Current Status of Chemical Fertilizer Input and Countermeasures for Nutrient Optimization Management in Ziyang City of Sichuan Province

PANGPei, LIHua, WANGLiang, XUShilong

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 172-178.

PDF(1390 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1390 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 172-178. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0635

Current Status of Chemical Fertilizer Input and Countermeasures for Nutrient Optimization Management in Ziyang City of Sichuan Province

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on the agricultural statistical data of Ziyang City from 2015 to 2023, this study analyzed the variation characteristics of the total amount of chemical fertilizer, the amount of fertilizer applied per unit area, the variety of chemical fertilizer and the proportion of nutrient input in Ziyang City, so as to provide reference for the green and high-quality development of agriculture in Ziyang City. Based on the analysis of the current situation of fertilizer application and the actual situation of local agricultural production, this paper put forward some countermeasures and suggestions for fertilizer management with the core of optimizing nutrient structure. The results showed that: (1) From 2015 to 2023, the total amount of fertilizer application showed an overall downward trend and went through three stages, including a rapid decline period, a steady decline period, and a gradual stabilization period. In 2023, it dropped to 44000 t, a decrease of 28140 t compared with 2015, with a decrease of 32.13%. (2) The amount of fertilizer applied per unit area in Ziyang City in 2023 was 111.6 kg/hm2, a decrease of 6.15% compared with 118.9 kg/hm2 in 2015. This was not only lower than the national (292.6 kg/hm2) and Sichuan (315.7 kg/hm2) levels of fertilizer application per unit area, but also far lower than the fertilizer application intensity standard of 250 kg/hm2 proposed by the former Ministry of Ecology and Environment. (3) During the period of 2015 to 2023, the main fertilizer types applied in Ziyang City were nitrogen fertilizers (N) and compound fertilizer, which collectively accounted for over 80% every year. The proportion of phosphate fertilizers (P) ranged between 6% and 22%, and potash fertilizers (K) accounted for only 1% to 4%. Overall, the phosphate (P) and potash (K) fertilizers accounted for a relatively small proportion. (4) The N:P:K application ratio changed from 1:0.40:0.11 (2015) to 1:0.67:0.61 (2023). Notably, the ratio in 2021 (1:0.58:0.54) was the closest to the national average. Overall, the N:P:K application ratio remained imbalanced, especially the potassium fertilizers (K) consistently showing the lowest proportion. In summary, from 2015 to 2023, total fertilizer consumption and fertilizer application rate per unit area in Ziyang City showed overall declining trend, basically achieving the goal of “zero growth in fertilizer application”. However, structural imbalances in fertilizer product composition and nutrient input imbalances were persisted. Therefore, it was recommended that the optimization management of chemical fertilizer nutrients should follow the general principles of controlling nitrogen, stabilizing phosphorus and increasing potassium. Scientifically implement measures such as organic fertilizer replacement for chemical fertilizers, water and fertilizer integration, and agricultural mechanization should be extended to ensure the green and high-quality development of agriculture in Ziyang City.

Key words

Ziyang City / chemical fertilizer / current application status / nutrient optimization management / green agricultural development

Cite this article

Download Citations
PANG Pei , LI Hua , WANG Liang , et al. Current Status of Chemical Fertilizer Input and Countermeasures for Nutrient Optimization Management in Ziyang City of Sichuan Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(4): 172-178 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0635

