PDF(2318 KB)
Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Cadmium and Lead in Agricultural Soil of Typical Mining Area in Northern Guangdong and Its Pollution Assessment
HUANGWanyi, GAOLin, QIUTian, LINChanghua, PANHuirou, GUOYinan, CHENLeilei
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 82-91.
PDF(2318 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(2318 KB)
Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Cadmium and Lead in Agricultural Soil of Typical Mining Area in Northern Guangdong and Its Pollution Assessment
This study investigated the spatial distribution and risk levels of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) contamination in farmland soils within a typical industrial and mining area of northern Guangdong. An evaluation framework centered on “total content-chemical speciation-bioavailability” was constructed to provide a scientific basis for regional soil heavy metal pollution control and remediation. Taking the specific farmland area around typical industrial and mining industries in northern Guangdong as the research object, field sampling and laboratory analyses were conducted to determine the total concentrations and chemical speciation of Cd and Pb. The contamination degree, ecological risk, and bioavailability were systematically assessed. The results showed that: (1) both the contents and evaluation indices of Cd and Pb exhibit strong spatial variability. The spatial distributions of high-concentration areas differ between the two elements, indicating distinct pollution sources. Cd, in particular, displays significant point-source pollution characteristics. (2) Cd showed a high level according to the potential ecological risk index, whereas Pb was classified as uncontaminated based on both the single-factor index and the potential ecological risk index. However, the risk assessment code (RAC) and reduced partition index (RSP) evaluations for Cd both indicated high contamination levels. For Pb, RAC results suggested mainly low to moderate risk, while its RSP result indicated high contamination. The pollution grades derived from bioavailability-based assessment (using chemical speciation) were higher than those based on total heavy metal content. The soils in the study area were predominantly acidic, which could enhance Cd bioavailability and lead to a high contamination risk. Although Pb was considered safe based on total content evaluation, its potential ecological threat remained significant. Priority should be given to the remediation of Cd, while long-term monitoring of Pb should be strengthened to mitigate the composite pollution risk in the farmland ecosystem.
cadmium / lead / pollution risk assessment / bioavailability / spatial distribution
| [1] |
江振蓝, 杨玉盛, 沙晋明. GWR模型在土壤重金属高光谱预测中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3):533-544.
目前土壤重金属高光谱反演模型大多忽视了重金属与光谱变量间相关关系的空间异质性,这与实际情况不相吻合,而地理权重回归(GWR)模型能有效地揭示变量间关系的空间异质性。本文以福州市土壤重金属Cd、Cu、Pb、Cr、Zn、Ni为对象,构建土壤重金属预测的GWR高光谱模型,并将预测结果与普通最小二乘法回归(OLS)结果进行比较分析,探讨GWR模型在土壤重金属高光谱预测中的适用性及局限性。结果表明:① GWR模型在土壤重金属高光谱预测中适用与否取决于重金属对光谱变量影响的空间异质性程度:对于Cr、Cu、Zn、Pb等对光谱变量影响空间异质性大的元素,其GWR预测精度较OLS提高明显,表现为GWR模型的调节R<sup>2</sup>较OLS模型有了明显提高,分别为OLS模型的2.69倍、2.01倍、1.87倍和1.53倍;而AIC值以及残差平方和较OLS模型却明显降低,AIC值减少量均大于3个单位,残差平方和则仅分别为OLS模型的25.33%、30.09%、47.22%和86.84%;对于Cd和Ni等对光谱变量影响空间异质性小的元素,相较于OLS模型,GWR模型的调节R<sup>2</sup>分别提高了0.015和0.007,残差平方和分别减少了5.97%和4.18%,但AIC值却分别增加了2.737和2.762,GWR预测效果改善不明显;② 光谱变换可以有效增强土壤重金属的光谱特征,其中以光谱的倒数变换效果最好,而且该变换及其微分形式可以很好地提高模型的预测效果;③ GWR模型的应用前提是变量间关系的空间非平稳性,适合在与土壤光谱变量间关系具有显著空间异质性的重金属高光谱预测中推广。
|
| [2] |
胡杰, 赵心语, 王婷婷, 等. 太原市汾河河岸带土壤重金属分布特征、评价与来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(5):2500-2509.
