Impact of Organic Alternatives on Soybean Yield and Soil Fertility

ZHAOWenhui, JINGYudan, WANGXiao, WANGYing, WANGJiajia

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 24-30.

PDF(1290 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1290 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 24-30. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0562

Impact of Organic Alternatives on Soybean Yield and Soil Fertility

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Excessive application of chemical fertilizers leads to numerous problems such as soil acidification and compaction. Soybeans, as soil-improving crops, play a significant role in soil improvement. Their yield formation depends on the accumulation of dry matter in the later stage, and the slow-release property of organic fertilizers can meet this requirement. Current research focuses on the combined application mode of chemical and organic fertilizers. This study explored the impact of partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers on soybean yield and soil fertility, which was of great significance. This experiment used ‘Wandou 37’ as the material and set different ratios of organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizers to analyze the growth traits, yield components, nutrient absorption, and changes in soil physical and chemical properties of soybeans, and to screen the best substitution ratio, providing a theoretical basis for green soybean production. Suitable plots were selected in Mengcheng, Anhui Province, and six treatments were set up, including single application of chemical fertilizers (T1) and five treatments of organic fertilizer substitution for 20% to 100% of chemical fertilizers (T2 to T6). Samples were collected at maturity to analyze relevant indicators. The results showed that the plant height, stem diameter, and dry matter weight of each treatment with organic fertilizer substitution were all improved to varying degrees compared with the single application of chemical fertilizers. The yield of each treatment increased first and then decreased with the substitution ratio. Among them, the treatment with 60% substitution of chemical fertilizers (T4) had the largest increase in yield (29.33%), and the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per plant, and the 100-seed weight all reached the highest. After applying organic fertilizers to substitute for chemical fertilizers, the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium were significantly increased, and the microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus also increased. Organic fertilizer substitution could increase soil pH, improve soil buffering capacity, and alleviate acidification in the long term. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers can significantly promote soybean growth, increase yield, and improve soil quality. Among them, the comprehensive effect of 60% substitution ratio is the best, which has the benefits of increasing yield and sustainable soil improvement, and is the recommended optimal fertilization mode.

Key words

organic fertilizer substitution / chemical fertilizer / soybean / yield / soil fertility

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHAO Wenhui , JING Yudan , WANG Xiao , et al . Impact of Organic Alternatives on Soybean Yield and Soil Fertility[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(9): 24-30 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0562

References

[1]
孟庆英, 于忠和, 贾绘彬, 等. 不同施肥处理对大豆根际土壤微生物及土壤肥力影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2011, 30(3):471-474.
[2]
焦晓光, 魏丹, 隋跃宇. 长期培肥对农田黑土土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(3):1-3.
[3]
王立刚, 李维炯, 邱建军, 等. 生物有机肥对作物生长、土壤肥力及产量的效应研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 2004(5):12-16.
[4]
高菊生, 黄晶, 董春华, 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻产量及土壤有效养分影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(2):314-324.
[5]
张发明, 毛昆明, 刘宏斌, 等. 不同量有机肥与化肥配施对水稻氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 26(5):694-699.
[6]
朱菜红, 董彩霞, 沈其荣, 等. 配施有机肥提高化肥氮利用效率的微生物作用机制研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2):282-288.
[7]
张国荣, 李菊梅, 徐明岗, 等. 长期不同施肥对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(2):543-551.
[8]
张欣, 施利利, 刘晓宇, 等. 不同施肥处理对水稻产量、食味品质及蛋白质组分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(4):104-108.
[9]
莫艳芳, 申云鑫, 贺彪, 等. 基于整合分析土壤微生物量碳、氮含量对有机肥施用的响应特征[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(6):89-101.
[10]
牛天新, 查燕, 马华升. 有机肥替代化肥减施对鲜食大豆的效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(2):301-303.
为减少环境污染,改善土壤的生态环境,进行有机肥替代化肥的田间试验,研究等氮条件下不同生物肥料和化肥配施对鲜食大豆的效果。结果表明,城市生活易腐垃圾有机肥和菌渣有机肥在株高、植物生物量和产量等方面表现较好,易腐垃圾有机肥比空白对照产量增加174.8%,比单施化肥处理增产30.5%;菌渣有机肥比空白对照增产139.0%,比单施化肥的处理增产13.5%。
[11]
丁娇, 韩晓增, 邹文秀, 等. 长期施肥对大豆生长状况及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5):778-783.
[12]
裴雪霞, 党建友, 张定一, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对旱地小麦产量、品质和水分利用率的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4):250-258.
[13]
孟庆英, 韩旭东, 张春峰, 等. 白浆土施有机肥及石灰对土壤酶活性与大豆产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(3):56-60.
[14]
郎漫, 刘元英, 彭显龙, 等. 不同氮肥用量下镁对大豆碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006(1):48-52,57.
[15]
孙炜, 樊雪梅. 生物有机肥料对大豆生育性状和产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2009(5):63-64.
[16]
MANDAL K, HATI K, MISRA A. Biomass yield and energy analysis of soybean production in relation to fertilizer-NPK and organic manure[J]. Biomass and bioenergy, 2009, 33(12):1670-1679.
[17]
薛红, 宁海龙, 杨兴勇, 等. 大豆产量相关性状的遗传分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(2):1-8.
[18]
金宏鑫, 裴占江, 李淑芹, 等. 污泥生物有机肥对大豆产量和氮磷吸收的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2012(1):92-95.
[19]
匡恩俊, 李梓瑄, 迟凤琴, 等. 耕地方式与有机肥配施对大豆产量及土壤养分特征的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(1):108-115.
[20]
宋震震, 李絮花, 李娟, 等. 有机肥和化肥长期施用对土壤活性有机氮组分及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3):525-533.
[21]
郭振, 王小利, 徐虎, 等. 长期施用有机肥增加黄壤稻田土壤微生物量碳氮[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1168-1174.
[22]
李春越, 苗雨, 薛英龙, 等. 长期施肥黄土旱塬农田土壤-微生物-植物系统碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1):370- 378.
[23]
李其胜, 赵贺, 汪志鹏, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对稻麦轮作土壤养分利用和酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(4):912-919.
[24]
臧逸飞, 郝明德, 张丽琼, 等. 26年长期施肥对土壤微生物量碳、氮及土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(5):1445-1451.
[25]
齐莎, 赵小蓉, 郑海霞, 等. 内蒙古典型草原连续5年施用氮磷肥土壤生物多样性的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(20):5518-5526
PDF(1290 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/