Effects of Different Feed on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Muscle of Quasipaa spinosa

LI Wensheng; CHEN Duhuang; LIANG Ping; XUE Lingzhan; HU Zhenxi; LAI Mingyong; LAN Zhuqing

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0492

PDF(2446 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 212-218. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0492

Effects of Different Feed on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Muscle of Quasipaa spinosa

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of feeding biological bait (control group J-A) and artificial compound feed (experimental group J-B) on volatile flavor compounds in muscle of Quasipaa spinosa，the volatile flavor compounds in the muscle of Quasipaa spinosa reared on two feeds were detected by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectroscopy, and the fingerprints were compared and analyzed. The volatile flavor substances in the two groups of muscles were detected in 45 peaks with 30 substances, including aldehydes, ketones, alcohols and other substances, and there were 15 aldehydes, 8 ketones, 3 alcohols, 1 acid, 1 furan, 1 puzzle and 1 unknown substance. The relative contents of volatile substances in J-A and J-B were as follows: aldehydes (50.45%, 43.13%), alcohols (18.72%, 5.08%), ketones (28.40%, 49.56%), acids (0.65%, 0.84%), ethers (0.14%, 0.27%), furans (1.31%, 0.29%) and unknown substances (0.30%, 0.72%). Among the main volatile flavor substances, the relative content of aldehydes and alcohols J-A was greater than that of J-B, and the relative content of ketones was less than that of J-B. Feeding artificial compound feed can significantly reduce the volatile odor substances such as hexanal, nonanal and heptanal in the muscle of Quasipaa spinosa, improve the muscle quality of Quasipaa spinose. The results of this study provide a certain reference for the evaluation of muscle quality of Quasipaa spinosa and the identification of products.

Key words

Quasipaa spinosa / artificial compound feed / muscle / volatile flavor substances

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LI Wensheng , CHEN Duhuang , LIANG Ping , et al . Effects of Different Feed on Volatile Flavor Compounds in Muscle of Quasipaa spinosa[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(5): 212-218 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0492

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	费梁, 叶昌媛, 江建平, 等. 中国两栖动物检索及图解[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社,2005:102-139. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	谢永广, 汪小冬, 吴亚峰, 等. 棘胸蛙胚胎发育观察与相关抗氧化酶活性变化研究[J]. 水产科学, 2023, 42(6):1054-1062. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	高士贤. 中国动物药志[M]. 长春: 吉林科学技术出版社,1996:572-573. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	刘芳彬, 王伟, 黄永春, 等. 棘胸蛙肌肉营养成分季节变化分析与评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(9):365-371. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	赵蒙蒙, 郑荣泉, 宋婷婷, 等. 饲料营养水平和温度对棘胸蛙蝌蚪变态发育的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(20):119-122. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	项婷婷, 郑荣泉, 施诺, 等. 饲料配方对棘胸蛙蝌蚪死亡率、变态率影响及肝脏转录组分析[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 48(3):313-322. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	孙佳顺. 棘胸蛙养殖技术[J]. 中国水产, 2024(7):41-42. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	任思宇, 吴春艳, 刘震坤, 等. 一株高致病性棘胸蛙源嗜水气单胞菌的全基因组测序及其感染后脾的超微病理损伤[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2025, 43(1):48-56. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	张燕萍, 章海鑫, 习宏斌, 等. 基于线粒体COI基因对棘胸蛙养殖群体的遗传多样性分析[J]. 江西水产科技, 2023(4):1-5. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	侯金亮, 余建波, 向建国, 等. 3种棘胸蛙体成分的比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(23):75-77,89. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	WANG S, CHEN H, SUN B. Recent progress in food flavor analysis using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS)[J]. Food chemistry, 2020, 315:126158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126158 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814619323106 Cited in this article [1]

[12]

ZHANG

X X

, DAI

, FAN

X J

, et al. A study on volatiles metabolites screening by HS-SPME-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS for discrimination and characterization of white and yellowed rice[J]. Cereal chemistry, 2020, 97(2):496-504.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.v97.2

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/19433638/97/2

Cited in this article [1]

[13]	姜宁, 董浩然, 李巧珍, 等. 不同光质培养下香菇挥发性风味物质的比较分析[J]. 上海农业学报, 2023, 39(6):32-40. Cited in this article [1]

[14]

郑荣美, 张磊, 郑淮升, 等. 不同杀菌方式对白切香猪肉品质和挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(22):246-253.

https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.037945

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为了研究低温调理白切香猪肉在不同杀菌过程中品质和挥发性成分的变化,该文采用气相色谱-离子迁移谱技术对未杀菌、水浴巴氏杀菌、高静水压杀菌、辐照杀菌和高温高压处理香猪肉的挥发性组分进行定性分析,共鉴定出63种挥发性风味化合物,包括醛类5种、酮类10种、醇类11种、酯类13种、醚类6种、呋喃类4种、吡嗪类4种、噻唑类2种,其他类8种。根据各组挥发性化合物的相对含量,高静水压组的香猪肉比水浴巴氏杀菌组更接近于对照组。利用扫描电镜比较了香猪肉在4种杀菌方式下的微观结构,辐照杀菌和高静水压杀菌能较好保留原样品的肌纤维结构。综合分析,高静水压杀菌较好地保持了产品原有的品质和风味,在低温调理类肉制品以及预制菜肴的杀菌领域具有较好的应用前景。

[15]	崔明仙, 李妍, 付睛睛, 等. 三种扇贝挥发性风味物质指纹图谱分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2022, 53(3):743-758. Cited in this article [1]

[16]

陈东杰, 张明岗, 聂小宝, 等. 基于气相离子迁移谱检测静电场处理的大菱鲆品质[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(24):313-319.

https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180904-044

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

研究静电场对大菱鲆贮藏品质的影响，比较不同贮藏条件下大菱鲆的菌落总数、假单胞菌、总挥发性盐基氮（total volatile base nitrogen，TVB-N）值和硫代巴比妥酸（thiobarbituric acid，TBA）值。采用电子鼻采集其气体指纹信息，通过离子气相迁移谱对不同处理方式大菱鲆的挥发性物质进行分析检测。结果表明：静电场能够改善贮藏期间大菱鲆的品质，有效抑制菌落总数和优势腐败菌的生长及减少TVB-N值和TBA值的增加，在一定程度上抑制了鱼肉内脂肪氧化，具有较好的保鲜效果。采用主成分分析、线性判别分析方法可较好区分不同贮藏时间及不同处理方式的大菱鲆品质。根据气相离子迁移谱采集的指纹图谱，利用热图聚类分析可区分不同贮藏时间内及不同处理方式下大菱鲆挥发性物质。气相离子迁移谱与电子鼻具有快速、准确、无损的特点，可对大菱鲆新鲜度品质进行快速检测可行。

[17]

XIAO

, LIAO

, CHEN

, et al. Effects of konjac glucomannan/ε -Polylysine hydrochloride/ferulic acid composite coating on the freshness preservation performance and flavor of refrigerated sea bass fillets[J]. Foods, 2023, 12(3):517.

https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030517

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/3/517

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

Coating preservation has a remarkable effect on the preservation of aquatic products. This work prepared a composite coating using konjac glucomannan (KGM) as the film-forming matrix and ε-polylysine hydrochloride (ε-PL) and ferulic acid (FA) as the preservative. Three types of treated sea bass (KGM, KGM-ε-PL, and KGM-ε-PL-FA) and untreated sea bass were stored at 4 °C for 20 days to compare freshness changes under different treatment conditions. The results showed that the surface color and texture of sea bass in refrigerated storage changed dramatically and deteriorated as storage time increased. The composite coating treatment was significantly different from the control group. Using Gas-phase ion migration spectrometry (GC-IMS) technology, 32 volatile compounds, such as aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones, were found in fillets during flavor quality analysis. The composite coating can successfully inhibit the formation of odor compounds such as 2-nonenone, isoamyl alcohol monomer, ammonia, and trimethylamine, delaying the deterioration of fish and improving freshness. Among them, KGM-ε-PL-FA composite coating has the most remarkable preservation performance, which significantly inhibits the occurrence of rotten odor, and has a potential application prospect in the field of food preservation.

[18]	赵素娟, 刘林, 郭登峰, 等. 不同饲喂方式对猪肉品质和风味的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2018, 44(5):194-200. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	李敏, 胡高宇, 滕爽爽, 等. 养殖与野生鮻营养成分和挥发性物质比较[J]. 水产科学, 2024, 43(1):51-60. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	曹静, 张凤枰, 龙斌, 等. 野生和养殖长吻鮠肌肉挥发性风味成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(16):170-174. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	于继英. 性别和饲料对固城湖河蟹(Eriocheir sinensis)可食部位营养和风味的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	林瑞榕, 袁红飞, 钟小清, 等. 不同熬制工艺对“佛跳墙”营养成分及风味物质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(4):240-246. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	屠云洁, 栾德琴, 单艳菊, 等. 3种乌骨鸡肌肉中挥发性有机物差异分析[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2023, 44(11):36-41. Cited in this article [1]

[24]

YANG

, ZHANG

, WANG

, et al. Study on the volatile compounds generated from lipid oxidation of Chinese bacon (unsmoked) during processing[J]. European journal of lipid science and technology, 2017, 119(10):1600512 1600522.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.v119.10

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14389312/119/10

Cited in this article [1]

[25]	于慧子. 中华绒螯蟹与锯缘青蟹中关键气味活性化合物的鉴定[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2011. Cited in this article [1]

[26]	崔保威, 欧阳远鑫, 马杨柳, 等. 不同产地秀丽白虾干风味物质GC-IMS指纹图谱分析[J]. 食品工业, 2022, 43(7):311-315. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	江津津, 严静, 郑玉玺, 等. 不同产地传统鱼露风味特征差异分析[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(12):206-214. Cited in this article [1]

[28]	刘芳, 张健, 赵云苹, 等. 基于GC-IMS分析盐渍海参挥发性风味物质[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(1):195-198,217. Cited in this article [1]

[29]

方心如, 肖乃勇, 郭全友, 等. 基于顶空-气相色谱-离子迁移谱分析蒸制过程中草鱼肉挥发性成分的变化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023, 49(24):241-250.

https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.034713

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为提高蒸制草鱼的风味品质,通过顶空-气相色谱-离子迁移谱(headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectroscopy, HS-GC-IMS)结合主成分分析(principal component analysis, PCA)及感官评定研究了草鱼白肉和红肉在蒸制过程中挥发性成分的变化。在鱼肉中共鉴定出40种化合物,其中白肉(34种)和红肉(37种)共有的挥发性化合物有30种,主要是醛类、醇类、酮类和酯类。蒸制处理会促进鱼肉中挥发性化合物(异丁醛、戊醛、己醛、庚醛、2-乙基己醇和2-戊酮)的形成;蒸制后,红肉中挥发性成分的数量和相对含量都高于白肉。PCA结果表明,在蒸制过程中,红肉的风味变化较白肉更为丰富。在蒸制时间到达9 min时,鱼肉整体的风味趋于稳定,鱼肉中的挥发性成分可以代表熟草鱼肉的风味。感官评定的结果也显示,蒸制9 min的草鱼肉具有较好的风味和整体可接受度。综上,HS-GC-IMS和PCA的组合可以较好地描述不同蒸制时间的草鱼白肉和红肉挥发性化合物的变化,并为确定草鱼适宜的蒸制时间提供依据。

[30]	赵勇, 蒋东丰, 朱克卫, 等. 不同产地进口三文鱼挥发风味物质组成特征研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2020, 11(3):734-744. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	马姗, 于文龙, 焦英帅, 等. 不同减菌处理对凡纳对虾贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2022, 47(3):116-124. Cited in this article [1]

[32]	韦毓, 翁旭东, 于瑾, 等. 不同养殖模式对鲫鱼(Carassius auratus)营养品质及特征风味的影响研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2024, 55(1):243-252. Cited in this article [2]

[33]

韩乃瑄, 马成莹, 李敏, 等. 电子鼻和GC-IMS联用分析不同条件发酵山楂糯米酒的香气成分[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(23):312-320.

https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.038437

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

目前我国的石榴产业、酒类产业发展势头迅猛,新产品层出不穷,同时随着科技的发展,各种新型的分析技术也不断出现。为了探究不同发酵条件对山楂糯米酒风味物质的影响,该研究从酵母种类和原料比例两方面探究发酵条件对山楂糯米酒香气成分组成的影响。结果表明,电子鼻对氮氧化合物、甲基类、醛酮醇类物质的响应值更高,主成分分析结果表明黄酒酵母发酵产品的风味优于果酒酵母。气相色谱-离子迁移谱分析定性了52种物质,主要为酯类和醇类。相对气味活性值结合正交偏最小二乘法判别分析和变量投影重要性(variable importance in projection,VIP)筛选出4种关键性风味物质(VIP＞1),分别是乙酸异戊酯、丁酸乙酯、异丁醛、异松油烯;5种具有重要修饰作用的化合物(VIP<1),分别是甲基三硫醚、庚酸乙酯、异丁酸乙酯(二聚体)、芳樟醇、乙酸叶醇酯。感官分析结果表明,山楂浆占比50%时,产品的评分更高,香气丰富度和平衡度更好。