|
| [3] |
陈航, 王颖, 王澍. 铜山矿区周边农田土壤重金属来源解析及污染评价[J]. 环境学, 2022, 43(5):2719-2731.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
杨宇, 郭婷婷, 刘孝利, 等. 南方典型矿区农业小流域耕地土壤重金属空间分布特征及污染评价[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(3):1602-1610.
|
| [6] |
环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染调查公报[EB/OL].(2014-04-17)[2024-10-12]. https://www.gov.cn/foot/2014-04/17/content_2661768.htm.
|
| [7] |
童晓玉, 郭静静, 高瑞丽, 等. 宁夏某工业园周边农田土壤重金属分布特征及风险评估[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2025, 37(1):50-56.
|
| [8] |
冯慧敏, 李海渤. 粤北地区重金属污染菜地现状及土壤修复对策与建议:以韶关为例[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2018, 5(3):48-56.
|
| [9] |
田美玲, 陆素芬, 常显志, 等. 粤北某矿业密集区土壤重金属含量特征研究[J]. 河池学院学报, 2019, 39(5):38-43.
|
| [10] |
中华人民共和国国务院. 土壤污染防治行动计划[EB/OL].[2016-05-31]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/31/content_5078377.htm.
|
| [11] |
叶彩红, 邹祖有, 许窕孜, 等. 粤北地区森林土壤重金属含量特征及生态风险评价—以曲江区为例[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2022, 38(3):39-46.
|
| [12] |
李强, 曹莹, 何连生, 等. 典型冶炼行业场地土壤重金属空间分布特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(12):5930-5937.
|
| [13] |
王越, 莫莉, 余新晓, 等. 粤北典型工矿区土壤重金属富集特征、来源解析及风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(3):1636-1645.
|
| [14] |
梁家辉. 区域土壤重金属污染源解析研究[D]. 北京: 中国环境科学研究院, 2023.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
张仁甫, 刘超琦, 张语馨, 等. 岩溶地质高背景区农田土壤重金属污染特征、风险评价与来源解析研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(2):268-280.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
孟婷婷. 焦作市南部郊区农田土壤重金属形态特征及生态健康风险[D]. 郑州: 河南理工大学, 2023.
|
| [20] |
任志建, 余爱华, 徐贝贝. 路域环境中土壤重金属污染的研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2022, 51(3):787-792.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
高知睿, 常玉虎, 赵元艺. 江西德兴铜矿附近流域土壤中重金属化学形态特征及意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2025, 44(1):167-180.
|
| [25] |
汪媛媛, 廖启林, 李文博, 等. 江苏典型农田土壤重金属形态分布初步研究[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(6):1326-1338.
|
| [26] |
周亚龙, 王乔林, 王成文, 等. 雄安新区企业周边农田土壤—作物系统重金属污染风险及累积效应[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(12):5977-5987.
|
| [27] |
杨帆, 杨熙斌, 黄小凤, 等. 卡房锡尾矿库重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(12):7177-7186.
|
| [28] |
邓凯文, 安永龙, 黄勇. 金矿区周边桃园地土壤重金属赋存特征、生物有效性及来源分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2024, 47(9):149-157.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
唐瑞玲, 徐进力, 刘彬, 等. 西南典型碳酸盐岩高地质背景区农田重金属化学形态、影响因素及回归模型[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(5):2995-3004.
|
| [31] |
黄帆, 赵兴敏, 李明堂, 等. 吉林省红旗岭镍矿区重金属赋存形态及生物有效性分析[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2024, 46(1):131-139.
|
| [32] |
韦昌江, 丁浩男, 潘荣庆, 等. 广西德保县某水稻种植区重金属污染特征及来源分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(2):409-418.
|
| [33] |
余飞, 张风雷, 周皎, 等. 矿区周边耕地土壤—农作物系统重金属富集特征及风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(11):7385-7394.
|
| [34] |
何明江, 李章涛, 上官宇先, 等. 农田土壤重金属外源识别及安全利用技术筛选—以宜宾市筠连县部分区域为例[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(6):1340-1348.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |