PDF(1616 KB)
Phenotypic Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 40 Colored Wheat Germplasm Resources in Huang-huai Wheat Region
LIUXiaodan, ZHOUSiyuan, ZHAOShilei, WANGJunsen, GAOYang, ZHAOLifei, ZHAOShuangsuo
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10) : 68-78.
PDF(1616 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(1616 KB)
Phenotypic Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 40 Colored Wheat Germplasm Resources in Huang-huai Wheat Region
At present, there are some problems in color wheat breeding, such as unsystematic germplasm evaluation, unclear coordination mechanism of agronomic traits, and lack of quantitative basis for screening excellent parents. In order to clarify the phenotypic variation, trait association characteristics and comprehensive performance of colored wheat germplasm resources in Huang-huai wheat area, and improve the selection efficiency of breeding parents, 40 colored wheat germplasms and 1 common wheat germplasm control (ZM18) were used as materials in this study. Nine agronomic traits such as plant height, spike length, flag leaf traits and spikelet number were investigated at mature plant stage, and genetic variation, comprehensive evaluation including principal component and cluster analysis were carried out. The results showed that the 40 colored wheat germplasm resources had abundant variation and specific characteristics. The variation coefficient of nine agronomic traits ranged from 10.750% to 120.147%, and the diversity index ranged from 1.083 to 2.057. More than 77.78% of agronomic traits had variation coefficients greater than 15%, and diversity indices greater than 1.8. The overall performance of colored wheat is characterized by long flag leaf, large flag leaf angle, many fertile spikelets, and short peduncle and exposed peduncle. Correlation analysis indicates that the number of fertile spikelets is significantly correlated with most traits. Among them, it was significantly positively correlated with ear length (r=0.50) and flag leaf width (r=0.53), while ear length was significantly or highly significantly positively correlated with plant height (r=0.33) and flag leaf length (r=0.58), and plant height was highly significantly negatively correlated with flag leaf width (r=-0.47). Principal component analysis simplified the nine traits into three principal components, which could explain 75.412% of the trait information. Plant height, ear length, and flag leaf angle were the core indicators. The comprehensive evaluation value (D value) was used to assess the overall performance of each germplasm, with a higher D value indicating better overall performance. Thirteen colored wheat germplasm resources with D values greater than DCK (0.523) were screened out, among which KDH1, LLM1, ZHM1, and LHM1 had relatively short plant heights at 66.67, 85.50, 82.50, and 80.88 cm, respectively, which could be used as candidate parents. When the genetic distance was 5.78, the 41 test materials can be divided into five major categories, with Group III having the most germplasm resources, and Group V having more germplasm resources and a larger mean D value (0.638). In summary, the agronomic traits of 40 colored wheat germplasm resources had rich variations and clear characteristics. When breeding new varieties, attention should be paid to the coordinated relationship among plant height, ear length, flag leaf length, flag leaf width, and number of fertile spikelets. Cluster analysis further clarified the characteristics of germplasm resources in different groups. Four candidate parents with larger D values and shorter plant heights were screened out. This provides a reference for high yield, lodging resistance, ideal plant type breeding or improvement, the utilization of agronomic traits, and the selection of parents of colored wheat varieties. Subsequent multi-dimensional accurate evaluation can be carried out in combination with yield and quality traits.
colored wheat / germplasm resources / agronomic traits / phenotypic variation analysis / correlation analysis / principal component analysis / cluster analysis / comprehensive evaluation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
刘文进. 特殊粒色小麦的研究进展及应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(20):44-45.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
丁志远, 赵晖. 特殊粒色小麦在育种中的利用研究进展[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2006(2):7-8.
|
| [5] |
徐萍, 张正斌, 张锦鹏, 等. 彩色小麦基因发掘和种质资源育种利用[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6):1549-1571.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
赵善仓, 刘宾, 赵领军, 等. 蓝、紫粒小麦籽粒花色苷组成分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(19):4072-4080.
|
| [8] |
何秀平. 彩色小麦产量性状与粒色遗传研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
张正斌, 徐萍, 张锦鹏, 等. 彩色小麦种质资源在生物强化和功能食品应用中的研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6):1572-1584.
|
| [11] |
马强, 李延坤, 王桂娥, 等. 山东省审定彩色小麦品种农艺性状和品质分析及改良方向研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2025(5):113-119.
|
| [12] |
吕强, 熊瑛, 马超, 等. 彩色小麦与普通小麦产量形成差异及其生理基础研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2008(1):41-43.
|
| [13] |
叶君, 吴晓华, 王小兵, 等. 彩色小麦品系农艺性状与营养品质分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2024, 44(10):1270-1278.
|
| [14] |
应开, 孟天琪, 高旺南, 等. 彩色小麦种质主要农艺性状和营养品质综合评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2025, 45(3):337-348.
|
| [15] |
吴宏亚, 张伯桥, 汪尊杰, 等. 长江中下游冬麦区小麦品种主要性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(5):67-72.
|
| [16] |
马兴国, 梁晓东, 李建疆, 等. 98份国外引进春小麦种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 种子, 2025, 44(8):101-105.
|
| [17] |
程西永, 李会涛, 许海霞, 等. 抽样方式对评价小麦种质资源遗传多样性统计数的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(18):388-393.
|
| [18] |
金艳, 宋全昊, 宋佳静, 等. 69份小麦种质资源的综合性评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2):33-45.
|
| [19] |
倪永静, 姜晓君, 卢祖权, 等. 30份国内外小麦种质资源主要农艺性状的分析与评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(3):16-22.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
张正斌, 徐萍, 李奉令, 等. 彩色小麦农艺性状和微量营养元素相关回归分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(10):1669-1678.
|
| [22] |
任文斌, 谢三刚, 李素娟, 等. 蓝、 紫粒糯小麦农艺性状比较分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2014, 42(12):1239-1241.
|
| [23] |
袁青锋, 郑新疆, 张静, 等. 黑小麦主要农艺性状的相关性和主成分分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(14):36-37.
|
| [24] |
徐鑫, 王玉洁, 李小军, 等. 小麦旗叶相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(12):1514-1523.
|
| [25] |
王艳胜. 紫色小麦和普通小麦的农艺性状及功能成分测定[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2019.
|
| [26] |
项超, 周春宏, 徐智斌, 等. 小麦穗下节性状与灌浆速率及产量相关因素的关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2022, 28(2):352-359.
|
| [27] |
黄杰, 周璐琪, 葛昌斌, 等. 小麦穗下节性状与灌浆特性、穗部相关因素的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(10):104-111.
|
| [28] |
李建波, 邓珂. 作物种质资源常用综合评价方法[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(3):40-46.
|
| [29] |
董连生. 2019—2023年国审小麦品种生育期、株高与品质的变化趋势分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(6):5-12.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |