Response of Mucilaginous and Non-mucilage Artemisia ordosica Seed Germination to Salt Stress

ZHAOQianyun, LIDelu, WANGFei, LIYa

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 60-66.

PDF(1336 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1336 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 60-66. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0597

Response of Mucilaginous and Non-mucilage Artemisia ordosica Seed Germination to Salt Stress

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The study aims to clarify the germination protective effect of mucilage of Artemisia ordosica seed on salt stress and to reveal the salt tolerance characteristics of mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds during the germination stage, providing a basis for artificial sand-fixing afforestation in salinized habitats. Taking mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds of Artemisia ordosica as test materials, seeds were treated with NaCl solutions at different concentrations (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, and 1.0%), and indicators such as germination rate, germination potential, germination index, and seedling length were measured, the salt tolerance characteristics of mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds during the germination period were analyzed. The results indicate that: as the concentration of NaCl solution increases, the germination rates of both mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds of Artemisia ordosica show a decreasing trend. When the NaCl concentration ranged from 0% to 0.6%, the germination rate of mucilaginous seeds was significantly higher than that of non-mucilage seeds (P<0.05). However, at concentrations between 0.8% and 1.0%, the difference between the two was not significant (P>0.05). Under the control treatment, there was no significant difference in the germination index between mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds (P>0.05). As the salt concentration increased, the germination index gradually decreased. Within the NaCl concentration range of 0% to 0.6%, the germination index of mucilaginous seeds showed significant differences (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed between concentrations of 0.8% and 1.0% (P>0.05). The germination index of non-mucilage seeds reached highest under the control condition and significantly decreased when the NaCl concentration reached 0.4%. Within the NaCl concentration range of 0% to 0.4%, the germination index of mucilaginous Artemisia ordosica seeds was significantly higher than that of non-mucilage seeds (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed between the two within the 0.6% to 1.0% concentration range (P>0.05). The plumule length of mucilaginous seeds showed no significant difference between the control group and the 0.2% NaCl treatment (P>0.05), but it was significantly higher than that observed under the 0.4% to 1.0% NaCl treatments (P<0.05). Under low-concentration conditions, the relative of salt damage rate was relatively low, and the relative salt damage rate of mucilaginous seeds was lower than that of non-mucilage seeds. High concentrations of salt had a significant adverse effect on seed germination, with no notable difference in salt damage between mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds (P>0.05). In summary, under low-concentration NaCl stress conditions (0-0.6%), salt tolerance of mucilaginous seeds is stronger than non-mucilage seeds. Under high-concentration NaCl stress (0.6%-0.8%), there is no significant difference between mucilaginous and non-mucilage seeds. This also indicates that the salt tolerance of Artemisia ordosica seeds during the germination period is relatively weak, while salt tolerance of mucilaginous seeds is slightly stronger than non-mucilage seeds during this stage. This study offers a theoretical foundation for the cultivation and afforestation of Artemisia ordosica in salinized sandy areas and further research may focus on the effects of mixed salt stress and the regulatory mechanisms of mucilage.

Key words

Artemisia ordosica / mucilage / germination rate / salt tolerance / NaCl stress / germination index / relative salt damage rate

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHAO Qianyun , LI Delu , WANG Fei , et al. Response of Mucilaginous and Non-mucilage Artemisia ordosica Seed Germination to Salt Stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(8): 60-66 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0597

References

[1]
MASHALI A, SUAREZ D L, NABHAN H, et al. Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt-affected soils[M]. Rome: FAO land and plant nutrition management service, 2005.
[2]
王遵亲. 中国盐渍土[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993.
[3]
赵可夫, 张万钧, 范海, 等. 改良和开发利用盐渍化土壤的生物学措施[J]. 土壤通报, 2001, 32(S0):115-119.
[4]
刘玉艳, 于凤鸣, 曹慧颖, 等. 盐胁迫对紫花地丁植株生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(3):36-40.
[5]
郭世乾, 崔增团, 傅亲民. 甘肃省盐碱地现状及治理思路与建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2013, 34(4):75-79.
[6]
赵可夫, 李法曾. 中国盐生植物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1999:40.
[7]
冷家明, 尚天翠, 毛锦龙, 等. 不同盐胁迫对假苇拂子茅种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5):1152-1155.
假苇拂子茅(Calamagrostis pseudophragmites)为禾本科多年生根茎禾草,在饲料、园林景观和人工湿地等领域具有重要应用前景。为了解该物种的抗逆性,采用不同的盐溶液进行胁迫处理,探讨不同盐胁迫处理对假苇拂子茅种子的发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数以及根芽生长的影响。结果表明:相较于中性盐NaCl,碱性盐Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>和NaHCO<sub>3</sub>胁迫显著降低了假苇拂子茅种子的发芽率,胚芽和胚根长伸长所受胁迫更强。
[8]
王赞, 李源, 吴欣明, 等. PEG渗透胁迫下鸭茅种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008(1):50-55.
[9]
王飞, 刘世增, 刘有军, 等. 沙地云杉和青海云杉种子萌发和幼苗生长对干旱盐碱胁迫的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(11):2309-2316.
[10]
黄修梅, 郝丽珍, 袁春爱. 蒙古高原野韭种子萌发对PEG模拟干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 种子, 2014, 33(11):14-17.
[11]
杨洪晓, 张金屯, 吴波, 等. 油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)对半干旱区沙地生境的适应及其生态作用[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 40(5):684-6901.
[12]
何莹莹, 于明含, 丁国栋, 等. 基于冠层温度的典型沙生植物土壤水分状况诊断[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(4):89-96.
[13]
董雪, 刘明虎, 李新乐, 等. 人工模拟增雨对油蒿种子形态性状和比叶面积的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(2):36-42.
[14]
张德魁, 王继和, 马全林, 等. 油蒿研究综述[J]. 草业科学, 2007(8):30-35.
[15]
靳虎甲, 王继和, 李毅, 等. 油蒿生态学研究综述[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(4):62-66,72.
[16]
刘芳. 油蒿容器育苗试验[J]. 防护林科技, 2008(1):9-10.
[17]
张定海, 杨丽萍, 张志山. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同生境油蒿种群的数量动态[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(5):893-901.
对腾格里沙漠东南缘不同的生境条件(包括始建于1964年的人工植被区和天然植被区)下油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)种群调查取样,按照植株的体积大小分为7个龄级(Ⅰ,0~2 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅱ,2~5 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅲ,5~10 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅳ,10~15 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅴ,15~20 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅵ,20~30 cm<sup>3</sup>;Ⅶ,>30 cm<sup>3</sup>),分析了种群的组成、静态生命表和存活曲线。结果表明:人工植被区油蒿种群的总体规模大于天然植被区,幼龄个体占有很高的比例;天然植被区油蒿的死亡率低于人工植被区,天然植被区Ⅰ和Ⅱ龄级油蒿种群的死亡率最高,人工植被区Ⅴ~Ⅶ龄级的油蒿种群死亡率最高;天然植被区油蒿种群的稳定性维持主要通过幼苗的更新,而人工植被区可通过幼苗的自我更新和大龄植株的自疏作用;Ⅴ龄级的油蒿个体是种群中的生存质量最佳的个体;两种生境下油蒿种群均符合Deevey Ⅱ型存活曲线。
[18]
魏巍, 王晓, 张克斌, 等. 毛乌素沙地不同立地条件对油蒿种群存活、开花分布格局的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(1):104-111.
[19]
王春媛. 油蒿生理生态特性对降雨变化的响应机制[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2022.
[20]
靳川, 李鑫豪, 蒋燕, 等. 利用叶片荧光参数估算油蒿灌丛群落生态系统生产力[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(7):2899-2909.
[21]
陈栋, 周海燕, 李培广, 等. 油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)和柠条(Caragana korshinskii)生理生态特性的昼夜变化特征与调节机制[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015, 35(6):1549-1556.
研究了两种优良固沙植物油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)和柠条(Caragana korshinskii)的光合生理、水分生理和根、茎、叶渗透调节物质的昼夜变化特征。结果显示:空气相对湿度在夜间大幅度回升,植物的昼夜叶温差高于气温差。植物日间呈光合作用,夜间呈呼吸作用,油蒿的光合速率和呼吸速率均高于柠条;日间光合作用出现的光抑制可在日落时迅速恢复。日间气孔导度和蒸腾速率呈现大幅度的波动,在夜间趋于低缓,油蒿日间的调节幅度高于柠条,且在夜间仍维持一定的气孔开度。油蒿根含水量和小枝水势始终高于柠条,但柠条在夜间的根系吸水能力高于油蒿。油蒿根、茎、叶的可溶性糖含量均高于柠条,在夜间叶片的可溶性糖可大量的传输至根部;柠条根、茎、叶的脯氨酸含量均高于油蒿,油蒿的根和叶片在夜间出现较高的脯氨酸累积。植物生理活动的夜间调整对增强午间抗逆性有一定的作用。
[22]
丘明新. 油蒿植物群落与固沙造林关系的研究兼论用该群落在沙坡头建立人工植被的可能性[J]. 西北植物研究, 1984(1):29-39,80.
[23]
姜生秀, 严子柱, 吴昊. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对2种沙冬青种子萌发的影响. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(5):130-136.
[24]
欧文静, 朱爱国, 喻春明, 等. 盐胁迫对罗布白麻种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2018, 40(5):208-212.
[25]
沈禹颖, 王锁民, 陈亚明. 盐胁迫对牧草种子萌发及其恢复的影响[J]. 草业学报, 1999(3):54-60.
[26]
高瑞如, 赵瑞华, 张双凤, 等. 盐分和温度对盐节木种子萌发的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(11):2281-2285.
[27]
黄勇, 郭猛, 张红瑞, 等. 盐胁迫对石竹种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12):105-111.
通过对不同浓度盐胁迫下石竹种子萌发特性、幼苗生长和生理特性等指标的测定,研究盐胁迫对石竹种子萌发、幼苗生长的影响。结果表明:50 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫对石竹种子萌发无显著影响,100、150、200和250 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫显著抑制石竹种子发芽,且浓度增加抑制作用变强。50、100和150 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫对植株幼苗茎粗有显著促进作用,200 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫对茎粗影响不显著,250 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫显著抑制茎粗生长;叶长、叶宽、根长和单株干重在50 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫下正常生长,在其余胁迫处理下被显著抑制。幼苗游离脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白和丙二醛的含量随盐胁迫浓度的增加而升高,可溶性糖含量、过氧化物酶和过氧化氢酶活性随盐胁迫浓度的增加呈先升高后下降的趋势,可溶性糖含量在100 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫下含量达到最高,过氧化物酶和过氧化氢酶活性在150 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫下活性最大,盐胁迫显著抑制超氧化物歧化酶活性。石竹有一定的抗盐胁迫能力,可在50 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>盐胁迫下正常萌发生长,高浓度盐胁迫下石竹种子萌发和幼苗生长受到抑制。
[28]
李海云, 赵可夫, 王秀峰. 盐对盐生植物种子萌发的抑制[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 33(2):170-173.
[29]
UNGA R. Seed germination and seed-bank ecology in halophytes[M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1995.
[30]
尤佳, 王文瑞, 卢金, 等. 盐胁迫对盐生植物黄花补血草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(12):3825-3833.
[31]
宋旭丽, 侯喜林, 胡春梅, 等. NaCl胁迫对超大甜椒种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(3):569-575.
[32]
肖斌, 汪媛艳. 盐胁迫对罗布麻和大花白麻种子萌发的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(2):314-319.
PDF(1336 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/