Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality

ZHOUChunyan, TAONing, FANMeina, WANGLirong

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 77-83.

PDF(2269 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2269 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 77-83. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0474

Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the impact of compound microbial inoculants applied via foliar spraying on fruit color development, maturation, and quality attributes. Using 4-year-old ‘Fujiminori’ grape and ‘Busan 88’ cherry tomato as experimental materials, and two bacterial agent concentration treatment groups (T1: diluted 500 times, T2: diluted 300 times) and a blank control group (CK) were set up. The plants were sprayed at the initial fruit coloring stage and re-sprayed after 10 days. The coloring process, quality, and yield parameters were measured. The results showed that: (1) the color-promoting effect was significant. Under the T2 treatment, the time required for grapes to reach 90% coloration was 12 days earlier than CK, and the ripening of tomatoes was advanced by 7 days. (2) Fruit quality was significantly improved. Compared with CK, the ‘Fujiminori’ grapes showed a 22.07% increase in total anthocyanins, a 1.69% increase in soluble sugar, and a 27.73% increase in vitamin C content, while titratable acid decreased by 9.38%. For tomatoes, soluble sugar, vitamin C, and lycopene contents increased by 24.80%, 33.91%, and 35.08%, respectively, compared to CK, with titratable acid reducing by 18.82%. (3) Yield was simultaneously enhanced. Compared with CK, the hundred-berry weight and single-cluster weight of grapes increased by 32.93% and 22.25%, respectively, while the single-fruit weight and yield per plant of tomatoes increased by 5.58%-9.44% and 1.37%-5.92%, respectively. (4) Economic benefits were significant. Grapes reached the market 12 days earlier, with the selling price increasing from 8-10 yuan/kg to 20 yuan/kg. Similarly, tomatoes were marketed 7 days earlier, and their price rose from 10-15 yuan/kg to 20 yuan/kg. In conclusion, spraying the 300-fold diluted compound microbial agent synergistically promotes fruit coloration, ripening, and quality improvement, providing technical support for high-quality, efficient, and green cultivation of fruits and vegetables.

Key words

microbial agent / color change / fruit quality / soluble sugar / grape / tomato / spraying

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHOU Chunyan , TAO Ning , FAN Meina , et al. Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(1): 77-83 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0474

References

[1]
杨桂兰, 陈迎春, 昝林生, 等. 壳聚糖对葡萄病害和果实品质影响的研究进展[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2021(6):77-83.
[2]
李百云, 许泽华, 郭鑫年, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对土壤肥力及苹果果实品质的影响[J]. 果树资源学报, 2024, 5(6):55-60.
[3]
王志典. 微生物菌肥对秋月梨果实品质、产量及土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 农村科学实验, 2024(16):175-177.
[4]
许士芳, 王齐旭, 占绣萍, 等. 不同微生物肥料对番茄生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2024(2):56-58.
[5]
马纪龙, 齐勇杰, 韩林蒲, 等. 滴灌施肥条件下不同复合微生物菌剂对玉米产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(8):10-22.
[6]
王军, 陈云, 石磊, 等. 微生物菌剂在巨峰葡萄上的肥效试验[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2020, 43(11):35-38.
[7]
吕路琼, 赵绮, 郭峻宁, 等. 复合微生物菌剂的应用对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(6):1383-1386.
[8]
郑秋玲, 刘军鹏, 郑媛媛, 等. 复合液体肥对‘夏黑’葡萄园土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2023(2):23-29.
[9]
陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 等. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9):2285-2289.
[10]
侯晨薇, 郭亚晴, 程诚, 等. 叶面肥在农业生产中的作用与机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(11):132-139.
[11]
宋雯, 王强, 张佳, 等. 不同施肥方式下氯吡脲对藤稔葡萄生长和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10):1879-1888.
[12]
邢延富. UV-C对葡萄果实黄烷醇类多酚积累及隐色花色素还原酶表达的研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2013.
[13]
杨亚蒙, 韦静波, 郭红娜, 等. 影响葡萄着色的原因及改进措施[J]. 果树资源学报, 2023, 4(5):56-58.
[14]
全龙萍, 王明, 周波, 等. 草炭和微生物菌剂对‘美乐’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(12):2344-2354.
[15]
陈国品, 李玮, 谢蜀豫, 等. 2种类型微生物肥对夏黑葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(1):106-112.
[16]
李宝成, 赵贵红, 赵美兰, 等. 微生物菌剂对提升荔枝妃子笑品质、品相和产量的试验研究[J]. 肥料与健康, 2022, 49(5):44-47.
[17]
李正青, 刘朋宇, 张颖, 等. 不同时期施用菌剂对番茄生长、品质及相关酶基因表达[J]. 北方园艺, 2023(4):1-8.
[18]
尹心馨, 李婷, 王跃, 等. 复合微生物肥料替代常规底肥对设施番茄产量、品质的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2025, 45(1):61-66.
[19]
许孜萍, 韩子颖, 袁亚静, 等. 叶面喷施微生物菌肥对桃叶片生理指标及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2025(3):28-36.
[20]
车建美, 赖恭梯, 李思雨, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对葡萄生长、品质及根际土壤环境的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(8):264-274.
[21]
邢瑜, 周晓丽, 张小东, 等. 微生物菌剂在苹果上的应用效果研究[J]. 烟台果树, 2022(1):22-25.
[22]
孙彩霞, 胡剑平, 于国光, 等. 芽孢杆菌对巨峰葡萄品质指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(11):2052-2054.
[23]
撒晓梅, 丁琴, 李明. 蚯蚓粪和微生物菌剂对土壤养分及红地球葡萄生理特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2025, 60(1):158-165.
[24]
高萌萌, 宋梦圆, 李佳璠, 等. 氨基酸替代和氮钾配比对樱桃番茄产量、品质和土壤养分残留的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(20):172-178.
[25]
刘宇星, 董醇波, 邵秋雨, 等. 叶际微生物与植物健康研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2022, 42(2):88-98.
[26]
王颖. 外源赤霉素对葡萄果实品质及果皮花色苷代谢的影响[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2023.
[27]
姚会东, 闫威姣, 李宏业, 等. 不同外源调节物质对克瑞森无核葡萄果实着色及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(23):140-146.
[28]
李夏媛, 王琦, 武彦霞, 等. 微生物菌剂在提升果实品质中的作用研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 2025, 53(1):181-186.
[29]
吕路琼, 赵绮, 郭峻宁, 等. 复合微生物菌剂的应用对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(6):1383-1386.
[30]
杜延恒, 何洪光. 藤稔葡萄栽培技术与效益分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2014, 34(1):125.
PDF(2269 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/