Regulatory Mechanism of Wheat Straw and Cotton Stalk Biochar on Silicon Morphological Transformation and Salt Ion Dynamics in Rhizosphere Soil

HUTianqiao, WANGYaofeng

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (17) : 76-88.

PDF(6797 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(6797 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (17) : 76-88. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0228

Regulatory Mechanism of Wheat Straw and Cotton Stalk Biochar on Silicon Morphological Transformation and Salt Ion Dynamics in Rhizosphere Soil

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the pathways and mechanisms by which biochars with contrasting silicon contents ameliorate rhizosphere salinized soils. A pot experiment was established using wheat-straw (WS) and cotton-straw (CS) biochars pyrolyzed at 300℃ and 500℃, designated as WS300, WS500, CS300, and CS500, with a no-biochar treatment as the control (CK). The effects of these biochars on rhizosphere microenvironments, silicon speciation transformation, and ionic uptake were systematically assessed. The results revealed that WS-derived biochars consistently outperformed CS-derived counterparts in terms of labile silicon fractions (i.e., water-soluble and amorphous silicon) and ion-releasing capacity, with low-temperature (300℃) pyrolysis being more favorable for retaining these active constituents. Specifically, WS300 triggered a rapid efflux of salt ions at the tillering stage, substantially elevating rhizosphere electrical conductivity (EC) and concurrently increasing the concentrations of Na+, Cl-, K+, and Ca2+, thereby establishing a high-salt priming microenvironment. By the harvest stage, the available silicon content under WS300 treatment was approximately 1.15-fold and 2.35-fold higher than that under CS300 and CS500, respectively. Post-incubation characterization of WS300 biochar showed surface Si enrichment accompanied by decreased Cl and Ca levels, indicating a surface-mediated process wherein rapid salt release was coupled with concurrent silicon immobilization. In contrast, CS500 biochar, possessing a denser microstructure, exhibited lower silicon availability and slower salt release. WS500 biochar, however, continuously optimized rhizospheric ionic balance by reducing the Na/Cl ratio and elevating the K/Na ratio at tillering, maintaining Ca/Mg stability at flowering, and sustaining the highest K/Na ratio at harvest. These findings further suggest a synergistic coupling between salt liberation and silicon activation. The functional traits of the tested biochars were distilled into two dominant axes: WS300 was distinguished by its superior labile silicon content and high K/Na selectivity, whereas CS500 was characterized by high salt loading. Collectively, this work clarifies the divergent regulatory pathways of wheat-straw versus cotton-straw biochars in modifying rhizosphere environments, providing a theoretical basis for the targeted design and application of silicon-variable biochars in arid saline agricultural regions.

Key words

wheat straw biochar / rhizosphere soil / silicon morphological transformation / salt ions / K/Na ratio

Cite this article

Download Citations
HU Tianqiao , WANG Yaofeng. Regulatory Mechanism of Wheat Straw and Cotton Stalk Biochar on Silicon Morphological Transformation and Salt Ion Dynamics in Rhizosphere Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(17): 76-88 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0228

References

[1]
赵维彬, 王松, 刘玲玲, 等. 生物炭改良盐碱地效果及其对植物生长的影响研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2024, 55(2):551-561.
[2]
刘小岑, 胡海骏, 田野, 等. 外源纳米硅对盐胁迫下辣椒种子萌发及生理指标的影响[J]. 种子, 2025, 44(4):26-33.
[3]
RENGASAMY P. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils[J]. Functional plant biology, 2010, 37(7):613-620.
Salts can be deposited in the soil from wind and rain, as well as through the weathering of rocks. These processes, combined with the influence of climatic and landscape features and the effects of human activities, determine where salt accumulates in the landscape. When the accumulated salt in soil layers is above a level that adversely affects crop production, choosing salt-tolerant crops and managing soil salinity are important strategies to boost agricultural economy. Worldwide, more than 800 million hectares of soils are salt-affected, with a range of soils defined as saline, acidic–saline, alkaline–saline, acidic saline–sodic, saline–sodic, alkaline saline–sodic, sodic, acidic–sodic and alkaline–sodic. The types of salinity based on soil and groundwater processes are groundwater-associated salinity (dryland salinity), transient salinity (dry saline land) and irrigation salinity. This short review deals with the soil processes in the field that determine the interactions between root-zone environments and plant responses to increased osmotic pressure or specific ion concentrations. Soil water dynamics, soil structural stability, solubility of compounds in relation to pH and pE and nutrient and water movement all play vital roles in the selection and development of plants tolerant to salinity.
[4]
OKEBALAMA C B, UDEANI C M, AWAOGU C E. Aggregate stability and the influence of sodium chloride on dispersion of sandy clay loam soils in Southeastern Nigeria[J]. Global journal of agricultural sciences, 2024, 23(1):49-60.
Soil dispersion is an important process that should be considered in irrigation and ferti-irrigation of agricultural soils. Triplicate topsoil samples from five different locations in southeastern Nigeria were characterized and examined for aggregate stability and clay dispersion potential by leaching with different NaCl concentrations. The results showed that the soils were mainly sandy clay loam (SCL), slightly acid to neutral pH and low in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen, and exchangeable cations. The soils had lower proportions of > 1.00 mm water-stable aggregates (WSA) compared to the higher proportions of < 1.00 mm WSA. Percent aggregate stability (AS) of the soils averaged 36.25 % and was significantly positively correlated with SOC (r = 0.55*) and Na+ content (r = 0.58*). Furthermore, Na+ correlated positively with the 1.00-2.00 mm WSA (r = 0.67*), but negatively with the < 0.25 mm WSA fraction (r = -0.68**), while the opposite was true for the correlation of clay and these WSA fractions (r = -0.57*; 0.60*, respectively), indicating the minor role of clay in aggregate formation. The soils were less dispersible in water than in NaCl solutions, resulting in a higher clay content, which increased with increasing NaCl concentration. However, the clay dispersion ratio of the soils was moderately low and showed a decreasing trend with increasing NaCl concentration, and indicating the NaCl dispersion potential at the lowest 25 S m-1. Thus, the clay dispersion potential of Na+ at ≤ 50 S m-1 relates to the reduced stability of < 0.25 mm microaggregates, while the clay flocculation potential of Na+ at ≥ 75 S m-1 accounts for the 1.00-2.00 mm macro aggregation and aggregate stability of the soils. Therefore, the structural stability of SCL soils in the humid tropics depends on SOC and Na+ content, including the dispersive and flocculative influence of Na+ on clay minerals.\r\n \r\n \r\n 
[5]
ONDRASEK G, RENGEL Z, VERES S. Soil salinisation and salt stress in crop production[A]//SHANKER A. Abiotic Stress in Plants—Mechanisms and Adaptations[C]. Rijeka: InTech, 2011:171-190.
[6]
SHABAAN M, ASGHAR H N, ZAHIR Z A, et al. Salt-tolerant PGPR confer salt tolerance to maize through enhanced soil biological health, enzymatic activities, nutrient uptake and antioxidant defense[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2022, 13:901865.
