PDF(5399 KB)
Investigation and Analysis of Field Occurrence Pattern and Influencing Factors of Brown Spot of Peach Pulp
ZENGShaomin, HUANGBaoping, HuangXinzhong, WUJingdong, LYUKeliang, WANGGuihua, ZHANGZhenwei, JIANGCuicui
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21) : 46-53.
PDF(5399 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(5399 KB)
Investigation and Analysis of Field Occurrence Pattern and Influencing Factors of Brown Spot of Peach Pulp
To enable efficient prevention and control of brown spot of peach pulp, this study investigated its field occurrence patterns and key influencing factors. Using varieties such as ‘Jinxiu’ yellow peach and ‘Olecranon’ peach as subjects, fruit samples were collected from various types of peach orchards. Observations were conducted on symptom manifestation, time of occurrence, and disease location. By comparing the fruit incidence rate, disease index, and coloration coefficient, the effects of factors including cultivar, inter-annual variation, soil type, tree age, slope position, and aspect on the occurrence of brown spot were analyzed. The results indicated that: in the initial stage of brown spot of peach pulp, the fruit epidermis showed no abnormalities; in the mid-to-late stages, it appeared dark green and sunken. Independent lesions were nearly circular, with a diameter of 3 mm to 6 mm; the color progressed from white to brown, and in the mid-to-late stages, the sunken areas presented a honeycomb-like appearance. The occurrence process was divided into the initial stage (25 days before maturity), the rapid stage (18 days before maturity), the peak stage (11 days before maturity), and the severe stage (3 days before maturity). The disease location developed from the fruit apex towards the fruit shoulder, and from the shallow flesh to the stone. This symptom primarily occurred in mid-to-late ripening, hard-melting or non-melting varieties maturing from mid-July onward; it did not occur or occurred lightly in trees aged 1 to 3 years, but intensified year by year after the 4th year. Regarding soil types, the severity was lightest in terraced loam soil and most severe in mountainous sandy soil; the order of severity by slope segment was: upper slope segment>middle slope segment>lower slope segment>flat ground at the slope bottom; regarding aspect, west-facing slopes were more severely affected. In conclusion, brown spot of peach pulp is closely related to variety, tree age, soil type, slope segment, and aspect, and can be effectively controlled through rational orchard establishment; and its trend of annual aggravation suggests the potential existence of a dominant inducing factor, which requires further investigation.
peach / pulp / brown spot / occurrence pattern / influencing factors
| [1] |
颜少宾, 周平, 郭瑞, 等. 桃果肉组织异常木栓化现象浅析[J]. 东南园艺, 2023, 11(5):334-339.
|
| [2] |
廖永林, 王龙江, 章玉苹, 等. 鹰嘴蜜桃果肉海绵组织病害调查[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(33):123-124.
|
| [3] |
王璐, 贾静安, 朱祥文, 等. 早酥梨果实木栓化褐变发生规律及防治试验[J]. 中国果树, 1990(1):35-36.
|
| [4] |
王强, 杨佳文, 李根, 等. 龙泉酥梨果肉木栓化褐变的成因及预防措施[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(13):72-75.
|
| [5] |
张力田, 刘先琴, 李育民, 等. 苍溪梨果实褐斑病研究[J]. 果树科学, 1999(1):47-50.
|
| [6] |
董肖昌, 王宏伟, 魏树伟, 等. 山东省中西部梨果实果肉木栓化褐变的成因及防治[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(S):139-142.
|
| [7] |
唐志鹏, 王惠, 李明富, 等. 紫花杧果实生理病害海绵组织发生规律研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(14):8107-8110.
|
| [8] |
卢锦明, 林心悦, 廖永林. 鹰嘴桃果实组织海绵化病害相关基因差异表达分析[J]. 果树学报, 2023, 40(12):2524-2535.
|
| [9] |
唐志鹏, 武英霞, 黄晓容. 几种矿质元素对紫花杧果实海绵组织的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2005, 22(5):505-509.
|
| [10] |
陆建勋. 钙胁迫对紫花芒果实PE、PG、纤维素酶和淀粉酶的影响与海绵组织病害发生的关系[D]. 南宁: 广西大学,2008:6-8.
|
| [11] |
徐磊, 陈超. 中国桃产业经济分析与发展趋势[J]. 果树学报, 2023, 40(1):133-143.
|
| [12] |
金睦皓, 毛双, 刘鹏凌. 我国桃产业出口贸易的现状分析及应对策略[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(12):334-338.
|
| [13] |
张承林. 芒果(Mangifera indica L.)果实的生理病害及其病因的研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学,1997:8-13.
|
| [14] |
黄晓蓉. 紫花芒果实海绵状组织发病因子的研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学,2006:18-19.
|
| [15] |
李洪耀. 紫花芒果实海绵状组织发生规律及主要影响因子的研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学,2007:17.
|
| [16] |
吕燕亮. 秋月梨果肉木栓化病因分析及防治措施[J]. 河北林业, 2020(9):33-33.
|
| [17] |
梁玉本. 果树营养元素盈亏与果园土壤类型的关系[J]. 西北园艺, 2003(6):22-23.
|
| [18] |
田永强, 李夏鸣, 李庆亮, 等. 矿质元素与果树病害发生关系的研究进展[J]. 山西果树, 2016(1):14-16.
|
| [19] |
隋秀奇, 李洪妍. 果园土壤酸化对果树的危害及改良措施[J]. 烟台果树, 2011(1):49-49.
|
| [20] |
贾云云, 王越辉, 白瑞霞, 等. 光照对桃果实内在品质的影响研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(12):30-36.
|
| [21] |
廖振军, 黄冬平. 不同光照条件对桃品质影响的研究[J]. 江西园艺, 2003(3):2-3.
|
| [22] |
路超, 王金政, 薛晓敏, 等. 苹果树冠不同区位果实产量和品质特征及其与枝叶空间分布关系的研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010, 11:28-33.
|
| [23] |
岳玉苓, 魏钦平, 张继祥, 等. 黄金梨棚架树体结构相对光照强度与果实品质的关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(5):625-630.
为了探明棚架形黄金梨果实品质与相对光照强度和枝(梢)叶的关系,应用树冠分格方法系统研究了冠层不同部位相对光照强度的变化、枝(梢)叶空间分布特征和果实品质差异及相对光照强度与果实品质和枝(梢)叶关系。结果表明:树冠不同层次相对光照强度从上到下逐渐降低,树冠上部的相对光照强度大于树冠下部,相对光照强度小于30%的区域主要分布在树冠下部;枝(梢)垂直方向上分布主要在树冠的1.0 ~2.0 m 冠层内,水平方向分布从树冠内膛到外围差异较小;产量主要分布在光照条件较好的1.0 ~2.0 m冠层内,果实单果质量、硬度、可溶性固形物含量均与相对光照强度呈正相关,可滴定酸含量与相对光照强度呈负相关;应用多元统计分析方法,建立了果实品质与相对光照强度、相对光照强度和枝(梢)叶量关系的回归方程,获得了最佳梨果实品质因素的相对光照强度分别是:单果质量的最佳相对光强为42.17%,可溶性固形物为78.98%,硬度为70.12%,可滴定酸为59.97%;获得了整个树冠最低相对光照强度大于42.17%时,每公顷总枝(梢)量约为42.95万条,长枝、中枝、短枝的比例分别为2.61℅:6.59℅:90.8℅。
|
| [24] |
高照全, 冯社章, 李天红, 等. 苹果树冠不同部位叶片结构、内含物和模拟光合能力的比较术[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(6): 1245-1250.
|
| [25] |
胡德玉, 邓烈, 刘雪峰, 等. 脐橙植株冠层光照、叶片营养及果实品质的空间分布研究[J]. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 38(6):7-14.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |