PDF(1953 KB)
Differences Analysis of Yields Formation in No-tillage Summer-sown Soybean After Wheat in Southern Xinjiang
ZHANGZhanqin, HEZongling, SUXin, TANXin, ZHANYong, ZHANGHengbin
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (14) : 25-33.
PDF(1953 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(1953 KB)
Differences Analysis of Yields Formation in No-tillage Summer-sown Soybean After Wheat in Southern Xinjiang
Taking the cultivation model that created the high-yield record for summer-sown soybeans in the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps as the research object, the differences in effective accumulated temperature during the growth period, water and fertilizer management measures, dynamic accumulation of dry matter, spatial distribution of leaf area and pods and grains, and yield components were analyzed by comparing with medium and low-yield fields to clarify the key technical measures and population structure characteristics for high-yield formation of summer-sown soybeans, and to establish a high-yield cultivation model. The research showed that it was crucial to adopt the no-tillage precision sowing technology mode for summer soybean planting, with sowing as early as possible after wheat harvest. The high-yield field of summer-sown soybeans took 104 days from sowing (with the emergence water dripping) to maturity, and the accumulated temperature of ≥10℃ during the growth period was 2496.72℃. The total irrigation water was 4817.4 m3/hm2, and the total fertilizer application was 502.5 kg/hm2, with balanced irrigation and fertilization at each growth stage. The population structure characteristics were as followed: plant height was 72.5 cm, the number of harvested plants was 384000 plants/hm2, the number of grains per plant was 73.58, the number of pods per plant was 30.00, the weight of grains per plant was 12.07 g, the accumulation of dry matter was 9941.33 kg/hm2, and the harvest index was 0.46. During the podding stage, the photosynthetically active radiation gradually increased from bottom to top, the LAI was 4.03, the main stem had 13 nodes, and the leaf area and grain distribution were larger from the 6th to the 11th node. The analysis and comparison of the reasons for the yield differences among different plots showed that a higher effective accumulated temperature during the growth period, reasonable water and fertilizer input at each growth stage, sufficient population size, and uniform plant growth were the keys to achieving high yields of summer-sown soybeans.
summer sowing / no-tillage / soybean / yield levels / yield variation
| [1] |
冯锋, 战勇, 田志喜. 新疆地区发展大豆生产的可行性和初步建议[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(2):199-204.
大豆(Glycine max)是重要的粮油作物。近年来, 我国大豆需求量和进口量不断增加。扩大种植面积和提高单产是增加大豆总产量的主要途径, 西北地区尤其是新疆在扩大大豆种植面积和提高单产方面具有一定的潜力。该文从新疆大豆生产的自然气候条件、大豆在新疆的种植情况及新疆发展大豆生产的优势和局限性等方面分析了新疆地区发展大豆生产的可行性; 并围绕大豆生产政策扶持、机械化水平提升、加快科技创新培育优良品种和加强大豆生产示范等措施, 提出新疆发展大豆生产的初步建议。
|
| [2] |
曾凯, 赵靓, 张恒斌, 等. 新疆春大豆膜下滴灌超高产栽培模式创建[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(1):28-38.
|
| [3] |
张恒斌, 杨相昆, 颉健辉, 等. 第一师夏播大豆生产现状分析[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2023(3):11-15.
|
| [4] |
李慧琴, 王潭刚, 汤晓昀, 等. 南疆麦后夏播大豆存在的问题及对策建议[J]. 农村科技, 2024(3):67-70.
|
| [5] |
邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006:13-24.
|
| [6] |
明道绪. 高级生物统计[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006:19-20.
|
| [7] |
张恒斌, 何宗铃, 赵靓, 等. 南疆地区春播大豆主要农艺性状分析与综合评价[J]. 大豆科学, 2025, 44(1):33-41.
|
| [8] |
曾凯, 战勇, 张恒斌, 等. 新疆春大豆膜下滴灌高产栽培技术[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2023(5):16-17.
|
| [9] |
张勇, 胡凯凤, 王磊, 等. 高低两种密度条件下耐密植优异大豆种质鉴定[J]. 大豆科学, 2024, 43(5):578-588.
|
| [10] |
刘士达. 大豆群体发展与田间小气候关系的初步探讨[R]. 农业气象研究报告选编(第二集), 1963.
|
| [11] |
董钻. 大豆株型、群体结构与产量关系的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 1986, 5(2):110-120.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
王程, 刘兵, 金剑, 等. 密度对大豆农艺性状及产量构成因素空间分布特征的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(6):936-948
|
| [15] |
李彦生, 刘兵, 张秋英, 等. 大豆粒重的粒位效应及其空间分布特征[J]. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(2):218-222.
|
| [16] |
章建新, 倪丽, 翟云龙. 施氮对高产春大豆氮素吸收分配的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2005, 24(1):38-42.
|
| [17] |
倪丽. 高产春大豆氮磷钾吸收分配规律研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2004.
|
| [18] |
董钻. 大豆产量生理[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012:70,104.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |