PDF(1387 KB)
Study on Production Performance of Forage Oats in Western Henan Under Late Sowing Condition
WANGYueqing, LILifeng, WANGJieqiong, YUEYulu, LUJiading, CAIHaixia, YANGZhibo, LIDefeng
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 162-169.
PDF(1387 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(1387 KB)
Study on Production Performance of Forage Oats in Western Henan Under Late Sowing Condition
In order to understand the effect of late sowing on the production performance of oats, and screen late sowing varieties suitable for western Henan, 12 oat varieties were selected and sown in late November, and randomized block design was used to investigate phenological period, basic seedlings, tillering, plant height, yield, dry-fresh ratio, leaf-stem ratio and other data. The results showed that the growth period was 180-196 d, with ‘Qinghai 444’ being the shortest. The average seedling emergence period was 23 days, 10 varieties showed an increase in basic seedlings at regreening stage, which was analyzed as uneven emergence caused by low temperature. At regreening stage, the basic seedlings were 1.758-2.967 million plants/hm2, with ‘Temu’ being the highest. There were no tillers before overwintering, and 1.85-2.5 tillers per plant at regreening stage, with ‘Tianyan No.3’ having the most tillers. The plant height was 135.0-164.5 cm, and ‘Temu’ was the highest. The leaf-stem ratio was 0.285-0.344, and ‘Beiley’ was the highest. The dry-fresh ratio was 0.238-0.301, with ‘Temu’ being the highest. The fresh grass yield was 38382.1-53216.2 kg/hm2, and ‘Tianyan 70’ was the highest. The hay yield was 10683.4-13643.8 kg/hm2, with ‘Temu’ being the highest. The results of grey correlation analysis showed that ‘Tianyan 70’ and ‘Temu’ ranked first and second respectively in the comprehensive performance evaluation. In production, it is recommended that ‘Tianyan 70’ and ‘Temu’ are suitable varieties for late sowing in western Henan, and the seeding rate should be increased when late sowing.
forage oats / late sowing / production performance / western Henan
| [1] |
姚晋, 何云, 卢家顶, 等. 河南省秋播饲用燕麦的越冬率分蘖特性及其生产性能[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2):528-538.
为探明河南省秋播燕麦的越冬情况和生产性能,本试验秋播21个燕麦品种,对其越冬率、分蘖情况等农艺性状及干草产量、抗倒伏性、营养品质进行测定和综合评价。结果表明:各秋播燕麦品种越冬率为33%~86%,其中有13个品种越冬率在60%以上。秋播的燕麦分蘖能力较强,越冬前和越冬后为2次分蘖高峰期,且越冬前分蘖为有效分蘖。各品种株高为1.04~1.42 m,'太阳神'的株高最高;干草产量为9.95~18.69 t·hm<sup>-2</sup>,'贝勒'最高。相关分析表明,干草产量与株高呈极显著正相关关系,干草产量与分蘖等指标无显著相关性关系。对各品种营养指标进行主成分分析表明,可利用主成分分析法对营养品质进行量化评分。综合抗倒伏性、干草产量和营养品质综合评价表明,'贝勒''牧王'和'贝勒2'得分较高,适宜在河南省及黄淮海平原进行秋播推广。
|
| [2] |
高菲, 王铁梅, 卢欣石. 2021年我国商品饲草生产形势分析与2022年趋势展望[J]. 畜牧产业, 2022(3):32-37.
|
| [3] |
国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2024[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社,2024:388-389.
|
| [4] |
杨秀玲, 魏臻武. 燕麦种苗的抗寒性研究[J]. 四川草原, 2005(6):23-24.
|
| [5] |
吴嘉浩, 桑瑞娟, 董春阳, 等. 播期与播量对河南省秋播饲用燕麦生产性能的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2024(15):155-161.
|
| [6] |
张洁, 田文仲, 黄向荣, 等. 半湿润偏旱区水肥耦合对大豆产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(3):469-476.
|
| [7] |
张瑞珍, 马涛, 杨春桃, 等. “康巴”变绿异燕麦品种比较研究[J]. 四川农业与农机, 2020(3):43-45.
|
| [8] |
景芳, 刘彦明, 陈富, 等. 饲用燕麦在甘肃不同种植区的生产性能及营养品质[J]. 草原与草坪, 2025, 45(5):137-145.
|
| [9] |
张靓, 梁小玉, 胡远彬, 等. 燕麦抗倒伏性研究进展[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2024, 44(1):74-81.
|
| [10] |
陈路路. 不同行距和密度对谷子茎秆抗倒伏性能及产量的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2022.
|
| [11] |
曹利萍, 王君杰, 雷梦林, 等. 高光谱对冬小麦倒伏的响应[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(12):1930-1932.
|
| [12] |
何玉婷. 10个青稞高代品系农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J]. 种子科技, 2024, 42(18):58-60.
|
| [13] |
吕伟, 文飞, 韩俊梅, 等. 芝麻种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定及灰色关联度分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(12):106-112.
|
| [14] |
王贞. 中国燕麦填图[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2007.
|
| [15] |
郑殿升, 张宗文. 大粒裸燕麦(莜麦)(Avena nuda L.)起源及分类问题的探讨[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(5):667-670.
燕麦属(Avena L.)植物中有5个栽培种即普通栽培燕麦(A. sativa L.)、埃塞俄比亚燕麦(A. abyssinica Hochst.)、地中海燕麦(A. byzantina Koch)、砂燕麦(A. strigosa Schreb.)和大粒裸燕麦又称莜麦(A. nuda L.),其中大粒裸燕麦的子粒不带稃皮为裸燕麦,其他物种均带稃皮为皮燕麦。国际上主要种植皮燕麦,而我国主要种植大粒裸燕麦,由此不难看出,大粒裸燕麦在世界燕麦中占有特殊的地位。然而,关于大粒裸燕麦的起源和分类地位问题,迄今学者们的意见仍不尽相同。笔者通过参阅有关文献和研究实践,对这两个问题进行探讨,认为大粒裸燕麦起源于我国山西和内蒙古一带,在植物学分类上应为一个独立的物种即A. nuda L.。
|
| [16] |
熊昌绪. 种子休眠特性的研究[J]. 石河子农学院学报, 1984(2):65-70.
|
| [17] |
康素珍, 朱文江. 野燕麦种子的休眠和萌发习性的初步研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 1981(4):20-24.
|
| [18] |
浦铜良, 吕忠恕. 野燕麦籽粒休眠与种皮透气性及内源GA类物质活性的关系[J]. 植物学通报, 1988(4):232-235.
|
| [19] |
M.P.沙马,D.K. 麦克比思,W.H. 范登博恩, et al. 野燕麦生物学的研究Ⅰ.休眠、萌芽和出苗[J]. 青海农林科技, 1978(1)28-35.
|
| [20] |
王霞霞, 李龑, 李岩, 等. 低温胁迫对燕麦种子萌发期蛋白质组影响的研究[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(3):28-32.
|
| [21] |
柏晓玲, 周青平, 陈有军, 等. 燕麦幼苗对低温胁迫的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(7):1375-1382.
|
| [22] |
贾志国, 张丽. 低温胁迫对不同萌发状态的裸燕麦种子某些生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2011(5):117-118.
|
| [23] |
河南省农业科学院小麦研究所. DB41/T 1379—2017,小麦品种冬春季抗寒性鉴定与评价[S].2017-04-24.
|
| [24] |
郑冬晓. 不同冬春性小麦低温灾害指标和可种植界限变化研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2019.
|
| [25] |
冯学颖, 米俊珍, 刘景辉, 等. 宽幅条播和种植密度对燕麦抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(7):914-920.
|
| [26] |
王雪莱, 郭潇潇, 郭伟, 等. 种植密度对松嫩平原西部燕麦产量形成的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(7):881-889.
|
| [27] |
周萍萍, 赵军, 颜红海, 等. 播期、播种量与施肥量对裸燕麦籽粒产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(3):433-441.
|
| [28] |
桑瑞娟, 崔超杰, 何云, 等. 豫北地区18个秋播饲用燕麦品种抗倒伏特性及生产性能评价[J].草业学报, 2024, 33(8):74-85.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |