Effects of Soil Nutrient Element Balance on Growth, Development, and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

ZHANGXiongwen, FULimei, HUANGFeiyan, SHIHaoliang, ZHOUHongxia, TIANMinghui

Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21) : 156-165.

PDF(1393 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull      Editor in chief: Yulong YIN

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1393 KB)
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21) : 156-165. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0267

Effects of Soil Nutrient Element Balance on Growth, Development, and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To investigate the effects of soil nutrient balance on the growth, development, and quality of flue-cured tobacco, and to improve plant growth and leaf quality, this experiment set up five treatments, including conventional fertilization, conventional fertilization + Englan microbial inoculant, conventional fertilization + soil conditioner + water-soluble trace and microelement fertilizer, conventional fertilization + Hailuo chitin, and conventional fertilization + “Kalimei” fertilizer. These were designated as CK, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The study assessed the effects of these treatments on flue-cured tobacco growth, agronomic and botanical traits, disease incidence, as well as post-curing indicators such as chemical composition, trace element content, and sensory quality of the tobacco leaves. Principal component analysis was conducted on the three indicators: agronomic traits, chemical composition, and trace element content. The results showed that there were no significant differences in growth periods among the treatments; however, treatment T3 exhibited the most optimal agronomic traits, with its field growth and maturity characteristics, along with those of treatments T4 and T5, significantly superior to those of treatments CK and T2. In terms of disease resistance, treatment T3 performed best. In terms of chemical composition, treatment T4 fell within the optimal range for chemical indicators such as potassium oxide, chlorine, starch, protein, and total nitrogen, demonstrating good chemical composition balance. Analysis of trace elements revealed that all treatments generally suffered from deficiencies in calcium, magnesium, silicon, and molybdenum. Principal component analysis indicated that the T3 treatment achieved the highest composite score for agronomic traits, the T4 treatment achieved the highest composite score for chemical composition, and the T5 treatment achieved the highest composite score for trace elements in tobacco leaves. This experiment demonstrates that treatment T3 (soil conditioner + water-soluble trace element fertilizer) promotes growth and enhances stress resistance, while treatment T4 (conch chitin) improves chemical quality. Together, these two treatments can serve as the core optimized fertilization scheme for the high-quality development of tobacco leaf raw materials in the Shuangjiang tobacco-growing area of Lincang.

Key words

flue-cured tobacco / soil / nutrient balance / growth / flue-cured tobacco quality

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Xiongwen , FU Limei , HUANG Feiyan , et al . Effects of Soil Nutrient Element Balance on Growth, Development, and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2026, 42(21): 156-165 https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0267

