Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province

XIONG Ying; YANG Junjie; JIANG Jiazhu; LI Qiang; WANG Yong; ZHANG Yang; DONG Xiaowei; ZHANG Dongdong

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0668

PDF(1497 KB)

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 210-218. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0668

Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province

Author information +

History +

Abstract

To investigate the differences and usability of chemical components in flue-cured tobacco from different production areas of Shandong Province, B2F and C3F grade flue-cured tobacco samples from 20 production areas in six regions (Weifang, Linyi, Jinan, Zibo, Rizhao, and Qingdao) were analyzed. The contents of total sugar, reducing sugar, total nitrogen, nicotine, potassium, and chloride were determined. Regional differences were analyzed through multiple comparisons and cluster analysis, while the chemical component usability index (CCUI) was calculated using fuzzy mathematics to evaluate quality grades. The results showed that: (1) The total sugar content of B2F tobacco was within the optimal range, but reducing sugar, total nitrogen, potassium, and chloride were below optimal levels, with nicotine content exceeding thresholds. C3F tobacco exhibited slightly higher total sugar and optimal reducing sugar, but insufficient total nitrogen, nicotine, potassium, and chloride. The B2F grade tobacco exhibited significantly lower total sugar and reducing sugar content compared to the C3F grade, while its total nitrogen and nicotine content were significantly higher. No significant differences were observed in potassium and chloride content between the two grades. (2) High coefficients of variation (CV) were observed in chemical components (B2F: 12.91%-42.68%; C3F: 10.89%-48.57%), with nicotine, potassium, and chloride CV exceeding 20%, indicating pronounced fluctuations. (3) Flue-cured tobacco exhibited significant differences in chemical components and usability among different production areas, yet cluster analysis revealed no distinct geographical differentiation patterns. (4) In some production areas, flue-cured tobacco exhibits a low-value tendency in CCUI, with insufficient total nitrogen, potassium, and chloride content being common limiting factors. In summary, in some tobacco production areas in Shandong Province, flue-cured tobacco exhibits insufficient chemical coordination. Targeted optimization of nitrogen, potassium, and chloride nutrient management, along with standardized cultivation practices, should be implemented to enhance quality.

Key words

Shandong Province / flue-cured tobacco / production areas / routine chemical components / multiple comparisons / cluster analysis / chemical component usability index

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

XIONG Ying , YANG Junjie , JIANG Jiazhu , et al . Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(4): 210-218 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0668

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	闫克玉. 烟草化学[M]. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2002:23,57,113,233,237. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	孙建锋, 刘霞, 李伟, 等. 不同生态条件下烤烟化学成分的相似性研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2006, 27(3):22-24. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	杜文, 谭新良, 易建华, 等. 用烟叶化学成分进行烟叶质量评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2007, 13(3):25-31. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	史跃伟, 康俊, 徐刚, 等. 典型中间香型产区烤烟化学成分区域特征分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(8):319-321. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	李勇, 逄涛, 师君丽, 等. 国内外主产烟区烤烟化学成分分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2013, 34(1):12-16. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	梁太波, 戴华鑫, 王勇, 等. 凉山烟区土壤有机碳组分特征及与烟叶化学成分的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(5):1-5. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	张盟, 翟振, 梁太波, 等. 河南烟区土壤有机碳组分特征及其对烟叶化学成分的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2022, 55(1):17-24. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	陈胜利, 张玉林, 张占军, 等. 烤烟主产区烟叶糖碱比的变异分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2012(10):73-76. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	贺帆, 王涛, 余金恒, 等. 不同典型浓香型产区烟叶化学成分差异分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(11):1189-1193. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	王刘胜. 我国烤烟主产区烟叶主要化学成分的含量特征及其比较[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(11):71-73. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	蒋佳磊, 陆扬, 苏燕, 等. 我国主要烟叶产区烤烟化学成分特征与可用性评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2017, 23(2):13-27. Cited in this article [3]

[12]	王鹏, 孙兰茜, 彭忠, 等. 国内主要烟区烟叶常规化学成分含量的差异[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(5):50-53. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	吕祥敏, 王鹏, 唐杰, 等. 不同产区烟叶化学成分4个衍生指标的差异[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(6):105-108. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	周翔, 梁洪波, 董建新, 等. 山东烟区烤烟化学成分含量变化及聚类分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(6):13-17. Cited in this article [3]

[15]	孔德才, 杨俊杰, 王永, 等. 潍坊市不同地区与品种烟叶化学成分的差异性及可用性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2024, 36(11):14-23. Cited in this article [2]

[16]	佟道儒. 烟草育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997:279. Cited in this article [2]

[17]	王寒, 许紫阳, 罗思维, 等. 基于化学成分可用性的韶关烟区特色烤烟品种筛选及其评价方法探索[J]. 江西农业学报, 2024, 36(2):18-26. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	丁云生, 何悦, 曹金丽, 等. 大理州烤烟主要化学成分特征及其可用性分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(3):13-18. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	张勇刚, 吴键, 项波卡, 等. 基于改进模糊灰色关联分析法的烤烟化学品质评价[J]. 烟草科技, 2014(10):83-86. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	李卫, 周冀衡, 张一扬, 等. 云南曲靖烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2010, 16(2):61-65. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	周翔, 梁洪波, 董建新, 等. 山东烟区降水对烟叶主要化学成分的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2008, 29(2):37-41. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	周翔. 山东烟区生态因子与烟叶品质的关系[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008. Cited in this article [3]

[23]	王成才, 李现道, 梁洪波, 等. 土壤与烟叶化学成分及内在品质调查分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2005(3):30-33. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	张久权, 张教侠, 刘传峰, 等. 山东烤烟生态适应性综合评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2008(5):11-17. Cited in this article [2]

[25]

张志灵, 房权祥, 林祖斌, 等. 福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分特征分析[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(7):60-64.

https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0012

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

分析福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分特征,为烟叶生产技术方案制定、生产布局优化和卷烟工业企业烟叶原料采购提供参考。测定福建3个烟叶产区2013—2019年度3个主栽烤烟品种烟叶样品的总糖、还原糖、总氮、总植物碱、淀粉、钾、氯的含量,计算氮碱比、糖碱比、钾氯比、两糖差等衍生值,分析比较主要化学成分年度变化规律、品种、部位及产区差异情况。实验结果显示,福建烟区烟叶总糖(32.9%)、还原糖(23.1%)、钾(3.37%)、淀粉(7.09%)含量较高,氯离子(0.20%)含量相对较低。年度间变化特征为,总氮和糖含量的变异系数均小于20%,氯含量变异系数71.5%。品种间变化特征为,‘K326’的总糖和还原含量最低,‘云烟87’的还原糖含量最高,‘CB-1’的烟碱显著低于‘K326’和‘云烟87’;3个品种氯含量差距最为显著,钾和淀粉含量无差异。部位间变化特征为,除氯含量外各指标差异显著。产区间变化特征为,龙岩烟区烟叶表现最高还原糖含量和最低淀粉含量,南平烟区烟叶呈现最高的氯含量和最低的钾含量,3个产区总糖、烟碱含量、氮碱比和糖碱比无显著差异。综上,福建烟叶呈现高糖钾淀粉、适氮碱、低氯的特点,总氮和糖的含量年度间稳定性较好,氯含量波动较大;品种间、产区间烟叶主要化学成分存在一定差异,部位间烟叶主要化学成分差异显著。

[26]	刘天择, 杨菁, 汪旭, 等. 不同部位烤烟化学成分及热解产物与加热卷烟感官质量的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2023, 44(1):77-84. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	张志灵, 林隆, 张炳辉, 等. 不同部位烤烟主要化学成分特征及其与感官评吸质量的关系[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(6):28-33. Cited in this article [1]

[28]

张艳艳, 代琛, 赵百英, 等. 沂蒙丘陵生态区烤烟化学成分与感官质量的相关分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22):145-150.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0223

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为明确沂蒙丘陵生态区蜜甜焦香型烤烟化学成分对感官质量的影响,选取2020年山东潍坊、临沂、日照产烟区176份典型代表性烤烟样品（包括下部烟X2L、X3L、X2F、X3F,中部烟C2F、C3F、C2L、C3L,上部烟B2F、B3F、B2L、B3L）,进行常规化学成分及感官质量指标的统计分析及相关性分析。简单相关分析显示,燃烧性与总烟碱和两糖差分别呈显著和极显著负相关关系,与淀粉、还原糖和钾含量分别呈显著和极显著正相关关系;灰分与还原糖和氯、两糖差均表现为极显著负相关关系,与淀粉呈极显著正相关关系;刺激性与氯呈显著负相关关系。典型相关分析显示,总烟碱与浓度、劲头呈正相关,氮碱比与浓度、劲头呈负相关,氯与刺激性、余味呈负相关。综上,总烟碱、氮含量、氯含量是影响沂蒙丘陵生态区烤烟感官质量的关键因素。

[29]	王炽, 陈兴位, 阮亚男, 等. 红河植烟区烟叶主要化学成分含量特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(12):2793-2799. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	夏春, 李寒雪, 孙觅, 等. 烤烟不同部位叶片超微结构与常规化学成分的关系[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 46(2):150-156. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	陈伟, 黄全康, 杨云高, 等. 不同生态条件下初烤烟叶化学成分的变化[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2002(6):36-39. Cited in this article [2]

[32]	邓超, 董召荣. 南丹地区烤烟不同叶位化学成分差异分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(13):88-89. Cited in this article [1]

[33]	黄勇, 周冀衡, 郑明, 等. UV-B对烟草生长发育及次生代谢的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(1):140-144. Cited in this article [1]

[34]	钟楚, 陈宗瑜, 毛自朝, 等. 滤减UV-B辐射对烟叶可溶性蛋白、光合色素和类黄酮的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2010, 30(4):501-506. Cited in this article [1]