PDF(1393 KB)
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of 0.005% Flocoumafen Bait for Farmland Rodent Control
QINJiao, JIANGHongxue, LINSiliang, YAODandan, WANGShiyu, QINMeng
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 184-189.
PDF(1393 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(1393 KB)
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of 0.005% Flocoumafen Bait for Farmland Rodent Control
To investigate the feasibility of 0.005% flocoumafen for controlling rodent pests in farmlands, field trials were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in agricultural areas across nine provinces (regions) in China. The study evaluated the control efficacy in blank control areas, control agent areas (0.005% bromadiolone/brodifacoumat 10 g/hm2), and test agent areas (0.005% flocoumafen at 10 g/hm2) at 7, 15 and 21-30 days after bait application. A systematic assessment was performed on the control efficacy, palatability, and safety of 0.005% flocoumafen bait against farmland rodents. Results demonstrated that flocoumafen bait exhibited significant lethal effects on dominant rodent species such as Rattus norvegicus and Apodemus agrarius (control efficacy ranging from 60.9% to 100%). The average bait consumption rate of flocoumafen was 69.61%, indicating superior palatability compared to the control agents. Safety assessments indicated sporadic occurrences of secondary poisoning in non-target animals and accidental ingestion by poultry in certain areas during the trial; it is necessary to enhance warning signage and implement appropriate protective measures during baiting periods. The findings confirm that flocoumafen effectively controls rodent pest populations with favorable palatability. However, precise evaluation of its safety must be strengthened to support large-scale promotion and application of flocoumafen.
flocoumafen / rodent control / bait consumption rate / palatability / Apodemus agrarius
| [1] |
王祖望, 张知彬. 鼠害治理的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996:367-377.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
张知彬. 中国植物保护百科全书(鼠害卷)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2022.
|
| [4] |
王云鹏, 秦萌, 喻宏斌, 等. 2025年全国农区鼠害发生趋势与防控建议[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2025, 45(3):28-31.
|
| [5] |
王勇, 刘晓辉, 王登, 等. 我国鼠害学科发展现状与展望[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(5):325-334.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
董天义, 阎丙申. 抗凝血灭鼠剂研究进展[J]. 医学动物防制, 1998, 14(4):61-67.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
刘晓辉. 我国杀鼠剂应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5):85-90.
|
| [10] |
姚丹丹, 姜洪雪, 林思亮, 等. 珠江三角洲地区黄毛鼠抗药性的发生趋势及其Vkorc1基因多态性[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(5):1202-1209.
|
| [11] |
刘晓辉. 中国鼠害防控需求的差异、矛盾、挑战与对策[J]. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(1):407-414.
|
| [12] |
全国农业技术推广服务中心. NY/T1481—2007,农区鼠害监测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
|
| [13] |
梁杰荣, 周立, 魏善武, 等. 高寒草甸灭鼠后鼠兔和鼢鼠数量恢复的数学模型[J]. 生态学报, 1984, 4(1):88-98.
|
| [14] |
杨沛虹, 陈卫军, 张仁敏. 三种抗凝血型灭鼠毒饵的适口性及灭效研究[J]. 口岸卫生控制, 2013, 18(2):24-27.
|
| [15] |
阿布都克尤木·卡德尔, 杨森, 宋英, 等. 3种抗凝血类杀鼠剂在喀什农区防治害鼠效果及对家禽的安全性评价[J]. 植物保护, 2024, 50(1):316-323.
|
| [16] |
中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T1152—2006,农药登记用杀鼠剂防治家栖鼠类药效试验方法及评价[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
|
| [17] |
根呷羊批, 周俗, 杨孔, 等. 4种杀鼠剂对高原鼠兔适口性及防控效果[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(1):253-258.
|
| [18] |
刘丽, 周俗, 刘芳, 等. 不同灭鼠饵剂对高原鼠兔种群密度的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(4):94-98.
|
| [19] |
张正炜, 陈秀. 澳大利亚抗凝血类杀鼠剂的非靶标影响与管控[J]. 世界农药, 2022, 144(5):22-28.
|
| [20] |
王登, 秦萌, 郭永旺. 2011—2020年我国农区鼠害治理的成就与挑战[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2022, 42(9):24-29.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
梁梓亮, 张均功. 南方农业生产鼠害发生及防治方法[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023(12):160-162.
|
| [24] |
张武鸣, 陈斌艳, 孙太华, 等. 不同处理防控广西稻田鼠害的示范效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 8:70-72.
|
| [25] |
黄秀清, 冯志勇, 颜世祥, 等. 黄毛鼠综合防治对策及技术研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2002(1):40-42.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |