Study on Evaluation of Climate Quality of Sand Pear in Jinshan, Shanghai Based on Meteorological Factors

WUJunting, XUXiangming, SUNYangyue, SHIChunhui, ZHOUBoqiang

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (18) : 111-116.

PDF(1203 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1203 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (18) : 111-116. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-1043

Study on Evaluation of Climate Quality of Sand Pear in Jinshan, Shanghai Based on Meteorological Factors

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To quantitatively assess the impact of meteorological conditions on the quality of sand pears, the key meteorological factors affecting the quality of sand pears were screen out by using the methods of correlation analysis, multiple stepwise regression analysis and weighted calculation based on the quality data of sand pears from 2018 to 2024 and the meteorological observation data of the same period. The climate quality evaluation models and fruit climate quality classification index for Jinshan sand pears were constructed. The results showed that the soluble solids content of sand pears was significantly positively correlated with the daily temperature range and sunshine duration during the fruit expansion period, with correlation coefficients of 0.75 and 0.76 respectively, while it was significantly negatively correlated with the minimum temperature during the fruit expansion period and the precipitation at maturity stage, with correlation coefficients of -0.81 and -0.73 respectively. The single fruit weight had the greatest positive correlation with the precipitation during the fruit expansion period, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. The climate quality grade indicators for the super-grade sand pear were as follows: the average daily minimum temperature within 35 days before picking was no more than 24.0℃, the daily temperature range within15 days before picking was no less than 7.0℃, the sunshine duration within 31 days before picking was no less than 175.6 hours, the precipitation within 36 days before picking was no less than 186.0 mm, and the precipitation within 10 days before picking was no more than 66.0 mm. Upon verification, the sand pear climate quality evaluation models established in this paper can effectively reflect the impact of climatic conditions on sand pear quality. This research outcome can provide a scientific decision-making reference for sand pear production and relevant management departments.

Key words

Jinshan sand pear / climate quality / meteorological factors / correlation analysis / regression model

Cite this article

Download Citations
WU Junting , XU Xiangming , SUN Yangyue , et al . Study on Evaluation of Climate Quality of Sand Pear in Jinshan, Shanghai Based on Meteorological Factors[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(18): 111-116 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-1043

References

[1]
骆军, 许苏梅, 练雪兴, 等. 早熟、优质砂梨新品种‘早生新水’[J]. 园艺学报, 2006(1):212,222.
[2]
骆军, 李世诚, 张学英, 等. ‘早生新水’梨的育成[J]. 果农之友, 2003(12):12-13.
[3]
骆军, 叶正文, 练雪兴, 等. ‘早生新水’的栽培技术[J]. 上海农业科技, 2004(1):53-55.
[4]
李仁忠, 王治海, 金志凤, 等. 浙江省农产品气候品质认证服务浅析[J]. 浙江气象, 2015, 36(4):23-25, 43.
[5]
陈曦, 岳伟, 徐建鹏, 等. 猕猴桃主栽品种气候品质评价模型构建[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(12):4119-4127.
[6]
张丽. 蓝莓气候品质评价标准研究[J]. 标准科学, 2022(4):103-108.
[7]
陈惠, 林晶, 杨凯, 等. 青枣气候品质等级评价模型构建及应用[J]. 应用气象学报, 2021, 32(4):443-455.
[8]
张向荣, 何可杰, 雷雯, 等. 猕猴桃果品气候品质认证技术研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2015(10):65-68.
[9]
刘璐, 王景红, 张树誉, 等. 陕西红富士苹果气候品质指标及认证技术[J]. 中国农业气象, 2018, 39(9):611-617.
[10]
屈振江, 郑小华, 刘璐, 等. 陕西不同生态区苹果品质差异及与气象因子的关系[J]. 气象, 2017, 43(7):872-878.
[11]
徐相明, 谈建国, 顾品强, 等. 奉贤黄桃产量的气象影响因子分析及预测模型的建立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(35):43-50.
利用奉贤1981—2019年逐旬气温、降水、湿度、日照等气象观测资料及1982—2019年黄桃产量数据,分析了黄桃产量的变化趋势及对气象因子的响应,并通过采用单要素指标及相关分析法着重分析2003—2019年黄桃全生育期各气象因子对产量的影响,构建了奉贤黄桃产量的气象预测模型。结果表明:黄桃产量以2003年为界,由波动上升转为上下波动,2003—2019年产量变异系数为22.9%。黄桃果实膨大—成熟期气象因子与产量的相关性较大,其次为花芽分化期、萌动—开花坐果期,落叶—休眠期较小。膨大成熟期气温(日照)在4—6月与产量呈正相关,而在7—8月为负相关,降水(湿度)影响与气温基本相反,其中7月下旬的最低气温、降水量、降水日数、日照均与产量呈显著相关;花芽分化期气温除7月下旬—8月上旬、9月上旬外均与产量呈正相关,且上年10℃终日及10、20℃有效积温与产量均呈显著正相关。花芽分化期各旬降水量(降水日数)与产量的相关性波动大;落叶—休眠期的干旱及暖冬带来的蓄冷量不足可能对产量有一定影响。建立的基于气象因子的黄桃产量最小二乘偏回归方程拟合效果较好,可为黄桃生产及管理部门提供决策服务。
[12]
胡园春, 安广池, 张越. 枣庄石榴气候品质评价模型研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(7):72-76.
[13]
施春晖, 王晓庆, 张静增, 等. 梨树专用肥对翠冠梨树体营养水平及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(10):49-55.
[14]
王晓庆, 林雪君, 施春晖, 等. 不同砧木对翠冠梨生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2025, 41(2):55-60.
[15]
孙扬越, 李军, 周涛, 等. 上海市金山区蟠桃气候品质评价模型[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(8):62-67.
[16]
上海市农业技术推广服务中心. 上海果品等级梨:DB31/T 1132-2019[S].
[17]
田晓婷, 李瑞萍, 荆肖军, 等. 山西高原丘陵区酥梨气候品质评价标准研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(7):1030-1035.
[18]
李德, 高超, 孙义, 等. 基于关键品质因素的砀山酥梨气候品质评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(12):1836-1845.
[19]
胡丽莉, 胡敏, 郭艳兰, 等. 武威优质梨气候品质评价指标设计——以凉州区皇冠梨为例[J]. 农学学报, 2025, 15(1):92-99.
本研究通过设计凉州皇冠梨气候品质评价指标,探讨了果品品质气候品质认证方法,为开展本地优质梨气候品质认证提供技术支撑。利用2016—2022年在选定试验地气象观测资料及果品品质观测资料,通过相关性分析找出与皇冠梨果品品质有明显生物学意义的气象因子,通过这些敏感气象因子,利用熵权法,建立关系矩阵、评判集、权重集、设计皇冠梨品质气候评价指标。结果表明:(1)本地皇冠梨生育期温度适宜指标为:开花期10~16℃、挂果期12~18℃、幼果成熟到成熟期15~25℃,有效降水量为≥0.1 mm;(2)影响皇冠梨主要品质敏感气象因子是成熟期和营养累计期内的气象因子。(3)皇冠梨气象评价是从适宜气候条件中除去灾害性的天气影响,评价结果划分为特优、优、一般3个等级。(4)以2022年实验基地皇冠梨观测数据为例,综合评价了其果品品质,综合得出成熟期评价86.865分,属于优等品。本研究气候品质综合评价方式不仅在模块构建上有别于现行的定性模式,更在数据分析、标准建立上突出了创新,适用于本地皇冠梨气候品质的定量评价。
[20]
AMAMOTO H, SHISHIDO Y, UCHIUMI T, et al. Effects of low light intensity on growth, photosynthesis and distribution of photoassimilates in tomato plants[J]. Environment control in biology, 2000, 38(2):63-69.
[21]
OZMAN, HÜHNER M, KOLENKO M, et al. Apple variety assessment with analytical hierarchy process[J]. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2015, 57(2):97-104.
[22]
桂园园, 肖清媛, 姜磊, 等. 鹰潭市早熟梨品质气候认证技术研究[J]. 江西科学, 2015(5):690-695,728.
[23]
张皓, 高慧莉, 金凤雷, 等. 基于主成分分析的上海水晶梨气候品质评价与应用[J]. 上海农业学报, 2023, 39(4):47-54.
[24]
黄娟, 李新建, 吴新国, 等. 库尔勒香梨气候品质评价指标及模型的研究[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2018, 12(3):87-94.
[25]
李德, 高超, 孙义, 等. 黄河故道砀山酥梨气候品质评价模型研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(10):108-116.
[26]
段晓凤, 张磊, 金飞, 等. 气象因子对苹果产量、品质的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(7):33-37.
PDF(1203 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