References

[1]
曾希柏, 陈同斌, 胡清秀, 等. 中国粮食生产潜力和化肥增产效率的区域分异[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(5):539-546.
[2]
朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):259-273.
[3]
王艳群, 彭正萍, 薛世川, 等. 过量施肥对设施农田土壤生态环境的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005, 24(Z1):81-84.
[4]
麻坤, 刁钢. 化肥对中国粮食产量变化贡献率的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):1113-1120.
[5]
SAVCI S. An agricultural pollutant: Chemical fertilizer[J]. International journal of environmental science and development, 2012, 3(1):73.
[6]
SAVCI S. Investigation of effect of chemical fertilizers on environment[J]. Apcbee procedia, 2012, 1:287-292.
[7]
祝宏辉, 王彦. 我国农业化肥施用强度的变动趋势与影响因素——基于省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(13):353-358.
[8]
王金林, 武广云, 刘友林, 等. 云南省化肥施用现状及减量增效的途径研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(3):26-36.
针对云南省化肥用量偏高、施肥结构不合理、肥料利用率较低、施肥方式落后,且化肥施用量逐年增长的问题。收集了全省《测土配方施肥农户施肥情况调查表》信息410095份,统计了全省16个州市的351194块地块410095季作物的施肥情况,综述了过量施用化肥的危害。建议采取适类、适时、适量、科学的施肥方法和技术,科学的田间管理,“化肥 ”三方面的措施,实现我省化肥零增长的目标。为农业生产提供指导,以保证我省粮食安全。
[9]
串丽敏, 郑怀国, 王爱玲, 等. 京津冀化肥投入特征与污染防控对策研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(1):54-61.
[10]
卜容燕, 韩上, 余忠, 等. 安徽省化肥施用现状分析及思考[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(5):60-67.
[11]
国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2023.
[12]
四川统计局. 四川统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2023.
[13]
刘钦普, 林振山, 周亮. 山东省化肥使用时空分异及潜在环境风险评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015(7):208-214.
[14]
国家环境保护部. 关于印发《国家级生态乡镇申报及管理规定(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].[2025-9-16]. https://sthjj.luzhou.gov.cn/hbyw/trhjgl/trhjgl1/content_358508
[15]
宋秀杰, 程大军, 张鑫, 等. 北京种植业结构调整及化肥面源污染控制[C].// 中国环境科学学会.2010中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集. 2010:795-798.
[16]
刘钦普. 中国化肥面源污染环境风险时空变化[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(7):1247-1253.
[17]
AKHTER Z, IMAM M H, RAZZAK M A, et al. Feasibility of replacing chemical fertilizer by using organic fertilizer in wheat (Triticum aestivum) considering dry matter content and estimatimation of different growth parameters[J]. Journal of environmental science and natural resources, 2013, 6(1):7-10.
[18]
侯红乾, 林洪鑫, 刘秀梅, 等. 长期施肥处理对双季晚稻叶绿素荧光特征及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(2):280-289.
[19]
邢鹏飞, 高圣超, 马鸣超, 等. 有机肥替代部分无机肥对华北农田土壤理化特性、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(3):98-104.
[20]
季佳鹏, 赵欣宇, 吴景贵, 等. 有机肥替代20%化肥提高黑钙土养分有效性及玉米产量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(3):491-499.
[21]
黄绍文, 唐继伟, 李春花, 等. 我国蔬菜化肥减施潜力与科学施用对策[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1480-1493.
[22]
AYARS J E, CHRISTEN E W, SOPPE R W, et al. The resource potential of in-situ shallow ground water use in irrigated agriculture: A review[J]. Irrigation science, 2006, 24:147-160.
[23]
陈静, 王迎春, 李虎, 等. 滴灌施肥对免耕冬小麦水分利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014(10):1966-1975.
【目的】为解决黄淮海平原麦区冬小麦滴灌用水量和合理的水肥配合等问题,以山东省桓台县免耕农田为试验点,系统研究了滴灌施肥对土壤水分垂直运移、冬小麦产量及其构成因素、水分利用效率等的影响。【方法】采用测墒补灌和生育期滴灌施肥相结合的方法,以常规漫灌施肥处理为对照。设置65 mm(W1)、98 mm(W2)、130 mm(W3)、195 mm(W4)和260 mm(W5)5个滴灌梯度水平处理。在130 mm滴灌水平下,分别于冬小麦的分蘖期、拔节期、孕穗期、扬花期和灌浆期5个生育时期设置相应的氮磷钾肥料配比,采用氮磷钾3个因素,每个因素4个水平的二次饱和D-最优设计方法进行田间试验。氮、磷、钾4个水平分别为:0水平(0、0、0),1水平(94.5、42.4、59.2 kg•hm-2),2水平(189、84.7、118.3 kg•hm-2)和3水平(270、121、169 kg•hm-2)。【结果】测墒补灌试验结果表明,W1、W3和W5处理滴灌后土壤水分主要向下运移至60、80和100 cm以下土层。滴灌量越大,土壤水分垂直运移深度越大。滴灌量260 mm时存在灌溉水深层渗漏的风险;W1处理在整个生育期土壤含水量明显低于其他滴灌处理,滴灌量130 mm以上的处理,整个生育期0—80 cm土层的含水量为田间持水量的75%—80%;滴灌施肥处理与常规漫灌施肥处理相比显著增加了冬小麦的有效穗数,不同滴灌处理中灌溉量与穗粒数呈正相关关系,与千粒重呈负相关关系;滴灌量130 mm时,小麦籽粒产量最高;滴灌显著提高了冬小麦的水分利用效率,并以W3处理最高,达2.28 kg•m-3;对滴灌施肥试验的拟合结果表明,试验区冬小麦最佳N、P2O5和K2O施用量分别为206.63、86.72和88.07 kg•hm-2。【结论】在黄淮海平原地区免耕冬小麦采用测墒补灌和滴灌施肥相结合的方法可以显著提高水分利用效率和小麦籽粒产量,较常规对照分别提高了57.46%和21.13%。主要原因是滴灌后水分向下运移至作物根区内,减少了灌溉水深层渗漏的风险,促进了作物对随水施入肥料的吸收。合理的滴灌施肥配比下总体可节水51.85%,节约氮肥23.47%、磷肥28.33%和钾肥47.89%。
[24]
宋计平, 王克安, 孙凯宁, 等. 膜下滴灌对春拱棚茄子经济效益及土壤质量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(3):86-90.
[25]
赵志成, 杨显贺, 李清明, 等. 不同膜下滴灌方式对设施黄瓜生理特性及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(22):6597-6605.
[26]
何进宇, 田军仓. 旱作水稻水肥耦合模型及经济效应[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2015, 33(8):716-723.
[27]
温明霞, 奚辉, 吴韶辉, 等. 滴灌施肥对山地柑橘园生产效应的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 48(5):566-572.
[28]
刘阳春. 变量配肥施肥精准作业装备关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业机械化科学研究院, 2012:81-87.
[29]
罗锡文, 蒋恩臣, 王在满, 等. 开沟起垄式水稻精量穴直播机的研制[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(12):52-56.
PDF(1390 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/