Influence of Different Fallowing Methods on Soil Quality of Degraded Vegetable Fields

WANGJingwen, YUANHangjie, LOULing, ZHANGXiumei, YANGWenye, WANGZhong

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 146-152.

PDF(1210 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1210 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 146-152. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0718

Influence of Different Fallowing Methods on Soil Quality of Degraded Vegetable Fields

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To explore the restoration effect of fallowing on the soil quality of degraded vegetable fields, a three-year positioning experiment was carried out on eight fallowing measures which included direct fallowing without removing the greenhouse, direct fallowing after removing the greenhouse, rotary tillage fallowing after removing the greenhouse, deep ploughing fallowing after removing the greenhouse, deep ploughing fallowing with rice husk after removing the greenhouse, deep ploughing and covering fallowing after removing the greenhouse, deep ploughing and planting green manure fallowing after removing the greenhouse and deep ploughing with lime after removing the greenhouse. The changes in soil quality indicators during different fallowing processes were dynamically observed. The results showed that all the above eight fallowing measures could reduce the contents of water-soluble salts, exchangeable acids, available phosphorus and available potassium in the soil to varying degrees, and increase soil organic carbon, water-stable aggregates, microbial biomass carbon, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, pH value and cation exchange capacity. Except for the direct fallowing without removing the greenhouse, all other fallowing measures could reduce soil bulk density, but all fallowing measures had a relatively small impact on total nitrogen, total phosphorus and slow-release potassium in the soil. Research suggested that the most suitable fallowing measures for restoring the soil quality of degraded vegetable fields included deep ploughing after removing the greenhouse and planting green manure, deep ploughing with rice husks after removing the greenhouse, and deep ploughing with lime after removing the greenhouse. Deep ploughing after removing the greenhouse and covering, as well as deep ploughing after removing the greenhouse, also had good effects. The effects of rotary tillage after the greenhouse was removed and direct fallowing after the greenhouse was removed were relatively small.

Key words

degraded vegetable fields / fallowing measures / remove the shed / deeply ploughing / cover / apply rice husks / green manure / lime

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Jingwen , YUAN Hangjie , LOU Ling , et al . Influence of Different Fallowing Methods on Soil Quality of Degraded Vegetable Fields[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(2): 146-152 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0718

References

[1]
黄毅, 邓志英, 黄玉屏, 等. 重金属污染区耕地轮作休耕治理实践与对策建议[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2024(10):32-35,39.
[2]
彭芳英, 王力. 花生轮作、休耕对产量和土壤健康的影响与建议[J]. 粮油与饲料科技, 2024(8):108-110.
[3]
邵珊, 朱正康, 郑博文. 江苏省宜兴市耕地轮作休耕制度实施情况、成效及问题与对策[J]. 上海农业科技, 2024(5):16-18.
[4]
刘金华, 金泽萌. 湖南省耕地轮作休耕:提升粮食安全的关键选择与模式探索[J]. 乡村科技, 2024, 15(17):46-52.
[5]
聂英, 韩鲜籽, 王子茗惠, 等. 耕地休耕:国外经验与中国实践[J]. 世界农业, 2022(12):34-44.
[6]
赵昱茜, 鲁春阳, 文枫, 等. 我国耕地轮作休耕研究进展与展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(19):1-9.
[7]
邹学荣, 杨庆媛, 陈展图. 美国休耕制度及其对中国耕地休耕制度构建的启示[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(7):78-84.
[8]
曾思燕. 中国休耕的主控因素及其对粮食安全的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
[9]
寻舸, 宋彦科, 程星月. 轮作休耕对我国粮食安全的影响及对策[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(4):681-687.
[10]
侯艳. 重金属污染地区休耕政策绩效评价[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
[11]
景瑞祥. 休耕政策对耕地绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2024.
[12]
谷雨, 蒋平, 李明德, 等. 治理式休耕对“长株潭”镉污染稻田土壤理化特性及镉含量的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(3):393-400.
[13]
赵仰徽, 齐向辉, 任稳江, 等. 半干旱区雨养农田绿肥作物轮作休耕技术措施研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2024, 38(1):123-132.
[14]
程玉龙, 张文斌, 黄裕飞, 等. 土地轮作休耕发展特征及建议[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(19):180,184.
[15]
黄毅, 邓志英. 我国重金属污染区耕地轮作休耕存在的问题及对策——以湖南省为例[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(13):22-26.
[16]
陈展图, 杨庆媛. 广西实行耕地轮作休耕制度研究[J]. 桂海论丛, 2018, 34(6):69-76.
[17]
刘仁平, 李安艳, 方智勇. 昭通市实行耕地轮作休耕的探讨[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(26):86-88.
[18]
谢先雄, 赵敏娟, 康健, 等. 休耕能实现生态改善与农户增收的双赢吗——来自西北生态严重退化休耕试点区的准实验证据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(12):33-45.
[19]
陆雪芳, 王建明, 管红良, 等. 常州市武进区蔬菜地酸化成因及防止措施[J]. 上海农业科技, 2007(2):89-90.
[20]
王辉, 董元华, 安琼, 等. 高度集约化利用下蔬菜地土壤酸化及次生盐渍化研究[J]. 土壤, 2005, 37(5):530-533.
[21]
陈雅玲, 李静, 张奇, 等. 江苏省蔬菜地土壤养分状况及问题、对策分析[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2005(8):87-91.
[22]
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[23]
NY/T1121. 19-2008,土壤检测第19部分:土壤水稳性大团聚体组成的测定[S].
[24]
李治海, 童永贞, 鲁学文. 轮作休耕对耕地质量提升的效果研究[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2021(1):9-13.
[25]
夏梓泰, 程伟威, 李永梅, 等. 轮作休耕模式对土壤团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3):31-37.
[26]
王根林, 段衍, 刘峥宇, 等. 秸秆覆盖休耕对土壤C、N、P循环功能基因的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2024, 41(2):325-332.
[27]
高慧芳, 孟婷, 熊琦, 等. 太子参不同休耕年限土壤理化特征和微生物群落变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8):2196-2204.
太子参为福建道地中药材,连作效应严重限制其产业发展。休耕可以在一定程度上缓解连作效应,然而休耕对于缓解连作效应的机制尚不清楚。本文通过高通量测序分析不同休耕年限对太子参土壤微生物丰度及群落多样性的影响,并探索土壤理化性质、酚酸类物质与土壤微生物群落之间的关联性。结果表明:与对照太子参土壤相比,休耕土壤真菌多样性降低,细菌多样性增多。在细菌优势菌门中,酸杆菌门相对丰度显著增加,变形菌门与放线菌门相对丰度显著降低;真菌优势菌门相对丰度无显著变化。土壤酸性减弱,有机质含量随休耕年限增加呈现递减模式,酚酸类物质中苯甲酸和水杨酸含量显著降低,而对香豆酸等逐渐积累。综上,太子参土壤休耕改善了土壤微生物的菌群结构、土壤性质,从而缓解了连作效应。
[28]
梁悦萍, 李科江, 张俊鹏, 等. 咸水灌溉棉田休耕期土壤胞外酶活性和微生物多样性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(4):732-740.
[29]
徐光辉, 王洋, 王继红, 等. 休耕轮作对农田土壤微生物量碳的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(4):897-901.
[30]
董立国, 白晓雄, 许浩, 等. 免耕和休耕改善黄绵土水稳性团聚体组成及稳定性[J]. 土壤与作物, 2024, 13(3):294-304.
[31]
鲁泽让, 李永梅, 杨春怀, 等. 连续周年轮作休耕对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(03):1644-1654.
[32]
鲁泽让, 夏梓泰, 芦美, 等. 周年轮作休耕对土壤AMF群落和团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(9):5154-5163.
[33]
王志强, 刘英, 杨文亭, 等. 稻田复种轮作休耕对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(5):1143-1155.
PDF(1210 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/