Effects of Soil Biostimulants and Nitrogen Reduction on Salt-resistant Physiological Traits and Nitrogen Nutrient Enhancement of Facilities Rapeseed

YANGQijuan, LUShuchang, GUOLiuming, CIDANSangji, ZHANGZixuan, YAOXinyu

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21) : 81-87.

PDF(1436 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1436 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21) : 81-87. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0172

Effects of Soil Biostimulants and Nitrogen Reduction on Salt-resistant Physiological Traits and Nitrogen Nutrient Enhancement of Facilities Rapeseed

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To address the issues of soil salinization in facilities and low efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer, pot experiments were conducted with eight treatments, including T1 (conventional nitrogen application), T2 (conventional nitrogen application with 15% reduction), T3 (conventional nitrogen application with 30% reduction), T4 (conventional nitrogen application with 100% reduction), T5 (biostimulant + conventional nitrogen application), T6 (biostimulant + conventional nitrogen application with 15% reduction), T7 (biostimulant + conventional nitrogen application with 30% reduction), and T8 (biostimulant + conventional nitrogen application with 100% reduction). The combined effects of biostimulants and nitrogen reduction on the salt tolerance traits and nitrogen utilization efficiency of rapeseed were studied. The research results demonstrated that the combination of biostimulants and nitrogen reduction significantly enhanced rapeseed salt tolerance and nitrogen utilization efficiency. The T6 treatment (biostimulant + 15% nitrogen reduction) showed optimal performance, with rapeseed superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity reaching 519.66 U/g, while yield, dry matter accumulation, and nitrogen uptake were the highest among all treatments (202.90 g/pot, 60.87 g/pot, and 1.51 g/pot, respectively). This treatment also exhibited the highest nitrogen productivity (533.95 g/g) and agronomic efficiency (103.68 g/g), achieving the goal of “nitrogen reduction without yield loss”. No significant difference was observed between treatments with and without biostimulants in soil salinity. Compared to nitrogen reduction alone, biostimulants enhanced nitrogen utilization by strengthening the antioxidant enzyme system and optimizing soil carbon-nitrogen balance. These findings provide a scientific basis for nitrogen efficiency improvement in saline-affected protected farmland and promote the green, sustainable development of greenhouse agriculture.

Key words

greenhouse soils salinization / biostimulant / nitrogen reduction / nitrogen efficiency enhancement / salt-resistant

Cite this article

Download Citations
YANG Qijuan , LU Shuchang , GUO Liuming , et al . Effects of Soil Biostimulants and Nitrogen Reduction on Salt-resistant Physiological Traits and Nitrogen Nutrient Enhancement of Facilities Rapeseed[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(21): 81-87 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0172

References

[1]
程同顺, 赫永超. 设施农业要注重发挥综合效益-以天津为例[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2016(3):22-25.
[2]
葛桂利, 李爽, 左伟立, 等. 生物焖棚对盐渍化设施土壤理化性质与微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2025(2):95-104.
[3]
黄梓翀. 不同土壤调理剂对次生盐渍化菜地蔬菜生长与氮磷淋溶阻控的研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2022.
[4]
夏渝静. 减氮与微生物菌剂结合对设施土壤氮素吸收与形态转化影响研究[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2023.
[5]
刘兆普, 王兴起, 陈铭达. 盐胁迫对作物养分吸收与利用的影响及调控措施[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(3):590-596.
[6]
宋海妹, 李振松, 张超一, 等. 不同生物刺激素在叶菜类蔬菜上的应用效果[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2015(2):22-25.
[7]
GIUSEPPE C, HOAGLAND L, MAURIZIO R, et al. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2017, 8:1951.
[8]
谢一夫, 许秋瑾, 夏青. 生物刺激素研究进展及其对解决中国农业面源污染问题的启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 2025(4):831-83.
[9]
王小静, 李淑婷, 王海旭, 等. 生物刺激素在蔬菜生产上的应用[J]. 现代园艺, 2026, 49(11):102-105.
[10]
王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].第三版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
[11]
郑飞雪, 魏民, 牟同水. NaCl胁迫对羽衣甘蓝生理生化指标的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(17):42-44.
[12]
孟远夺, 赵英杰, 吴优, 等. 加强生物刺激素行业管理的借鉴与思考[J]. 中国农技推广, 2025, 41(4):1-5.
[13]
PAMELA C, LOUISE N, KLOEPPER J K. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants[J]. Plant and soil, 2014, 383(1-2):3-41.
[14]
陈俊杰, 李艳梅, 杨俊刚, 等. 叶施生物刺激剂与减量灌溉对芹菜生长、产量及灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2024(10):1-7.
生物刺激剂在增强农作物非生物逆境耐性方面的潜在价值备受各方关注。采用完全随机区组设计,考察了生物刺激剂(清水对照组CK;黄腐酸FA;甜菜碱GB)叶施与减量灌溉(常规灌溉CI;73%常规灌溉RI)措施相耦合对设施芹菜生产的影响,旨在探索生物刺激剂的节水增产增效潜力。分析了芹菜光合作用、生物量、产量、灌溉水利用效率、营养和安全品质以及矿质营养元素氮磷钾吸收量等指标。结果表明,常规及减量灌溉条件下,叶施FA和GB显著降低了芹菜的叶片温度,大幅提升了芹菜的叶片蒸腾效率;叶喷2种生物刺激剂还明显提升了芹菜地上部氮磷钾元素吸收量和单棵重、产量、净收入、灌溉水利用效率,叶施FA处理芹菜的生长及产量明显优于GB。品质调控方面,GB优于FA。与CI相比,RI处理未引起芹菜减产,大幅提升了芹菜灌溉水利用效率。RIFA和RIGB组合处理的芹菜产量、水分利用效率和净收入均明显大于CICK,表明2种生物刺激剂在农业增产增效及节水领域均具有应用价值。
[15]
高倩, 冯棣, 刘杰, 等. 外源物缓解植物盐分胁迫的作用机理及其分类[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11):2030-2044.
[16]
毛培. 紫花苜蓿WRKY基因家族鉴定及MsWRKY100基因耐旱功能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2022.
[17]
谢远杰. STGC3基因低表达对NP69细胞的影响及机制研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2015.
[18]
TAO Y, XIE W, XU L, et al. The characteristics of soil salinization effects on nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in upland fields[J]. Frontiers in environmental science, 2024, 12:1098761.
[19]
赵飞燕, 严文辉, 李明江, 等. 生物刺激素促进植物磷吸收的研究进展及其磷肥增效途径[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2025(53):10-22.
[20]
ZHANG J L, YANG J, ZHANG W H. Amelioration effect of biochar on nitrogen transformation and secondary salinization of vegetable soils in facilities[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2023, 23(12):4971-4986.
[21]
林家欣, 陆苑莹, 伏广农, 等. 不同生物刺激素对水培上海青产量及品质的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023(6):11-15.
[22]
LI J, VAN G T, GEELEN D. A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022, 13:987654.
[23]
ROUPHAEL Y, GIUSEPPE C. Editorial: biostimulants in agriculture[J]. Journal of plant growth regulation, 2020, 40(1):1-7.
[24]
高贤彪, 肖辉. 天津滨海盐渍土壤发展设施农业可行性分析[J]. 天津农业科学, 2020, 26(1):1-4.
[25]
艾京, 郭俊. 生物刺激素在辣椒生长促进中的应用效果评估[J]. 河北农业, 2025(4):95-96.
[26]
郭刘涛, 刘丙霞, 王仕琴, 等. 有机肥和生物炭基肥对微咸水灌溉盐渍农田土壤氮素和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2026(1):1-13.
[27]
王晓丽, 南运有, 李越, 等. 减氮及施用生物炭对间作玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2026(44):104-115.
[28]
陈林, 阿米娜·胡吉, 孙阳阳. 土壤盐渍化现状和快速检测方法研究[J]. 新疆有色金属, 2024(3):90-91.
[29]
周天阳. 不同肥水管理措施对水稻产量、氮素利用和土壤特性的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2025.
PDF(1436 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