\n Salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can improve soil enzyme activities, which are indicators of the biological health of the soil, and can overcome the nutritional imbalance in plants. A pot trial was executed to evaluate the effect of inoculation of different salt-tolerant PGPR strains in improving soil enzyme activities. Three different salinity levels (original, 5, and 10 dS m\n –1\n ) were used and maize seeds were coated with the freshly prepared inocula of ten different PGPR strains. Among different strains, inoculation of SUA-14 (\n Acinetobacter johnsonii\n ) caused a maximum increment in urease (1.58-fold), acid (1.38-fold), and alkaline phosphatase (3.04-fold) and dehydrogenase (72%) activities as compared to their respective uninoculated control. Acid phosphatase activities were found to be positively correlated with P contents in maize straw (\n r\n = 0.96) and grains (\n r\n = 0.94). Similarly, a positive correlation was found between alkaline phosphatase activities and P contents in straw (\n r\n = 0.77) and grains (\n r\n = 0.75). In addition, urease activities also exhibited positive correlation with N contents in maize straw (\n r\n = 0.92) and grains (\n r\n = 0.91). Moreover, inoculation of\n Acinetobacter johnsonii\n caused a significant decline in catalase (39%), superoxide dismutase (26%) activities, and malondialdehyde contents (27%). The PGPR inoculation improved the soil’s biological health and increased the uptake of essential nutrients and conferred salinity tolerance in maize. We conclude that the inoculation of salt-tolerant PGPR improves soil enzyme activities and soil biological health, overcomes nutritional imbalance, and thereby improves nutrient acquisition by the plant under salt stress.\n
[7]
AWAIS M, RASHEED Z, SADIQ M T. Salinity stress effects on nutrient uptake in plants and its influence on plant growth efficiency[J]. Trends in animal and plant sciences, 2023, 1:64-72.
[8]
WANG Z, LIU C, OUYANG J, et al. Porous carbon materials derived from rice husk pyrolysis with NaCl/Na2CO3 binary molten salt for CO2capture[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2025, 227:120808.
[9]
HUANG M, ZHANG Z, ZHAI Y, et al. Effect of straw biochar on soil properties and wheat production under saline water irrigation[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(8):457.
Use of saline water for irrigation is essential to mitigate increasing agricultural water demands in arid and semi-arid regions. The objective of this study is to address the potential of using straw biochar as a soil amendment to promote wheat production under saline water irrigation. A field experiment was conducted in a clay loam soil from eastern China during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 winter wheat season. There were five treatments: freshwater irrigation (0.3 dS m−1), saline water irrigation (10 dS m−1), saline water irrigation (10 dS m−1) combined with biochar of 10, 20, 30 t ha−1. Saline water irrigation alone caused soil salinization and decreased wheat growth and yield. The incorporation of biochar decreased soil bulk density by 5.5%–11.6% and increased permeability by 35.4%–49.5%, and improved soil nutrient status. Biochar also reduced soil sodium adsorption ratio by 25.7%–32.6% under saline water irrigation. Furthermore, biochar alleviated salt stress by maintaining higher leaf relative water content and lower Na+/K+ ratio, and further enhanced photosynthesis and relieved leaf senescence during reproductive stages, leading to better grain formation. Compared to saline water irrigation alone, biochar application of 10 and 20 t ha−1 significantly increased wheat grain yield by 8.6 and 8.4%, respectively. High dose of biochar might increase soil salinity and limit N availability. In the study, biochar amendment at 10 t ha−1 would be a proper practice at least over two years to facilitate saline water irrigation for wheat production. Long-term studies are recommended to advance the understanding of the sustainable use of straw biochar.
[10]
宋文涛, 宁川川, 黄美琳, 等. 秸秆生物炭对两种典型土壤的养分特性及硅的化学形态的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2023, 42(5):123-132.
[11]
侯新村, 胡艳霞, 孙宇, 等. 生物炭添加对滨海盐土柳枝稷生长的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(1):31-37.
[12]
王杰, 王耀锋. 盐分离子对生物炭和土壤中硅溶出的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(11):2680-2689.
[13]
SINGH G, MAVI M S, CHOUDHARY O P, et al. Rice straw biochar application to soil irrigated with saline water in a cotton-wheat system improves crop performance and soil functionality in north-west India[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2021, 295:113277.
[14]
ZHANG W, YU X, LI M, et al. Silicon promotes growth and root yield of Glycyrrhiza uralensis under salt and drought stresses through enhancing osmotic adjustment and regulating antioxidant metabolism[J]. Crop protection, 2018, 107:1-11.
[15]
WANG Y, XIAO X, CHEN B. Biochar impacts on soil silicon dissolution kinetics and their interaction mechanisms[J]. Scientific reports, 2018, 8(1):8040.
Effects of biochars on soil silicon dissolution kinetics remain unaddressed. Si-rich rice husk (RH) and rice straw (RS), and Si-deficient wood sawdust (WB) and orange peel (OP) were applied to prepare biochars at 300-700 degrees C. The silicon dissolution of Si-rich biochars was relatively high in comparison with Si-deficient biochars, and increased with the pyrolysis temperature. The mechanism of silicon release is suggested to be controlled by a protective carbon-silicon interaction, as accompanied by carbon release. After mixing with soil, the addition of Si-rich biochar leads up to 72.7-121% improvement in silicon dissolution in a high-silicon soil (HSS) compared to 147-243% improvement in a low-silicon soil (LSS). The total cumulative amount of silicon dissolved decreased compared to the theoretical value due to the adsorption of silicic acid by the biochar. The addition of WB700 or OP700 as Si-deficient biochars leads to a cumulative Si dissolution decrease of 15.7 and 12.1%, respectively. The adsorption of silicic acid in the biochar and the protection of soil dissolved Fe make biochar a reservoir of soil silicon. Thus, Si-rich biochar could serve as a source of Si with slow release, while Si-deficient biochar could serve as an extra Si sink in agricultural paddy soil.
[16]
许晓慧. 土壤可溶盐八大离子的测定[J]. 新疆有色金属, 2022, 45(1):93-94.
[17]
SONG Z, WANG H, STRONG J P, et al. Increase of available soil silicon by Si-rich manure for sustainable rice production[J]. Agronomy for sustainable development, 2014, 34(4): 813-819.
[18]
刘燕. 《土壤质量全氮的测定凯氏法》的方法改进[J]. 化工管理, 2020(14):45-46.
[19]
赵金兰, 张树莲, 祁建峰. 硫酸-高氯酸-钼锑抗比色法测定土壤全磷的注意事项[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(21):234.
[20]
陶曙华, 王洁敏, 苗雪雪, 等. 高氯酸-氢氟酸联合消解法测定土壤中全量氮磷钾[J]. 中国测试, 2022, 48(9):78-83.
[21]
李金彦. 土壤水解性氮的测定(碱解扩散法)[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2010(10):15.
[22]
杜苗, 钟慧琴. 重铬酸钾氧化-容量法测定土壤中有机质的方法改进[J]. 化工管理, 2021(25):16-17.
[23]
AKHTAR S S, ANDERSEN M N, LIU F L. Residual effects of biochar on improving growth, physiology and yield of wheat under salt stress[J]. Agricultural water management, 2015, 158:61-68.
[24]
WALKER D J, BERNAL M P. The effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry manure on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil[J]. Bioresource technology, 2008, 99(2):396-403.
The effects of a compost (produced from by-products of the olive oil industry) and a poultry manure on mineral ion solubility and exchangeability in a highly saline agricultural soil (electrical conductivity for a 1:5 soil:water extract=1.85 dS m(-1)) from Murcia (SE Spain) were studied. The organic amendments did not change significantly the soil electrical conductivity or the soluble Na(+), Ca(2+) or Mg(2+). Only soluble K(+) increased, due to the K(+) supplied by the amendments. The cation exchange capacity increased in treated soils, the exchange complex being mainly saturated with Ca(2+), Mg(2+) and K(+). However, Na(+) was not retained in the exchange sites, and the sodium absorption ratio remained low. The compost and manure increased markedly the shoot growth of the salt-tolerant Beta maritima L. (sea beet) and Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). For B. maritima, this seemed to be related to decreases in the shoot concentrations of Na(+) and Cl(-) and increases in K(+) and H(2)PO(4)(-). In the case of B. vulgaris, increases in shoot H(2)PO(4)(-) and B and, for manure-treated soil, a decrease in shoot Na(+) may have been involved. Cultivation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Moneymaker) in the soil used previously for B. vulgaris indicated that the effects of the manure on tissue cation concentrations were longer-lasting than those of the compost.
[25]
XIAO X, CHEN B, ZHU L. Transformation, morphology, and dissolution of silicon and carbon in rice straw-derived biochars under different pyrolytic temperatures[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2014, 48(6):3411-3419.
[26]
PUPPE D, KACZOREK D, SCHALLER J, et al. Crop straw recycling prevents anthropogenic desilication of agricultural soil-plant systems in the temperate zone-Results from a long-term field experiment in NE Germany[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 403:115187.
[27]
DREVER J I. The effect of land plants on weathering rates of silicate minerals[J]. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 1994, 58(10):2325-2332.
[28]
YANG X, SONG Z, QIN Z, et al. Phytolith-rich straw application and groundwater table management over 36 years affect the soil-plant silicon cycle of a paddy field[J]. Plant and soil, 2020, 454(1):343-358.
[29]
赵送来, 宋照亮, 姜培坤, 等. 西天目集约经营雷竹林土壤硅存在形态与植物有效性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2):331-338.
[30]
YANG X, SONG Z, YU C, et al. Quantification of different silicon fractions in broadleaf and conifer forests of northern China and consequent implications for biogeochemical Si cycling[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 361:114036.
[31]
MOTESHAREZADEH B, BELL R, VAN Gool D, et al. Evaluation of soil factors related to available silicon in agricultural soils of Western Australia[J]. Soil Research, 2025, 63(8):SR25086.
[32]
COSTA C A E, COLEMAN W, DUBE M, et al. Assessment of key features of lignin from lignocellulosic crops: Stalks and roots of corn, cotton, sugarcane, and tobacco[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2016, 92:136-148.
[33]
COLLINS S R A, WELLNER N, MARTINEZ Bordonado I, et al. Variation in the chemical composition of wheat straw: the role of tissue ratio and composition[J]. Biotechnology for biofuels, 2014, 7(1):121.
Background: Wheat straw is an attractive substrate for second generation ethanol production because it will complement and augment wheat production rather than competing with food production. However, like other sources of lignocellulosic biomass, even from a single species, it is heterogeneous in nature due to the different tissues and cell types, and this has implications for saccharification efficiency. The aim of this study has been to use Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Partial least squares (PLS) modelling to rapidly screen wheat cultivars for the levels of component tissues, the carbohydrate composition and lignin content, and the levels of simple cross-linking phenolics such as ferulic and diferulic acids. Results: FTIR spectroscopy and PLS modelling was used to analyze the tissue and chemical composition of wheat straw biomass. Predictive models were developed to evaluate the variability in the concentrations of the cell wall sugars, cell wall phenolics and acid-insoluble lignin. Models for the main sugars, phenolics and lignin were validated and then used to evaluate the variation in total biomass composition across 90 cultivars of wheat grown over two seasons. Conclusions: Whilst carbohydrate and lignin components varied across the varieties, this mainly reflected differences in the ratios of the component tissues rather than differences in the composition of those tissues. Further analysis indicated that on a mol% basis, relative levels of sugars within the tissues varied to only a small degree. There were no clear associations between simple phenolics and tissues. The results provide a basis for improving biomass quality for biofuels production through selection of cultivars with appropriate tissue ratios.
[34]
MORADI S, RASOULI-SADAGHIANI M H, SEPEHR E, et al. Soil nutrients status affected by simple and enriched biochar application under salinity conditions[J]. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019, 191(4):257.
In order to study the effect of biochar application as simple and enriched, on the soil nutrients status in the salinity conditions, a research was conducted as a factorial arrangement based on completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. The biochar (grape pruning residues) was applied in three levels (0, 2% biochar, and 2% enriched biochar by rock phosphate and cow manure). Also, the salinity treatment was considered in three levels (2, 4.5, and 9 dSm). After treating the soil, it was incubated in polyethylene containers for a 70-day period at 25 °C and 70% field capacity moisture regime. The results showed that salinity significantly affected the soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium, magnesium, sodium, basal respiration, and nitrifying bacteria frequency (P < 0.001) and chloride concentration (P < 0.01). Also, the biochar significantly affected the pH, organic carbon, concentration of total nitrogen, phosphorous, solution potassium, sodium, iron, zinc, copper, basal respiration, and nitrifying bacteria frequency (P < 0.001) of the soil. The interaction effect of biochar and salinity levels was significant on soil sodium concentration (P < 0.01) and pH (P < 0.05). In comparison with the control treatment, the enriched biochar, decreased soil pH (about 1.4%) and increased the phosphorous, iron, and zinc up to 36%, 29%, and 36%, respectively and simple biochar increased the Nitrogen and Potassium up to 46% and 48%, respectively. In general, it was concluded that both types of the biochars lowered the sodium concentration of the soil in different salinity levels due to high potential of biochar for sodium absorption which this ability may be considered in saline soils remediation.
[35]
FAN Y, JIA H, PINO V, et al. A Si-K-Based amendment prepared by coal gangue and plant ash could improve the growth of maize plants in saline soils[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2024, 24(1):761-774.
[36]
YAO D, WU J, GAO H, et al. Changes in soil silicon forms and availability as affected by rice straw and its biochar[J]. European journal of soil science, 2022, 73(6):e13316.
[37]
MATICHENKOV V V, BOCHARNIKOVA E A. The relationship between silicon and soil physical and chemical properties[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001, 8:209-219.
[38]
PANDA R, PATRA S K. Quantity-intensity relations of potassium in representative coastal soils of eastern India[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 332:198-206.
[39]
LIANG J, LI Y, SI B, et al. Optimizing biochar application to improve soil physical and hydraulic properties in saline-alkali soils[J]. Science of the total environment, 2021, 771:144802.
[40]
XIE X, PU L, ZHU M, et al. Differential effects of various reclamation treatments on soil characteristics: An experimental study of newly reclaimed tidal mudflats on the east China coast[J]. Science of the total environment, 2021, 768:144996.
[41]
CUI L, LIU Y, YAN J, et al. Revitalizing coastal saline-alkali soil with biochar application for improved crop growth[J]. Ecological engineering, 2022, 179:106594.
[42]
ZHANG K, KHAN Z, KHAN M N, et al. The application of biochar improves the nutrient supply efficiency of organic fertilizer, sustains soil quality and promotes sustainable crop production[J]. Food and energy security, 2024, 13(1):e520.
Rapeseed meal, a nutritious organic fertilizer (OF), contributes to improving soil environment and crop productivity. However, there are also problems, namely slow fertilizer efficiency and low nutrient utilization during the growing season. This 2‐year field trial was conducted to explore the effect of biochar addition on improving the nutrient availability of OF through a comparative study of various biochar application rates under rice‐rapeseed rotation conditions. The findings revealed that, compared to the individual application of chemical fertilizers (CF), OF alone decreased rice yield (2%/2%) and rapeseed yield (6%/10%) in 2019/2020. Compared with OF, combining biochar (15 t ha−1) with OF (OF + B15) significantly increased rice yield (17%/10%) and rapeseed yield (25%/20%) in the first/second year. Additionally, OF + B15 still increased rice yield (14%/7%) and rapeseed yield (12%/13%) for two consecutive years compared to CF. The co‐application of biochar and OF had positive impacts on soil physicochemical properties and enzymes. Compared to OF, OF + B15 elevated soil organic carbon (SOC) by 57%–81%, soil catalase 19%, invertase 14%–20%, urease 17%–19%, and phosphatase 13%–17% during rice season, and similarly increased SOC by 77%–90%, soil catalase 14%–16%, invertase 14%–20%, urease 18%–24%, and phosphatase 16%–17% in rapeseed season. Biochar addition improved soil conditions and enzymatic activities, and the available nutrient supply of OF. Also, the co‐application of biochar and rapeseed meal surpassed the effect of chemical fertilizer alone on the growth and yield of crops. Therefore, biochar coupling with organic fertilizer is an effective fertilization strategy based on resource recycling, which promotes both crop yield and sustainable agriculture.
[43]
LIU Y, JIANG W, ZHAO W, et al. Effects of biochar application on soil properties and the growth of Melissa officinalis L. under salt stress[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2024, 338:113704.
[44]
HOU J, LIU X, ZHANG J, et al. Combined application of biochar and partial root-zone drying irrigation improves water relations and water use efficiency of cotton plants under salt stress[J]. Agricultural water management, 2023, 290:108584.
[45]
袁金华, 徐仁扣, 俄胜哲, 等. 生物质炭中盐基离子存在形态及其与改良酸性土壤的关系[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(1):75-82.
[46]
高亚林, 费良军, 彭有亮, 等. 生物炭添加对盐碱土浑水入渗土壤水盐运移特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2025, 41(20):86-96.
[47]
LIN Y, YU C, ZHANG Y, et al. Biochar modification methods and mechanisms for salt-affected soil and saline-alkali soil improvement: A review[J]. Soil use and management, 2024, 40(1):e12992.
[48]
WANG P, LIU Q, FAN S, et al. Combined application of desulfurization gypsum and Biochar for improving saline-alkali soils: A strategy to improve newly reclaimed cropland in coastal mudflats[J]. Land, 2023, 12(9):1717.
This study investigated the effects of combined (mixed) application of desulfurization gypsum and biochar on crop growth and soil properties in the saline-alkali soils of coastal mudflats through indoor pot experiments and eight experimental ameliorant treatments. Among them, CK was the control of newly reclaimed cropland in the study area with no added ameliorator, treatment A was desulfurization gypsum applied alone, and treatment F was biochar applied alone, while treatments B, C, D, and E were set as a combination of desulfurization gypsum and biochar treatments with different ratios, and treatment G was a local multi-year improved farmland soil with no added ameliorator. Additionally, an evaluation index system was established for evaluating the saline-alkali soil improvement in the newly reclaimed cropland. Finally, the improvement effect was evaluated by assessing soil physical and chemical indicators, as well as nutrient and crop growth indicators. Based on the results, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) Desulfurization gypsum and biochar significantly improved the soil physicochemical properties. Both single and mixed application of desulfurization gypsum significantly increased soil Ca2+, SO42−, and Mg2+ contents and significantly reduced soil pH, sodium adsorption ratio, and bulk density. Both single and mixed application of biochar significantly reduced soil bulk density and significantly increased water-soluble K+, field capacity (water-holding capacity), available phosphorus, available potassium, and organic matter contents. (2) Both single and mixed application of desulfurization gypsum and biochar demonstrated effectiveness in promoting crop growth, where the fresh weight, dry weight, plant height, and leaf area of peanut were higher than those of treatments CK and G. Treatment A (desulfurization gypsum 100 g/kg) was the most effective ameliorant treatment, in terms of improving the fresh and dry weight of peanut. Treatment C (desulfurization gypsum 75 g/kg, biochar 20 g/kg) had the most significant effect on peanut plant height and leaf area. (3) After 60 days of planting, the improvement effect of each treatment was ranked as C &gt; A &gt; E &gt; B &gt; D &gt; F &gt; G &gt; CK. The treatments with a desulfurization gypsum–biochar combination and desulfurization gypsum alone had the best improvement effect, followed by the treatment with biochar alone.
PDF(6797 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/