References

[1]
宋曼宁, 田野, 冷雨轩, 等. 重庆渝东南烟区土壤养分丰缺评价及施肥区划[J]. 土壤, 2025, 57(5):986-994.
[2]
苏欣悦, 王晋峰, 程晓梅, 等. 云南省典型县域烟田土壤肥力演变及综合评价[J]. 土壤, 2023, 55(6):1380-1388.
[3]
曹长代, 周永, 邱询学, 等. 不同中微量元素肥用量对烤烟生长发育和质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2025, 53(21):167-172.
[4]
张馨予, 万永青, 李国庆, 等. 菌肥促进作物生长和抗逆性提升的作用机制综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2026, 54(2):32-39.
[5]
杨志刚, 叶英杰, 常海文, 等. 微生物菌肥及土壤修复剂对干制辣椒生长、品质及产量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(19):1-7.
[6]
兰志勇, 周洁, 吴金平, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对武穴佛手山药连作障碍的防控效果[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2024, 37(10):149-155.
[7]
戚嘉琦, 王玮, 仲秀娟, 等. 氨基多糖对连作西瓜生长与土壤环境的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(2):18-22.
[8]
高华军, 李龙科, 耿召良, 等. 不同遮阴方式对烟田小气候及雪茄烟生长、产质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2025, 39(7):1555-1565.
为探明不同遮阴方式对雪茄烟田小气候及烟株生长、烟叶产质量的影响,本试验设置不遮阴(对照,Z1)、半遮阴(Z2)、全遮阴(Z3)3个处理,测定雪茄烟田小气候、烟叶产量及理化指标,并进行相关性分析。结果表明,Z2、Z3处理不同高度平均光照强度分别较Z1显著下降34.65%、37.32%,白昼各时段光照强度、100 cm高度风速均较Z1显著下降,且Z3处理空气、土壤降温增湿效果明显。Z2、Z3处理雪茄烟株高、最大叶长及烟叶钾、氯含量显著高于Z1处理,叶片平均厚度、叶片氮含量及烟叶还原糖、总氮、烟碱含量则显著低于Z1处理。Z2、Z3处理烟叶含梗率高于Z1处理,烟叶厚度分别较Z1处理显著下降13.79%、18.04%,Z3处理单叶重较Z1处理显著降低14.32%。Z3处理全株干重、烟叶产量显著低于Z1处理,但其茄衣产量与产出率均高于Z1、Z2处理,分别较Z1处理显著提高74.99%、100.70%。相关分析表明,雪茄烟田小气候指标与烟叶产质量指标间存在一定相关性。综上,全遮阴方式能更好调节烟田温湿度和风速条件,提高茄衣产量及茄衣产出率。本研究结果为雪茄茄衣烟叶遮阴调控提供了理论依据。
[9]
王林, 周红审, 王昊, 等. 烟叶中微量元素差异及其与外观品质关联分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(3):9-16.
[10]
刘杰, 黄家腾, 陈代荣, 等. 生草栽培对烟田杂草防治效果和烟叶产量与品质的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2026, 59(1):37-45.
[11]
侍浩良, 王继明, 郑元仙, 等. 云南双江烟叶中微量元素与化学成分关联分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2026, 54(7):195-202.
[12]
马江黎, 尤春, 陈松, 等. 不同钙肥对西瓜生长及产量、品质的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2025(22):84-87.
[13]
黄浪平. 硅肥对丰都县植烟土壤微生物多样性和烤烟品质的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学,2023:34-37.
[14]
黄化刚, 刘世碧, 班国军, 等. 多孔改良剂对毕节烟区植烟土壤重金属铬镉铅的影响[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(2):346-351.
[15]
席元肖, 王毅, 金玲玲, 等. 不同栽培措施对山东烟区KRK26生长发育及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2026, 54(2):95-104.
[16]
沈日敏, 杜培兵, 朱智慧, 等. 微生物菌肥及土壤修复剂对马铃薯生长、产量及营养品质的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2025(1):51-55.
[17]
彭奎. 不同中微量元素配施对烤烟生长发育和产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(6):140-142.
[18]
闫凯龙, 王文亮, 张梦楚, 等. 凉山烟区植烟黄壤基础养分丰缺及综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(7):82-87.
[19]
张瑜, 张玉帅, 龚治翔, 等. 亚硒酸钠和纳米硒对烟草疫霉的抑制作用及黑胫病防治效果[J]. 微生物学通报, 2025, 52(10):4693-4705.
[20]
李倩, 姚晓远, 程玉渊, 等. 不同中微量元素对烟草生长及病害发生的影响[J]. 植物医生, 2018, 31(8):55-58.
[21]
冯圭如, 季泽顺, 张转勇, 等. 不同中微量元素配施对烤烟农艺性状、两糖积累及品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(2):81-86.
[22]
徐勇贤, 梁强, 钱玭, 等. 抚仙湖流域典型烟区土壤中养分失衡对烟叶品质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2025, 57(4):785-791.
[23]
周效峰, 李佳琦, 张利军, 等. 钙镁营养对靖西‘K326’烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20251016.1735.008. 2025-10-17.
[24]
李亚飞, 张翔, 常栋, 等. 不同土壤调理剂对土壤性质和烟叶产量、质量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(6):1402-1410.
[25]
吴贵丽. 镁对烤烟碳氮代谢及其关键酶活性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学,2019:38-39.
[26]
梁一凡, 毛娟, 张士怡, 等. 鼠李糖脂配合钾肥叶面喷施对烤烟叶片生长发育和钾素代谢的影响[J/OL]. 甘肃农业大学学报, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1055.s.20260113.1121.002. 2026-01-13.
[27]
喻杰, 熊橙梁, 张庆富, 等. 晒黄烟不同棚内调制方式对烟叶品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(16):153-155.
[28]
许自成, 郑聪, 李丹丹, 等. 烤烟钾含量与主要挥发性香气物质及感官质量的关系分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2009, 43(4):354-358.
[29]
李健, 孙爱华, 郭秦羽, 等. 不同施镁量对烟株养分累积规律的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(11):1-12.
[30]
张龙, 李彩斌, 陈秀娥, 等. 毕节市植烟土壤缺镁风险评价与应对措施[J]. 江西农业学报, 2024, 36(8):64-69.
[31]
郑璞帆, 崔志燕, 陈富彩, 等. 喷施硅肥对烤烟圆顶期光合特性、氮钾含量及产质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4):124-128.
[32]
刘杰, 李玉柱, 艾永峰, 等. 硼、钼肥配施对植烟土壤真菌群落及烤烟生长的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2026, 47(2):103-113.
[33]
漆慧娟, 岳雅妮, 徐继根, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的不同品种芦笋营养品质综合评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2026, 39(4):72-81.
PDF(1393 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