Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) and Ridge Regression Modeling in Tobacco Planting Areas of Shiyan

RENHeng, TANGCong, SHENYu, WANGXia, ZHANGQiuhong, ZHANGHao, SUNXueli

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11) : 129-139.

PDF(2684 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2684 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11) : 129-139. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0699

Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) and Ridge Regression Modeling in Tobacco Planting Areas of Shiyan

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The aims are to enhance the continuity and accuracy of surface ultraviolet radiation (UVR) data in smaller regions and mountainous areas, explore the spatiotemporal distribution patterns and variation characteristics of UVR under complex terrain, and establish a high-precision UVR simulation model, so as to provide a scientific basis for optimizing planting zoning, precise production management, and sustainable development of specialty agriculture for flue-cured tobacco. In this study, the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) were analyzed by the methods of climatic propensity rate and spatial statistical analysis with using daily observation data from eight tobacco ecological meteorological stations in Shiyan area from 2012 to 2023, and the prediction equations of UVR exposure were developed by ridge regression analysis. The results showed that the annual UVR exposure in Shiyan area generally distributed in accordance with the characteristic of three mountains surrounding two rives (Duhe River and Hanjiang River), showing the spatial distribution characterized by "more in the north while less in the south and more in the east while less in the west". The daily average UVR exposure was 0.54MJ/m2, and the diurnal variation roughly showed a wave-like characteristic; the monthly variation of UVR exposure with the seasonal variation followed a distinct singel-peaked variation law, and the monthly average value ranged from 9.33 to 25.30 MJ/m2; the annual UVR exposure showed a clear upward trend, and the annual average value was 201.10 MJ/m2. UVR exposure was positively correlated with daily mean temperature, daily maximum temperature, daily minimum temperature, daily difference in temperature and sunshine hours, while it was negatively correlated with relative humidity and precipitation. The annual daily scale and seasonal daily scale regression models of UVR were established by ridge regression method, and all models showed good fitting performance (RMSE < 0.2 MJ/m2). The model fitting results show that the autumn-winter season model (RMSE = 0.11 ~0.14 MJ/m2) is more advantageous than the year-round day model (RMSE = 0.17 MJ/m2), but the fitting effect of the two models in spring and summer (RMSE = 0.19 MJ/m2) is not as good as that of the year-round day model. Based on the dual effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on flue-cured tobacco growth, the model-fitted UVR data can be utilized for targeted selection of suitable planting areas during the site selection phase. During the field growth stage, for regions with higher UVR levels or during periods of intense UVR (July-August), a comprehensive analysis of its impacts should be conducted. This analysis provides the scientific basis for implementing appropriate protective measures through either ecological adaptation strategies or production interventions.

Key words

Shiyan tobacco-growing area / UVR / radiant exposure / temporal and spatial distribution / ridge regression / fitting model

Cite this article

Download Citations
REN Heng , TANG Cong , SHEN Yu , et al . Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) and Ridge Regression Modeling in Tobacco Planting Areas of Shiyan[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(11): 129-139 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0699

References

[1]
过伟民, 张艳玲, 蔡宪杰, 等. 光质对烤烟品质及光合色素含量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2011(9):65-70.
[2]
LAMNATOU C, CHEMISANA D. Solar radiation manipulations and their role in greenhouse claddings: Fresnel lenses, NIR-and UV-blocking materials[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2013, 18:271-287.
[3]
NEHA R, ORLANDO M L, JOSé A P. Perception of solar UV radiation by plants: photoreceptors and mechanisms[J]. Plant physiology, 2021, 186(3):1382-1396.
About 95% of the ultraviolet (UV) photons reaching the Earth's surface are UV-A (315-400 nm) photons. Plant responses to UV-A radiation have been less frequently studied than those to UV-B (280-315 nm) radiation. Most previous studies on UV-A radiation have used an unrealistic balance between UV-A, UV-B, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Consequently, results from these studies are difficult to interpret from an ecological perspective, leaving an important gap in our understanding of the perception of solar UV radiation by plants. Previously, it was assumed UV-A/blue photoreceptors, cryptochromes and phototropins mediated photomorphogenic responses to UV-A radiation and "UV-B photoreceptor" UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) to UV-B radiation. However, our understanding of how UV-A radiation is perceived by plants has recently improved. Experiments using a realistic balance between UV-B, UV-A, and PAR have demonstrated UVR8 can play a major role in the perception of both UV-B and short-wavelength UV-A (UV-Asw, 315 to ∼350 nm) radiation. These experiments also showed that UVR8 and cryptochromes jointly regulate gene expression through interactions that alter the relative sensitivity to UV-B, UV-A, and blue wavelengths. Negative feedback loops on the action of these photoreceptors can arise from gene expression, signaling crosstalk, and absorption of UV photons by phenolic metabolites. These interactions explain why exposure to blue light modulates photomorphogenic responses to UV-B and UV-Asw radiation. Future studies will need to distinguish between short and long wavelengths of UV-A radiation and to consider UVR8's role as a UV-B/UV-Asw photoreceptor in sunlight.© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists.
[4]
国家气象计量站, 江苏省无线电科学研究所有限公司. GB/T 33866—2017,太阳紫外辐射测量宽带紫外辐射表法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[5]
CHRISTIAN A GUEYMARD. The sun's total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models[J]. Solar energy, 2004, 76(4):423-453.
[6]
中国气象局公共气象服务中心. 吴昊, 郜婧婧, 陈辉, 等. GB/T 36744-2018, 紫外线指数预报方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
[7]
李勇, 王世锋, 陈天禄, 等. 青藏高原太阳紫外线辐射及其生物学效应研究现状[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(4):1321-1328.
[8]
辛华剑. 北京地区紫外辐射时间变化特征及其对气溶胶和云的响应[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2023.
[9]
周平, 陈宗瑜. 云南高原紫外辐射强度变化时空特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008(3):487-493.
[10]
吉廷艳, 王红丽, 胡跃文, 等. 贵阳地区太阳紫外辐射变化特征及主要影响因子分析[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(4):1005-1010.
利用贵阳地区近6年太阳紫外辐射的观测资料及相关的气象因子, 分析了该地区太阳紫外辐射的变化特征。结果表明, 贵阳地区紫外辐射逐时平均最大值为21 W·m<sup>-2</sup>(四级强度), 瞬时最大值为26.4 W·m<sup>-2</sup>, 未出现很强辐射(五级)的情况; 4~9月出现强紫外辐射的时段较长, 在10:00~15:00可达四级; 13:00强紫外辐射在4~9月出现的几率最大, 尤其是7月和8月分别达到52%和51%; 晴天紫外辐射强且稳定, 多云天气紫外辐射波动较大, 阴雨天气紫外辐射较弱; 一年中, 晴天和多云条件下, 中午时刻各月紫外辐射量均超过了10 W·m<sup>-2</sup>, 而阴天的情况下仅在7~9月出现中等辐射, 3种天气情况下的紫外辐射随季节的变化趋势相似, 均表现为冬季弱、 夏季强的特点; 云量、 相对湿度以及能见度与贵阳地区太阳紫外辐射具有显著的相关性。
[11]
王建嫱, 郑自君, 李林, 等. 攀西地区太阳紫外线指数特征分析[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2022, 42(S1):99-103.
[12]
申彦波, 王炳忠. 基于SMARTS模式的紫外辐射多参数时空变化及影响因子模拟[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(4):175-183.
为弥补中国紫外辐射实测数据的不足,该文基于SMARTS辐射传输模式计算分析标准大气、无云条件下280~400 nm 波段紫外总辐射Eg、315~400 nm波段UVA、280~315 nm波段UVB、紫外指数UVI、红斑有效紫外辐射CIE、立面紫外总辐射等多参数时空变化特征及大气浑浊度、臭氧含量、海拔高度、地表反照率等因素对各参数的定量影响。结果表明:1)紫外辐射各参数随纬度升高而降低,各纬度全年各月的紫外辐射与全波段总辐射之比基本约为5%;2)紫外辐射各参数夏季高而冬季低,正午高而早晚低,高纬度的年变率大于低纬度,夏至前后的3个月,中低纬度的紫外辐射参数较接近,均可能对人体健康产生较大影响;3)UVI在夏季全晴天情况下,正午时分有可能接近11,UVA和UVB正午时分分别可达70和2 W/m<sup>2</sup>,低纬度地区朝南立面上的紫外总辐照度在夏至日的峰值可达70 W/m<sup>2</sup>,与水平面上的值相当;4)能见度从2 km升高至50 km时,紫外辐照度增加一倍以上,随着能见度升高,紫外辐照度的增加幅度减缓;臭氧总量从200 DU翻倍增加至400 DU时,UVI指数降低一半以上,降低幅度随臭氧总量增加呈减缓趋势;海拔高度从0 km升高至5 km时,紫外辐照度增加约1/4,增加幅度随海拔高度的升高保持相对均匀;地表反照率从0.2倍增至0.4时,朝南立面紫外辐射增加1/5,朝南立面上的紫外总辐射中来源于地面反射的部分在夏季占比较大,而冬季占比较小。尽管上述只是无云条件下的理论模拟结果,但其所反映出的紫外辐射和影响因素基本特征仍可供气象学和医学领域参考。
[13]
祝青林, 于贵瑞, 蔡福, 等. 中国紫外辐射的空间分布特征[J]. 资源科学, 2005(1):108-113.
利用中国科学院生态系统研究网络29个生态站的2002年紫外辐射、总辐射、日照时数、相对湿度、温度等气象因子资料,采用多种方法分析紫外辐射与其他气象因子以及地理因子之间的关系,选择出最优的因子和最佳方法建立紫外辐射的计算模型。结合本课题组开发的中国陆地生态系统气象/气候要素空间化数据库的1km*1km气候要素栅格图,利用ArcMap/ArcInfo软件实现了紫外辐射的空间化。通过比较,选择出合适的紫外线指数分类方法完成了紫外线指数和紫外线辐射等级的栅格化。在空间化图像的基础上分析了年及各月中国紫外辐射的空间分布特征,并对形成这种分布的原因进行了初步探讨。
[14]
刘滔, 李云苍, 刘群生, 等. 云南省太阳紫外辐射研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2001(6):37-42.
[15]
夏玉珍, 鲁绍坤, 王毅, 等. UV-B紫外辐射与烟叶生理指标的关系研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(30):10543-10546.
[16]
钟楚, 陈宗瑜, 王毅, 等. 低纬高原滤减UV-B辐射对烤烟营养生长期形态性状的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2010, 31(1):83-87.
[17]
陈宗瑜, 王毅. 烤烟种植生态适应评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018:17-18.
[18]
陈艳, 张文娟, 邓昌蓉, 等. 辣椒苗期耐紫外性综合评价及预测[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(3):948-956.
[19]
范方媛. 紫外辐射对茶树生理代谢的影响及防控策略[J]. 中国茶叶, 2020, 42(6):1-4,9.
[20]
董继国, 柴利广, 吴芳, 等. 环神农架地区气候因素对烟叶化学品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(14):3316-3319.
[21]
任恒, 曾繁蕊, 杜世晔, 等. 十堰地区近30年烤烟大田生长期气候因子变化特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(24):92-99.
针对气候因子概率分布、周期变换规律对烟叶大田期不同生育阶段均存在不同差异性的现状,利用湖北省十堰烟区7个国家气象站1991—2020年4—9月气候统计资料,首先采用最小二乘法研究烟叶不同生育阶段气候因子年际变化趋势;其次采用核密度估计函数,研究不同生育阶段气候因子概率分布特征;最后采用小波变换算法,研究多时间尺度周期变换差异性。结果表明:烟叶不同生育阶段气候因子均存在一定年代差异性,气温条件较为稳定;日照时数在旺长期均呈递减趋势,其他生育期日照变化较为平稳;降水量方面各生育期存在较大差异;烟叶不同生育阶段气温、降水量概率分布存在较大差异,日照时数概率分布较为集中;不同生育阶段气候因子均存在多时间尺度周期变换规律,烟叶成熟期存在长时间尺度第一主周期变换,对气候因子敏感程度远高于其余阶段。研究结果为优化烟叶种植布局和提高种植效益提供了科学依据。
[22]
华创风云·北京华创维想科技开发有限责任公司. HSC-FZAB-1紫外辐射表产品使用手册[EB/OL]. http://www.huatron.cn/download/Documentation/20150527174405.pdf.
[23]
湖北省气象局, 中国气象局气象探测中心, 云南省气象局.杨志彪,陈永清,涂满红,等. QX/T 55—2007,地面气象观测规范.第11部分:辐射观测[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[24]
施能. 气象科研与预报中的多元分析方法[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002:1-74.
[25]
王娟, 梁登星. 岭回归在修正多重共线性中的应用[J]. 四川理工学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 26(3):98-100.
[26]
王王强, 胡海清. 基于岭回归和人工神经网络估测森林可燃物负荷量[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(9):108-114.
[27]
陈芳, 张志强, 李扉, 等. 基于EEMD分解与BOA算法优化神经网络的密云水库大阁水文站径流预测[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(6):188-194.
[28]
刘秀英, 余俊茹, 刘长秀, 等. 基于颜色参数和BP神经网络的紫叶李叶片花青素含量估算[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(6):145-152.
[29]
常志坤, 吴薇, 黄毅. 沧州市紫外线辐射强度变化特征及预报模型[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2021, 229(1):84-85.
[30]
冯新建, 白慧. 安顺市太阳紫外辐射特征分析[C]//贵州省气象学会.贵州省气象学会2013年学术年会论文集, 2013:306-309.
[31]
丁国香, 刘承晓. 合肥紫外线辐射强度与空气质量的关系研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(S2):378-381.
[32]
翟红楠, 李明. 武汉市紫外线辐射强度特征分析及其预测模型的建立[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(8):157-159.
[33]
么枕生, 丁裕国. 气候统计[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1990:347-377.
[34]
胡启军, 李泊霖, 曹帮军, 等. 太阳辐射对青藏高原东部地区气温日较差的影响[J]. 高原科学研究, 2021, 5(1):8-17.
[35]
刘晶淼, 丁裕国, 黄永德, 等. 太阳紫外辐射强度与气象要素的相关分析[J]. 高原气象, 2003(1):45-50.
利用地面常规气象观测资料,分析了白天条件下太阳紫外辐射与其它气象要素的相关关系,又利用这些常规气象要素拟合出紫外辐射强度的预报方程,并利用逐日天气预报结果(某些常规要素)预报逐日紫外辐射强度,评价各气象要素对太阳紫外辐射变化的主次贡献。
[36]
丁元林, 孔丹莉, 毛宗福, 等. 多重线性回归分析中的常用共线性诊断方法[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2004, 17(4):299-300.
[37]
白青华, 殷雪莲, 王静, 等. 基于岭回归的河西走廊中部日光温室低温预测模型[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(5):96-100.
为了构建基于气象要素的甘肃省甘州区日光温室低温预测模型,探索应用了岭回归分析的方法。在合理选取预测因子的基础上,对预测因子之间存在的多重共线性进行诊断,为了克服预测因子共线性对模型稳定性的影响,选择岭回归分析的方法进行共线性的处理和模型构建,应用模型的预测值与实测值对模型的精度进行检验。结果表明:选取的预测因子之间存在共线性问题,通过岭回归分析建立的日光低温预测模型可以克服预测因子间由于共线性问题对模型参数造成的影响,模型预测值与实测值之间的绝对误差(≤3℃)的准确率为98.4%,决定系数(R<sup>2</sup>)为0.8543和均方根误差(RMSE)为0.7849℃,模型精度较好。基于岭回归分析法建立的日光温室低温预测模型能够对当地日光温室低温进行合理而有效的预测。
[38]
黄勇. 遮光和增强紫外线辐射对烤烟生长及烟叶品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2010.
[39]
何承刚, 杨志新, 邵建平, 等. 增强UV-B辐射对两个烤烟品种主要化学成分的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(6):767-771.
[40]
胡波, 王跃思. 三江平原紫外辐射变化特征[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2014, 19(1):1-10.
[41]
刘慧, 胡波, 王跃思, 等. 山东禹城紫外辐射变化特征及其估测方程的建立[J]. 大气科学, 2015, 39(3):503-512.
[42]
张兴华, 胡波, 王跃思, 等. 拉萨紫外辐射特征分析及估算公式的建立[J]. 大气科学, 2012, 36(4):744-754.
[43]
刘雨轩, 巫俊威, 赵清扬, 等. 都江堰紫外辐射特征分析及多元回归预报方程的建立研究[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2019, 42(3):94-101.
[44]
应爽, 谢静芳, 刘海峰, 等. 基于WRF模式的紫外线指数逐小时预报模型[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2021, 44(3):106-111.
PDF(2684 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/