Evaluation and Analysis of Health Condition of Reserve Resources of Ancient Trees: A Case Study of Ficus virens

LIUShihan, CHENGLinlin, LUOSiting

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 62-69.

PDF(1322 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1322 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 62-69. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0645

Evaluation and Analysis of Health Condition of Reserve Resources of Ancient Trees: A Case Study of Ficus virens

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To enable a scientific and precise evaluation of ancient tree reserve resources health status, so as to take timely and well-informed rejuvenation and protective measures, this study focused on 45 reserve resources of ancient Ficus virens in Liwan District, Guangzhou. A health evaluation system including three criteria layers of growth status (A), growth environment (B) and biological hazard (C) and 16 index layers was constructed, and growth and health indicators were systematically evaluated. The analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine indicator weights, compute health scores, and categorize health grades, followed by a comprehensive analysis of their overall health status. The results show that in the criterion layer, the weight of A is the highest (0.5396), followed by C (0.2970), and B is the lowest (0.1634). Among the 16 evaluation indicators, the damage degree of insect pests has the highest total weight value of 0.1465, indicating its most significant impact on the health evaluation of reserve resources of ancient trees. In contrast, the percentage of effective above-ground space has the lowest total weight value of 0.0197, suggesting its minimal influence on the health evaluation of reserve resources of ancient trees.The collective health status of the 45 ancient tree reserve resources individuals is favorable: 40 trees (88.89%) are classified as good, 5 trees (11.11%) are classified as moderate, and no ancient tree reserve resources are assessed as poor or very poor. This study has established a health evaluation methodology for reserve resources of ancient F. virens trees, providing a reference for subsequent health assessment and conservation efforts targeting ancient tree reserve resources.

Key words

ancient tree reserve resources / analytic hierarchy process / health status assessment / growth status / growth environment / biological hazards / Ficus virens

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Shihan , CHENG Linlin , LUO Siting. Evaluation and Analysis of Health Condition of Reserve Resources of Ancient Trees: A Case Study of Ficus virens[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(7): 62-69 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0645

References

[1]
冯毅敏, 孙龙华, 李智琦, 等. 广州市城区古树后续资源调查与保护建议[J]. 广东园林, 2016, 38(4):73-76.
[2]
骆卫坚. 古树及其后续资源保护措施——以广州市中心城区为例[J]. 乡村科技, 2022, 13(7):90-93.
[3]
马娇. 侧柏、圆柏古树后备资源健康诊断研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022.
[4]
叶广荣, 何世庆, 陈莹, 等. 广州市古树名木现状与保护对策[J]. 热带农业科学, 2014, 34(3):87-91.
[5]
管东生, 胡月玲, 郑淑颖, 等. 广州城市古树名木的特征及其保护[J]. 中国园林, 1999(5):62-64.
[6]
朱宇钒, 叶洋, 余祖伟, 等. 古树名木价值等级评估研究——以广州市从化区古树名木为例[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2023, 39(5):88-95.
[7]
邓希, 陈丽丽, 陈哲, 等. 广州市古树名木价值感知评价研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2024, 47(20):39-42.
[8]
李智琦, 阮琳, 熊咏梅. 广州中山纪念堂植物群落结构动态变化[J]. 广东园林, 2021, 43(4):90-92.
[9]
广州市荔湾区住房建设和园林局. 关于2023年广州市荔湾区新增古树后续资源目录(第一批)的公告[EB/OL].(2023-10-19)[2025-08-01]. https://www.lw.gov.cn/gzlwzj/gkmlpt/content/9/9269/post_9269514.html#13119.
[10]
广州市市场监督管理局. DB4401-T126—2021,古树名木健康巡查技术规范[S]. 广州: 广州市市场监督管理局, 2021:2-11.
[11]
谭夏阳, 薛彦斌, 钟叶, 等. 楠木古树健康评价模型的构建及应用[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2025, 41(2):51-59.
[12]
李大鹏, 张宝鑫, 李跃超. 园林景观树木健康状况评价与分析——以中国园林博物馆室外展园油松为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(4):14-22.
摸清园博馆油松植株的生长和健康状况,及时准确发现植株存在的健康问题和潜在风险,为短期内实施紧急补救、调整干预措施以及制订长期的树木复壮管理和科学养护方案提供参考依据。本研究系统调查园博馆内栽植的79株油松基本生长和健康指标,计算其健康值、划分健康等级,对其整体健康状况进行评价。结果表明,园博馆室外展园内栽植的油松绝大部分健康状况表现良好,没有差和极差2个健康等级的植株,健康等级为中的植株为9株,占总株数的11.39%,健康等级为良和优的分别为63株和7株,占总株数的79.75%和8.86%。平地和缓坡立地环境下的油松健康状况整体表现优于山地立地环境下的油松表现。在树冠和树干方面的不佳表现,枝叶病虫害、叶斑或变色以及干部病虫害等问题是导致植株健康状况变差、健康值降低的关键指标因素。应围绕引发园博馆油松衰弱的病虫害关键问题,建立基于病虫害发生规律的综合防控措施。此外要以提高和改善油松植株立地条件为目标和导向,科学实施精细化养护管理措施,提高植株的生长势和树势。还应建立树木健康档案制度,加强对油松植株生长状况的定期监测巡查。
[13]
仇建习, 吕贤良, 吴彬, 等. 莲都区古树名木资源现状分析与评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2019, 46(3):123-129.
[14]
MUSCAS D, ROBERTO P, FABIO O, et al. Life cycle assessment of common urban trees- The environmental performance of three Mediterranean cities[J]. Science of the total environment, 2024, 954:15.
[15]
邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7):93-100.
[16]
吴焕忠, 蔡壖. 古树价值计量评价的研究[J]. 林业建设, 2010(1):31-35.
[17]
朱祎珍. 城市古树名木健康诊断技术[J]. 福建热作科技, 2021, 46(1):48-51.
[18]
DEGERICKX J, ROBERTS D A, MCFADDEN J P, et al. Urban tree health assessment using airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR imagery[J]. International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2018, 73:26-38.
[19]
KARLOVICH D A, GRONINGER J W, CLOSE D D. Tree condition associated with topping in Southern Illinois communities[J]. Journal of arboriculture, 2000, 26(2):87-91.
[20]
严朝东, 苏纯兰, 孔爱冬, 等. 东莞市古树名木无损诊断和健康评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(6):155-162.
[21]
连琛, 敖妍, 谷飞云, 等. 文冠果古树优良单株筛选与健康评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(1):6-13.
[22]
苏纯兰, 陈葵仙, 胡秋艳, 等. 基于层次分析法构建东莞市古树名木健康评价体系[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2016, 32(2):57-62.
[23]
陈永曦. 广州市从化区古树名木资源调查与健康评价研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2020.
[24]
赵静娴, 朱桂寿, 章银柯, 等. 古树健康评价与保护的研究进展[J]. 林业科技情报, 2025, 57(1):20-24.

感谢中国城市规划学会城市感知学术专班对本工作的支持!

PDF(1322 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/