Study on Improvement Effects of Three Agricultural Wastes on Soda Saline-alkali Wasteland

WANGLina, QIGuochao, RENCuimei, GUXin, ZHANGHongyu, WANGDi, RUIHaiying

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 76-81.

PDF(1353 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1353 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 76-81. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0836

Study on Improvement Effects of Three Agricultural Wastes on Soda Saline-alkali Wasteland

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To explore the improvement effect of agricultural wastes on saline-alkali wasteland for scientific application, this study selected three agricultural wastes, namely furfural residue, vinegar residue and bacterial residue. Random large-area plot experiment was conducted by applying them to soda saline-alkali wasteland. The application effects of the three amendments were comprehensively evaluated by measuring the physical and chemical properties of the soil, the structural characteristics of soil bacterial communities, and the biomass of aboveground plants. The results showed that the application of furfural residue, vinegar residue and bacterial residue could increase soil water content, reduce soil compactness and soil bulk density. The order of improvement effect from best to good was vinegar residue > furfural residue > bacterial residue. Furfural residue could effectively reduce the soil to pH 7.86, reduce the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) to 3.58%, and increase the organic matter to 36.00 g/kg. In contrast, vinegar residue and bacterial residue increased the soil pH and the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and reduced the soil organic matter content compared with the control. The application of the three amendments reduced the richness and diversity of soil bacteria, changed the composition of dominant bacterial phyla, increased the relative abundance of soil Pseudomonadota, but decreased that of soil Acidobacteriota. The application of furfural residue increased the dry matter content of Sesbania sesban to 13406.7 kg/hm2. Comprehensively, the effect of furfural residue on improving saline-alkali wasteland was better than that of vinegar residue and bacterial residue.

Key words

agricultural wastes / saline-alkali wasteland / improvement effect / exchangeable sodium percentage / richness / diversity

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Lina , QI Guochao , REN Cuimei , et al . Study on Improvement Effects of Three Agricultural Wastes on Soda Saline-alkali Wasteland[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(9): 76-81 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0836

References

[1]
LI Y. Research progress of improving measures of “raised field-shallow pool” for coastal saline alkaline land[J]. Agricultural research in the arid areas, 2014, 32(5):154-161.
[2]
王丽娜, 王迪, 任翠梅, 等. 土壤改良剂的应用现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(30):84-88.
苏打盐碱土的改良是东北松嫩平原土壤治理的重要目标。综合前人的研究结果,归纳总结了改良剂的作用机理和改良效果,主要类型及应用,以及改良剂在实际使用中存在的问题,也展望了改良剂的应用前景,为今后改良剂的深入研究提供参考。改良剂可分为无机改良剂、有机改良剂、微生物菌剂,组合改良剂的使用效果好于单一改良剂,改良剂的应用对土壤理化性质、结构、养分含量以及微生态环境都有改善,并促进植物生长。提出针对北方旱田盐碱土的改良,新型有机改良剂以及配套改良技术的研发是今后研究的重点。
[3]
杨峥, 解恒参, 袁涛, 等. 农业废弃生物质转化利用技术的研究进展[J]. 邢台职业技术学院学报, 2021, 38(5):74-80.
[4]
杨依, 焦艳婷, 王延智, 等. 氮负载生物炭对干湿交替稻田水土生态环境的调控效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):226-234,243.
[5]
张美娟, 王冰, 黄升财, 等. 糠醛渣改良土壤增强苕子对盐碱土的适应性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020(6):115-117.
[6]
谭延肖, 韩梅梅, 郑现和, 等. 醋渣覆盖对德州地区盐渍土理化性质和樱桃幼苗地上部生长的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2023, 27(1):73-75,80.
[7]
齐光耀, 张书菡, 孙建平, 等. 大球盖菇菌渣对盐碱土区林地土壤的改良研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(1):104-110.
[8]
鲍士旦. 《土壤农化分析》[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[9]
闻亚美, 黄桃阁, 张辉, 等. 平菇菌渣连续还田对土壤性状的影响[J]. 中国食用菌, 2018, 37(4):82-83.
[10]
秦嘉海, 吕彪, 南永慧, 等. 糠醛渣的改土增产效应[J]. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(5):237-238,233.
[11]
杨柳青, 付明鑫. 糠醛渣对苏打盐渍土的改良效果研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 1992(1):13-16.
[12]
菜阿兴, 宋荣华, 常运诚, 等. 糠醛渣防治碱土及增产效果的初步研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 1997, 18(4):240-243.
[13]
罗成科, 吕雯, 许兴, 等. 利用糠醛渣改良银川北部碱化土壤的效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2008(3):232-234.
[14]
杜伟光, 康立娟, 董宁. 吉林省西部重度盐碱土糠醛渣复合改良剂配方研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010, 40(6):76-78.
[15]
王光华, 刘俊杰, 于镇华, 等. 土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(2):14-20.
酸杆菌是土壤中一类重要的细菌类群。基于16S rRNA基因序列分析发现,酸杆菌一般占细菌总量的20%左右,甚至高达50%以上,表明酸杆菌在土壤生态过程中起到重要的作用。从植被、海拔高度、氮肥管理及二氧化碳升高对土壤酸杆菌分布的影响,以及酸杆菌根际效应等几方面论述了土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展;综合分析揭示出不同分类单元酸杆菌细菌分布与环境因子间的关系;阐述了部分酸杆菌细菌的潜在生态功能。最后指出在土壤酸杆菌研究中应强化分离培养、细化分子生态、采用宏基因组学和单细胞测序新技术的重要性。
[16]
LAUBER C L, STRICKLANG M S, BRADFORD M A, et al. The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2008, 40:2407-2415.
[17]
CHU H Y, FIERER N, LAUBER C L, et al. Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2010, 12:2998-3006.
The severe environmental stresses of the Arctic may have promoted unique soil bacterial communities compared with those found in lower latitude environments. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the biogeography of soil bacterial communities in the Arctic using a high resolution bar-coded pyrosequencing technique. We also compared arctic soils with soils from a wide range of more temperate biomes to characterize variability in soil bacterial communities across the globe. We show that arctic soil bacterial community composition and diversity are structured according to local variation in soil pH rather than geographical proximity to neighboring sites, suggesting that local environmental heterogeneity is far more important than dispersal limitation in determining community-level differences. Furthermore, bacterial community composition had similar levels of variability, richness and phylogenetic diversity within arctic soils as across soils from a wide range of lower latitudes, strongly suggesting a common diversity structure within soil bacterial communities around the globe. These results contrast with the well-established latitudinal gradients in animal and plant diversity, suggesting that the controls on bacterial community distributions are fundamentally different from those observed for macro-organisms and that our biome definitions are not useful for predicting variability in soil bacterial communities across the globe.© 2010 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[18]
GRIFFITH R I, THOMSON B C, JAMES P, et al. The bacterial biogeography of British soils[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2011, 13:1642-1654.
Despite recognition of the importance of soil bacteria to terrestrial ecosystem functioning there is little consensus on the factors regulating belowground biodiversity. Here we present a multi-scale spatial assessment of soil bacterial community profiles across Great Britain (> 1000 soil cores), and show the first landscape scale map of bacterial distributions across a nation. Bacterial diversity and community dissimilarities, assessed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, were most strongly related to soil pH providing a large-scale confirmation of the role of pH in structuring bacterial taxa. However, while α diversity was positively related to pH, the converse was true for β diversity (between sample variance in α diversity). β diversity was found to be greatest in acidic soils, corresponding with greater environmental heterogeneity. Analyses of clone libraries revealed the pH effects were predominantly manifest at the level of broad bacterial taxonomic groups, with acidic soils being dominated by few taxa (notably the group 1 Acidobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria). We also noted significant correlations between bacterial communities and most other measured environmental variables (soil chemistry, aboveground features and climatic variables), together with significant spatial correlations at close distances. In particular, bacterial and plant communities were closely related signifying no strong evidence that soil bacteria are driven by different ecological processes to those governing higher organisms. We conclude that broad scale surveys are useful in identifying distinct soil biomes comprising reproducible communities of dominant taxa. Together these results provide a baseline ecological framework with which to pursue future research on both soil microbial function, and more explicit biome based assessments of the local ecological drivers of bacterial biodiversity.© 2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
PDF(1353 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/