Curing Characteristics and Curing Process of Middle Leaves of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘YM2020’

LIHongchen, YANGJunjie, CHANGJianbo, XIAZongliang

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 194-199.

PDF(1600 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1600 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 194-199. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0499

Curing Characteristics and Curing Process of Middle Leaves of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘YM2020’

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The new flue-cured tobacco variety ‘YM2020’ is a mutant of ‘Yunyan 87’. To explore the optimal curing process for the middle leaves of ‘YM2020’, its curing characteristics were systematically evaluated and compared with those of ‘Yunyan 87’. A suitable curing process was also developed. Through dark-box and dynamic curing experiments, the yellowing/browning characteristics, moisture loss patterns, chlorophyll degradation dynamics, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity changes, and shrinkage rates of the tobacco leaves were determined. The results showed that ‘YM2020’ and ‘Yunyan 87’ had comparable ease of curing, with similar yellowing rates (complete yellowing within 72 hours). However, ‘YM2020’ had moderate curing tolerance [average PPO activity of 0.3-0.4 U/(g·FW)], which was lower than that of ‘Yunyan 87’ [PPO activity< 0.3 U/(g·FW)]. During the curing process, ‘YM2020’ exhibited a ‘slow-fast-slow’ moisture loss pattern, with a 12.6% slower chlorophyll degradation rate in the first 48 hours compared to ‘Yunyan 87’. Additionally, its shrinkage rates (length 19.61%, width 37.35%) were significantly higher than those of the control. Based on these characteristics, a phased temperature and humidity control process was proposed: during the yellowing stage (37-43℃), a gradual temperature increase to promote chlorophyll degradation; during the coloring stage (45-54℃), precise temperature control to balance material conversion and drying rate; and during the dry vein stage (54-62℃), a staged temperature increase to ensure complete drying of the main vein.

Key words

flue-cured tobacco / moisture content / dehydration pattern / chlorophyll degradation rate / polyphenol oxidase / curing characteristics / curing process

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Hongchen , YANG Junjie , CHANG Jianbo , et al. Curing Characteristics and Curing Process of Middle Leaves of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘YM2020’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(1): 194-199 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0499

References

[1]
周诚, 郭鸿雁, 邓世媛, 等. 优质烤烟烘烤特性的研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(10):14-17.
[2]
李雪君, 李建华, 郭敬, 等. 烤烟新品种豫浓香201中部叶的烘烤特性及烘烤工艺[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(11):2710-2716.
[3]
杨树勋. 烟叶烘烤原理及技术研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2018, 32(6):541-544.
[4]
王传义, 张忠锋, 徐秀红, 等. 烟叶烘烤特性研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(1):38-41.
[5]
刘芳, 宋笑龙, 宗胜杰, 等. 烤烟新品种许金101烘烤特性及烟叶质量研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(12):172-180.
[6]
曹想, 裴晓东, 陈梦思, 等. 烤烟新品种HN2146烘烤特性研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报
( 自然科学), 2020,35(3 ) :464-469.
[7]
曾航, 蒋垚, 陈宏涛, 等. 烤烟新品系09011的烘烤特性[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(7):104-108.
[8]
林旋, 张洋, 杨丽花, 等. 云南烤烟品种中部叶烘烤特性研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(6):68-73.
[9]
宫长荣. 烟叶烘烤原理[M]. 北京: 农业出版社,1994:131-137.
[10]
李许涛, 武广鹏, 李伟观, 等. 不同氮用量对烤烟品种氮代谢及烘烤特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(4):1-7.
[11]
周国柱, 薛超群, 张永红, 等. 栽培因素对烤烟经济性状的效应分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2001, 34(1):41-43.
[12]
张希. 5个烤烟品种在河南烟区适宜采收成熟度与烘烤工艺研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021.
[13]
霍开玲, 江凯, 贺帆, 等. 鲜烟叶烘烤特性影响因素研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(5):1225-1228.
[14]
中国烟草总公司青州烟草研究所. YC/T 311—2009,烤烟品种烘烤特性评价[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2009:2.
[15]
李建东, 孙光伟, 张丽, 等. 施肥量对烤烟烘烤过程中多酚氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(4):89-93.
[16]
裴晓东, 路晓崇, 李帆, 等. 烘烤过程中烟叶不同叶片结构含水量变化的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(25):10425-10426.
[17]
朱林, 曹想, 邓小华, 等. 湘烟7号烘烤过程中烟叶失水和色素降解特性[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(5):174-179.
[18]
徐晓燕, 孙五三, 王能如. 烟草多酚类化合物的合成与烟叶品质的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2003, 24(1):3-5.
[19]
仙立国, 黄一兰, 王松峰, 等. 翠碧一号鲜烟叶素质及烘烤特性研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(3):66-73.
[20]
彭宣翔, 余金龙, 陈夏晔. 烤烟新品种湘烟5号烘烤工艺研究[J]. 农技服务, 2021, 38(1):69-71.
[21]
董淑君, 黄明迪, 王耀锋, 等. 密集烤房与普通烤房烘烤中烟叶色素和多酚含量的变化分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(1):90-95.
[22]
赵高坤, 任可, 陈妍洁, 等. 不同成熟度烟叶烘烤过程中大分子物质代谢动态研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(9):1950-1957.
[23]
陈颐, 郑竹山, 王建兵, 等. 不同成熟度烤烟烘烤过程中游离氨基酸及转氨酶活性变化[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(3):75-83.
[24]
冯莉, 常爱霞, 李艳丽, 等. 不同烤烟品种叶片代谢关键酶活性差异研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(3):49-52.
[25]
徐秀红, 许家来, 杨永花, 等. 烤烟烘烤性状与烟叶化学成分的相关性[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(6):103-106.
PDF(1600 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/