Study on Storage Rules and Quality Comparison of Different Varieties of Tomatoes in Panzhihua

LIUShiyu, XIAOXinyu, DUYuhan, LEIShanshan, YIChengjing, FANGWeirui, LIHongchen, CHENMingrui, LIUYaowen

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (19) : 187-199.

PDF(1894 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1894 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (19) : 187-199. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0088

Study on Storage Rules and Quality Comparison of Different Varieties of Tomatoes in Panzhihua

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To investigate the differences in intrinsic characteristics and the patterns of quality change under room-temperature and low-temperature storage among three tomato cultivars (‘Chuanguofan No.1’, ‘Hemei 809’, and ‘Hongshuo Haomai’) from Miyi County, Panzhihua, 90%-mature fruits of the three cultivars were used as experimental materials. A total of 12 indicators covering physical quality, nutritional quality, and oxidative stability were determined. The study was conducted by integrating principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis, and kinetic models for quality change during storage were established for the three tomato cultivars. The results showed that during storage, quality deterioration phenomena (including decreased fruit firmness, rising weight loss rate, malondialdehyde accumulation, and nutrient loss) were more pronounced in the 25℃ room-temperature group than in the 10℃ low-temperature group. Meanwhile, low-temperature treatment at 10℃ significantly elevated lycopene content and weakened the correlations among various quality indicators (P<0.05). Principal component analysis and cluster analysis results indicated that ‘Chuanguofan No.1’ achieved the highest comprehensive quality score. Based on tomato firmness, kinetic models of quality change were constructed by coupling the first-order kinetic equation with the Arrhenius equation. This study obtained quality change data of the three tomato cultivars under room temperature and low temperature conditions. Storage at 10℃ can effectively delay the fruit deterioration process of all three cultivars. For freshly harvested tomatoes, the comprehensive ranking in terms of physical quality, nutritional quality, and oxidative stability is as follows: ‘Chuanguofan No.1’> ‘Hemei 809’> ‘Hongshuo Haomai’. The established kinetic models enable rapid prediction of the shelf life of these three tomato cultivars, providing a reference for quality assessment of tomatoes stored at different temperatures.

Key words

tomato / storage / quality / room temperature / low temperature / shelf-life model

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Shiyu , XIAO Xinyu , DU Yuhan , et al . Study on Storage Rules and Quality Comparison of Different Varieties of Tomatoes in Panzhihua[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(19): 187-199 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0088

References

[1]
王仁杰, 蔡红明, 丁发强, 等. 5种口感番茄的风味物质分析与感官评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2025(6):146-156.
[2]
YAN L Y, GARCIA-CAPARROS P, WANG J X, et al. Biaxially oriented polyethylene film packing and hydrogen sulfide fumigation maintain postharvest quality of tomato fruits by reducing malondialdehyde levels and water loss[J]. Postharvest biology and technology, 2026, 231:113845.
[3]
RUSSO M, FANALI C, TRIDDO G, et al. Analysis of phenolic compounds in different parts of pomegranate (Punica granatum) fruit by HPLC-PDA-ESI/MS and evaluation of their antioxidant activity: Application to different Italian varieties[J]. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2018, 410(15):3507-3520.
The analysis of pomegranate phenolic compounds belonging to different classes in different fruit parts was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array and mass spectrometry detection. Two different separation methods were optimized for the analysis of anthocyanins and hydrolyzable tannins along with phenolic acids and flavonoids. Two C columns, core-shell and fully porous particle stationary phases, were used. The parameters for separation of phenolic compounds were optimized considering chromatographic resolution and analysis time. Thirty-five phenolic compounds were found, and 28 of them were tentatively identified as belonging to four different phenolic compound classes; namely, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, hydrolyzable tannins, and flavonoids. Quantitative analysis was performed with a mixture of nine phenolic compounds belonging to phenolic compound classes representative of pomegranate. The method was then fully validated in terms of retention time precision, expressed as the relative standard deviation, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity range. Phenolic compounds were analyzed directly in pomegranate juice, and after solvent extraction with a mixture of water and methanol with a small percentage of acid in peel and pulp samples. The accuracy of the extraction method was also assessed, and satisfactory values were obtained. Finally, the method was used to study identified analytes in pomegranate juice, peel, and pulp of six different Italian varieties and one international variety. Differences in phenolic compound profiles among the different pomegranate parts were observed. Pomegranate peel samples showed a high concentration of phenolic compounds, ellagitannins being the most abundant ones, with respect to pulp and juice samples for each variety. With the same samples, total phenols and antioxidant activity were evaluated through colorimetric assays, and the results were correlated among them.
[4]
李景富, 何艳龙, 尚娜, 等. 番茄果实硬度与多个性状间相关分析及通径分析[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47(5):1-8.
[5]
MOHAMMAD S U, SHALAHUDDIN M, PRODIP K B, et al. The protective role of vitamin C in the management of COVID-19: A review[J]. The journal of the egyptian public health association, 2021, 96(1):33-33.
The outbreak of coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) is globally deemed a significant threat to human life. Researchers are searching for prevention strategies, mitigation interventions, and potential therapeutics that may reduce the infection’s severity. One such means that is highly being talked in online and in social media is vitamin C.
[6]
LI D, WU W, ZHANG H, et al. The interaction between imidazole-based ionic liquids and the mustard gas simulant CEES and its influence on its solubility[J]. Journal of molecular liquids, 2023, 385:122407.
[7]
柯旭波, 潘凌洁, 张路, 等. 11个番茄品种的品质比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(15):3692-3695.
[8]
程远, 万红建, 刘超超, 等. 十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11):1859-1869.
采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)等技术手段,对目前生产上16个主栽樱桃番茄(Solanum lycopersicum Mill. var. cerasiforme)品种的风味评分及相关指标进行测定和比较分析,解析决定樱桃番茄风味的主要影响因素。研究表明,相比其他风味相关指标,不同番茄品种间柠檬酸、苹果酸、V<sub>c</sub>和氨基酸含量的差异较大。16个参试品种中,浙江省农业科学院蔬菜研究所的浙樱粉1号、浙樱黄1号,日本金子种苗株式会社的黄妃,及山东省农业科学院蔬菜研究所的天正红珠风味评分排名前4,以上品种的7项风味及营养决定指标参数(可溶性固形物、总糖、有机酸、果糖、葡萄糖、柠檬酸和V<sub>c</sub>)均显著高于风味评价排名后4名的参试番茄品种。进一步的相关性分析结果表明,风味评分与可溶性固形物、总糖、有机酸、果糖、葡萄糖和V<sub>c</sub>含量显著正相关,而与糖酸比等复合参数无显著相关性。由上述结果可知,番茄风味品质的主要指标为可溶性固形物、总糖(果糖+葡萄糖)、有机酸(主要是柠檬酸)和V<sub>c</sub>。此外,氨基酸作为传统意义上的营养物质,可能与番茄风味存在一定关联。
[9]
庞胜群, 赵飏, 李格, 等. 灰色关联分析法综合评价不同品种加工番茄的品质[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(6):682-684.
[10]
曹建康. 果蔬采后生理生化指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社,2022:29-49,70-72.
[11]
曾凡凡. MA包装结合1-MCP对樱桃番茄贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2026, 46(7):34-39.
[12]
李爱玲. 油菜素内酯介导SlSAM3调控番茄果实色泽的分子机制[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2025.
[13]
NAUSCH H, BUYEL J F. Cryopreservation of plant cell cultures- Diverse practices and protocols[J]. New biotechnology, 2021, 62(3):86-95.
[14]
刘秀云, 曹碧婷, 岳钉伊, 等. 西瓜种质资源番茄红素含量鉴定与评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2025, 38(2):25-31.
[15]
梁结桦, 冯瑞, 田柬昕, 等. 不同贮藏温度对即食花胶品质的影响及其保质期预测模型的建立[J]. 农产品加工, 2026(10):70-74.
[16]
裴娇艳. 番茄果实采后品质特性变化及预测模型研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010.
[17]
刘晶玉, 等. 赛菲娅·斯拉衣丁,阿迪娜·赛提汗, 臭氧处理对番茄果实贮藏期品质及活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2025, 25(9):31-39.
[18]
张珮, 刘妍, 潘转, 等. 低温贮藏的桃果实品质近红外光谱预测模型比较[J]. 中国食品学报, 2025, 25(10):386-396.
[19]
张翼斐, 鲁丁强, 刘玉姣, 等. 温度对采后番茄代谢通量的影响研究[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2025, 25(10):36-45.
[20]
BABANJEE T, TALWAR D, SINGH K, et al. Combined preharvest and postharvest approaches for enhancing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit quality and storability[J]. Journal of stored products research, 2026,115(c):102853.
[21]
张晓英, 毛咪, 靳雨婷, 等. 不同药剂处理对番茄果实转色及品质的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2026, 44(3):379-390.
[22]
黄鑫燕, 匡家灵, 陈月舞, 等. 磷酸二氢钾与硼酸配施对番茄生长、果实品质与转色的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2026.
[23]
黄玉波, 梁路, 庄秋丽, 等. 蚯蚓营养液促进番茄生长并改善其果实品质[J]. 北方园艺, 2025(1):44-51.
[24]
屈乃聃, 曹玲玲, 王惠玉, 等. 蔬菜抗坏血酸合成代谢及影响因素研究进展[J]. 蔬菜, 2025(5):17-26.
[25]
李蕾. Sly-miR167a调控番茄果实采后低温耐受能力的表观遗传学机制研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2024.
[26]
戴露. 几种微生物菌剂对盐渍环境下番茄的促生效果及果实品质的影响研究[D]. 烟台: 鲁东大学, 2025.
[27]
AFTAB R A, AHMAD F, MONISH M, et al. Postharvest quality assessment of tomato during storage: An experimental and ML fusion[J]. Journal of stored products research, 2025, 112:102643.
PDF(1894 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