Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold Resistance of 11 Introduced Amphipodial Bamboo Species in Eastern Anhui Province

SUNHui, CAOZhihua, HUTao, YANGChunyu, MAYanjun, QIANKongping, WUZhongneng, YUGuoqing, CHENWei

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (13) : 79-85.

PDF(1379 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1379 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (13) : 79-85. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0989

Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold Resistance of 11 Introduced Amphipodial Bamboo Species in Eastern Anhui Province

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Comparing the cold resistance of different introduced mixed-growth bamboo species, the excellent bamboo species were selected for the promotion of southern bamboo introduction to north and afforestation. Using the two-year old transplanted mother bamboos of 11 bamboo species, namely Pleioblastus fortunei, Pl. viridistriatus, Pl. pygmaeus, Shibataea kumasaca, Indocalamus latifolius, S. hispida, I. decorus, I. latifolius f. flavistriatus, Pseudosasa japonica var. tsutsumiana, Ps. japonica, Chimonobambusa sichuanensis, as materials, this study explored their morphological and physiological responses to natural low temperatures for 6 consecutive years after introduction. The cold resistance of different bamboo species was comprehensively evaluated through principal component analysis combined with the membership function method. Under natural low temperature stress, the external morphology of the 11 bamboo species showed significant adaptive changes, mainly manifested as typical cold damage symptoms such as leaf yellowing, death of newly sprouted bamboo and mother bamboo. Photosynthetic physiological indicators showed that natural low temperature significantly inhibited the actual photochemical efficiency Y() of PSⅡ, the maximum electron transport rate (ETR), the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (Fv/Fm), and the effective photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fo) of the 11 bamboo species. With the extension of the introduction time, the variation ranges of the photosynthetic parameters of each bamboo species showed significant differences, reflecting obvious differences in the tolerance levels of different bamboo species to natural low temperature stress. The results of principal component analysis showed that after dimensionality reduction of 7 single indicators, 4 principal components could be extracted, with a cumulative contribution rate of 93.0%. By calculating the comprehensive evaluation value D of cold resistance, the final ranking of the cold resistance abilities of the 11 bamboo species was obtained as follows: I. decorus> I. latifolius f. flavistriatus> Ps. japonica var. tsutsumiana> S. kumasaca> I. latifolius> Pl. viridistriatus> Pl. pygmaeus> C. sichuanensis> S. hispida> Ps. japonica> Pl. fortunei.

Key words

amphipodial bamboo species / cold resistance / principal component analysis / membership function method / comprehensive evaluation

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Hui , CAO Zhihua , HU Tao , et al . Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold Resistance of 11 Introduced Amphipodial Bamboo Species in Eastern Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(13): 79-85 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0989

References

[1]
贺嘉欣. 苦参cpSSR分子标记开发应用与温度胁迫响应研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2021.
[2]
朱成磊, 杨克彬, 徐秀荣, 等. 毛竹NIP基因的分子特征及应答胁迫的表达模式[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(1):64-76.
[3]
王宁. 植物抗寒生理性研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(4):174-177.
[4]
王树梅, 张琦, 耿颖, 等. 金镶玉竹不同引种距离的生理适应性[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2022, 20(增刊1):28-34.
[5]
李丽, 王开芳, 李自成, 等. 低温胁迫对淡竹2个抗寒性生理指标的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(11):39-42.
[6]
曹志华, 吴中能, 蔡如胜, 等. 安徽省不同毛竹种源抗寒性生长生理指标的综合评价[J]. 竹子学报, 2018, 37(3):45-50.
[7]
夏雯, 尹子旭, 官凤英. 黄槽竹及其变种自然极端低温后的生理响应特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(3):75-84.
[8]
胡尚连, 曹颖, 段宁, 等. 不同类型竹种抗寒性的灰色关联与聚类分析[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2010, 30(4):327-332.
[9]
滕召勇. 湖南丛生观赏竹抗寒性研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2013.
[10]
祁潇勇. 沿海沙地引种绿竹的种源评价和优良种源选择[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.
[11]
田海涛, 高培军, 温国胜. 7种箬竹抗寒特性比较[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2006, 23(6):641-646.
[12]
蔡纯. 部分竹种抗寒性研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2015.
[13]
李娟, 高健. 黄条金刚竹、阔叶箬竹和菲白竹在干旱、冻害和重金属Pb胁迫下光合生理响应研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2016, 35(1):22-29.
[14]
葛忠强, 吴德军, 李春明, 等. 10个竹子品种在山东自然寒冷条件下抗寒性评价[J]. 山东林业科技, 2020, 50(5):13-18.
[15]
耿颖, 陈炳卓, 曹帮华, 等. 11个南竹北移竹种抗寒性差异[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2022, 20(增刊1):6-13.
[16]
曹志华, 孙慧, 钱孔屏, 等. 不同引种竹子对低温胁迫的生长生理响应[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2024, 50(5):19-24.
[17]
李星星, 严青青, 王立红, 等. 不同棉花品种生长特性分析及耐寒性鉴定[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40(4):584-591.
[18]
刘冰, 曹莎, 周泓园, 等. 杜鹃花品种耐寒性比较及其机制研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(2):295-306.
以杜鹃花品种‘埃尔西 ? 李’、‘紫萼’和‘紫蝴蝶’为材料,在浙江杭州自然低温条件下(2013年12月至2014年3月)测定7个取样时期的叶片相对电导率,结合Logistic方程计算半致死温度(LT50),并比较耐寒性强弱。同时测定耐寒性相关生理指标,通过主成分及相关性分析发现,蔗糖、可溶性蛋白、脯氨酸、丙二醛的含量与杜鹃花耐寒性关系密切,较高的蔗糖积累量及可溶性蛋白、脯氨酸含量可能是‘埃尔西 ? 李’抵御寒冷的主要途径;由MDA含量推测,膜脂不饱和脂肪酸含量上升可能是另一途径。运用隶属函数法对3个杜鹃花品种耐寒性进行综合评价,‘埃尔西 ? 李’耐寒性最强,‘紫蝴蝶’和‘紫萼’耐寒性相似,结合园林应用及冬季表现情况,判定‘紫蝴蝶’耐寒性稍好于‘紫萼’。
[19]
曹志华, 吴中能, 刘俊龙, 等. 不同竹种对淹水胁迫的生理响应[J]. 中南林业大学学报, 2022, 42(8):1-14.
[20]
曹志华, 吴中能, 王沛, 等. 毛竹辐射诱变实生优株生长性状的综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(2):34-40.
[21]
刁正科. 外源ABA和腐植酸对地被观赏竹的低温胁迫缓解效应[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2019.
[22]
张琦. 南竹北移适应性评价及对低温的生理响应[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
[23]
包昌艳, 赵俊, 杨汉奇, 等. 西藏拉萨引种的4种竹子的耐寒性评价[J]. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(3):118-124.
[24]
张玲, 王忠英, 曹晓楠, 等. 5种引种地被竹在山东的耐旱与耐寒性分析[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2022, 20(增刊1):14-19.
[25]
高佩刚. 6种地被观赏竹对低温胁迫的生理响应研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2014.
PDF(1379 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/