK, and the ripening of tomatoes was advanced by 7 days. (2) Fruit quality was significantly improved. Compared with CK, the ‘Fujiminori’ grapes showed a 22.07% increase in total anthocyanins, a 1.69% increase in soluble sugar, and a 27.73% increase in vitamin C content, while titratable acid decreased by 9.38%. For tomatoes, soluble sugar, vitamin C, and lycopene contents increased by 24.80%, 33.91%, and 35.08%, respectively, compared to CK, with titratable acid reducing by 18.82%. (3) Yield was simultaneously enhanced. Compared with CK, the hundred-berry weight and single-cluster weight of grapes increased by 32.93% and 22.25%, respectively, while the single-fruit weight and yield per plant of tomatoes increased by 5.58%-9.44% and 1.37%-5.92%, respectively. (4) Economic benefits were significant. Grapes reached the market 12 days earlier, with the selling price increasing from 8-10 yuan/kg to 20 yuan/kg. Similarly, tomatoes were marketed 7 days earlier, and their price rose from 10-15 yuan/kg to 20 yuan/kg. In conclusion, spraying the 300-fold diluted compound microbial agent synergistically promotes fruit coloration, ripening, and quality improvement, providing technical support for high-quality, efficient, and green cultivation of fruits and vegetables.
microbial agent / color change / fruit quality / soluble sugar / grape / tomato / spraying
| [1] |
杨桂兰, 陈迎春, 昝林生, 等. 壳聚糖对葡萄病害和果实品质影响的研究进展[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2021(6):77-83.
|
| [2] |
李百云, 许泽华, 郭鑫年, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对土壤肥力及苹果果实品质的影响[J]. 果树资源学报, 2024, 5(6):55-60.
|
| [3] |
王志典. 微生物菌肥对秋月梨果实品质、产量及土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 农村科学实验, 2024(16):175-177.
|
| [4] |
许士芳, 王齐旭, 占绣萍, 等. 不同微生物肥料对番茄生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2024(2):56-58.
|
| [5] |
马纪龙, 齐勇杰, 韩林蒲, 等. 滴灌施肥条件下不同复合微生物菌剂对玉米产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(8):10-22.
|
| [6] |
王军, 陈云, 石磊, 等. 微生物菌剂在巨峰葡萄上的肥效试验[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2020, 43(11):35-38.
|
| [7] |
吕路琼, 赵绮, 郭峻宁, 等. 复合微生物菌剂的应用对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(6):1383-1386.
|
| [8] |
郑秋玲, 刘军鹏, 郑媛媛, 等. 复合液体肥对‘夏黑’葡萄园土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2023(2):23-29.
|
| [9] |
陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 等. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9):2285-2289.
|
| [10] |
侯晨薇, 郭亚晴, 程诚, 等. 叶面肥在农业生产中的作用与机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(11):132-139.
|
| [11] |
宋雯, 王强, 张佳, 等. 不同施肥方式下氯吡脲对藤稔葡萄生长和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10):1879-1888.
|
| [12] |
邢延富. UV-C对葡萄果实黄烷醇类多酚积累及隐色花色素还原酶表达的研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2013.
|
| [13] |
杨亚蒙, 韦静波, 郭红娜, 等. 影响葡萄着色的原因及改进措施[J]. 果树资源学报, 2023, 4(5):56-58.
|
| [14] |
全龙萍, 王明, 周波, 等. 草炭和微生物菌剂对‘美乐’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(12):2344-2354.
|
| [15] |
陈国品, 李玮, 谢蜀豫, 等. 2种类型微生物肥对夏黑葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(1):106-112.
|
| [16] |
李宝成, 赵贵红, 赵美兰, 等. 微生物菌剂对提升荔枝妃子笑品质、品相和产量的试验研究[J]. 肥料与健康, 2022, 49(5):44-47.
|
| [17] |
李正青, 刘朋宇, 张颖, 等. 不同时期施用菌剂对番茄生长、品质及相关酶基因表达[J]. 北方园艺, 2023(4):1-8.
|
| [18] |
尹心馨, 李婷, 王跃, 等. 复合微生物肥料替代常规底肥对设施番茄产量、品质的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2025, 45(1):61-66.
|
| [19] |
许孜萍, 韩子颖, 袁亚静, 等. 叶面喷施微生物菌肥对桃叶片生理指标及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2025(3):28-36.
|
| [20] |
车建美, 赖恭梯, 李思雨, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对葡萄生长、品质及根际土壤环境的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(8):264-274.
|
| [21] |
邢瑜, 周晓丽, 张小东, 等. 微生物菌剂在苹果上的应用效果研究[J]. 烟台果树, 2022(1):22-25.
|
| [22] |
孙彩霞, 胡剑平, 于国光, 等. 芽孢杆菌对巨峰葡萄品质指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(11):2052-2054.
|
| [23] |
撒晓梅, 丁琴, 李明. 蚯蚓粪和微生物菌剂对土壤养分及红地球葡萄生理特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2025, 60(1):158-165.
|
| [24] |
高萌萌, 宋梦圆, 李佳璠, 等. 氨基酸替代和氮钾配比对樱桃番茄产量、品质和土壤养分残留的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(20):172-178.
|
| [25] |
刘宇星, 董醇波, 邵秋雨, 等. 叶际微生物与植物健康研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2022, 42(2):88-98.
|
| [26] |
王颖. 外源赤霉素对葡萄果实品质及果皮花色苷代谢的影响[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2023.
|
| [27] |
姚会东, 闫威姣, 李宏业, 等. 不同外源调节物质对克瑞森无核葡萄果实着色及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(23):140-146.
|
| [28] |
李夏媛, 王琦, 武彦霞, 等. 微生物菌剂在提升果实品质中的作用研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 2025, 53(1):181-186.
|
| [29] |
吕路琼, 赵绮, 郭峻宁, 等. 复合微生物菌剂的应用对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(6):1383-1386.
|
| [30] |
杜延恒, 何洪光. 藤稔葡萄栽培技术与效益分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2014, 34(1):125.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |