Research Progress on Physiological Functions of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Application in Livestock and Poultry Production

ZHANGFengxia, CHENCheng, CHIChunmei, LEISongbo, CHENXin, ZHONGLulong

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 155-161.

PDF(1218 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1218 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 155-161. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0708

Research Progress on Physiological Functions of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Application in Livestock and Poultry Production

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As the core probiotic species in the genus Lactobacillus, Lactobacillus acidophilus exhibits significant application potential in the context of the growing demand for antibiotic substitutes in livestock and poultry breeding, due to its unique characteristics such as acid tolerance, bile salt resistance, and lactic acid production. This article aims to systematically review the biological characteristics, physiological functions, and application status of Lactobacillus acidophilus in livestock and poultry production, clarify its application bottlenecks, and prospect future research directions, so as to provide theoretical support for its widespread adoption. Studies show that Lactobacillus acidophilus can improve the intestinal health of livestock and poultry by competitively excluding pathogenic bacteria and regulating the structure of intestinal microbiota; it can enhance the utilization rate of feed nutrients and promote the growth of livestock and poultry by secreting various digestive enzymes and optimizing the intestinal morphological structure; it can balance the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses of the body and enhance immunity by regulating the activation of immune cells and the secretion of cytokines. In livestock and poultry production, it can be used as a feed additive to improve meat and egg quality and reduce the incidence of diarrhea, as a fermentation strain to degrade anti-nutritional factors and enhance the nutritional value of plant-based feeds, and also as an oral vaccine carrier or adjuvant to stimulate mucosal immunity and reduce breeding costs. At present, Lactobacillus acidophilus faces challenges such as difficulty in maintaining activity during processing, inconsistent dosage standards, and incomplete clarification of its mechanism of action. In the future, research should focus on the breeding of heat-resistant and processing-tolerant strains, determining optimal addition doses, elucidating molecular mechanisms of action, and establishing unified evaluation standards, so as to further release its application potential in green livestock and poultry production and contribute to the sustainable development of the animal husbandry industry.

Key words

Lactobacillus acidophilus / intestinal microbiota / feed fermentation / vaccine carrier / vaccine adjuvant

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Fengxia , CHEN Cheng , CHI Chunmei , et al . Research Progress on Physiological Functions of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Its Application in Livestock and Poultry Production[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(12): 155-161 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0708

References

[1]
HANSEN P A, MOCQUOT G. Lactobacillus acidophilus (Moro) comb. nov.[J]. International journal of systematic bacteriology, 1970, 20(3):325-327.
[2]
YAN F, LI N, SHI J, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus alleviates type 2 diabetes by regulating hepatic glucose, lipid metabolism and gut microbiota in mice[J]. Food &function, 2019, 10(9):5804-5815.
[3]
XING T, BIAN X, MA C, et al. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus AD125 and antagonism against Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to Caco-2 cell[J]. Food &function, 2023, 14(5):2472-2480.
[4]
GAO H, LI X, CHEN X, et al. The functional roles of Lactobacillus acidophilus in different physiological and pathological processes[J]. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2022, 32(10):1226-1233.
[5]
ALTERMANN E, RUSSELL W M, AZCARATE-PERIL M A, et al. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2005, 102(11):3906-3912.
\n Lactobacillus acidophilus\n NCFM is a probiotic bacterium that has been produced commercially since 1972. The complete genome is 1,993,564 nt and devoid of plasmids. The average GC content is 34.71% with 1,864 predicted ORFs, of which 72.5% were functionally classified. Nine phage-related integrases were predicted, but no complete prophages were found. However, three unique regions designated as potential autonomous units (PAUs) were identified. These units resemble a unique structure and bear characteristics of both plasmids and phages. Analysis of the three PAUs revealed the presence of two R/M systems and a prophage maintenance system killer protein. A spacers interspersed direct repeat locus containing 32 nearly perfect 29-bp repeats was discovered and may provide a unique molecular signature for this organism.\n In silico\n analyses predicted 17 transposase genes and a chromosomal locus for lactacin B, a class II bacteriocin. Several mucus- and fibronectin-binding proteins, implicated in adhesion to human intestinal cells, were also identified. Gene clusters for transport of a diverse group of carbohydrates, including fructooligosaccharides and raffinose, were present and often accompanied by transcriptional regulators of the lacI family. For protein degradation and peptide utilization, the organism encoded 20 putative peptidases, homologs for PrtP and PrtM, and two complete oligopeptide transport systems. Nine two-component regulatory systems were predicted, some associated with determinants implicated in bacteriocin production and acid tolerance. Collectively, these features within the genome sequence of\n L. acidophilus\n are likely to contribute to the organisms' gastric survival and promote interactions with the intestinal mucosa and microbiota.\n
[6]
AZCARATE-PERIL M A, ALTERMANN E, HOOVER-FITZULA R L, et al. Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004, 70(9):5315-5322.
[7]
张媛媛, 赵梦迪, 李悦垚, 等. 犬源嗜酸乳杆菌GLA09分离鉴定及其益生特性和安全性研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(4):339-347.
[8]
LAN R, KOO J, KIM I. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial and noxious gas emission in weaning pigs[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2017, 97(4):1310-1315.
[9]
DE CESARE A, SALA C, CASTELLANI G, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) supplementation in drinking water on chicken crop and caeca microbiome[J]. PloS one, 2020, 15(1):e0228338.
[10]
SUNU P, SUNARTI D, MAHFUDZ L D, et al. Effect of synbiotic from Allium sativum and Lactobacillus acidophilus on hematological indices, antioxidative status and intestinal ecology of broiler chicken[J]. Journal of the saudi society of agricultural sciences, 2021, 20(2):103-110.
[11]
DE CESARE A, SIRRI F, MANFREDA G, et al. Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens[J]. Plos one, 2017, 12(5):e0176309.
[12]
FORTE C, MANUALI E, ABBATE Y, et al. Dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus positively influences growth performance, gut morphology, and gut microbiology in rurally reared chickens[J]. Poultry science, 2018, 97(3):930-936.
[13]
MINELLI E B, BENINI A. Relationship between number of bacteria and their probiotic effects[J]. Microbial ecology in health and disease, 2008, 20(4):180-183.
[14]
OUWEHAND A C. A review of dose-responses of probiotics in human studies[J]. Beneficial microbes, 2017, 8(2):143-151.
The probiotic definition requires the administration of an 'adequate amount' in order to obtain a health benefit. What that amount should be is not indicated. Here, an overview is given of studies that investigated the dose-response relation of probiotics in human interventions. Studies were divided in; meta-analyses, meta-analyses on specific probiotic strains, and studies testing two or more doses of a probiotic (combination) in the same study. Meta-analyses on the effect of probiotics on antibiotic associated diarrhoea (AAD) suggest a dose-response effect; for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea on the other hand no dose-response was observed. For other end-points; such as necrotising enterocolitis, prevention of atopic dermatitis and slow intestinal transit, no dose-response relation was identified in meta-analyses. For prophylaxis in colorectal cancer and relief of irritable bowel syndrome, no dose-response relation was determined. However, for blood pressure, a meta-analysis observed that higher doses (greater than 10 cfu) were more effective than lower doses. Meta-analyses of specific strains suggest a break-point for effectiveness of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children; no dose-response was observed for two other probiotics assessed. Studies comparing two or more doses indicate that faecal recovery and risk reduction of AAD follow a positive dose-response relationship. Other end-points such as immune markers, general health, and bowel function did not exhibit clear dose-response relations. For AAD, the findings are very compelling; both meta-analyses and dedicated dose-response studies observe a positive correlation between dose and AAD risk. These findings do not allow for extrapolation, but suggest that studying higher doses for this end-point would be worthwhile. The lack of a clear dose-response for other end-points, does not mean it does not exist; present data does just not allow drawing any conclusions.
[15]
ELAM N A, GLEGHORN J F, RIVERA J D, et al. Effects of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (strains NP45 and NP51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii on performance, carcass, and intestinal characteristics, and Escherichia coli strain O157 shedding of finishing beef steers[J]. Journal of animal science, 2003, 81(11): 2686-2698.
[16]
WATKINS B A, MILLER B F, NEIL D H. In vivo Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic chicks[J]. Poultry science, 1982, 61(7):1298-1308.
[17]
LI Z, WANG W, LIU D, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens[J]. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018, 9(1):25.
[18]
QIAO J, LI H, WANG Z, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal barrier function, rectal microflora and serum immune function in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide[J]. Antonie van leeuwenhoek, 2015, 107(4):883-891.
[19]
LAN R X, KOO J M, KIM I H. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbiota shedding, and fecal noxious gas emission in weaning pigs[J]. Animal feed science and technology, 2016, 219: 181-188.
[20]
MONIKA M, TYAGI J S, SONALE N, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus derived postbiotics on growth metrics, health, and gut integrity in broiler chickens[J]. Scientific reports, 2024, 14(1):24768.
[21]
WU Y, SHAO Y, SONG B, et al. Effects of Bacillus coagulans supplementation on the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis[J]. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018, 9(1):9.
[22]
WU Z, YANG K, ZHANG A, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance, immune response, and intestinal barrier function of broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli O157[J]. Poultry science, 2021, 100(9):101323.
[23]
DAR A H, SINGH S K, RAHMAN J U, et al. The effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or prebiotic mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance, nutrient utilization, blood metabolites, faecal bacteria, and economics of crossbred calves[J]. Iranian journal of veterinary research, 2022, 23(4):322-330.
[24]
MANSILLA F I, MIRANDA M H, UEZEN J D, et al. Effect of probiotic lactobacilli supplementation on growth parameters, blood profile, productive performance, and fecal microbiology in feedlot cattle[J]. Research in veterinary science, 2023, 155:76-87.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) selected on the basis of probiotic characteristics were administered to beef feedlot catlle and the effect on body condition/growth and nutritional-metabolic status as well as on E. coli O157:H7 fecal shedding, were investigated. A feeding trials involving 126 steers were used to evaluate the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL2074, Limosilactobacillus fermentum CRL2085 and Limosilactobacillus mucosae CRL2069 and their combinations (5 different probiotic groups and control) when 10-10 CFU/animal of each probiotic group were in-feed supplemented. Cattle were fed a high energy corn-based diet (16 to 88%) and samples from each animal were taken at 0, 40, 104 and 163 days. In general, animals body condition and sensorium state showed optimal muscle-skeletal development and behavioral adaption to confinement; no nasal/eye discharges and diarrheic feces were observed. The nutritional performance of the steers revealed a steady increase of biometric parameters and weight. Animals supplied with L. mucosae CRL2069 for 104 days reached the maximum mean live weight (343.2 kg), whereas the greatest weight daily gain (1.27 ± 0.16 Kg/day) was obtained when CRL2069 and its combination with L. fermentum CRL2085 (1.26 ± 0.11 kg/day) were administered during the complete fattening cycle. With several exceptions, bovine cattle blood and serum parameters showed values within referential ranges. As a preharvest strategy to reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle feces, CRL2085 administered during 40 days decreased pathogen shedding with a reduction of 43% during the feeding period. L. fermentum CRL2085 and L. mucosae CRL2069 show promise for feedlot cattle feeding supplementation to improve metabolic-nutritional status, overall productive performance and to reduce E. coli O157:H7 shedding, thus decreasing contamination chances of meat food products.Published by Elsevier Ltd.
[25]
YANG Y J, CHUANG C C, YANG H B, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus ameliorates H. pylori-induced gastric inflammation by inactivating the Smad7 and NFκB pathways[J]. BMC microbiology, 2012, 12:38.
H. pyloriinfection may trigger Smad7 and NFκB expression in the stomach, whereas probiotics promote gastrointestinal health and improve intestinal inflammation caused by pathogens. This study examines if probiotics can improveH. pylori-induced gastric inflammation by inactivating the Smad7 and NFκB pathways.
[26]
ALAQIL A A, ABBAS A O, EL-BELTAGI H S, et al. Dietary supplementation of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates cholesterol levels, immune response, and productive performance of laying hens[J]. Animals, 2020, 10(9):1588.
This study examines the effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) on the cholesterol levels, immune response, and productive performance of laying hens. A total of 216, 40-week-old, commercial Hy-Line brown chicken layers were randomly assigned into four treatment groups (18 birds × three replicates per group) and fed diet supplemented with 0 (control), 1 × 109, 21 × 109, and 31 × 109 colony forming units (CFUs) of Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) per kg of feed for six consecutive weeks. Results show that plasma triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterols became lesser, while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol became higher in LA-supplemented groups compared to the control. In addition, a significant reduction occurred in the liver and egg yolk cholesterol by LA supplementation. Moreover, the immunological parameters including antibody titer against sheep red blood cells (SRBCs), phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-wattle swelling test, and T- & B-lymphocyte proliferation were enhanced in laying hens supplemented with LA compared to the control hens. While the heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratio decreased with LA supplementation, indicating low stress conditions in the treated hens. These positive effects for LA were further reflected on the productive performance of laying hens and improved egg production, egg weight, egg mass, and feed efficiency. Our findings indicate that LA probiotic could be recommended in laying hens’ diets for lowering egg yolk cholesterol with positive impacts on health and performance.
[27]
XIA M, LI C, WU D, et al. Benefits of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant status, immunity, and cecal microbiota of rabbits[J]. Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024, 11:1361908.
Heat-killed probiotics, as a type of inactivated beneficial microorganisms, possess an extended shelf life and broader adaptability compared to their live counterparts. This study aimed to investigate the impact of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus, LA) - a deactivated probiotic on the growth performance, digestibility, antioxidant status, immunity and cecal microbiota of rabbits.
[28]
MESHKIBAF S, FRITZ J, GOTTSCHALK M, et al. Preferential production of G-CSF by a protein-like Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 secretory factor through activating TLR2-dependent signaling events without activation of JNKs[J]. BMC microbiology, 2015, 15:238.
Background: Different species and strains of probiotic bacteria confer distinct immunological responses on immune cells. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 (GR-1) is a probiotic bacterial strain found in both the intestinal and urogenital tracts, and has immunomodulatory effects on several cell types including macrophages. However, detailed immunological responses and the signaling mechanism involved in the response are largely unknown. Results: We examined the production of GR-1-induced cytokines/chemokines and signaling events in macrophages. Among 84 cytokines and chemokines examined, GR-1 discretely induced granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mRNA at highest levels (>60-fold) without inducing other cytokines such as IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha (<5-fold). The toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/6-agonist PAM(2)CSK(4), TLR2/1-agonist PAM(3)CSK(4) and TLR4-agonist lipopolysaccharide induced all of these inflammatory cytokines at high levels (>50-fold). The TLR2 ligand lipoteichoic acid activated all mitogen-activated kinases, Akt and NF-kappa B; whereas, GR-1 selectively activated extracellular regulated kinases and p38, NF-.B and Akt, but not c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) in a TLR2-dependent manner. Using specific inhibitors, we demonstrated that lack of JNKs activation by GR-1 caused inefficient production of pro-inflammatory cytokines but not G-CSF production. A secreted heat-labile protein-like molecule, 30-100 kDa in size, induced the preferential production of G-CSF. Conclusion: This study elucidated unique signaling events triggered by GR-1, resulting in selective production of the immunomodulatory cytokine G-CSF in macrophages.
[29]
LI H, ZHANG L, CHEN L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus alleviates the inflammatory response to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 via inhibition of the NF-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in piglets[J]. BMC microbiology, 2016, 16:273.
[30]
JUNAID M, LU H, DIN A U, et al. Deciphering microbiome, transcriptome, and metabolic interactions in the presence of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus against Salmonella typhimurium in a murine model[J]. Antibiotics, 2024, 13(4):352.
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium), a foodborne pathogen that poses significant public health risks to humans and animals, presents a formidable challenge due to its antibiotic resistance. This study explores the potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus 1.3251) probiotics as an alternative strategy to combat antibiotic resistance associated with S. Typhimurium infection. In this investigation, twenty-four BALB/c mice were assigned to four groups: a non-infected, non-treated group (CNG); an infected, non-treated group (CPG); a group fed with L. acidophilus but not infected (LAG); and a group fed with L. acidophilus and challenged with Salmonella (LAST). The results revealed a reduction in Salmonella levels in the feces of mice, along with restored weight and improved overall health in the LAST compared to the CPG. The feeding of L. acidophilus was found to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNA induced by Salmonella while upregulating anti-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, it influenced the expression of mRNA transcript, encoding tight junction protein, oxidative stress-induced enzymes, and apoptosis-related mRNA expression. Furthermore, the LEfSe analysis demonstrated a significant shift in the abundance of critical commensal genera in the LAST, essential for maintaining gut homeostasis, metabolic reactions, anti-inflammatory responses, and butyrate production. Transcriptomic analysis revealed 2173 upregulated and 506 downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the LAST vs. the CPG. Functional analysis of these DEGs highlighted their involvement in immunity, metabolism, and cellular development. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated their role in tumor necrosis factor (TNF), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), chemokine, Forkhead box O (FOXO), and transforming growth factor (TGF-β) signaling pathway. Moreover, the fecal metabolomic analysis identified 929 differential metabolites, with enrichment observed in valine, leucine, isoleucine, taurine, glycine, and other metabolites. These findings suggest that supplementation with L. acidophilus promotes the growth of beneficial commensal genera while mitigating Salmonella-induced intestinal disruption by modulating immunity, gut homeostasis, gut barrier integrity, and metabolism.
[31]
BALLARD S T, HUNTER J H, TAYLOR A E. Regulation of tight-junction permeability during nutrient absorption across the intestinal epithelium[J]. Annual review of nutrition, 1995, 15(1):35-55.
[32]
SCHNEEBERGER E E, LYNCH R D. The tight junction: a multifunctional complex[J]. American journal of physiology-cell physiology, 2004, 286(6):1213-1228.
Multicellular organisms are separated from the external environment by a layer of epithelial cells whose integrity is maintained by intercellular junctional complexes composed of tight junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes, whereas gap junctions provide for intercellular communication. The aim of this review is to present an updated overview of recent developments in the area of tight junction biology. In a relatively short time, our knowledge of the tight junction has evolved from a relatively simple view of it being a permeability barrier in the paracellular space and a fence in the plane of the plasma membrane to one of it acting as a multicomponent, multifunctional complex that is involved in regulating numerous and diverse cell functions. A group of integral membrane proteins-occludin, claudins, and junction adhesion molecules-interact with an increasingly complex array of tight junction plaque proteins not only to regulate paracellular solute and water flux but also to integrate such diverse processes as gene transcription, tumor suppression, cell proliferation, and cell polarity.
[33]
CHEN J, WANG P, LIU C, et al. Effects of compound feed additive on growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broilers[J]. Poultry science, 2023, 102(1):102302.
[34]
FENG Y, WU X, HU D, et al. Comparison of the effects of feeding compound probiotics and antibiotics on growth performance, gut microbiota, and small intestine morphology in yellow-feather broilers[J]. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(9):2308.
This study was devoted to the comparison of the probiotic effect of compound probiotics to antibiotics as a feed additive for chicken. Two hundred and seventy newly hatched yellow-feather broilers were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (Con), probiotics (Pb), and antibiotics group (Ab). The Pb group received compound probiotics (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus faecalis, and yeast) via drinking water for 24 days. The Ab group received antibiotics (zinc bacitracin and colistin sulfate) in their diet for 24 days. All broilers were slaughtered on day 42. Compared with the Con group, the body weight was significantly increased on days 13, 28, and 42 in the Pb group (p &lt; 0.05), and markedly increased on day 28 in the Ab group (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Ab group, the body weight of the broilers in the Pb group increased significantly on day 13 (p &lt; 0.05). Compared to the Con and Pb groups, the antibiotics treatment reduced the feed intake (p &lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the feed conversion ratio between the Ab and Pb groups (p &gt; 0.05). The feed conversion ratio of the broilers treated with antibiotics or probiotics significantly decreased compared to the Con group (p &lt; 0.05). The depth of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum crypts in the Pb group decreased significantly compared to the Con and Ab group (p &lt; 0.05). The ratio of the villi length to crypt depth of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum epithelium was significantly increased in the Pb group compared to the Con group (p &lt; 0.05). The genera Bacteroides and Barnesiella were the most significantly enriched bacteria in the Ab and Pb groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). The expression of the genes related to antibiotic resistance was significantly decreased in the Pb group compared to the Ab group (p &lt; 0.05). Although both compound probiotics and antibiotics can improve growth performance, antibiotics increased the abundance of harmful bacteria and drug-resistant genes, while probiotics increased Barnesiella abundance, which is related to a decrease in the drug-resistant gene expression. Moreover, the probiotics treatment improved small intestinal morphology and fecal emissions, while antibiotics have no significant effect on these indicators, indicating a bright future for probiotics as an alternative to feed antibiotics in the yellow-feather broiler industry.
[35]
LIU X, MA Z, WANG Y, et al. Compound probiotics can improve intestinal health by affecting the gut microbiota of broilers[J]. Journal of animal science, 2023, 101:1-12.
[36]
AGUSTONO B, WARSITO S H, YUNITA M N, et al. Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens[J]. Veterinary world, 2023, 12:1461-1467.
[37]
POORBAGHI S L, GHEISARI H, DADRAS H, et al. Effects of simple and microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus with or without inulin on the broiler meat quality infected by avian influenza virus (H9N2)[J]. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2016, 8(4):221-228.
[38]
SANTILLO A, ANNICCHIARICO G, CAROPRESE M, et al. Probiotics in milk replacer influence lamb immune function and meat quality[J]. Animal, 2012, 6(2):339-345.
This study was undertaken to assess the effect of milk replacer (MR) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and a mix of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum on lamb immune response and on lamb meat quality. A 6-week-trial was conducted on 40 male Comisana lambs, divided into four groups, fed maternal milk (MM), MR, MR with L. acidophilus supplementation (MRL) and MR with a mix (1 : 1) of B. animalis subsp. lactis and B. longum subsp. longum supplementations (MRB). Lambs fed MR containing a mix of bifidobacteria showed the highest in vivo cellular immune response to phytohemagglutinin, whereas MM and MRB showed the highest antibody response to ovalbumin. At day 11 of the trial, MRL displayed the highest value of Interleukin-10; differences disappeared among groups subsequently. Blood cholesterol levels in lambs fed MR containing L. acidophilus was almost halved compared with that found in MM and MR groups. Meat from artificially reared lambs was characterized by trans-11 18:1 and total conjugated 18:2n-6, whereas meat from the dam-suckled lambs was characterized by 14:0, cis-9 14:1 and 16:0. Polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio was higher in meat of MR, MRL and MRB than in MM lambs. Meat from artificially reared lamb fed MR containing probiotics showed an improved fatty acid profile for human diet.
[39]
YUANITA I, SILITONGA L, SUTHAMA N. Evaluation of health status in broilers fed with a mixture of Dayak onion extract and Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2023, 10(2):269.
[40]
AGARWAL N, KAMRA D N, CHAUDHARY L C, et al. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives[J]. Letters in applied microbiology, 2002, 34(5):329-336.
To test various microbial cultures as cattle feed additives.Four groups of newly born crossbred calves (average body weight 23.5 kg) were reared on green berseem and calf starter which was devoid of cereal grains. Milk was fed up to 8 weeks of age, starting with one tenths and gradually reducing to one twentieths of the body weight. One hundred millilitres of microbial feed additive or 100 g fermented feed was fed to the animals of group 2 (curd containing lactic acid bacteria at 10(8) cfu x ml(-1)), group 3 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCDC-49 at 10(6) cfu x ml(-1)) and group 4 (Lactobacillus acidophilus-15 at 10(8) cfu x ml(-1)). Group 1 served as control. The incidence and duration of diarrhoea was lower in the animals of probiotic fed groups as compared to control group. Out of three microbial feed additives, yeast feeding showed maximum suppression of diarrhoea followed by Lactobacillus and curd.There was no effect of probiotic feeding on the log number of cells of lactic acid bacteria, yeast and coliform bacteria in the faeces and rumen liquor at any age. The activities of carboxymethylcellulase, xylanase, beta-glucosidase, alpha-glucosidase, alpha-amylase, protease, urease and pH of the rumen liquor remained unaffected by probiotic feeding at all ages tested in this experiment.
[41]
NEVES N O D S, DE DEA LINDNER J, STOCKHAUSEN L, et al. Fermentation of plant-based feeds with Lactobacillus acidophilus improves the survival and intestinal health of juvenile nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in a biofloc system[J]. Animals, 2024, 14(2):332.
This study evaluated the effect of fermentation with Lactobacillus acidophilus on the biochemical and nutritional compositions of a plant-based diet and its effects on the productive performance and intestinal health of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in a biofloc technology (BFT) system. The in vitro kinetics of feed fermentation were studied to determine the L. acidophilus growth and acidification curve through counting the colony-forming units (CFUs) mL−1 and measuring the pH. Physicochemical and bromatological analyses of the feed were also performed. Based on the microbial growth kinetics results, vegetable-based Nile tilapia feeds fermented for 6 (FPB6) and 18 (FPB18) h were evaluated for 60 days. Fermented diets were compared with a positive control diet containing fishmeal (CFM) and a negative control diet without animal protein (CPB). Fermentation with L. acidophilus increased lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count and the soluble protein concentration of the plant-based feed, as well as decreasing the pH (p &lt; 0.05). FPB treatments improved fish survival compared with CPB (p &lt; 0.05). Fermentation increased feed intake but worsened feed efficiency (p &lt; 0.05). The use of fermented feeds increased the LAB count and reduced pathogenic bacteria both in the BFT system’s water and in the animals’ intestines (p &lt; 0.05). Fermented plant-based feeds showed greater villi (FPB6; FPB18) and higher goblet cell (FPB6) counts relative to the non-fermented plant-based feed, which may indicate improved intestinal health. The results obtained in this study are promising and show the sustainable potential of using fermented plant-based feeds in fish feeding rather than animal protein and, in particular, fishmeal.
[42]
PÉREZ-VELASCO R, GÓMEZ-GIL B, et al. Nutritional attributes and microbial metagenomic profile during solid-state fermentation of soybean meal inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus under non-sterile conditions[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024, 104(13):8219-8229.
[43]
DU T, XIONG S, WANG L, et al. Two-stage fermentation of corn and soybean meal mixture by Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus to improve feeding value: optimization, physicochemical property, and microbial community[J]. Food science and biotechnology, 2024, 33(5):1207-1219.
[44]
HUANG J, DAI Y, HUANG T, et al. Comparison of nutritional value, bioactivity, and volatile compounds of soybean meal-corn bran mixed substrates fermented by different microorganisms[J]. Letters in applied microbiology, 2023, 76(2):1-10.
[45]
SU L W, CHENG Y H, HSIAO F S H, et al. Optimization of mixed solid-state fermentation of soybean meal by Lactobacillus species and Clostridium butyricum[J]. Polish journal of microbiology, 2018, 67(3):297-305.
\n Soybean meal is the main vegetable protein source in animal feed. Soybean meal contains several anti-nutritional factors, which directly affect digestion and absorption of soy protein, thereby reducing growth performance and value in animals. Fermented soybean meal is rich in probiotics and functional metabolites, which facilitates soybean protein digestion, absorption and utilization in piglets. However, the mixed solid-state fermentation (SSF) conditions of soybean meal remain to be optimized. In this study, we investigated the optimal parameters for SSF of soybean meal by\n Lactobacillus\n species and\n Clostridium butyricum\n. The results showed that two days of fermentation was sufficient to increase the viable count of bacteria, lactic acid levels and degradation of soybean protein in fermented soybean meal at the initial moisture content of 50%. The pH value, lowering sugar content and oligosaccharides in fermented soybean meal, was significantly reduced at the initial moisture content of 50% after two days of fermentation. Furthermore, the exogenous proteases used in combination with probiotics supplementation were further able to enhance the viable count of bacteria, degradation of soybean protein and lactic acid level in the fermented soybean meal. In addition, the pH value and sugar content in fermented soybean meal were considerably reduced in the presence of both proteases and probiotics. Furthermore, the fermented soybean meal also showed antibacterial activity against\n Staphylococcus aureus\n and\n Escherichia coli\n. These results together suggest that supplementation of both proteases and probiotics in SSF improves the nutritional value of fermented soybean meal and this is suitable as a protein source in animal feed.\n
[46]
SU X, MENGHE B, ZHANG H, et al. In vitro evaluation of intestinal transport and high-density fermentation of Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. Metabolites, 2023, 13(10):1077.
Lactobacillus acidophilus strains have limiting factors such as low cell density and complex nutritional requirements in industrial production, which greatly restricts their industrial application. In this study, fermentation conditions for L. acidophilus were optimized and transcriptomic analysis used to understand growth mechanisms under high-density fermentation conditions. We found that L. acidophilus IMAU81186 has strong tolerance to gastrointestinal juice. In addition, its optimal culture conditions were 3% inoculum (v/v); culture temperature 37 °C; initial pH 6.5; and medium composition of 30.18 g/L glucose, 37.35 g/L soybean peptone, 18.68 g/L fish peptone, 2.46 g/L sodium citrate, 6.125 g/L sodium acetate, 2.46 g/L K2HPO4, 0.4 g/L MgSO4·7H2O,0.04 g/L MnSO4·5H2O, 0.01 g/L serine, and 0.3 g/L uracil. After optimization, viable counts of IMAU81186 increased by 7.03 times. Differentially expressed genes in IMAU81186 were analyzed at different growth stages using transcriptomics. We found that a single carbon source had limitations in improving the biomass of the strain, and terP and bfrA were significantly down-regulated in the logarithmic growth period, which may be due to the lack of extracellular sucrose. After optimizing the carbon source, we found that adding 12 g/L sucrose to the culture medium significantly increased cell density.
[47]
MIGUEL M, MAMUAD L, RAMOS S, et al. Effects of using different roughages in the total mixed ration inoculated with or without coculture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population[J]. Animal bioscience, 2021, 34(4):642-651.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of different roughages in total mixed ration (TMR) inoculated with or without coculture of <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> (<i>L. acidophilus</i>) and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (<i>B. subtilis</i>) on <i>in vitro</i> rumen fermentation and microbial population.Methods: Three TMRs formulations composed of different forages were used and each TMR was grouped into two treatments: non-fermented TMR and fermented TMR (F-TMR) (inoculated with coculture of <i>L. acidophilus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>). After fermentation, the fermentation, chemical and microbial profile of the TMRs were determined. The treatments were used for <i>in vitro</i> rumen fermentation to determine total gas production, pH, ammonianitrogen (NH<sub>3&lt;/sub&gt;-N), and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Microbial populations were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All data were analyzed as a 3×2 factorial arrangement design using the MIXED procedure of Statistical Analysis Systems.Results: Changes in the fermentation (pH, lactate, acetate, propionate, and NH<sub>3&lt;/sub&gt;-N) and chemical composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fiber, and ash) were observed. For <i>in vitro</i> rumen fermentation, lower rumen pH, higher acetate, propionate, and total VFA content were observed in the F-TMR group after 24 h incubation (p&lt;0.05). F-TMR group had higher acetate concentration compared with the non-fermented group. Total VFA was highest (p&lt;0.05) in F-TMR containing combined forage of domestic and imported source (F-CF) and F-TMR containing Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage (F-IRS-CS) than that of TMR diet containing oat, timothy, and alfalfa hay. The microbial population was not affected by the different TMR diets.Conclusion: The use of Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage, as well as the inoculation of coculture of <i>L. acidophilus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>, in the TMR caused changes in the pH, lactate and acetate concentrations, and chemical composition of experimental diets. In addition, F-TMR composed with Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage altered ruminal pH and VFA concentrations during <i>in vitro</i> rumen fermentation experiment.
[48]
HADJ SAADOUN J, CALANI L, CIRLINI M, et al. Effect of fermentation with single and co-culture of lactic acid bacteria on okara: evaluation of bioactive compounds and volatile profiles[J]. Food&function, 2021, 12(7):3033-3043.
[49]
CORREA V A, PORTILHO A I, DE GASPARI E. Vaccines, adjuvants and key factors for mucosal immune response[J]. Immunology, 2022, 167(2):124-138.
Vaccines are the most effective tool to control infectious diseases, which provoke significant morbidity and mortality. Most vaccines are administered through the parenteral route and can elicit a robust systemic humoral response, but they induce a weak T-cell-mediated immunity and are poor inducers of mucosal protection. Considering that most pathogens enter the body through mucosal surfaces, a vaccine that elicits protection in the first site of contact between the host and the pathogen is promising. However, despite the advantages of mucosal vaccines as good options to confer protection on the mucosal surface, only a few mucosal vaccines are currently approved. In this review, we discuss the impact of vaccine administration in different mucosal surfaces; how appropriate adjuvants enhance the induction of protective mucosal immunity and other factors that can influence the mucosal immune response to vaccines. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
[50]
GILL H S, RUTHERFURD K J, PRASAD J, et al. Enhancement of natural and acquired immunity by Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis (HN019)[J]. British journal of nutrition, 2000, 83(2):167-176.
In order to study the mechanism by which increasing unsaturation of dietary fat lowers HDL-cholesterol levels, we studied various measures of HDL metabolism in hamsters fed with fats with different degrees of saturation. Hamsters were fed on a cholesterol-enriched (1 g/kg) semipurified diet containing 200 g/kg of maize oil, olive oil, or palm oil for 9 weeks. Increasing saturation of dietary fat resulted in increasing concentrations of total plasma cholesterol (4·29 (SD 0·51), 5·30 (sd 0·67) and 5·58 (sd 0·76) mmol/l respectively,n12) and HDL-cholesterol (3·31 (sd 0·50), 3·91 (sd 0·12) and 3·97 (sd 0·43) mmol/l) and these concentrations were significantly higher (P&lt; 0·05) in the palm-oil and olive-oil-fed hamsters compared with the maize-oil group. Total plasma triacylglycerol levels also increased with increasing fat saturation (1·01 (sd 0·59), 1·56 (sd 0·65) and 2·75 (sd 1·03) mmol/l) and were significantly higher (P&lt; 0·05) in the palm-oil group compared with the olive-oil and maize-oil-fed hamsters. The three diets did not have differential effects on plasma activity levels of lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). Levels of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) tended to be higher with increasing fat saturation but this effect was not significant. The capacity of liver membranes to bind human HDL3was significantly higher (P&lt; 0·05) in the hamsters fed with maize oil (810 (sd 100) ng HDL3protein/mg membrane protein,n4) compared with those fed on palm oil (655 (sd 56) ng/mg), whereas the olive-oil group had intermediate values (674 (sd 26) ng/mg). The affinity of HDL3for the binding sites was not affected by the type of dietary fat. Hepatic lipase (EC3.1.1.3) activity, measured in liver homogenates, increased with increasing fat saturation. We conclude that dietary maize oil, when compared with either olive oil or palm oil, may lower HDL-cholesterol concentrations by enhancing HDL binding to liver membranes.
[51]
URIZA P J, TRAUTMAN C, PALOMINO M M, et al. Development of an antigen delivery platform using Lactobacillus acidophilus decorated with heterologous proteins: a sheep in wolf’s clothing story[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2020, 11:509380.
[52]
PERONI D G, MORELLI L. Probiotics as adjuvants in vaccine strategy: is there more room for improvement?[J]. Vaccines, 2021, 9(8):811.
Background. It has been recognized that microbiota plays a key role in shaping immune system maturation and activity. Since probiotic administration influences the microbiota composition and acts as a biological response modifier, the efficacy of an adjuvant for boosting vaccine-specific immunity is investigated. Methods. A review of the literature was performed, starting from the mechanisms to laboratory and clinical evidence. Results. The mechanisms, and in vitro and animal models provide biological plausibility for microbiota use. Probiotics have been investigated as adjuvants in farm conditions and as models to understand their potential in human vaccinations with promising results. In human studies, although probiotics were effective in ameliorating seroconversion to vaccines for influenza, rotavirus and other micro-organisms, the results for clinical use are still controversial, especially in particular settings, such as during the last trimester of pregnancy. Conclusion. Although this topic remains controversial, the use of probiotics as adjuvant factors in vaccination represents a strategic key for different applications. The available data are deeply influenced by heterogeneity among studies in terms of strains, timing and duration of administration, and patients. Although these do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions, probiotics as adjuvants in vaccination should be considered in future studies, especially in the elderly and in children, where vaccine effectiveness and duration of immunization really matter.
[53]
BRON P A, VAN BAARLEN P, KLEEREBEZEM M. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa[J]. Nature reviews microbiology, 2012, 10(1): 66-78.
[54]
XUE R, TIAN Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of a live L. acidophilus expressing SAD epitope of transmissible gastroenteritis virus as an oral vaccine[J]. Acta virologica, 2019, 63(3):301-308.
[55]
ZANG Y, TIAN Y, LI Y, et al. Recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus expressing S1 and S2 domains of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus could improve the humoral and mucosal immune levels in mice and sows inoculated orally[J]. Veterinary microbiology, 2020, 248:108827.
[56]
NOURI GHARAJALAR S, MIRZAI P, NOFOUZI K, et al. Immune enhancing effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Newcastle disease vaccination in chickens[J]. Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, 2020, 72: 101520.
PDF(1218 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/