PDF(6763 KB)
Meteorological Risk Assessment of Sorghum at Different Growth Stages in Zunyi Based on Entropy Weight Method
XIEQiang, XIELufan, RENQingfeng, WUXinhao, ZHOUYanyan
Chin Agric Sci Bull ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (20) : 118-126.
PDF(6763 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chin Agric Sci Bull
Editor in chief: Yulong YIN
PDF(6763 KB)
Meteorological Risk Assessment of Sorghum at Different Growth Stages in Zunyi Based on Entropy Weight Method
This study aims to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of meteorological conditions and disaster risks during different growth periods of sorghum in the Zunyi region, and to assess the comprehensive meteorological risk. Based on data from 12 national meteorological stations in Zunyi from 1981 to 2024, methods including linear trend analysis, Mann-Kendall (M-K) mutation test, and entropy weight method were employed. The spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of meteorological conditions and major disaster risks (late spring cold/high temperature, drought, cloudy-rainy weather) during the sorghum nursery period, growth period, early maturation period, and late maturation period were systematically analyzed, followed by a comprehensive risk assessment. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) From 1981 to 2024, temperatures during all sorghum growth periods in Zunyi generally increased, with the most significant warming during the nursery period (0.7 ℃/10a, P<0.01). Precipitation exhibited a pattern of “increase in early stages, decrease in later stages”, with the largest decrease in the late maturation period (-8.6 mm/10a). Sunshine duration showed fluctuating changes, increasing during the nursery period and decreasing during the growth period. Concentrated mutations in meteorological elements occurred around 2000 and 2010, with temperatures generally rising by 0.3-1.8℃ after the mutations. (2) Disaster risks displayed a transition characteristic of “decreasing low-temperature risk and increasing high-temperature risk”. The number of late spring cold days during the nursery period decreased significantly (-1.3 d/10a, P<0.01), while the number of high-temperature days from the growth period to the late maturation period all increased significantly (0.1-1.1 d/10a). (3) Dominant risks varied significantly across different growth periods. Late spring cold was the core risk during the nursery period (weight 51.7%). During the growth period, early maturation period, and late maturation period, overcast, rainy and low-light weather became the dominant risk (weights 36.2%-39.9%), with high temperature and drought having similar weights (29.8%-32.4%). The northern and eastern parts of the region exhibited higher risks during the nursery period (≥0.8). Chishui City was identified as the area with the most prominent meteorological risks during the middle and late growth periods (≥0.6-0.8). The sorghum production in Zunyi exhibits a spatiotemporal differentiation pattern characterized by “late spring cold days in the early stage, and superimposed overcast, rainy and lowlight weather with high temperature and drought in the middle and late stages,” necessitating precision defense measures tailored to growth stage, region, and disaster type.
sorghum / reproductive period / comprehensive meteorological risk / entropy weight method / mutation test / trend analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
王春乙, 张继权, 霍治国, 等. 农业气象灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 气象学报, 2015, 73(1):3-21.
|
| [3] |
秦大河, 陈宜瑜, 李学勇, 等. 中国气候与环境演变(上卷):气候与环境的演变及预测[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
|
| [4] |
陶威. 近50年西南地区降水的时空分布特征[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2018, 7(4):308-319.
|
| [5] |
谷晓平, 吴俊铭, 徐丹丹, 等. 论贵州农业气候资源优势及其利用[J]. 贵州气象, 2005, 29(3):4-6.
|
| [6] |
张娜, 周国富, 雷嫦, 等. 基于SRP模型的喀斯特山区生态脆弱性评价——以遵义市为例[J]. 贵州科学, 2022(7):46-53.
|
| [7] |
杜玉婕, 章洁琼, 赵小敏, 等. 不同播期对酒用高粱农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 农技服务, 2023, 40(7):67-71.
|
| [8] |
赵小敏, 章洁琼, 胡朝凤, 等. 遵义8个酒用高粱品种的产量及酿酒品质[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2022, 50(5):126-131.
|
| [9] |
张波, 胡家敏, 于飞, 等. 基于高粱种植区的倒春寒风险精细化评估——以贵州仁怀市为例[J]. 东北农业科学, 2025, 45(2):52-62.
|
| [10] |
韦美静, 左晋, 孙俊丽, 等. 不同播期气象条件对酒用高粱农艺性状及产量形成的影响[J]. 乡村科技, 2023(16):101-104.
|
| [11] |
杨雨蒙, 吴新豪, 张莉, 等. 1979-2022年赤水河流域极端温度降水特征分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(8):144-155.
|
| [12] |
黄路梅, 梁虹, 焦树林, 等. 基于可变模糊和灰色理论的贵州省农业旱灾脆弱性评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4):247-251.
|
| [13] |
王睿, 李魁印, 董俐利, 等. 酒用糯高粱萌发期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(9):149-156.
|
| [14] |
敖芹, 左晋, 周万飞, 等. 遵义市酒用高粱品种红缨子的适宜直播期及其气候风险[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2023, 51(3):132-138.
|
| [15] |
敖芹, 谷晓平, 胡朝凤, 等. 贵州省酒用高粱种植的气候适宜性分析[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2017, 45(6):148-152.
|
| [16] |
张继权, 李宁. 主要气象灾害风险评价与管理的数量化方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2007.
|
| [17] |
霍治国, 李世奎, 王素艳, 等. 主要农业气象灾害风险评估技术及其应用研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(6):49-60.
|
| [18] |
唐余学, 郭建平. 我国东北地区玉米冷害风险评估[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27(3):98-106.
|
| [19] |
吴东丽, 王春乙, 薛红喜, 等. 华北地区冬小麦干旱风险区划[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(3):170-179.
|
| [20] |
杨彬云, 吴荣军, 郑有飞, 等. 河北省农业旱灾脆弱性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(15):369-372.
|
| [21] |
康永辉, 解建仓, 黄伟军, 等. 基于熵权法的田东县农业干旱识别与评价研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2012, 39(5):165-172.
|
| [22] |
郑双怡, 金亚男. 西南喀斯特地区气候脆弱性农户识别与评估研究[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 37(2):139-144.
|
| [23] |
中国气象局气象干部培训学院. 气象灾害风险评估与区划[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2019.
|
| [24] |
莫建国, 汪圣洪, 谷晓平. 基于GIS的贵州烤烟种植气候区划研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2011, 27(3):70-75.
|
| [25] |
李嵩博, 唐朝臣, 陈峰, 等. 中国粒用高粱改良品种的产量和品质性状时空变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(2):49-59.
|
| [26] |
袁世一, 李干琼. 基于熵权法的中国粮食安全评价及关键因素分析——以中部地区为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(19):251-258.
|
| [27] |
魏凤英. 现代气候统计诊断与预测技术[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007.
|
| [28] |
吴洪宝. 气候变率诊断和预测方法[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2005.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |